Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 141
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 55(1): 141-148, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36326967

ABSTRACT

A lack in patient knowledge of warfarin therapy is associated with poor adherence. This knowledge gap may result in a lower INR Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR). To investigate association between patient anticoagulation knowledge and warfarin control. Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) is a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan sponsored consortium of six anticoagulation management services. Patients prescribed warfarin at two MAQI2 sites completed a voluntary Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge (OAK) questionnaire at warfarin initiation and 6-month follow-up. The results of 20 OAK questions and TTRs (excluding 1st month post-initiation) were compared using chi-square tests, t-tests and multivariate analysis adjusting for SAMe-TT2R2 and days on warfarin. Of 1836 surveys distributed at warfarin initiation, 481 (26.2%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire (within 1 month post-initiation): mean OAK score: 14.6 ± 3.4. Of those, 147 (30.6%) completed 6-month follow-up surveys (OAK: 12.7 ± 5.8). Patients with TTR ≥ 70% at baseline scored higher on OAK tests than patients with TTR < 70% in unadjusted analyses (15.1 ± 3.2 v. 14.2 ± 3.5, p = 0.003) and adjusted analysis (p = 0.020). There was no unadjusted or adjusted difference in OAK scores at 6-month follow-up between patients with TTR ≥ 70% and TTR < 70%. For patients who completed baseline and follow-up surveys, there was a decrease of 2.4 points in OAK score between baseline and 6-month follow up (p < 0.001). Higher baseline, but not follow-up, OAK score is associated with better warfarin control and average OAK scores decreased between baseline and follow-up. Further studies are needed to determine what type of patient education may improve patient knowledge retention and warfarin control.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Warfarin , Humans , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Warfarin/pharmacology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Blood Coagulation , Time Factors , International Normalized Ratio
2.
Vasc Med ; 24(2): 164-189, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30648921

ABSTRACT

This article is a comprehensive document on the diagnosis and management of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), which was commissioned by the working group 'Hypertension and the Kidney' of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the Society for Vascular Medicine (SVM). This document updates previous consensus documents/scientific statements on FMD published in 2014 with full harmonization of the position of European and US experts. In addition to practical consensus-based clinical recommendations, including a consensus protocol for catheter-based angiography and percutaneous angioplasty for renal FMD, the document also includes the first analysis of the European/International FMD Registry and provides updated data from the US Registry for FMD. Finally, it provides insights on ongoing research programs and proposes future research directions for understanding this multifaceted arterial disease.


Subject(s)
Angiography/standards , Angioplasty/standards , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/diagnostic imaging , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/therapy , Angioplasty/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/epidemiology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 48(3): 500-505, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31111434

ABSTRACT

Guidelines and experts note that patients with atrial fibrillation require regular renal function monitoring to ensure safe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Insufficient monitoring could lead to inappropriate dosing and adverse events. Our objective was to describe the frequency of insufficient creatinine monitoring among patients on DOACs, and to describe clinical factors associated with insufficient monitoring. We hypothesized that renal impairment would be associated with insufficient monitoring. A retrospective cohort study was performed with data from the Michigan Anticoagulant Quality Improvement Initiative. Patients were included if they initiated DOAC therapy for stroke prevention related to atrial fibrillation, remained on therapy for ≥ 1 year, and had baseline creatinine and weight measurements. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was calculated via Cockcroft-Gault equation. Our outcome was the presence of insufficient creatinine monitoring, defined as: < 1 creatinine level/year for patients with CrCl > 50, or < 2 creatinine levels/year for patients with CrCl ≤ 50. Multivariable analysis was done via logistic regression. Study population included 511 patients. In overall, 14.0% of patients received insufficient monitoring. Among patients with CrCl > 50, 11.5% had < 1 creatinine level/year. Among patients with CrCl ≤ 50, 27.1% received < 2 creatinine levels/year. Baseline renal dysfunction was associated with a higher likelihood of insufficient creatinine monitoring (adjusted odds ratio 3.64, 95% confidence interval 1.81-7.29). This shows a significant gap in the monitoring of patients on DOACs-patients with renal impairment are already at higher risk for adverse events. Future studies are needed to describe the barriers in monitoring these patients and to identify how to optimally address them.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Creatinine/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Creatinine/pharmacokinetics , Drug Monitoring/standards , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kidney Diseases/complications , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/prevention & control
4.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 45(3): 403-409, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423559

