Spotlight on the real-world treatment of CML pts in Germany: a retrospective survey in private oncology practices.

Clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are usually carried out in specialized centers whereas primary care for patients (pts) with CML is mainly provided by local oncology practices. The aim of this study was to assess treatment practices in pts with CML in the setting of private oncology practices in Germany. We collected data of 819 pts with a confirmed diagnosis (dx) of CML in 2013 or later from 43 practices. At dx, 84.2% (n=690) and 9.4% (n=77) of pts were in chronic or accelerated phase, 0.7% (n=6) had a blast crisis. Molecular monitoring was provided by EUTOS certified laboratories in 87.7% of pts. Typical BCR::ABL1 transcripts were detected in 86.6% (n=709). Molecular response was assessed after 2.8, 6.0, 9.4 and 12.9 m (mean) after start of treatment. Of the pts with available data, 11.1% did not achieve early molecular response and at 18 m, 83.7% had at least a major molecular response. 288 (35.2%) of pts switched to 2nd line (2L) treatment after a mean of 21.0 months. Reasons for 2L treatment were side effects in 43.4% and suboptimal response or failure in 31.4% of pts. 106 pts went on to third line (3L) treatment. 36.8 % of pts switched to and 92.8 % of pts still on 3L treatment achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% at 12 m. In conclusion, in Germany pts with CML are routinely monitored by qPCR and good responses are achieved in the majority. Treatment changes are mainly due to adverse events rather than suboptimal responses.

Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 µg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/µL vs. 55.4/µL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted. CONCLUSIONS: Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.

Step-in dosing of bosutinib in pts with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy: results of the Bosutinib Dose Optimization (BODO) Study.

The approved dose of bosutinib in chronic phase CML is 400 mg QD in first-line and 500 mg QD in later-line treatment. However, given that gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity typically occurs early after treatment initiation, physicians often tend to start therapy with lower doses although this has never been tested systematically in prospective trials in the Western world. The Bosutinib Dose Optimization (BODO) Study, a multicenter phase II study, investigated the tolerability and efficacy of a step-in dosing concept of bosutinib (starting at 300 mg QD) in chronic phase CML patients in 2nd or 3rd line who were intolerant and/or refractory to previous TKI treatment. Of 57 patients included until premature closure of the study due to slow recruitment, 34 (60%) reached the targeted dose level of 500 mg QD following the 2-weekly step-in dosing regimen. While the dosing-in concept failed to reduce GI toxicity (grade II-IV, primary study endpoint) to < 40% (overall rate of 60%; 95% CI: 45-74%), bosutinib treatment (mean dosage: 403 mg/day) showed remarkable efficacy with a cumulative major molecular remission (MMR) rate of 79% (95% CI: 66 to 88%) at month 24. Of thirty patients refractory to previous therapy and not in MMR at baseline, 19 (64%) achieved an MMR during treatment. GI toxicity did not significantly impact on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and led to treatment discontinuation in only one patient. Overall, the results of our trial support the efficacy and safety of bosutinib after failure of second-generation TKI pre-treatment. Trial registration: NCT02577926.

Addendum to the German Consensus Recommendations on Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Based on the new data from the primary analysis of the OPTIC (Optimizing Ponatinib Treatment in CP-CML) trial on dose optimization of ponatinib in patients with chronic phase (CP)-CML, the German consensus paper on ponatinib published in 2020 (Saussele S et al., Acta Haematol. 2020) has been updated in this addendum. SUMMARY: Focus is on the update of efficacy and safety of ponatinib, reflecting the new data set, as well as the update of the benefit-risk assessment and recommendations for ponatinib starting dose in CP-CML - provided that the decision to use ponatinib has already been made. Furthermore, based on OPTIC and additional empirical data, the expert panel collaborated to develop a decision tree for ponatinib dosing, specifically for intolerant and resistant patients. The recommendations on cardiovascular management have also been updated based on the most recent 2021 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. KEY MESSAGES: The OPTIC data confirm the high efficacy of ponatinib in patients with CP-CML and provide the basis for individualized dose adjustment during the course of treatment.

Analysis of stem cell collections in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma is one of the most frequent soft-tissue tumors in pediatric patients. The current treatment protocols recommend stem cell apheresis (SCA) after completion of the second course of induction therapy with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicine, and etoposide (VIDE). The feasibility of SCA and graft compositions in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma have not been previously analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The authors analyzed 29 stem cell collections of 19 adult patients (9 male, 10 female) at a median age of 27 (range 19-53) years mobilized after VIDE (n = 17), cyclophosphamide/topotecan (n = 1) or vincristine, dactinomycin and ifosfamide (n = 1) chemotherapy. All patients were mobilized with filgrastim 5 µg/kg twice daily from day +7 of chemotherapy. The collections were performed if CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood was >10/µL. The target yields were ≥4×106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight. RESULTS: Median CD34+ cells/µL in peripheral blood before SCA were 45.8 (range 6.7-614.4)/µL. The median cumulative yields were 10.6 (range 1.5-38.8) CD34+ cells/kg body weight and ≥2×106 in all but two patients (89%). CD34, CD3, and CD56 yields in collections after the third VIDE and after later courses did not differ. Four patients underwent high-dose therapy with autologous transplantation, and all were engrafted. DISCUSSION: Stem cell mobilization is feasible in most Ewing sarcoma patients. Additionally, the present study's data suggest that it is safe to postpone stem cell collection to a later VIDE chemotherapy cycle if medically indicated.

Stem-cell mobilization of healthy sibling donors with pegfilgrastim-A prospective open-label phase II trial (EudraCT no: 2005-004971-39).

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is a covalently bound conjugate of filgrastim and mono-methoxypolyethylene glycol with a longer half-life. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We report on phase II prospective monocentric trial examining the feasibility of stem cell mobilization with 12 mg single dose pegfilgrastim in related donors. The objectives were to determine the optimal collection day, defined as CD34+ concentration in peripheral blood (PB) >50 cells/µl, the number of donors collected with single leukapheresis, and the peak level of pegfilgrastim in donor-serum. Furthermore, the cell composition of grafts was assessed and compared to published data. RESULTS: The results included about 28 matched related donors. The median pegfilgrastim serum level remained >200 ng/mL for 48 hours before declining, with the maximal measured concentration of 259.49 ng/ml 24 h after application. The median white blood cell count and CD34 count in PB peaked on day four with 52.6 (range 22.8-85.0) Gpt/l and 66.25 (range 22.9-136.6) cells/µl, respectively. A CD34+ count >50 cells/µl on day four was detected in 75% of donors. 79% of the donors underwent a single collection. Conventional filgrastim was administered additionally in two donors, due to insufficient CD 34+ concentration in PB. 89% of donors showed CD34+ yields ≥4 (median 6.5, range 4.6-14.5) × 10/kg body weight of the recipient. All grafts were administered without rejections. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial showed that stem cell mobilization with pegfilgrastim is a feasible, and attractive option. This is the first trial presenting the kinetics of pegfilgrastim serum levels in healthy donors.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies: Improved outcomes over two decades.

We have used a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for the past twenty years. During that period, changes in clinical practice have been aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from infections, organ toxicity, and graft-versus-host disease. We hypothesized that improvements in clinical practice led to better transplantation outcomes over time. From 1997-2017, 1,720 patients with hematologic malignancies received low-dose total body irradiation +/- fludarabine or clofarabine before transplantation from HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donors, followed by mycophenolate mofetil and a calcineurin inhibitor ± sirolimus. We compared outcomes in three cohorts by year of transplantation: 1997 +/- 2003 (n=562), 2004 +/- 2009 (n=594), and 2010 +/- 2017 (n=564). The proportion of patients ≥60 years old increased from 27% in 1997 +/- 2003 to 56% in 2010-2017, and with scores from the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comborbidity Index of ≥3 increased from 25% in 1997 +/- 2003 to 45% in 2010 +/- 2017. Use of unrelated donors increased from 34% in 1997 +/- 2003 to 65% in 2010-2017. When outcomes from 2004 +/- 2009 and 2010-2017 were compared to 1997 +/- 2003, improvements were noted in overall survival (P=.0001 for 2004-2009 and P <.0001 for 2010-2017), profression-free survival (P=.002 for 2004-2009 and P <.0001 for 2010 +/- 2017), non-relapse mortality (P<.0001 for 2004 +/- 2009 and P <.0001 for 2010 +/- 2017), and in rates of grades 2 +/- 4 acute and chronic graft-vs.-host disease. For patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning, outcomes have improved during the past two decades. Trials reported are registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00003145, NCT00003196, NCT00003954, NCT00005799, NCT00005801, NCT00005803, NCT00006251, NCT00014235, NCT00027820, NCT00031655, NCT00036738, NCT00045435, NCT00052546, NCT00060424, NCT00075478, NCT00078858, NCT00089011, NCT00104858, NCT00105001, NCT00110058, NCT00397813, NCT00793572, NCT01231412, NCT01252667, NCT01527045.

Clinical implications of SRSF2 mutations in AML patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The SRSF2 mutations are frequently found in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and mostly affect the P95 residue. Mutations in this splicing factor mediate abnormal splicing associated with exon skipping events, including EZH2 as a crucial target. While SRSF2 mutations are enriched in secondary AML and associated with worse outcomes following chemotherapy consolidation, very little is known about the associated biological and clinical implications in AML patients consolidated with allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell transplantation (HSCT). Here we retrospectively analyzed 263 adult AML patients who received an allogeneic HSCT regarding the biological and clinical implications of the SRSF2 mutation status at diagnosis and in morphologic remission at HSCT. We found 12.5% of the patients to be SRSF2 mutated at diagnosis. Mutated patients had increased EZH2 missplicing events with P95H likely driving this pathobiology most effectively. However, the amount of EZH2 missplicing events, as a functional surrogate marker did not associate with relevant biological or clinical characteristics. We observed a persistence of mutations in remission before HSCT in the majority (93%) of SRSF2 mutated AML patients. Importantly, the variant allele frequency (VAF) levels of SRSF2 mutations in remission at HSCT did not correlate with outcomes following HSCT consolidation, limiting the applicability of SRSF2 mutations as a marker for residual AML disease. Following allogeneic HSCT SRSF2 mutated AML patients experienced a 2-year overall survival of 77%, indicating that SRSF2 mutated AML patients may benefit from HSCT consolidation.

Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Leukemia: Recommendations of a German Expert Consensus Panel with Focus on Cardiovascular Management.

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has been revolutionized with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most patients with CML achieve long-term survival similar to individuals without CML due to treatment with TKIs not only in frontline but also in further lines of therapy. The third-generation TKI ponatinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory CML and Ph+ ALL. Ponatinib is currently the most potent TKI in this setting demonstrating activity against T315I mutant clones. However, ponatinib's safety data revealed a dose-dependent, increased risk of serious cardiovascular (CV) events. Guidance is needed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of TKIs, such as ponatinib, and safety measures to prevent treatment-associated CV events. An expert panel of German hematologists and cardiologists summarize current evidence regarding ponatinib's efficacy and CV safety profile. We propose CV management strategies for patients who are candidates for ponatinib.

Concomitant and noncanonical JAK2 and MPL mutations in JAK2V617F- and MPLW515 L-positive myelofibrosis.

Sequential genotyping for phenotype-driver mutations in JAK2 (exon 14), CALR (exon 9), and MPL (exon 10) is recommended in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Yet, atypical JAK2- and MPL-mutations were described in some triple-negative patients. Whether noncanonical and/or concomitant JAK2- and MPL-mutations exist in myelofibrosis (MF) regardless of phenotype-driver mutations is not yet elucidated. For this, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using blood genomic DNA from 128 MF patients (primary MF, n = 93; post-ET-MF, n = 18; post-PV-MF, n = 17). While no atypical JAK2- or MPL-mutations were seen in 24 CALR-positive samples, two JAK2-mutations [c.3323A > G, p.N1108S; c.3188G > A, p.R1063H] were detected in two of the 21 (9.5%) triple-negative patients. Twelve of the 82 (14.6%) JAK2V617F-positive cases had coexisting germline JAK2-mutations [JAK2R1063H, n = 6; JAK2R893T, n = 1; JAK2T525A, n = 1] or at least one somatic MPL-mutation [MPLY591D, n = 3; MPLW515 L, n = 2; MPLE335K, n = 1]. Overall, MPL-mutations always coexisted with JAK2V617F and/or other MPL-mutations. None of the JAK2V617F plus a second JAK2-mutation carried a TET2-mutation but all patients with JAK2V617F plus an MPL-mutation harbored a somatic TET2-mutation. Four genomic clusters could be identified in the JAK2V617F-positive cohort. Cluster-I (10%) (noncanonical JAK2mutated (mut) + TET2wildtype (wt) ) were younger and had less proliferative disease compared with cluster-IV (5%) (TET2mut + MPLmut ). In conclusion, recurrent concomitant classical and/or noncanonical JAK2- and MPL-mutations could be detected by NGS in 15.7% of JAK2V617F- and MPLW515-positive MF patients with genotype-phenotype associations. Many of the germline and/or somatic mutations might act as "Significantly Mutated Genes" contributing to the pathogenesis and phenotypic heterogeneity. A cost-effective NGS-based approach might be an important step towards patient-tailored medicine.

Pretreatment CD34+/CD38- Cell Burden as Prognostic Factor in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a highly heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic disorder. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment and is of particular interest in patients at high risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In MDS, CD34+/CD38- cells possess MDS stem cell potential, and secondary AML (sAML) clones originate from the MDS disease stage. However, the prognostic impact of the pretreatment stem cell population burden in MDS remains unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic impact of the pretreatment CD34+/CD38- cell burden in 124 MDS patients who received allogeneic HSCT at our institution. A high pretreatment bone marrow CD34+/CD38- cell burden (≥1%) was associated with worse genetic risk and a higher incidence of blast excess. Patients with a high CD34+/CD38- cell burden had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of MDS relapse, a higher cumulative incidence of secondary AML, and a trend for shorter overall survival after allogeneic HSCT. In multivariable analyses this prognostic impact was shown to be independent of other clinical and cytogenetic risk factors in MDS. Patients suffering MDS relapse or progression to AML also had a higher pre-treatment CD34+/CD38- cell burden as a continuous variable. The observed prognostic impact is likely mediated by MDS stem cells within the CD34+/CD38- cell population initiating MDS relapse or progression to AML. New therapeutic strategies targeting MDS stem cells might improve outcomes.

Comparison of non-myeloablative and reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) patients. The introduction of reduced intensity (RIC) and non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning enabled HSCT in older or comorbid individuals representing the majority of patients. Studies comparing RIC and NMA conditioning are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 151 MDS or MDS/MPN patients older than 50 years who received NMA- or RIC-HSCT. Patients younger or older than 65 years at HSCT were analyzed separately. Patients receiving RIC-HSCT or NMA-HSCT were balanced in factors reflecting disease aggressiveness and the HCT-CI comorbidity score. The NMA conditioned patients had a higher incidence of graft rejection and chronic graft-vs-host disease. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS), did not differ significantly with regard to the conditioning regime in the whole cohort. In patients <65 years at HSCT, NMA conditioning associated with higher NRM and shorter OS by trend, while CIR was similar in both groups. In multivariable analyzes, the conditioning regimen remained a prognostic factor for NRM and OS in patients <65 years at HSCT. In MDS patients NMA and RIC conditioning result in similar disease control, but especially patients <65 years may benefit from RIC-HSCT.

Digital droplet PCR-based absolute quantification of pre-transplant NPM1 mutation burden predicts relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an established consolidation therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. However, relapse after transplantation remains a major clinical problem resulting in poor prognosis. Thus, detection of measurable ("minimal") residual disease to identify patients at high risk of relapse is essential. A feasible method to determine measurable residual disease may be digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) that allows absolute quantification with high sensitivity and specificity without the necessity of standard curves. Using ddPCR, we analyzed pre-transplant peripheral blood and bone marrow of 51 NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia patients transplanted in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete recovery. Mutated NPM1 measurable residual disease-positive patients had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (P = 0.014). Restricting the analyses to patients receiving non-myeloablative conditioning, mutated NPM1 measurable residual disease positivity is associated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (P = 0.006). Positive mutated NPM1 measurable residual disease status determined by ddPCR before allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with worse prognosis independent of other known prognostic markers-also for those receiving non-myeloablative conditioning. In the future, mutated NPM1 measurable residual disease status determined by ddPCR might guide treatment and improve patients' outcomes.

Prognostic impact of the CD34+/CD38- cell burden in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leukemia-initiating cells exist within the CD34+/CD38- cell compartment. They are assumed to be more resistant to chemotherapy, enriched in minimal residual disease cell populations, and responsible for relapse. Here we evaluated clinical and biological associations and the prognostic impact of a high diagnostic CD34+/CD38- cell burden in 169 AML patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplantation in complete remission. Here, the therapeutic approach is mainly based on immunological graft-versus-leukemia effects. Percentage of bone marrow CD34+/CD38- cell burden at diagnosis was measured using flow cytometry and was highly variable (median 0.5%, range 0%-89% of all mononuclear cells). A high CD34+/CD38- cell burden at diagnosis associated with worse genetic risk and secondary AML. Patients with a high CD34+/CD38- cell burden had shorter relapse-free and overall survival which may be mediated by residual leukemia-initiating cells in the CD34+/CD38- cell population, escaping the graft-versus-leukemia effect after allogeneic transplantation. Evaluating the CD34+/CD38- cell burden at diagnosis may help to identify patients at high risk of relapse after allogeneic transplantation. Further studies to understand leukemia-initiating cell biology and develop targeting therapies to improve outcomes of AML patients are needed.

How risky is a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation?

There is no consensus on second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) indications in patients with hematologic malignancies relapsing after a first alloSCT. In historic publications, a very high non-relapse mortality (NRM) has been described, arguing against performing a second alloSCT. We analysed the outcome of 3356 second alloSCTs performed 2011-21 following a hematologic malignancy relapse. Outcomes at two years after second alloSCT were: NRM 22%, relapse incidence 50%, overall survival 38%, and progression-free survival 28%. Key risk factors for increased NRM were: older age, low performance score, high disease-risk-index, early relapse after the first alloSCT, unrelated/haploidentical donor, and GVHD before second alloSCT. Any type of GVHD after first alloSCT was also important risk factor for acute GVHD and chronic GVHD after second alloSCT. There was a preferential use of a different donor (80%) at second alloSCT from first alloSCT. However, in multivariate analysis, the use of the same alloSCT donor for second alloSCT vs. a different donor was not associated with any of the survival or GVHD endpoints. We show considerably improved outcome as compared to historic reports. These current data support a wider use of second alloSCT and provide risk factors for NRM that need to be considered.

Impact of Previous Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Anti-BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are effective treatment for patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, little is known about the impact of previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on lymphocyte collection for production of CAR T cells and subsequent treatment with CAR T cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of cellular composition of lymphocyte collections, CAR T cell expansion and treatment outcomes of RRMM patients undergoing therapy with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) with and without history of allo-HSCT. 27 patients (11/27 female) with median age 63 (range 39-75) years were analyzed. Five patients (19%) had the history of allo-HSCT median of 5.5 years before ide-cel. RESULTS: Prior to apheresis, the white blood cell, absolute lymphocyte counts, CD3+ cells and monocytes did not differ in patients with and without prior allo-HSCT. We also noticed no differences in the collected CD3+ yields or cellular compositions of lymphocyte collections. One year after ide-cel infusion, the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with and without previous allo-HSCT did not differ with 60% and 45% respectively (P = .58) and 66.7% and 74% respectively (P = .84). The highest expansion of CAR T was detected between day 7 after infusion and showed no difference regarding previous allo-HSCT (P = .71). No graft-versus-host disease during the follow-up was detected. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that the treatment with ide-cel is feasible for patients with prior allo-HSCT. Furthermore, allo-HSCT did not influence cellular composition of lymphocyte collections, clinical outcome or in vivo expansion of ide-cel.

Reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning for MDS: long-term results of an EBMT phase III study (RICMAC).

Short-term outcome of myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning in the prospective randomized international EBMT RICMAC study in patients with myelodyplastic syndrome (MDS) was comparable but longer follow up is lacking. Patients with MDS aged 18-65 years were randomized to receive MAC (N = 64) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide or RIC (n = 65) with busulfan/fludarabine followed by stem cell transplantation -(HCT) from HLA matched or mismatched donor. After a median follow-up of 6.2 (0.4-12.5) years, 10-year OS and RFS were 54.0% and 43.9% for RIC and 44.4% and 44.2% for MAC (p = 0.15 and p = 0.78), respectively. Since the first report, 6 patients died on NRM, 4 after RIC, and 2 after MAC. Similarly, 8 patients relapsed (4 in each arm), increasing the number of relapsed patients to 28. The second HCT was performed in 18 pts, 8 in the MAC, and 10 in the RIC arm. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG status and chemotherapy prior to HCT were independent risk factors for OS and RFS, ECOG and low cytogenetic risk for NRM and chemotherapy prior to HCT for RI. Patients with low cytogenetic risk had better OS [p = 0.002], RFS [p = 0.02], and NRM (p = 0.015) after RIC as compared to MAC.