Long-Term Antibiotic Treatment Prior to Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis Improves Postoperative Outcomes: Results from a Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis is a destructive bacterial infection typically necessitating nephrectomy. We hypothesized that long-term preoperative antibiotics would facilitate laparoscopic nephrectomy by reducing the renal inflammation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients with histologically confirmed xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis at 3 University of California institutions between 2005 and 2018. Patients were stratified by antibiotic treatment duration and surgical approach. Patients treated with long-term preoperative antibiotics (28 days or more of continuous treatment until surgery) were compared to patients treated with short-term antibiotics (less than 28 days) and those who only received single-dose prophylactic antibiotics before surgery. Patient demographics and operative outcomes were analyzed. Complications were assigned by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Among the 61 patients, 51 (84%) were female and mean age was 50 years. There were 21 (34%) open procedures and 40 (66%) laparoscopic procedures. Median duration of antibiotic treatment was 5 days in those who received a short-term treatment and 87 days in those who received long-term treatment. Eleven patients received only prophylactic single-dose antibiotics. Using multivariate analysis among patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy, controlling for preoperative drainage, long-term antibiotics resulted in a 6.5-day shorter length of stay (p=0.023) and less overall as well as milder postoperative complications (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Greater than or equal to 4 weeks of preoperative antibiotics before laparoscopic nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer, less severe postoperative complications.

Characterization of electric scooter injuries over 27 months at an urban level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Electric scooters (e-scooters) have become a widespread method of transportation. The purpose of this study is to provide risk stratification tools for modifiable risk factors associated with e-scooter injury morbidity. METHODS: Patients at an urban Level 1 Trauma center sustaining e-scooter injuries between November 2017 through March 2020 were identified. Primary outcomes of interest were major trauma, as defined by an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15, or hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients sustained orthopaedic (51%), facial (31%), cranial (13%), and chest/abdominal injuries (4.5%). Rate of helmet use was 2.5%, hospital admission was 40.7%, and intensive care was 3%. Patients with facial injuries were half as likely to sustain major trauma as compared to orthopaedic injuries (p < 0.05). Factors with higher likelihood of hospital admission included age > 40 years (OR 4.20, p < 0.01), alcohol or other substance intoxication (OR 4.14 and 9.87, p < 0.001), loss of consciousness (OR 2.72, p < 0.003), or transport to the hospital by ambulance (OR 4.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial proportion of major trauma within e-scooter injuries. Modifiable risk factors for hospital admission include use of head protection and substance use while riding e-scooters.

Health-related quality of life disparities among Hispanic/Latinx patients with nephrolithiasis.

It is documented that Hispanic/Latinx kidney stone formers have inferior health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to the general population. We hypothesized that socioeconomic factors drive HRQoL disparities. Specifically, we sought to determine if medical insurance type is associated with HRQoL disparities among Hispanic/Latinx stone formers. This was a prospective cohort observational study of patients with kidney stones across the University of San Diego Health Care System. Patients enrolled from June 2018 to August 2020 completed a validated Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire (WISQoL). Patient characteristics and self-reported HRQoL were compared between Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic/Latinx stone formers using MANCOVA and ordinal logistic regression. Matched group comparisons were performed based on age, gender, body mass index, stone symptoms, and insurance type using MACOVA. A total of 270 patients were enrolled (Hispanic/Latinx n = 88; non-Hispanic/Latinx n = 182). Hispanic/Latinx stone formers had higher rates of public insurance at baseline (p < 0.001) with significantly lower HRQoL [social impact (p = 0.007)]. However, a matched cohort comparison demonstrated no differences. On multivariate analysis, private insurance increased the likelihood of having higher HRQoL (OR 2.21, p = 0.021), while stone symptoms (OR = 0.06, p < 0.001) and emergency department visits (OR = 0.04, p = 0.008) decreased chances of higher HRQoL. Ethnicity was not a significant factor in HRQoL scores on multivariate analysis. Our analysis suggests that differences in HRQoL among Hispanic/Latinx stone formers may be primarily driven by socioeconomic factors as opposed to clinical or racial differences. Specifically, source of insurance appears to have significant effect on HRQoL in this ethnic group.

Standardizing Perioperative Medications to Be Used in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Is Feasible in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients.

Introduction: The objective of this process improvement project was to determine the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients with respect to quality of life (QOL) and pain management in the postoperative recovery period. Methods: An electronic-based medical record ERAS orders protocol for PCNL was instituted at an academic medical center in July 2020. The protocol utilized a pain control regimen designed to minimize opioid medication use postoperatively. We prospectively evaluated PCNL patients' QOL through the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) survey and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) at routine perioperative visits. To assess any opioid reduction benefit of the ERAS protocol, we reviewed an age-matched historical cohort n = 66 (before ERAS implementation) to serve as a comparison cohort with respect to opioid usage. Results: After an inception cohort of 95 patients, 55 ERAS patients remained available for assessment with the WISQOL and PROMIS surveys. In comparison with the non-ERAS cohort, the ERAS cohort represented larger stones, more supine positioning, higher blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and more use of access sheath. ERAS patients received a significantly lower amount of opioids compared with non-ERAS patients upon discharge narcotic usage (116.13 morphine milliequivalent [MME] vs 39.57 MME, p = 0.0001). Compared with their preoperative evaluation, the ERAS cohort had significantly improved QOL scores at 1 week, which sustained through 8 weeks postoperatively. Moreover, pain intensity and pain interference scores were improved at 8 weeks postoperatively for ERAS patients compared with their preoperative time point. Conclusions: We demonstrate that standardizing medications in early efforts toward a PCNL ERAS protocol is feasible and allows for reduced opioid use by patients while achieving early and sustained postprocedure QOL.

Understanding Causes for Admission in Planned Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: For treatment of nephrolithiasis, ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (aPCNL) is growing in popularity for select patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a set of aPCNL selection criteria as well as search for predictors of failed aPCNL resulting in inpatient admission. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients from 2016 to 2020. A total of 175 met selection criteria for aPCNL and were included. Primary outcome was safety and efficacy, and secondary outcome was to identify predictors of inpatient stay. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed with both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In total, between 2016 and 2020, 552 patients underwent PCNL, with 175 of them meeting criteria for aPCNL. One hundred thirty-four of the 175 (76.6%) of these patients were discharged the same day as the surgery and 41 patients were admitted. On univariate analysis, patients who required upper pole access or multiple accesses (p = 0.038) American Society of Anesthesiologists >2 (p = 0.005), or postoperative nephrostomy (PCN) tube (p < 0.001) were more likely to be admitted after surgery. On multivariate analysis, only postoperative PCN was significantly associated with admission (p = 0.015). Regarding reasons for unsuccessful aPCNL, 19.5% of admissions were attributed to intraoperative complications, 7% to social causes, 12.2% to postoperative complications, 14.6% to uncontrolled pain, and 34.1% to unexpected intraoperative procedures. Conclusions: aPCNL using selection criteria is safe and effective, with postoperative PCN predicting the possible necessity for conversion to inpatient admission. Furthermore, our study provides a practical algorithm for those opting to provide aPCNL to patients.

Financial impact of electric scooters: a review of injuries over 27 months at an urban level 1 trauma center (cost of e-scooter injuries at an urban level 1 trauma center).

BACKGROUND: Electric scooters (e-scooters) have become a widespread method of transportation due to convenience and affordability. However, the financial impact of medical care for sustained injuries is currently unknown. The purpose of this study is to characterize total billing charges associated with medical care of e-scooter injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with e-scooter injuries presenting to the trauma bay, emergency department or outpatient clinics at an urban level 1 trauma center was conducted from November 2017 to March 2020. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Primary outcomes of interest were total billing charges and billing to insurance (hospital and professional). Multivariable models were used to identify preventable risk factors associated with higher total billing charges. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were identified consisting of 42 (66.7%) males, average age 40.19 (SD 13.29) years and 3.2% rate of helmet use. Patients sustained orthopedic (29%, n=18), facial (48%, n=30) and cranial (23%, n=15) injuries. The average total billing charges for e-scooter clinical encounters was $95 710 (SD $138 215). Average billing to insurance was $86 376 (SD $125 438) for hospital charges and $9 334 (SD $14 711) for professional charges. There were no significant differences in charges between injury categories. On multivariable regression, modifiable risk factors independently associated with higher total billing charges included any intoxication prior to injury ($231 377 increase, p=0.02), intracranial bleeds ($75 528, p=0.04) and TBI ($360 898, p=0.006). DISCUSSION: Many patients sustain high-energy injuries during e-scooter accidents with significant medical and financial consequences. Further studies may continue expanding the financial impact of e-scooter injuries on both patients and the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Electric Scooter Orthopaedic Injury Demographics at an Urban Level I Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: This study highlights demographics and orthopaedic injuries of electric scooter-related trauma that presented to our institution over a 27-month period. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Urban Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the emergency department, trauma bay, or outpatient clinic after electric scooter injury were identified from November 2017 through January 2020 using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. MAIN OUTCOMES: Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, imaging, treatment, perioperative data, and Injury Severity Scores. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five patients presented during the study period. Of these, 44% had orthopaedic injuries, including 30% with pelvis or extremity fractures. There were 21 (10%) polytraumatized patients in the orthopaedic cohort. The age ranged from 16 to 79 years (average 36 years), with 58% men, and 18% were visitors from out of town. Of 49 patients requiring orthopaedic surgery, 8 underwent surgery on an urgent basis. The average Injury Severity Score for orthopaedic patients was 8.4 with a median of 5.0 for nonoperative injuries versus a significantly higher median of 16.0 for operative injuries. Twenty-nine percent of patients were intoxicated and only 2% wore a helmet. CONCLUSIONS: Electric scooter injuries are increasing, and many patients sustain high-energy injuries. As electric scooter use continues to increase, the prevalence of orthopaedic injuries is also likely to rise. Further studies are needed to fully understand the impact scooter-related injuries have on individual patients and the health care system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.