Rotational stability and capsular bag performance of a hydrophobic acrylic open-loop single-piece intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rotational stability and capsular bag performance of a blue light-absorbing hydrophobic acrylic open-loop single-piece intraocular lens (IOL) with a blast-finished anchor wing haptic design during the first 6 postoperative months. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, patients with age-related cataract and potential postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.2 logMAR or better were included. The patients received a non-toric hydrophobic acrylic single-piece IOL with an axis mark (YST0.00; Nidek Co. Ltd, Japan). Surgeries were video-taped. Retroillumination images were acquired 1 h, 1 week and 6 months postoperatively. Rotational stability was assessed by precise image overlay. At 6 months, Purkinje meter measurements were performed to evaluate tilt and decentration. RESULTS: In total, 100 eyes of 77 patients were included in the analysis. Mean absolute rotation was 2.1 ± 1.7° (median 1.7, range: 0-7.9) at 6 months (1 h - 6 months postoperatively). IOL rotation was ≤3° and ≤6° in 74 (74%) and 98 (98%) eyes, respectively. Mean absolute IOL rotation from the end of surgery to 6 months was 2.5 ± 2.2° (median 2.3, range: 0-15.6; n = 78). Mean tilt (pupillary axis) and decentration were 4.1 ± 1.9° (median 4.0, range: 0.5-8.2) and 0.35 ± 0.17 mm (median 0.32, range: 0.06-0.91) respectively (n = 84). Postoperatively, 98 (98%) eyes achieved a CDVA of 0.2 logMAR or better, 95 (95%) of ≤0.1 and 81 (81%) of ≤0.0. CONCLUSIONS: This hydrophobic acrylic single-piece IOL showed an excellent rotational stability and capsular bag position with low tilt and decentration values.

Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.

PURPOSE: To compare 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, IOLMaster 700 (biometer A), and ANTERION (biometer B). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHOD: Biometric measurements of cataract patients performed between June and July 2019 were reviewed. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were measured with both SS-OCT devices on the same day. The following biometry parameters were compared: keratometry, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL). RESULT: In total, 389 eyes of 209 subjects were measured with both devices. The mean absolute difference between the keratometry data of the 2 devices was 0.04 ± 0.05 mm (7.80 ± 0.26 mm for biometer A and 7.82 ± 0.26 mm for biometer B; P < .0001) for the steep keratometry readings and 0.04 ± 0.04 mm (7.63 ± 0.26 mm and 7.65 ± 0.25 mm; P < .0001) for the flat keratometry readings. For ACD and LT, the mean absolute difference was 0.07 ± 0.04 mm and 0.07 ± 0.04 mm. The mean absolute difference for AL was 0.02 ± 0.03 mm (23.55 ± 1.18 mm for biometer A and 23.54 ± 1.18 mm for biometer B; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Good agreement was found between the 2 devices, with a minor offset for ACD and LT measurements. Although differences were found to be small, the devices should not be used interchangeably.

Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.

AIM: To compare the repeatability of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, IOLMaster 700 (biometer A, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) and ANTERION (biometer B, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH) and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) device (biometer C, LENSTAR, LS900; Haag-Streit AG). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery-Karl Landsteiner Institute, Vienna, Austria. DESIGN: Prospective study that included patients scheduled for cataract surgery. METHOD: Three consecutive measurements were performed with 2 SS-OCT devices and 1 OLCR device. The repeatability of the following biometry variables was compared: keratometry, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial eye length (AL). To assess the repeatability of each parameter, the within-subject SD (Sw) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were calculated. RESULT: Fifty eyes of 50 patients were included. The CoV values were below 0.5 for all variables, except for ACD and LT for biometer C. The Sw values for mean keratometry were 0.018 for biometer A, 0.083 for biometer B, and 0.137 for biometer C. For the ACD, the Sw values were 0.039 and 0.004 for biometer A and biometer B, respectively, and 0.134 for biometer C. For the AL, the values were 0.006 for biometer A, 0.008 for biometer B, and 0.012 for biometer C. CONCLUSIONS: All biometry devices included in the analysis presented a high repeatability. The SS-OCT devices showed a higher repeatability performance compared with the OLCR device.