ABSTRACT

To understand how physicians from various specialties perceive coordination of care when managing peri-procedural anticoagulation. Cross-sectional survey of cardiologists, gastroenterologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) in an integrated health system (N = 251). The survey began with a vignette of a patient with atrial fibrillation co-managed by his PCP, cardiologist, and an anticoagulation clinic who must hold warfarin for a colonoscopy. Respondents' experiences and opinions around responsibilities and institutional support for managing peri-procedural anticoagulation were elicited using multiple choice questions. We examined differences in responses across specialties using Chi square analysis. The response rate was 51% (n = 127). 52% were PCPs, 28% cardiologists, and 21% gastroenterologists. Nearly half (47.2%) of respondents believed that the cardiologist should be primarily responsible for managing peri-procedural anticoagulation, while fewer identified the PCP (25.2%), anticoagulation clinic (21.3%), or gastroenterologist (6.3%; p = 0.09). Respondents across specialties had significantly different approaches to deciding how to manage the clinical case presented (p < 0.001). Most cardiologists (60.0%) would decide whether to offer bridging without consulting with other providers or clinical resources, while most PCPs would decide after consulting clinical resources (57.6%). Gastroenterologists would most often (46.2%) defer the decision to another provider. A majority of all three specialties agreed that their institution could do more to help manage peri-procedural anticoagulation, and there was broad support (88.1%) for anticoagulation clinics' managing all aspects of peri-procedural anticoagulation. Providers across specialties agree that their institution could do more to help manage peri-procedural anticoagulation, and overwhelmingly support anticoagulation clinics' taking responsibility.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Interdisciplinary Communication , Perioperative Care/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 46(3): 316-324, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948756

ABSTRACT

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining warfarin use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) may not accurately reflect real-world populations. We aimed to determine the representativeness of the RCT populations to real-world patients and to describe differences in the characteristics of trial populations from trial eligible patients in a real-world setting. We hypothesized that a significant fraction of real-world patients would not qualify for the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE trials and that real-world patients qualifying for the studies may have more strokes and bleeding events. We compared the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes from RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE against data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2), a regional network of six community- and academic-based anticoagulation clinics. Of the 1446 non-valvular AF patients in the MAQI2 registry taking warfarin, approximately 40-60% would meet the selection criteria used in RE-LY (788, 54.5%), ROCKET-AF (566, 39.1%), and ARISTOTLE (866, 59.9%). The most common reasons for exclusion from one or more trial were anemia (15.1%), other concurrent medications (11.2%), and chronic kidney disease (9.4%). Trial-eligible MAQI2 patients were older, more frequently female, with a higher rate of paroxysmal AF, and lower rates of congestive heart failure, previous stroke, and previous myocardial infarction than the trial populations. MAQI2 patients eligible for each trial had a lower rate of stroke and similar rate of major bleeding than was observed in the trials. A sizable proportion of real-world AF patients managed in anticoagulation clinics would not have been eligible for the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISOTLE trials. The expected stroke risk reduction and bleeding risk among real-world AF patients on warfarin may not be congruent with published clinical trial data.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan , Patient Selection , Quality Improvement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Registries , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 46(1): 7-11, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29605836

ABSTRACT

Many anticoagulation clinics have adapted their services to provide care for patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in addition to traditional warfarin management. Anticoagulation clinic scope of service and operations in this transitional environment have not been well described in the literature. A survey was conducted of United States-based Anticoagulation Forum members to inquire about anticoagulation clinic structure, function, and services provided. Survey responses are reported using summary or non-parametric statistics, when appropriate. Unique clinic survey responses were received from 159 anticoagulation clinics. Clinic structure and staffing are highly variable, with approximately half of clinics (52%) providing DOAC-focused care in addition to traditional warfarin-focused care. Of those clinics managing DOAC patients, this accounts for only 10% of their clinic volume. These clinics commonly have a DOAC follow up protocol (75%). Clinics assign a median of 190.5 (interquartile range 50-300) patients per staff full-time-equivalent, with more patients assigned in phone-based care clinics than in face-to-face based care clinics. Most clinics (68.5%) report receiving reimbursement, which occur either through a combination of patient and insurance provider billing (78.2%), insurance reimbursement only (19.5%) or patient reimbursement only (2.3%). There is wide heterogeneity in anticoagulation clinic structure, function, and services provided. Half of all survey-responding anticoagulation clinics provide care for DOAC-treated patients. Understanding how changes in healthcare policy and reimbursement have impacted these clinics remains to be explored.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Ambulatory Care Facilities/economics , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Humans , Reimbursement Mechanisms/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Warfarin/therapeutic use
7.
Circulation ; 134(14): 1013-1024, 2016 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27587434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improved medical care after initial aortic dissection (AD) has led to increased survivorship and a population of individuals at risk for further cardiovascular events, including recurrent AD. Reports describing recurrent ADs have been restricted to small numbers of patients from single institutions. We used the IRAD (International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection) database to examine the clinical profiles and outcomes of patients with recurrent AD. METHODS: We identified 204 patients enrolled in IRAD with recurrent AD. For the primary analysis, patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were analyzed and compared with 3624 patients with initial AD. Iterative logistic modeling was performed to investigate variables associated with recurrent AD. Cox regression analyses were used to determine variables associated with 5-year survival. A subset of recurrent AD patients was analyzed for anatomic and demographic details of initial and recurrent ADs. RESULTS: Patients with recurrent AD were more likely to have Marfan syndrome (21.5% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) but not bicuspid aortic valve (3.6% versus 3.2%; P=0.77). Descending aortic dimensions were greater in patients with recurrent AD than in patients with initial AD independently of sentinel dissection type (type A: 4.3 cm [3.5-5.6 cm] versus 3.3 cm [2.9-3.7 cm], P<0.001; type B: 5.0 cm [3.9-6.0 cm] versus 4.0 cm [3.5-4.8 cm], P<0.001), and this observation was accentuated among patients with Marfan syndrome. In multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome independently predicted recurrent AD (hazard ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 5.8-12.8; P<0.001). Patients with recurrent AD who presented with proximal followed by distal AD were younger than patients who experienced distal followed by proximal dissection AD (42.1±16.1 versus 54.3±14.8 years; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Among those suffering acute aortic dissection, 5% have a history of a prior aortic dissection. Recurrent AD is strongly associated with Marfan syndrome.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm/complications , Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Aortic Dissection/complications , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Marfan Syndrome/complications , Marfan Syndrome/surgery , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
8.
Vasc Med ; 22(3): 197-203, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28145152

ABSTRACT

A high SAMe-TT2R2 score predicted poor warfarin control and adverse events among atrial fibrillation patients. However, the SAMe-TT2R2 score has not been well validated in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. A cohort of 1943 warfarin-treated patients with acute VTE was analyzed to correlate the SAMe-TT2R2 score with time in therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical adverse events. A TTR <60% was more frequent among patients with a high (>2) versus low (0-1) SAMe-TT2R2 score (63.4% vs 52.3%, p<0.0001). A high SAMe-TT2R2 score (>2) correlated with increased overall adverse events (7.9 vs 4.5 overall adverse events/100 patient years, p=0.002), driven primarily by increased recurrent VTE rates (4.2 vs 1.5 recurrent VTE/100 patient years, p=0.0003). The SAMe-TT2R2 score had a modest predictive ability for international normalized ratio (INR) quality and adverse clinical events among warfarin-treated VTE patients. The utility of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to guide clinical decision-making remains to be investigated.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Decision Support Techniques , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Racial Groups , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Smoking , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Warfarin/adverse effects
10.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 43(2): 283-288, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837309

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents offer several lifestyle and therapeutic advantages for patients relative to warfarin in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). These alternative agents are increasingly used in the treatment of AF, however the adoption practices, patient profiles, and reasons for switching to a DOAC from warfarin have not been well studied. Through the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative, abstracted data from 3873 AF patients, enrolled between 2010 and 2015, were collected on demographics and comorbid conditions, stroke and bleeding risk scores, and reasons for anticoagulant switching. Over the study period, patients who switched from warfarin to a DOAC had similar baseline characteristics, risk scores, and insurance status but differed in baseline CrCl. The most common reasons for switching were patient related ease of use concerns (37.5%) as opposed to clinical reasons (16.5% of patients). Only 13% of patients that switched to a DOAC switched back to warfarin by the end of the study period.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Drug Substitution/trends , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Drug Substitution/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Male , Risk Factors , Warfarin/administration & dosage
11.
Vasc Med ; 21(3): 251-63, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067136

ABSTRACT

Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening aortic disease. The initial management goal is to prevent aortic rupture, propagation of the dissection, and symptoms by reducing the heart rate and blood pressure. Uncomplicated TBAD patients require prompt medical management to prevent aortic dilatation or rupture during subsequent follow-up. Complicated TBAD patients require immediate invasive management to prevent death or injury caused by rupture or malperfusion. Recent developments in diagnosis and management have reduced mortality related to TBAD considerably. In particular, the introduction of thoracic stent-grafts has shifted the management from surgical to endovascular repair, contributing to a fourfold increase in early survival in complicated TBAD. Furthermore, endovascular repair is now considered in some uncomplicated TBAD patients in addition to optimal medical therapy. For more challenging aortic dissection patients with involvement of the aortic arch, hybrid approaches, combining open and endovascular repair, have had promising results. Regardless of the chosen management strategy, strict antihypertensive control should be administered to all TBAD patients in addition to close imaging surveillance. Future developments in stent-graft design, medical therapy, surgical and hybrid techniques, imaging, and genetic screening may improve the outcomes of TBAD patients even further. We present a comprehensive review of the recommended management strategy based on current evidence in the literature.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm/therapy , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Endovascular Procedures , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects , Computed Tomography Angiography , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Humans , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 31(4): 641-50, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a non-inflammatory arteriopathy that causes significant morbidity in children. METHODS: The clinical features, presenting symptoms, and vascular beds involved are reviewed in the first 33 patients aged <18 years who are enrolled in the United States Registry for FMD from five registry sites and compared with 999 adult patients from 12 registry sites. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 8.4 ± 4.8 years (16 days to 17 years). Compared with adults, pediatric FMD occurs in more males (42.4 vs 6 %, p < 0.001). Children with FMD have a stronger previous history of hypertension (93.9 vs 69.9 %, p = 0.002). Hypertension (100 %), headache (55 %), and abdominal bruits (10.7 %) were the most common presenting signs and symptoms. FMD affects renal vasculature in almost all children (97 vs 69.7 %, p = 0.003). The extra-cranial carotid vessels are less commonly involved in children (23.1 vs 73.3 %, p < 0.001). The mesenteric arteries (38.9 vs 16.2 %, p = 0.02) and aorta (26.3 vs 2.4 %, p < 0.001) are more commonly involved in children. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States Registry for FMD, pediatric FMD affects children from infancy throughout childhood. All children presented with hypertension and many presented with headache and abdominal bruits. In children, FMD most commonly affects the renal vasculature, but also frequently involves the mesenteric arteries and abdominal aorta; the carotid vessels are less frequently involved.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Renal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Computed Tomography Angiography , Female , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/epidemiology , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/therapy , Headache/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography, Interventional , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 42(4): 566-72, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27217043

