Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Biomed Inform ; 45(4): 813-23, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285982

ABSTRACT

The increased need for interoperable electronic health records in health care organizations underscores the importance of standards. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a long history of developing and adopting various types of health care data standards. The authors present in detail their experience in this domain. A formal organization within VA is responsible for helping to develop and implement standards. This group has produced a Standards Life Cycle (SLC) process endorsed by VA key business and information technology (IT) stakeholders. It coordinates the identification, description, and implementation of standards aligned with VA business requirements. In this paper, we review the adoption of four standards in the categories of security and privacy, terminology, health information exchange, and modeling tools; emphasizing the implementation approach used in each. In our experience, adoption is facilitated by internal staff with expertise in standards development and adoption. Use of processes such as an SLC and tools such as an enterprise requirement repository help formally track and ensure that IT development and acquisition incorporate these standards. An organization should adopt standards that are aligned with its business priorities and favor those that are more readily implementable. To assist with this final point, we offer a standard "Likelihood of Adoption Scale," which changes as standards specifications evolve from PDF documents only, to PDF documents with construction and testing tools, to fully functional reference implementations.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/standards , Systems Integration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humans , Medical Informatics Applications , United States , Veterans Health
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 25 Suppl 1: 62-7, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20077154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal health records (PHRs) are designed to help people manage information about their health. Over the past decade, there has been a proliferation of PHRs, but research regarding their effects on clinical, behavioral, and financial outcomes remains limited. The potential for PHRs to facilitate patient-centered care and health system transformation underscores the importance of embracing a broader perspective on PHR research. OBJECTIVE: Drawing from the experiences of VA staff to evaluate the My HealtheVet (MHV) PHR, this article advocates for a health services research perspective on the study of PHR systems. METHODS: We describe an organizing framework and research agenda, and offer insights that have emerged from our ongoing efforts regarding the design of PHR-related studies, the need to address PHR data ownership and consent, and the promotion of effective PHR research collaborations. CONCLUSION: These lessons are applicable to other PHR systems and the conduct of PHR research across different organizational contexts.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Health Records, Personal , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Veterans , Biomedical Research/methods , Biomedical Research/standards , Humans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/organization & administration , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/standards
3.
Am J Public Health ; 97 Suppl 1: S136-41, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17413082

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We describe electronic health data use by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in the month after Katrina, including supporting technologies, the extent and nature of information accessed, and lessons learned. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using cross-sectional panels of data collected sequentially over time. RESULTS: By September 30, 2005, clinical data were accessed electronically for at least 38% (14941 of 39910) of patients cared for prior to Hurricane Katrina by New Orleans-area VA medical facilities. Approximately 1000 patients per day had data accessed during the month following Hurricane Katrina, a rate approximately two thirds of pre-Katrina values. Health care data were transmitted to more than 200 sites in 48 states and to at least 2300 users. CONCLUSIONS: The VA electronic health records supported continuity of care for evacuated veterans after Katrina. Our findings suggest that pharmacy and laboratory computerization alone will not be sufficient for future disaster support systems.


Subject(s)
Disasters , Hospitals, Veterans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Refugees , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Louisiana , Male , Needs Assessment , Relief Work , Retrospective Studies
4.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2011: 135-43, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22195064

ABSTRACT

The Nationwide Health Information Network allow for the secure exchange of Electronic Health Records over the Internet. The Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, and Kaiser Permanente, participated in an implementation of the NwHIN specifications in San Diego, California. This paper focuses primarily on patient involvement. Specifically, it describes how the shared patients were identified, were invited to participate and to provide consent for disclosing parts of their medical record, and were matched across organizations. A total 1,144 were identified as shared patients. Invitation letters containing consent forms were mailed and resulted in 42% participation. Invalid consent forms were a significant issue (25%). Initially, the identity matching algorithms yielded low success rate (5%). However, elimination of certain traits and abbreviations and probabilistic algorithms have significantly increased matching rate. Access to information from external sources better informs providers, improves decisions and efficiency, and helps meet the meaningful use criteria.


Subject(s)
Computer Communication Networks , Electronic Health Records , Informed Consent , Medical Record Linkage , Patient Selection , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , California , Confidentiality , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Internet , Male , Medical Informatics/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Participation , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL