Literature reviews and global neurosurgery: a powerful way of doing more with less.

INTRODUCTION: Neurosurgery is an intensely competitive field. With the USMLE Step 1 transitioning to a pass/fail system, research has become a crucial component of the neurosurgery residency application process. This emphasis on research is particularly critical for international medical graduates (IMGs), who often face greater challenges compared to their U.S. counterparts. IMGs typically need more publications and higher H-indices to stand out. However, accessing quality research opportunities is significantly more difficult for those from low- and middle-income countries. This mini-review aims to provide a new perspective for IMGs, demonstrating that publishing in prestigious neurosurgical journals is possible even with limited resources. METHODS: We searched Scopus and reviewed Brazilian publications from 2014 to 2023 in Neurosurgery and the Journal of Neurosurgery. We extracted the methodological designs of the studies and the graduation status of the first authors. RESULTS: In 2023-2024, four Brazilian medical students published systematic reviews in major neurosurgical journals as first authors, marking a revolutionary change in the Brazilian neurosurgical landscape not seen in the past decade. These achievements illustrate that high-impact publications are attainable without geographical proximity, substantial financial support, or access to extensive institutional databases. Letters to the editor also represented a considerable Brazilian contribution. CONCLUSION: Literature reviews and letters to the editor are accessible methods for IMGs to engage in impactful research. IMGs can maximize their abilities and significantly contribute to neurosurgery by embracing literature reviews and meta-analyses. These approaches can open doors for those without other avenues to begin their research careers.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in brain arteriovenous malformations treated with open surgery research: a systematic review and proposal of a reporting guideline for surgical and clinical outcomes.

Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

Presentation and management of cerebral proliferative angiopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on treatment outcomes.

Cerebral Proliferative Angiopathy (CPA) is a rare brain vascular malformation, similar to Arteriovenous Malformations (AVM) but lacking of early venous drainage. Presentation and treatment outcomes were investigated, examining for morbidity, mortality and complications. A meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Web Of Science were searched with keywords such as "cerebral proliferative angiopathy" and "management". We pooled and meta-analyzed outcomes on documented CPA cases. 11,079 studies were pooled as a result of manual citation searching, 50 studies were included, adding up to 115 CPA cases. The majority of patients were females (1.38:1), with a mean age of presentation of 26.9 (19.4) years. Headache (46%) and seizures (34%) were the most common presenting symptoms. 37% of patients presented with focal neurologic deficit. Patients managed conservatively from the surgical standpoint (i.e. nonoperative management) did not undergo homogenous treatment strategies, and major complications were at 47% (95% CI: 17%, 76%), with a 1% mortality (95% CI: 0%, 6%). Surgical and embolization interventions presented the highest proportion of major complications, 66% (95% CI: 33%, 99%) and 73% (95% CI: 42%, 100%), respectively. The embolization subgroup led in mortality, with 3% (95% CI: 0%, 10%). No death was documented in patients undergoing surgery. CPA has a similar presentation to brain arteriovenous malformations, but its treatment outcomes are potentially worse. This difference is not attributable to heterogeneity in assigning patient treatment strategies. This highlights the need for more accurate diagnostic methods.

Decompressive Craniectomy with or Without Dural Closure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Decompressive craniectomy is used to alleviate intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury and stroke by removing part of the skull to allow brain expansion. Traditionally, this procedure is followed by a watertight dural suture, although evidence supporting this method is not strong. This meta-analysis examines the feasibility of the open-dura (OD) approach versus the traditional closed-dura (CD) technique with watertight suturing. A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis were conducted on OD and CD dural closure techniques. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant trials. The primary end point was the rate of complications, with specific analyses for infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Mortality, poor neurological outcomes, and operation duration were also assessed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Following a comprehensive search, 930 studies were screened, from which four studies and a total of 368 patients were ultimately selected. The primary outcome analysis showed a reduced likelihood of complications in the OD group when compared with the CD group (368 patients, odds ratio 0.54 [95% CI 0.32-0.90]; I2 = 17%; p < 0.05). Specific analysis of infections and CSF leaks did not show statistically significant results, as well as the evaluation of the mortality rates and poor neurological outcome differences between groups. Assessment of operation duration, however, demonstrated a significant difference between techniques, with a mean reduction of 52.50 min favoring the OD approach (mean difference - 52.50 [95% CI - 92.13 to - 12.87]; I2 = 96%). This study supports the viability of decompressive craniectomy without the conventional time-spending watertight duraplasty closure, exhibiting no differences in the rate of infections or CSF leaks. Furthermore, this approach has been associated with improved rates of complications and faster surgery, which are important aspects of this technique, particularly in its potential to reduce both costs and procedure length.

Partial Labyrinth Removal Restricted to the Superior Semicircular Canal in Focal Combined Transpetrosal Approach: Description and Illustrative Cases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The labyrinthine structures obstruct the surgical view of the deep petroclival region in the transpetrosal approach. Historically, labyrinthectomy and removal of all 3 semicircular canals, with resultant deafness, was used in patients with ipsilateral functional hearing deficits to improve access. The advent and systematization of superior and posterior semicircular canal removal (transcrusal approach) with good rates of hearing preservation has allowed a redefinition of the possibility of partial labyrinthectomy in patients without previous hearing deficits. The present manuscript is intended to describe a technical refinement of partial labyrinthectomy during focal combined petrosectomy, offering a customization of the approach through the selective removal of the superior semicircular canal for specific types of tumors. METHODS: The use of the technique is demonstrated through surgical drawings, pictures, and videos. The rationale to indicate this new approach is discussed based on clinical cases. RESULTS: Three illustrative clinical cases (petroclival meningiomas) are demonstrated. Functional hearing on the approach side has been preserved in all of them. CONCLUSION: The focal combined transpetrosal approach associated with the superior semicircular canal resection has been a promising surgical technique in the treatment of selected petroclival tumors. It has the potential to further decrease the risks of postoperative auditory and vestibular dysfunctions associated with labyrinthectomies.

Sole Stenting Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling For Treating Dissecting Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Among the reconstructive methods for treating dissecting posterior circulation aneurysms (DPCAs), there are stent-assisted coiling (SAC), and sole stenting (SS) therapy. Despite SAC being widely employed when compared to SS, no study systematically analyzed the difference in their outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies employing both therapies to compare their outcomes. A search was performed in January 2024, including only studies with consecutive patients submitted to SS or SAC. The studies had to have at least one of the following outcomes: complete aneurysm occlusion, complications, mortality, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment, and good clinical outcome. Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized for statistics. RESULTS: In a pooled analysis of 17 studies, comparing 173 SS and 377 SAC procedures for DPCAs, no significant differences were found in related mortality (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.49-4.27); total mortality (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.53-3.37); retreatment (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.16-1.26); recurrence (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.43-2.33); postoperative complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.09-6.77); follow-up complete aneurysmal occlusion (OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.62-3.94); intraoperative complications (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.29-3.73); postoperative complications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.61-2.45); hemorrhagic complications (OR 2.16; 95% CI 0.77-6.06); ischemic complications (OR 1.68; 95% CI 0.68-4.15). Good clinical outcomes significantly favored SAC (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23-0.86). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest there is no substantial basis for favoring SAC over SS across all cases. Instead, an individualized approach should be considered, according to the patient's characteristics, surgeon skills, and the available material.

Clinical and Technical Outcomes of Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treating Complex Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding their outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least 4 patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose them with the results of IC-IC. RESULTS: Of the 2509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (odds ratio=0.60 [95% CI: 0.18-1.96]). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85%-97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (odds ratio=1.29 [95% CI: 0.43-3.88]). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5%-18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). CONCLUSIONS: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences.

Comparative anatomical analysis between lateral supraorbital and minipterional approaches.

Background: The pterional craniotomy, described by Yasargil and Fox in 1975, constitutes the most traditional and important surgical access in vascular neurosurgery. Minimally invasive alternatives include the minipterional (MP) and lateral supraorbital (LSO) craniotomies, which avoid complications such as injury to the frontal branch of the facial nerve, temporal muscle dysfunction, depression of the craniotomy site, frontal sinus opening, and cosmetically unacceptable outcomes. We evaluated and compared the exposures provided by MP and LSO craniotomies through quantitative measurements of the surgical exposure area around the circle of Willis and parasellar regions, as well as angular and linear exposures of the internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation, middle cerebral artery (MCA), midpoint of the anterior communicating artery, and tip of the basilar artery (BA). Methods: Seven fresh cadavers were dissected at the São Paulo Medical Examiner's Office, SP, and three at the skull base laboratory of Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA. The craniotomies were performed sequentially, initially with the LSO craniotomy followed by the MP. After the craniotomy, the surgical exposure area, craniotomy area, and angular exposures in the horizontal and vertical axes were determined. Results: The MP craniotomy provided better angular exposure for the ipsilateral MCA, while the LSO craniotomy and BA provided better vertical axis exposures. The LSO craniotomy provided better angular exposure in the vertical axis for the midpoint of the anterior communicating artery and contralateral ICA bifurcation. Regarding surgical exposure and craniotomy area, there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The MP craniotomy offers a significantly larger surgical exposure compared to the LSO craniotomy, with specific advantages regarding angular exposure to important neurovascular structures. This study provides important quantitative data to guide the choice between these minimally invasive access techniques in vascular neurosurgery.

Are ventriculopleural shunts the second option for treating hydrocephalus? A meta-analysis of 543 patients.

BACKGROUND: Some centers utilize ventriculopleural shunt (VPLS) for treating hydrocephalus when conventional approaches are not feasible. Nonetheless, the literature regarding this approach is scarce. PURPOSE: Evaluate the outcomes of VPLS through a single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for articles utilizing the VPLS in a cohort with more than four patients. Outcomes included: mortality, pleural effusion, number of patients who underwent revisions, obstructions, shunt migration, emphysema, and subdural hematoma. RESULTS: A total of 404 articles were reviewed, resulting in the inclusion of 13 retrospective studies encompassing 543 patients, with the majority being children (62.6 %). The median average follow-up period was 35.4 months (10-64.1). After analysis, results yielded a revision rate of 54 % (95 % CI: 44 %-64 %; I2=73 %). The most common complication observed was pleural effusion, with a post-analysis incidence of 16 % (95 % CI: 11 %-21 %; I2=63 %), followed by infections at 7 % (95 % CI: 4 %-10 %; I2=33 %). Shunt obstruction occurred in 13 % (95 % CI: 4 %-21 %; I2=84 %) of cases after analysis, while migrations, overdrainage, subdural hematoma, and cutaneous emphysema had minimal occurrence rates (0 %, 95 % CI: 0 %-1 %; I2=0 %). Notably, there were no reported cases of shunt-related mortality. CONCLUSION: VPLS can be considered when there are no other suitable options for placing the distal catheter. However, the notable rates of shunt revisions, pleural effusion, infections, and the inherent heterogeneity of outcomes currently limit the widespread adoption of VPLS. In this scenario, other alternatives should be given priority.

Surgical clipping and endovascular treatments for small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms: A comparative pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Small and very small anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms pose a complex challenge in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology due to their critical location and potential for severe consequences upon rupture. Surgical clipping has been a traditional approach, but it presents challenges requiring precision and expertise. Endovascular treatment has emerged as an alternative, offering minimally invasive techniques with potential advantages. This study aims to comprehensively compare outcomes and efficacy between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small or very small ACoA aneurysms. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms comparing surgical clipping and endovascular treatments. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies reporting on both treatment modalities. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Pooled analyses with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare treatment effects, and statistical analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with 637 patients were included. Endovascular treatment, predominantly coiling, was performed in 60.3% of patients, while 39.7% underwent surgical management. Endovascular treatment exhibited an 18% retreatment rate, contrasting with 0% in the surgery group. Mortality rates were 3% and 6% for endovascular and surgical treatments, respectively. Overall complications occurred in 1.8% of patients, with intraoperative rupture and cerebral infarction being the most common. CONCLUSION: In summary, our study indicates a comparable outcome between surgical clipping and endovascular treatment for small ACoA aneurysms, with the former showing a lower retreatment rate. Decision factors include surgeon expertise, healthcare context, and patient age. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies, considering variations in aneurysm status and evolving techniques.

Global Outcomes for Microsurgical Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Benchmark Analysis of 2245 Cases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Benchmarks represent the best possible outcome and help to improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, global thresholds mirroring an optimal and reachable outcome for microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are not available. This study aimed to define standardized outcome benchmarks in patients who underwent clipping of UIA. METHODS: A total of 2245 microsurgically treated UIA from 15 centers were analyzed. Patients were categorized into low- ("benchmark") and high-risk ("nonbenchmark") patients based on known factors affecting outcome. The benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all centers' median scores for a given outcome. Benchmark outcomes included intraoperative (eg, duration of surgery, blood transfusion), postoperative (eg, reoperation, neurological status), and aneurysm-related factors (eg, aneurysm occlusion). Benchmark cutoffs for aneurysms of the anterior communicating/anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, and posterior communicating artery were determined separately. RESULTS: Of the 2245 cases, 852 (37.9%) patients formed the benchmark cohort. Most operations were performed for middle cerebral artery aneurysms (53.6%), followed by anterior communicating and anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (25.2%). Based on the results of the benchmark cohort, the following benchmark cutoffs were established: favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale ≤2) ≥95.9%, postoperative complication rate ≤20.7%, length of postoperative stay ≤7.7 days, asymptomatic stroke ≤3.6%, surgical site infection ≤2.7%, cerebral vasospasm ≤2.5%, new motor deficit ≤5.9%, aneurysm closure rate ≥97.1%, and at 1-year follow-up: aneurysm closure rate ≥98.0%. At 24 months, benchmark patients had a better score on the modified Rankin scale than nonbenchmark patients. CONCLUSION: This study presents internationally applicable benchmarks for clinically relevant outcomes after microsurgical clipping of UIA. These benchmark cutoffs can serve as reference values for other centers, patient registries, and for comparing the benefit of other interventions or novel surgical techniques.

Sex-dependent characteristics and outcomes after clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in the epidemiology and growth rates of aneurysms between the sexes are known. However, little is known about sex-dependent outcomes after microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in characteristics and outcomes after microsurgical clipping of UIAs and to perform a propensity score-matched analysis using an international multicenter cohort. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved the participation of 15 centers spanning four continents. It included adult patients who underwent clipping of UIAs between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were stratified according to their sex and analyzed for differences in morbidities and aneurysm characteristics. Based on this stratification, female patients were matched to male patients in a 1:1 ratio with a caliper width of 0.1 using propensity score matching. Endpoints included postoperative complications, neurological performance, and aneurysm occlusion at discharge and 24 months after clip placement. RESULTS: A total of 2245 patients with a mean age of 57.3 (range 20-87) years were included. Of these patients, 1675 (74.6%) were female. Female patients were significantly older (mean 57.6 vs 56.4 years, p = 0.03) but had fewer comorbidities. Aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (7.1% vs 4.2%), posterior communicating artery (6.9% vs 1.9%), and ophthalmic artery (6.0% vs 2.8%) were more commonly treated surgically in females, while clipping of aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery was more frequent in males (17.0% vs 25.3%; all p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, female patients were found to have had significantly fewer pulmonary complications (1.4% vs 4.2%, p = 0.01). However, general morbidity (24.5% vs 25.2%, p = 0.72) and mortality (0.5% vs 1.1%, p = 0.34), as well as neurological performance (p = 0.58), were comparable at discharge in both sexes. Lastly, rates of aneurysm occlusion at the time of discharge (95.5% vs 94.9%, p = 0.71) and 24 months after surgery (93.8% vs 96.1%, p = 0.22) did not significantly differ between male and female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall differences between male and female patients in demographics, comorbidities, and treated aneurysm location, sex did not relevantly affect surgical performance or perioperative complication rates.

Microsurgical Clipping of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms-A Global Multicenter Investigation of Perioperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microsurgical aneurysm repair by clipping continues to be highly important despite increasing endovascular treatment options, especially because of inferior occlusion rates. This study aimed to present current global microsurgical treatment practices and to identify risk factors for complications and neurological deterioration after clipping of unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. METHODS: Fifteen centers from 4 continents participated in this retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent elective microsurgical clipping of untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. Posterior circulation aneurysms were excluded. Outcome parameters were postsurgical complications and neurological deterioration (defined as decline on the modified Rankin Scale) at discharge and during follow-up. Multivariate regression analyses were performed adjusting for all described patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among a total of 2192 patients with anterior circulation aneurysm, complete occlusion of the treated aneurysm was achieved in 2089 (95.3%) patients at discharge. The occlusion rate remained stable (94.7%) during follow-up. Regression analysis identified hypertension (P < .02), aneurysm diameter (P < .001), neck diameter (P < .05), calcification (P < .01), and morphology (P = .002) as preexisting risk factors for postsurgical complications and neurological deterioration at discharge. Furthermore, intraoperative aneurysm rupture (odds ratio 2.863 [CI 1.606-5.104]; P < .01) and simultaneous clipping of more than 1 aneurysm (odds ratio 1.738 [CI 1.186-2.545]; P < .01) were shown to be associated with an increased risk of postsurgical complications. Yet, none of the surgical-related parameters had an impact on neurological deterioration. Analyzing volume-outcome relationship revealed comparable complication rates (P = .61) among all 15 participating centers. CONCLUSION: Our international, multicenter analysis presents current microsurgical treatment practices in patients with anterior circulation aneurysms and identifies preexisting and surgery-related risk factors for postoperative complications and neurological deterioration. These findings may assist in decision-making for the optimal therapeutic regimen of unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.

Decompressive craniectomy and head injury: brain morphometry, ICP, cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral microvascular reactivity, and neurochemistry.

There has been renewed interest in decompressive craniectomy as a surgical treatment for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), although evidence-based clinical data are still lacking and some experimental results are conflicting. Ongoing clinical trials on the use of this operation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may clarify the clinical application of this technique, however, some pathophysiological issues, such as the timing of this operation, its effect on brain edema formation, and its role for secondary brain damage, are still controversial. This review addresses recent clinical data on the influence of decompressive craniectomy on the brain pathophysiology in TBI. Decompressive craniectomy with dural augmentation enlarges intracranial space so that the swollen cerebral hemisphere could expand out of normal cranial limits, avoiding progression of brain herniation. The gain in intracranial volume results in both the improvement of cerebral compliance and a decrease in ICP; the latter favors a rise in both cerebral blood flow and cerebral microvascular perfusion, which can be accompanied by elevation in brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) as well as the return of abnormal metabolic parameters to normal values in cases of cerebral ischemia. Enhancement of edema formation, impairment of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity, and non-restoration of brain aerobic metabolism due to metabolic crisis may occur after craniectomy and require further investigations. This review suggests that decompressive craniectomy as the sole treatment is likely to be insufficient; efforts must be made to maintain adequate brain hemodynamics, preferably coupled with brain metabolism, in addition to treating brain metabolic abnormalities, during postoperative stages.

Current State of Brazilian Neurosurgery: Evaluation of Burden of Care and Case Volume.

BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a heavier burden of neurosurgical diseases than high-income countries. Brazil, a growing middle-income country, holds promise as a health care market. However, there exists a lack of information to characterize the state of neurosurgical practice and access to care in Brazil. This study aimed to characterize neurosurgical practice in Brazil and identify barriers to care. METHODS: A collaborative survey was developed with Brazilian neurosurgeons and distributed by the Brazilian Society of Neurosurgery. The survey gathered demographic information, practice characteristics, case volume, referral patterns, income sources, and assessed barriers using a Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-nine neurosurgeons participated (response rate: 17.5%), representing various states in Brazil. Neurosurgeons practiced in more than 4 different hospital systems on average, with most consultations and procedures occurring in public hospitals. Common procedures included tumor surgeries, general neurosurgery, spine surgeries, trauma surgeries, and hydrocephalus management. Equipment shortage and systemic issues were identified as major barriers to care. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical practice in Brazil exhibits diverse age distribution, widespread distribution across states, and involvement in both public and private hospitals. Survey insights shed light on neurosurgical workload and neurosurgical practice characterization. Lack of equipment and inadequate postoperative resources pose significant barriers to care. The findings highlight the need for investments in equipment, critical care facilities, and improved health care system coordination to enhance access to neurosurgical care in Brazil.