ABSTRACT

All available direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least partially eliminated by the kidneys. These agents are increasingly being used as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to identify changes in renal function and associated DOAC dosing implications in a multicenter cohort of atrial fibrillation patients switched from warfarin to DOAC treatment. We included all patients in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative cohort who switched from warfarin to a DOAC with atrial fibrillation as their anticoagulant indication between 2009 and 2014, and who had at least two creatinine values. Compliance with FDA-recommended dosing based on renal function was assessed. Of the 189 patients switched from warfarin to a DOAC, 34 (18.0 %) had a baseline creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and 23 (12.2 %) experienced important fluctuations in renal function. Of these 23 patients, 6 (26.1 %) should have impacted the DOAC dosing, but only 1 patient actually received an appropriate dose adjustment. Additionally, 15 (7.9 %) of patients on DOACs had a dose change performed, but only one patient demonstrated a change in renal function to justify the dose adjustment. Most atrial fibrillation patients who switched from warfarin to a DOAC had stable renal function. However, the majority of patients who had a change in renal function did not receive the indicated dose change. As the use of DOACs expands, monitoring of renal function and appropriate dose adjustments are critical.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation , Drug Substitution , Kidney , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/blood , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Kidney/metabolism , Kidney/physiopathology , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Vasc Med ; 20(2): 143-52, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25832602

ABSTRACT

Initial treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes the acute and intermediate phases, usually lasting for 3 months. The choice to extend therapy beyond the initial 3-month window involves assessing a combination of risk factors for VTE recurrence and bleeding, along with weighing patient preferences. In some cases, such as VTE provoked by a reversible surgical risk factor, the recurrence risk is sufficiently low that most patients should not receive extended therapy. In other cases, such as VTE associated with malignancy, the recurrence risk is sufficiently high that treatment should be extended beyond the initial 3 months. However, a large number of patients fall into a grey zone where the decision on extended therapy is less clear-cut. In this review, we summarize the evidence for VTE recurrence risk and the role for extended anticoagulation given a variety of patient-specific factors and laboratory results. We also review the role of VTE risk prediction tools and provide a recommended algorithm for approaching the decision of extended anticoagulation therapy. Various agents available for extended VTE therapy, including warfarin, aspirin and the direct oral anticoagulant agents, are discussed.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Warfarin/administration & dosage
15.
Vasc Med ; 20(1): 60-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25722420

ABSTRACT

The Society for Vascular Medicine was founded in 1989. During the subsequent 25 years, the Society has grown to approximately 500 members and has achieved international recognition while making important contributions to vascular disease education, clinical vascular medicine and biology research, and patient care. In celebration of the Society's 25th anniversary, its past and current presidents reflect on the Society's history, challenges, and achievements, and emphasize the vital role of the SVM in the discipline of vascular medicine.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Cardiology , Societies, Medical , Vascular Diseases , Anniversaries and Special Events , Biomedical Research/history , Biomedical Research/trends , Cardiology/history , Cardiology/trends , Cooperative Behavior , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , International Cooperation , Societies, Medical/history , Societies, Medical/trends , Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Vascular Diseases/history , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology , Vascular Diseases/therapy
17.
Vasc Med ; 20(5): 447-53, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25964292

ABSTRACT

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), a non-inflammatory arterial disease, may lead to renovascular hypertension (HTN) and cerebrovascular disease. Little is known about medication use in FMD. Clinical features and medication use were reviewed in a national FMD registry (12 US sites). Medication usage was assessed in raw and adjusted analyses. Covariates included demographic characteristics, co-morbid conditions and vascular bed involvement. A total of 874 subjects (93.6% female) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 55.6±13.1 years, 74.5% had HTN, 25.4% had a history of transient ischemic attack or stroke, and 7.5% had a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Renal and cerebrovascular arteries were affected in 70.4% and 74.7%, respectively. Anti-platelet agents were administered to 72.9% of patients. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with a greater likelihood of anti-platelet agent use were older age (OR=1.02 per year, p=0.005), CAD (OR=3.76, p=0.015), cerebrovascular artery FMD involvement in isolation (OR=2.31, p<0.0001) or a history of previous intervention for FMD (OR=1.52, p=0.036). A greater number of anti-HTN medications was evident in isolated renal versus isolated cerebrovascular FMD patients. Factors associated with a greater number of anti-HTN medications were older age (OR=1.03 per year, p<0.0001), history of HTN (OR=24.04, p<0.0001), history of CAD (OR=2.71, p=0.0008) and a history of a previous therapeutic procedure (OR=1.72, p=0.001). In conclusion, in FMD, medication use varies based on vascular bed involvement. Isolated renal FMD patients receive more anti-HTN agents and there is greater anti-platelet agent use among patients with cerebrovascular FMD. Further studies correlating medication use in FMD with clinically meaningful patient outcomes are necessary.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Renal Artery Obstruction/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Fibromuscular Dysplasia/complications , Humans , Hypertension, Renovascular , Male , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Renal Artery/drug effects , United States
18.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 15: 21, 2015 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25880061

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly managed by a variety of specialists. Current guidelines differ in their recommendations leading to uncertainty regarding important clinical decisions. We sought to document practice pattern variation among cardiologists, emergency physicians (EP) and hospitalists at a single academic, tertiary-care center. METHODS: A survey was created containing seven clinical scenarios of patients presenting with AF. We analyzed respondent choices regarding rate vs rhythm control, thromboembolic treatment and hospitalization strategies. Finally, we contrasted our findings with a comparable Australasian survey to provide an international reference. RESULTS: There was a 78% response rate (124 of 158), 37% hospitalists, 31.5% cardiologists, and 31.5% EP. Most respondents chose rate over rhythm control (92.2%; 95% CI, 89.1% - 94.5%) and thromboembolic treatment (67.8%; 95% CI, 63.8% - 71.7%). Compared to both hospitalists and EPs, cardiologists were more likely to choose thromboembolic treatment for new and paroxysmal AF (adjusted OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.05 - 5.41). They were less likely to favor hospital admission across all types of AF (adjusted OR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.79) but thought cardiology consultation was more important (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI, 0.97 - 3.64). Australasian physicians were more aggressive with rhythm control for paroxysmal AF with low CHADS2 score compared to US physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists among specialties in the management of acute AF, likely reflecting a lack of high quality research to direct the provider. Future studies may help to standardize practice leading to decreased rates of hospitalization and overall cost.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cardiology , Emergency Medicine , Hospitalists , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Australia , Electric Countershock , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Referral and Consultation , United States
19.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 40(4): 488-93, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26130229

ABSTRACT

It has been suggested that direct oral anticoagulants are being preferentially used in low risk atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Understanding the changing risk profile of new AF patients treated with warfarin is important for interpreting the quality of warfarin delivery through an anticoagulation clinic. Six anticoagulation clinics participating in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative enrolled 1293 AF patients between 2010 and 2014 as an inception cohort. Abstracted data included demographics, comorbidities, medication use and all INR values. Risk scores including CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, SAMe-TT2R2, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were calculated for each patient at the time of warfarin initiation. The quality of anticoagulation was assessed using the Rosendaal time in the therapeutic range (TTR) during the first 6 months of treatment. Between 2010 and 2014, patients initiating warfarin therapy for AF had an increasing mean CHADS2 (2.0 ± 1.1 to 2.2 ± 1.4, p = 0.02) and CCI (4.7 ± 1.8 to 5.1 ± 2.0, p = 0.03), and a trend towards increasing mean CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and SAMe-TT2R2 scores. The actual TTR remained unchanged over the study period (62.6 ± 18.2 to 62.7 ± 17.0, p = 0.98), and the number of INR checks did not change (18.9 ± 5.2 to 18.5 ± 5.1, p = 0.06). Between 2010 and 2014, AF patients newly starting warfarin had mild increases in risk for stroke and death with sustained quality of warfarin therapy.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Stroke/chemically induced , Stroke/epidemiology , Time Factors , Warfarin/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL