Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
J Oral Implantol ; 32(1): 14-8, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16526577

ABSTRACT

Computerized tomography (CT)-based imaging and surgical guidance carry both radiographic information such as height, density, and width of bone and clinical information such as axis of orientation for a successful prosthodontic result, thus determining the trajectory, depth, and distribution of the implants. The objective of this report is to review the associated literature and recent developments in CT-image-based information and surgical guidance systems. This report attempts to provide an argument for the development of evidence-based research on the utility of such systems and their effect on outcome in oral implantology.


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Bone Density , Cephalometry , Humans , Patient Care Planning
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8556464

ABSTRACT

A success rate for osseointegrated implants approaching 100% has been reported. This rate of success has been made possible in part by a comprehensive appraisal of the morphologic features of the proposed implantation site: the quality and quantity of available bone, the presence of pathoses, the inclination of the alveolar process, and the relative location of anatomic structures to the site of implantation. Radiography has been found to be invaluable for the assessment of the proposed fixture site and for the evaluation of the fixture in time after implantation. The question of which radiographic technique to apply, intraoral or extraoral, plain film or digital radiography, remains for the clinician to answer after careful consideration of all variables.


Subject(s)
Dental Arch/diagnostic imaging , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Radiography, Dental/methods , Cephalometry , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Radiography, Panoramic , Reproducibility of Results , Stents , Tomography, X-Ray , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7600231

ABSTRACT

Film contrast, relative speed, and resolution of Fuji Super HR-G panoramic film were determined according to specifications of the American National Standards Institute and compared with those of Kodak T-mat G panoramic film. The films were simultaneously exposed by Kodak Lanex regular intensifying screens with time-scale sensitometry. Optical density was read with a digital densitometer, and characteristic curves were plotted and analyzed by polynomial and linear regression. The average gradients of the linear regression curves between 0.25 and 2.00 optical density units above base plus fog were taken as contrast (HR-G: 1.831, T-mat G: 1.712). Relative speed, when exposed with Lanex regular intensifying screens and calculated at 1.00 optical density unit above base plus fog, was 412 for HR-G. A speed of 400 was chosen for T-mat G to match Kodak consumer information. Resolution for both films was similar. These findings suggest that Fuji Super HR-G panoramic film develops similar contrast, speed, and resolution to Kodak T-mat G panoramic film.


Subject(s)
X-Ray Film/standards , Linear Models , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Regression Analysis , X-Ray Intensifying Screens
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9768430

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this retrospective clinical study were, first, to compare submentovertex radiography and zonographic temporomandibular joint orientation programs that use the Scanora imaging system with respect to the reproducibility with which the angulation of the horizontal condylar axis may be determined and, second, to assess the level of agreement between the 2 methods. STUDY DESIGN: Submentovertex radiographs and zonographic projections of 16 joints (8 patients) were evaluated. Two raters independently determined the horizontal angulation of each condyle 3 times using each method. Horizontal condylar angle measurements differing by no more than 5 degrees were considered to be in agreement. Statistical analyses were performed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance, sign tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the 3 measurements between the 2 raters (P = .9122) or between the raters adjusted for method (P = .5093). A significant difference was found between methods (P = .0001). Intrarater agreement values were 81% and 88% for the submentovertex method and 75% for each rater for the zonographic method. Interrater agreement was 94% for each method. Intermethod agreement was 50% for one rater and 81% for the other. CONCLUSIONS: The submentovertex and zonographic methods of determining the horizontal condylar angulation demonstrated consistency and reliability both within and between the raters. However, the zonographic method did not agree with the submentovertex method. This findings does not imply that the zonographic is not a clinically acceptable technique for the determination of the horizontal condylar angulation when subsequent tomographic projections are made on the same unit with the same head-positioning device.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cephalometry/standards , Mandibular Condyle/diagnostic imaging , Analysis of Variance , Humans , Mandibular Condyle/anatomy & histology , Observer Variation , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Temporomandibular Joint/diagnostic imaging
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9540092

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the difference in interpretation of the position of endodontic file tips between two imaging systems: photostimulable storage phosphor luminescence imaging versus radiographic film. STUDY DESIGN: Thirteen patients were selected at random. Preoperative and trial file length radiographs were made with a dual image receptor composed of a Digora Digital Imaging Plate and a piece of Ektaspeed Plus film. Exposure techniques for E-speed film were used. Root length and file length measurements were made from digital images with the Digora system's measuring tools. Measurements were also made on radiographic film with a 7 x measuring magnifier. Root length, file length, and their difference were compared for both film and digital images. RESULTS: Differences were found to be less in digital than in film images. Photostimulable storage phosphor luminescence imaging performed similarly to Ektaspeed Plus film for measuring root lengths, but file tip positions (especially of small file sizes) were difficult to visualize with E-speed film. CONCLUSIONS: The smaller difference between file tip and root apex found with digital imaging suggests that this technique is more accurate to assess trial file length. This imaging modality for assessing file positions during root canal treatment may be beneficial to the practitioner.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Root Canal Therapy/instrumentation , X-Ray Film , Bicuspid/diagnostic imaging , Cuspid/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Multivariate Analysis , Observer Variation , Odontometry , Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8974146

ABSTRACT

Studies of the effectiveness of commonly used imaging techniques have shown that they are less than optimal in revealing oral disease. The diagnostic accuracy of detailed narrow beam radiography (scanography) has been reported to be significantly better than intraoral periapical radiography for the observation of periodontal pathoses and at least as good as periapical radiography for detecting periapical lesions. The purpose of this study was to calculate and compare the effective doses and risk estimates from the use of detailed narrow beam radiography and intraoral radiography. With the use of a tissue equivalent human phantom and thermoluminescent dosimetry, the effective dose from detailed narrow beam radiography was found to vary from 5 to 35 microSv depending on the anatomic location of the image layer and intraoral radiography from 9 to 150 microSv depending on the type of survey. Effective doses of these magnitudes represent 0.6 to 18.8 days of equivalent natural radiation exposure and a probability for stochastic effects on the order of 0.37 to 10.95 x 10(-6).


Subject(s)
Periapical Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Process Assessment, Health Care , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Rotation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9247960

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to calculate and compare the effective dose and to estimate risk from the use of intraoral position-indicating devices of differing geometries. STUDY DESIGN: Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at selected sites in the upper portion of a tissue-equivalent human phantom to record the equivalent dose to weighted tissues and organs. The phantom was exposed to simulated complete mouth surveys with either a long (29.8 cm) or short (19.6 cm) round open-end position-indicating device, a long (35.3 cm) or short (23.3 cm) rectangular open-end position-indicating device, or a pointed (29.6 cm) closed-end position-indicating device. RESULTS: The effective dose was calculated as the sum of the equivalent doses to each organ or tissue multiplied by that organ or tissue's weighting factor. The salivary glands were included as part of the remainder. The effective dose ranged from 362 micro Sv for the pointed position-indicating device, to 63 micro Sv for both the long and the short rectangular position-indicating devices. CONCLUSIONS: These effective doses were calculated to represent a probability for stochastic effects that range in magnitude from 26 x 10(-6) to 4.6 x 10(-6).


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Health Physics , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
8.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 22(11): 955-8, 960, 962 passim; quiz 966, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11803660

ABSTRACT

Immediate mandibular complete dentures were placed in 18 patients. To prevent ridge resorption, bone grafts with hard tissue replacement synthetic bone were placed in sockets on one side of the mandible. The untreated sockets on the contralateral side served as controls. Bone density as shown in panoramic radiographs was reported at the time of placement, at 5 months to 6 months postsurgery, at 12 months to 14 months postsurgery, and at 20 months to 24 months postsurgery. The sites treated with hard tissue replacement synthetic bone not only prevented ridge resorption but also showed increased optical (socket) density of regenerating bone in the initial phase of the study, and maintained that elevated level at 24 months postextraction.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control , Bone Substitutes , Polymers , Tooth Extraction , Tooth Socket , Alveolar Bone Loss/etiology , Bone Density , Bone Regeneration , Denture, Complete, Lower , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandible , Middle Aged , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects
16.
Multivariate Behav Res ; 21(1): 3-28, 1986 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26760917

ABSTRACT

A procedure is suggested for test development and construct validation based on a theory about the criterion performance. The procedure involves building a criterion test and testing its fit to the theory by experimental or correlational methods, and assessing the construct validity of the desired operational test in terms of its similarity to the criterion test. The method is illustrated by describing a study concerned with the selection of medical school students, where the criterion is a measure of clinical problem-solving ability.

17.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 33(2): 128-9, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15314007

ABSTRACT

Panoramic radiography is a common imaging modality used in dentistry. Panoramic radiographs provide an overall view of the dentomaxillofacial complex and are often used along with intraoral radiographs during the diagnostic phase of patient treatment. In recent years, identification of potential stroke victims has been included as a benefit of panoramic radiographs. This has stimulated an increased interest in panoramic radiography both by oral and maxillofacial radiologists and by general dentists.


Subject(s)
Arteriosclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Posture , Radiography, Panoramic , Aged , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans
18.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 19(4): 173-7, 1990 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2097228

ABSTRACT

Kilovoltage, in most cases a variable readily controlled by the operator, and half-value layer have come to be regarded as factors defining image contrast. This has led to the assumption that comparable levels of image contrast may be obtained using X-ray units operated at the same kilovoltage and with the same half-value layer. To ascertain the validity of this view X-ray beams generated by seven X-ray units were compared with each other and with those from a Gendex Model 1000 operated at the same kilovoltage. The basis for comparison was the level of image contrast the X-ray beams were capable of producing after passage through selected thicknesses of aluminium absorber. While results showed no correlation between the nominal (stated) operating kilovoltage of any X-ray generator studied and the level of image contrast produced, a correlation (-0.98) was found between the measured half-value layer and image contrast when the units tested were compared with the Model 1000. This information should significantly affect the criteria used for the selection and/or operation of X-ray generators.


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental , Bone Density , X-Ray Film
19.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 23(3): 123-7, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7835511

ABSTRACT

There are no data relating complex film tomography with effective dose that may be used to estimate the relative risk associated with dental implant diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to calculate the effective dose and estimate risk from the use of the Scanora multimodal imaging system. With the use of a tissue equivalent human phantom and thermoluminescent dosimetry, panoramic radiography was found to result in an effective dose of 26 microSv, while complex film tomography resulted in an effective dose of < 1 microSv to 30 microSv depending on the anatomical location of the imaging plane and the collimation option. An effective dose of this magnitude for panoramic radiography was estimated to represent a probability for stochastic effects on the order of 1.9 x 10(-6). Similarly, the effective dose associated with film tomography may be estimated to be equal to a probability for stochastic effects in the range of << 1 x 10(-6) to 2.2 x 10(-6).


Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Dental Implants , Jaw/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental/methods , Tomography, X-Ray , Bicuspid/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous/diagnostic imaging , Models, Structural , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Patient Care Planning , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Panoramic , Risk Assessment
20.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 24(1): 55-8, 1995 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8593910

ABSTRACT

The effective dose from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex has been estimated and used for an assessment of risk. For each scan sequence 64 TLDs were placed in 27 selected sites in the upper portion of a tissue-equivalent human phantom to record the equivalent dose in radiosensitive organs/tissues. Equivalent doses ranged from 0.11 mSv (bone marrow, maxillary scan) to 20 mSv (salivary glands, mandibular scan). By the use of a calculation that included the salivary glands as part of the remainder, two contiguous 1 cm axial slices of the maxilla were found to result in an effective dose of 0.1 mSv, and four contiguous 1 cm axial slices of the mandible in an effective dose of 0.76 mSv. Effective doses of this magnitude represent a probability of stochastic effects of the order of 8 X 10(-6) and 56 X 10(-6) respectively.


Subject(s)
Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Absorption , Bone Marrow/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Sialography , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL