ABSTRACT
Signaling across cellular membranes, the 826 human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) govern a wide range of vital physiological processes, making GPCRs prominent drug targets. X-ray crystallography provided GPCR molecular architectures, which also revealed the need for additional structural dynamics data to support drug development. Here, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with the wild-type-like A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR) in solution provides a comprehensive characterization of signaling-related structural dynamics. All six tryptophan indole and eight glycine backbone 15N-1H NMR signals in A2AAR were individually assigned. These NMR probes provided insight into the role of Asp522.50 as an allosteric link between the orthosteric drug binding site and the intracellular signaling surface, revealing strong interactions with the toggle switch Trp 2466.48, and delineated the structural response to variable efficacy of bound drugs across A2AAR. The present data support GPCR signaling based on dynamic interactions between two semi-independent subdomains connected by an allosteric switch at Asp522.50.
Subject(s)
Allosteric Regulation , Receptor, Adenosine A2A/chemistry , Signal Transduction , Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists/chemistry , Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Allosteric Site , Animals , Molecular Docking Simulation , Pichia , Protein Binding , Receptor, Adenosine A2A/metabolism , Sf9 Cells , SpodopteraABSTRACT
This study describes the localization and computational prediction of a binding site for the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) positive allosteric modulator 2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)amine (LUF6000). The work reveals an extrahelical lipid-facing binding pocket disparate from the orthosteric binding site that encompasses transmembrane domain (TMD) 1, TMD7, and Helix (H) 8, which was predicted by molecular modeling and validated by mutagenesis. According to the model, the nearly planar 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolinamine ring system lies parallel to the transmembrane segments, inserted into an aromatic cage formed by π-π stacking interactions with the side chains of Y2847.55 in TMD7 and Y2938.54 in H8 and by π-NH bonding between Y2847.55 and the exocyclic amine. The 2-cyclohexyl group is positioned "upward" within a small hydrophobic subpocket created by residues in TMDs 1 and 7, while the 3,4-dichlorophenyl group extends toward the lipid interface. An H-bond between the N-1 amine of the heterocycle and the carbonyl of G291.49 further stabilizes the interaction. Molecular dynamics simulations predicted two metastable intermediates, one resembling a pose determined by molecular docking and a second involving transient interactions with Y2938.54; in simulations, each of these intermediates converges into the final bound state. Structure-activity-relationships for replacement of either of the identified exocyclic or endocyclic amines with heteroatoms lacking H-bond donating ability were consistent with the hypothetical pose. Thus, we characterized an allosteric pocket for 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines that is consistent with data generated by orthogonal methods, which will aid in the rational design of improved A3AR positive allosteric modulators. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Orthosteric A3AR agonists have advanced in clinical trials for inflammatory conditions, liver diseases, and cancer. Thus, the clinical appeal of selective receptor activation could extend to allosteric enhancers, which would induce site- and time-specific activation in the affected tissue. By identifying the allosteric site for known positive allosteric modulators, structure-based drug discovery modalities can be enabled to enhance the pharmacological properties of the 1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine class of A3AR positive allosteric modulators.
Subject(s)
Amines , Receptors, Purinergic P1 , Molecular Docking Simulation , Allosteric Regulation , Receptors, Purinergic P1/metabolism , Binding Sites , Allosteric Site , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , LipidsABSTRACT
The A2B adenosine receptor (A2BR) is one of the four adenosine-activated G protein-coupled receptors. In addition to adenosine, protein kinase C (PKC) was recently found to activate the A2BR. The A2BR is coupled to both Gs and Gi, as well as Gq proteins in some cell types. Many primary cells and cell lines, such as bladder and breast cancer, bronchial smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, and fat cells, express the A2BR endogenously at high levels, suggesting its potentially important role in asthma, cancer, diabetes, and other conditions. The A2BR has been characterized as both pro- and anti-inflammatory, inducing cell type-dependent secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10. Theophylline and enprofylline have long been used for asthma treatment, although it is still not entirely clear if their A2BR antagonism contributes to their therapeutic effects or side effects. The A2BR is required in ischemic cardiac preconditioning by adenosine. Both A2BR and protein kinase C (PKC) contribute to cardioprotection, and both modes of A2BR signaling can be blocked by A2BR antagonists. Inhibitors of PKC and A2BR are in clinical cancer trials. Sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and cauliflower have been reported to inhibit A2BR signaling via reaction with an intracellular A2BR cysteine residue (C210). A full, A2BR-selective agonist, critical to elucidate many controversial roles of the A2BR, is still not available, although agonist-bound A2BR structures have recently been reported.
ABSTRACT
The P2Y6 receptor, activated by uridine diphosphate (UDP), is a target for antagonists in inflammatory, neurodegenerative, and metabolic disorders, yet few potent and selective antagonists are known to date. This prompted us to use machine learning as a novel approach to aid ligand discovery, with pharmacological evaluation at three P2YR subtypes: initially P2Y6 and subsequently P2Y1 and P2Y14. Relying on extensive published data for P2Y6R agonists, we generated and validated an array of classification machine learning model using the algorithms deep learning (DL), adaboost classifier (ada), Bernoulli NB (bnb), k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier, logistic regression (lreg), random forest classifier (rf), support vector classification (SVC), and XGBoost (XGB) classifier models, and the common consensus was applied to molecular selection of 21 diverse structures. Compounds were screened using human P2Y6R-induced functional calcium transients in transfected 1321N1 astrocytoma cells and fluorescent binding inhibition at closely related hP2Y14R expressed in CHO cells. The hit compound ABBV-744, an experimental anticancer drug with a 6-methyl-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridine scaffold, had multifaceted interactions with the P2YR family: hP2Y6R inhibition in a non-surmountable fashion, suggesting that noncompetitive antagonism, and hP2Y1R enhancement, but not hP2Y14R binding inhibition. Other machine learning-selected compounds were either weak (experimental anti-asthmatic drug AZD5423 with a phenyl-1H-indazole scaffold) or inactive in inhibiting the hP2Y6R. Experimental drugs TAK-593 and GSK1070916 (100 µM) inhibited P2Y14R fluorescent binding by 50% and 38%, respectively, and all other compounds by < 20%. Thus, machine learning has led the way toward revealing previously unknown modulators of several P2YR subtypes that have varied effects.
ABSTRACT
The A3 adenosine receptor (AR) is an important inflammatory and immunological target. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we report the gene regulation in HL-60 cells treated acutely with highly selective A3AR agonist MRS5698, positive allosteric modulator (PAM) LUF6000, or both. Both pro- and anti-inflammatory genes, such as IL-1a, IL-1ß, and NFκBIZ, are significantly upregulated. During our observations, LUF6000 alone produced a lesser effect, while the MRS5698 + LUF6000 group demonstrated generally greater effects than MRS5698 alone, consistent with allosteric enhancement. The number of genes up- and down-regulated are similar. Pathway analysis highlighted the critical involvement of signaling molecules, including IL-6 and IL-17. Important upstream regulators include IL-1a, IL-1ß, TNF-α, NF-κB, etc. PPAR, which modulates eicosanoid metabolism, was highly downregulated by the A3AR agonist. Considering previous pharmacological results and mathematical modeling, LUF6000's small enhancement of genetic upregulation suggested that MRS5698 is a nearly full agonist, which we demonstrated in both cAMP and calcium assays. The smaller effect of LUF6000 on MRS5698 in comparison to its effect on Cl-IB-MECA was shown in both HL-60 cells endogenously expressing the human (h) A3AR and in recombinant hA3AR-expressing CHO cells, consistent with its HL-60 cell genetic regulation patterns. In summary, by using both selective agonists and PAM, we identified genes that are closely relevant to immunity and inflammation to be regulated by A3AR in differentiated HL-60 cells, a cell model of neutrophil function. In addition, we demonstrated the previously uncharacterized allosteric signaling-enhancing effect of LUF6000 in cells endogenously expressing the hA3AR.
Subject(s)
Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists , Receptor, Adenosine A3 , Humans , HL-60 Cells , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Receptor, Adenosine A3/genetics , Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Efforts to fully understand pharmacological differences between G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) species homologues are generally not pursued in detail during the drug development process. To date, many GPCRs that have been successfully targeted are relatively well-conserved across species in amino acid sequence and display minimal variability of biological effects. However, the A3 adenosine receptor (AR), an exciting drug target for a multitude of diseases associated with tissue injury, ischemia, and inflammation, displays as little as 70% sequence identity among mammalian species (e.g., rodent vs. primate) commonly used in drug development. Consequently, the pharmacological properties of synthetic A3AR ligands vary widely, not only in binding affinity, selectivity, and signaling efficacy, but to the extent that some function as agonists in some species and antagonists in others. Numerous heterocyclic antagonists that have nM affinity at the human A3AR are inactive or weakly active at the rat and mouse A3ARs. Positive allosteric modulators, including the imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivative LUF6000, are only active at human and some larger animal species that have been evaluated (rabbit and dog), but not rodents. A3AR agonists evoke systemic degranulation of rodent, but not human mast cells. The rat A3AR undergoes desensitization faster than the human A3AR, but the human homologue can be completely re-sensitized and recycled back to the cell surface. Thus, comprehensive pharmacological evaluation and awareness of potential A3AR species differences are critical in studies to further understand the basic biological functions of this unique AR subtype. Recombinant A3ARs from eight different species have been pharmacologically characterized thus far. In this review, we describe in detail current knowledge of species differences in genetic identity, G protein-coupling, receptor regulation, and both orthosteric and allosteric A3AR pharmacology.
Subject(s)
Mast Cells , Receptor, Adenosine A3 , Rats , Mice , Humans , Rabbits , Animals , Dogs , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Mast Cells/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Protein Binding , Signal Transduction , Mammals/metabolismABSTRACT
Adenosine receptor (AR) ligands are being developed for metabolic, cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory diseases and cancer. The ease of drug discovery is contingent on the availability of pharmacological tools. Fluorescent antagonist ligands for the human A2A and A3ARs were synthesized using two validated pharmacophores, 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine and triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-yl)amine, which were coupled to eight reporter fluorophores: AlexaFluor, JaneliaFluor (JF), cyanine, and near infrared (NIR) dyes. The conjugates were first screened using radioligand binding in HEK293 cells expressing one of the three AR subtypes. The highest affinities at A2AAR were Ki 144-316 nM for 10, 12, and 19, and at A3AR affinity of Ki 21.6 nM for 19. Specific binding of JF646 conjugate MRS7774 12 to the HEK293 cell surface A2AAR was imaged using confocal microscopy. Compound 19 MRS7535, a triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-yl)amine containing a Sulfo-Cy7 NIR dye, was suitable for A3AR characterization in whole cells by flow cytometry (Kd 11.8 nM), and its bitopic interaction mode with an A3AR homology model was predicted. Given its affinity and selectivity (11-fold vs. A2AAR, ~ 50-fold vs. A1AR and A2BAR) and a good specific-to-nonspecific binding ratio, 19 could be useful for live cell or potentially a diagnostic in vivo NIR imaging tool and/or therapy targeting the A3AR.
Subject(s)
Fluorescent Dyes , Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists , Humans , Purinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , HEK293 Cells , Flow Cytometry , Amines , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Receptor, Adenosine A2A/metabolism , Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacologyABSTRACT
The A3 adenosine receptor (AR) is emerging as an attractive drug target. Antagonists are proposed for the potential treatment of glaucoma and asthma. However, currently available A3AR antagonists are potent in human and some large animals, but weak or inactive in mouse and rat. In this study, we re-synthesized a previously reported A3AR antagonist, DPTN, and evaluated its affinity and selectivity at human, mouse, and rat ARs. We showed that DPTN, indeed, is a potent A3AR antagonist for all three species tested, albeit a little less selective for mouse and rat A3AR in comparison to the human A3AR. DPTN's Ki values at respective A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors were (nM) 162, 121, 230, and 1.65 (human); 411, 830, 189, and 9.61 (mouse); and 333, 1147, 163, and 8.53 (rat). Its antagonist activity at both human and mouse A3ARs was confirmed in a cyclic AMP functional assay. Considering controversial use of currently commercially available A3AR antagonists in rats and mice, we also re-examined other commonly used and selective A3AR antagonists under the same experimental conditions. The Ki values of MRS1523 were shown to be 43.9, 349, and 216 nM at human, mouse, and rat A3ARs, respectively. MRS1191 and MRS1334 showed incomplete inhibition of [125I]I-AB-MECA binding to mouse and rat A3ARs, while potent human A3AR antagonists, MRS1220, MRE3008F20, PSB10, PSB-11, and VUF5574 were largely inactive. Thus, we demonstrated that DPTN and MRS1523 are among the only validated A3AR antagonists that can be possibly used (at an appropriate concentration) in mouse or rat to confirm an A3AR-related mechanism or function.
Subject(s)
Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Cyclic AMP/metabolism , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Animals , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Mice , RatsABSTRACT
Various 6-alkynyl analogues of a known 3-nitro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-chromene antagonist 3 of the Gq-coupled P2Y6 receptor (P2Y6R) were synthesized using a Sonogashira reaction to replace a 6-iodo group. The analogues were tested in a functional assay consisting of inhibition of calcium mobilization in P2Y6R-expressing astrocytoma cells elicited by native P2Y6R agonist UDP. 6-Ethynyl and 6-cyano groups were installed, and the alkynes were extended through both alkyl and aryl spacers. The most potent antagonists, with IC50 of ~1 µM, were found to be trialkylsilyl-ethynyl 7 and 8 (3-5 fold greater affinity than reference 3), t-butyl prop-2-yn-1-ylcarbamate 14 and p-carboxyphenyl-ethynyl 16 derivatives, and 3 and 8 displayed surmountable antagonism of UDP-induced production of inositol phosphates. Other chain-extended terminal carboxylate derivatives were less potent than the corresponding methyl ester derivatives. Thus, the 6 position in this chromene series is suitable for derivatization with flexibility of substitution, even with sterically extended chains, without losing P2Y6R affinity. However, a 3-carboxylic acid or 3-ester substitution did not serve as a nitro bioisostere, as the affinity was eliminated. These compounds provide additional ligand tools for the underexplored P2Y6R, which is a target for inflammatory, neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases.
Subject(s)
Benzopyrans/pharmacology , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptors, Purinergic P2/metabolism , Benzopyrans/chemical synthesis , Benzopyrans/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Molecular Structure , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/chemical synthesis , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
In response to adenosine 5'-diphosphate, the P2Y1 receptor (P2Y1R) facilitates platelet aggregation, and thus serves as an important antithrombotic drug target. Here we report the crystal structures of the human P2Y1R in complex with a nucleotide antagonist MRS2500 at 2.7 Å resolution, and with a non-nucleotide antagonist BPTU at 2.2 Å resolution. The structures reveal two distinct ligand-binding sites, providing atomic details of P2Y1R's unique ligand-binding modes. MRS2500 recognizes a binding site within the seven transmembrane bundle of P2Y1R, which is different in shape and location from the nucleotide binding site in the previously determined structure of P2Y12R, representative of another P2YR subfamily. BPTU binds to an allosteric pocket on the external receptor interface with the lipid bilayer, making it the first structurally characterized selective G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligand located entirely outside of the helical bundle. These high-resolution insights into P2Y1R should enable discovery of new orthosteric and allosteric antithrombotic drugs with reduced adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Deoxyadenine Nucleotides/chemistry , Deoxyadenine Nucleotides/metabolism , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y1/chemistry , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y1/metabolism , Uracil/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Diphosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Diphosphate/chemistry , Adenosine Diphosphate/metabolism , Binding Sites , Crystallography, X-Ray , Deoxyadenine Nucleotides/pharmacology , Humans , Ligands , Models, Molecular , Molecular Conformation , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Thionucleotides/chemistry , Thionucleotides/metabolism , Uracil/chemistry , Uracil/metabolism , Uracil/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Rapid phosphoester hydrolysis of endogenous purine and pyrimidine nucleotides has challenged the characterization of the role of P2 receptors in physiology and pathology. Nucleotide phosphoester stabilization has been pursued on a number of medicinal chemistry fronts. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo stability and pharmacokinetics of prototypical nucleotide P2Y1 receptor (P2Y1R) agonists and antagonists. These included the riboside nucleotide agonist 2-methylthio-ADP and antagonist MRS2179, as well as agonist MRS2365 and antagonist MRS2500 containing constrained (N)-methanocarba rings, which were previously reported to form nucleotides that are more slowly hydrolyzed at the α-phosphoester compared with the ribosides. In vitro incubations in mouse and human plasma and blood demonstrated the rapid hydrolysis of these compounds to nucleoside metabolites. This metabolism was inhibited by EDTA to chelate divalent cations required by ectonucleotidases for nucleotide hydrolysis. This rapid hydrolysis was confirmed in vivo in mouse pharmacokinetic studies that demonstrate that MRS2365 is a prodrug of the nucleoside metabolite AST-004 (MRS4322). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the nucleoside metabolites of MRS2365 and 2-methylthio-ADP are adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, notably at A3 and A1ARs. In vivo efficacy of MRS2365 in murine models of traumatic brain injury and stroke can be attributed to AR activation by its nucleoside metabolite AST-004, rather than P2Y1R activation. This research suggests the importance of reevaluation of previous in vitro and in vivo research of P2YRs and P2XRs as there is a potential that the pharmacology attributed to nucleotide agonists is due to AR activation by active nucleoside metabolites.
Subject(s)
Adenosine A1 Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Prodrugs/pharmacokinetics , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Adenosine Diphosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Diphosphate/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Deoxyadenine Nucleotides/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Receptor, Adenosine A1/metabolism , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y1/metabolismABSTRACT
P2Y receptors (P2YRs), a family of purinergic G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are activated by extracellular nucleotides. There are a total of eight distinct functional P2YRs expressed in human, which are subdivided into P2Y1-like receptors and P2Y12-like receptors. Their ligands are generally charged molecules with relatively low bioavailability and stability in vivo, which limits our understanding of this receptor family. P2Y12R regulates platelet activation and thrombus formation, and several antithrombotic drugs targeting P2Y12R--including the prodrugs clopidogrel (Plavix) and prasugrel (Effient) that are metabolized and bind covalently, and the nucleoside analogue ticagrelor (Brilinta) that acts directly on the receptor--have been approved for the prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction. However, limitations of these drugs (for example, a very long half-life of clopidogrel action and a characteristic adverse effect profile of ticagrelor) suggest that there is an unfulfilled medical need for developing a new generation of P2Y12R inhibitors. Here we report the 2.6 Å resolution crystal structure of human P2Y12R in complex with a non-nucleotide reversible antagonist, AZD1283. The structure reveals a distinct straight conformation of helix V, which sets P2Y12R apart from all other known class A GPCR structures. With AZD1283 bound, the highly conserved disulphide bridge in GPCRs between helix III and extracellular loop 2 is not observed and appears to be dynamic. Along with the details of the AZD1283-binding site, analysis of the extracellular interface reveals an adjacent ligand-binding region and suggests that both pockets could be required for dinucleotide binding. The structure provides essential insights for the development of improved P2Y12R ligands and allosteric modulators as drug candidates.
Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/chemistry , Niacin/analogs & derivatives , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/chemistry , Sulfonamides/chemistry , Binding Sites , Crystallography, X-Ray , Disulfides/metabolism , Humans , Ligands , Models, Molecular , Molecular Docking Simulation , Niacin/chemistry , Niacin/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/metabolism , Sulfonamides/metabolismABSTRACT
The P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12R), one of eight members of the P2YR family expressed in humans, is one of the most prominent clinical drug targets for inhibition of platelet aggregation. Although mutagenesis and modelling studies of the P2Y12R provided useful insights into ligand binding, the agonist and antagonist recognition and function at the P2Y12R remain poorly understood at the molecular level. Here we report the structures of the human P2Y12R in complex with the full agonist 2-methylthio-adenosine-5'-diphosphate (2MeSADP, a close analogue of endogenous agonist ADP) at 2.5 Šresolution, and the corresponding ATP derivative 2-methylthio-adenosine-5'-triphosphate (2MeSATP) at 3.1 Šresolution. These structures, together with the structure of the P2Y12R with antagonist ethyl 6-(4-((benzylsulfonyl)carbamoyl)piperidin-1-yl)-5-cyano-2-methylnicotinate (AZD1283), reveal striking conformational changes between nucleotide and non-nucleotide ligand complexes in the extracellular regions. Further analysis of these changes provides insight into a distinct ligand binding landscape in the δ-group of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Agonist and non-nucleotide antagonist adopt different orientations in the P2Y12R, with only partially overlapped binding pockets. The agonist-bound P2Y12R structure answers long-standing questions surrounding P2Y12R-agonist recognition, and reveals interactions with several residues that had not been reported to be involved in agonist binding. As a first example, to our knowledge, of a GPCR in which agonist access to the binding pocket requires large-scale rearrangements in the highly malleable extracellular region, the structural and docking studies will therefore provide invaluable insight into the pharmacology and mechanisms of action of agonists and different classes of antagonists for the P2Y12R and potentially for other closely related P2YRs.
Subject(s)
Adenosine Diphosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Triphosphate/analogs & derivatives , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Agonists/chemistry , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/chemistry , Thionucleotides/chemistry , Adenosine Diphosphate/chemistry , Adenosine Diphosphate/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/chemistry , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Binding Sites , Crystallography, X-Ray , Humans , Ligands , Models, Molecular , Niacin/analogs & derivatives , Niacin/chemistry , Niacin/metabolism , Protein Conformation , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Agonists/metabolism , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12/metabolism , Substrate Specificity , Sulfonamides/chemistry , Sulfonamides/metabolism , Thionucleotides/metabolismABSTRACT
Affinity mass spectrometry (MS) enables rapid screening of compound mixtures for ligands bound to a specific protein target, yet its current throughput is limited to individually assay pools of 400-2000 compounds. Typical affinity MS screens implemented in pharmaceutical industry laboratories identify putative ligands based on qualitative analysis of compound binding to the target whereas no quantitative information is acquired to discriminate high- and low-affinity ligands in the screening phase. Furthermore, these screens require purification of a stabilized form of the protein target, which poses a great challenge for membrane receptor targets. Here, we describe a new, potentially general affinity MS strategy that allows screening of 20,000 compounds in one pool for highly efficient ligand discovery toward a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) target. Quantitative measurement of compound binding to the receptor enables high-affinity ligand selection using both the purified receptor and receptor-embedded cell membranes. This high-throughput, label-free and quantitative affinity MS screen resulted in discovery of three new antagonists of the A2A adenosine receptor.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists/analysis , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Humans , Ligands , Protein Binding , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
There are four subtypes of adenosine receptors (ARs), named A1, A2A, A2B and A3, all of which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Locally produced adenosine is a suppressant in anti-tumor immune surveillance. The A2BAR, coupled to both Gαs and Gαi G proteins, is one of the several GPCRs that are expressed in a significantly higher level in certain cancer tissues, in comparison to adjacent normal tissues. There is growing evidence that the A2BAR plays an important role in tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and immune suppression. Thus, A2BAR antagonists are novel, potentially attractive anticancer agents. Several antagonists targeting A2BAR are currently in clinical trials for various types of cancers. In this review, we first describe the signaling, agonists, and antagonists of the A2BAR. We further discuss the role of the A2BAR in the progression of various cancers, and the rationale of using A2BAR antagonists in cancer therapy.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics , Receptor, Adenosine A2B/physiology , Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists/chemistry , Adenosine A2 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Humans , Immune Tolerance/genetics , Neoplasm Metastasis/genetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neovascularization, Pathologic/genetics , Receptor, Adenosine A2B/genetics , Signal TransductionABSTRACT
The A3 adenosine receptor (A3 AR) subtype is a novel, promising therapeutic target for inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis, as well as liver cancer. A3 AR is coupled to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, leading to modulation of transcription. Furthermore, A3 AR affects functions of almost all immune cells and the proliferation of cancer cells. Numerous A3 AR agonists, partial agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators have been reported, and their structure-activity relationships (SARs) have been studied culminating in the development of potent and selective molecules with drug-like characteristics. The efficacy of nucleoside agonists may be suppressed to produce antagonists, by structural modification of the ribose moiety. Diverse classes of heterocycles have been discovered as selective A3 AR blockers, although with large species differences. Thus, as a result of intense basic research efforts, the outlook for development of A3 AR modulators for human therapeutics is encouraging. Two prototypical selective agonists, N6-(3-Iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA; CF101) and 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (Cl-IB-MECA; CF102), have progressed to advanced clinical trials. They were found safe and well tolerated in all preclinical and human clinical studies and showed promising results, particularly in psoriasis and RA, where the A3 AR is both a promising therapeutic target and a biologically predictive marker, suggesting a personalized medicine approach. Targeting the A3 AR may pave the way for safe and efficacious treatments for patient populations affected by inflammatory diseases, cancer, and other conditions.
Subject(s)
Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Inflammation/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Allosteric Site , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Crystallography, X-Ray , Humans , Immune System , Mice , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Rats , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
Tryptophan indole 15N-1H signals are well separated in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of proteins. Assignment of the indole 15N-1H signals therefore enables one to obtain site-specific information on complex proteins in supramacromolecular systems, even when extensive assignment of backbone 15N-1H resonances is challenging. Here we exploit the unique indole 15N-1H chemical shift by introducing extrinsic tryptophan reporter residues at judiciously chosen locations in a membrane protein for increased coverage of structure and function by NMR. We demonstrate this approach with three variants of the human A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR), a class A G protein-coupled receptor, each containing a single extrinsic tryptophan near the receptor intracellular surface, in helix V, VI, or VII, respectively. We show that the native A2AAR global protein fold and ligand binding activity are preserved in these A2AAR variants. The indole 15N-1H signals from the extrinsic tryptophan reporter residues show different responses to variable efficacy of drugs bound to the receptor orthosteric cavity, and the indole 15N-1H chemical shift of the tryptophan introduced at the intracellular end of helix VI is sensitive to conformational changes resulting from interactions with a polypeptide from the carboxy terminus of the GαS intracellular partner protein. Introducing extrinsic tryptophans into proteins in complex supramolecular systems thus opens new avenues for NMR investigations in solution.
Subject(s)
Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Molecular Probes/chemistry , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular , Receptor, Adenosine A2A/chemistry , Tryptophan/chemistry , Humans , Ligands , Pichia/chemistryABSTRACT
Activity of the A3 adenosine receptor (AR) allosteric modulators LUF6000 (2-cyclohexyl-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine) and LUF6096 (N-{2-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]quinolin-4-yl}cyclohexanecarbox-amide) was compared at four A3AR species homologs used in preclinical drug development. In guanosine 5'-[γ-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding assays with cell membranes isolated from human embryonic kidney cells stably expressing recombinant A3ARs, both modulators substantially enhanced agonist efficacy at human, dog, and rabbit A3ARs but provided only weak activity at mouse A3ARs. For human, dog, and rabbit, both modulators increased the maximal efficacy of the A3AR agonist 2-chloro-N 6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide as well as adenosine > 2-fold, while slightly reducing potency in human and dog. Based on results from N 6-(4-amino-3-[125I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide ([125I]I-AB-MECA) binding assays, we hypothesize that potency reduction is explained by an allosterically induced slowing in orthosteric ligand binding kinetics that reduces the rate of formation of ligand-receptor complexes. Mutation of four amino acid residues of the human A3AR to the murine sequence identified the extracellular loop 1 (EL1) region as being important in selectively controlling the allosteric actions of LUF6096 on [125I]I-AB-MECA binding kinetics. Homology modeling suggested interaction between species-variable EL1 and agonist-contacting EL2. These results indicate that A3AR allostery is species-dependent and provide mechanistic insights into this therapeutically promising class of agents.
Subject(s)
Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists/chemistry , Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonists/pharmacology , Receptor, Adenosine A3/drug effects , Receptor, Adenosine A3/metabolism , Aminoquinolines/chemistry , Aminoquinolines/pharmacology , Animals , Dogs , Humans , Imidazoles/chemistry , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Mice , Molecular Docking Simulation , Rabbits , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
Traditionally, G protein-coupled receptor antagonists are classified as competitive or noncompetitive and surmountable or insurmountable based on functional antagonism. P2Y1 receptor (P2Y1R) structures showed two antagonists binding to two spatially distinct sites: nucleotide MRS2500 (orthosteric, contacting the helical bundle) and urea BPTU (allosteric, on the external receptor surface). However, the nature of their P2Y1R antagonism has not been characterized. Here we characterized BPTU antagonism at various signaling pathways activated by structurally diverse agonists. BPTU rightward shifted the concentration-response curves of both 2-methylthioadenosine 5'-diphosphate trisodium salt and MRS2365 (5'-diphosphates) in some signaling events, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and label free, in a parallel manner without affecting the maximum agonist effect (Emax) but antagonized insurmountably (suppressed agonist Emax) in signaling events such as guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding and ß-arrestin2 recruitment. However, with dinucleotide Ap4A as an agonist, BPTU suppressed the Emax insurmountably in all signaling pathways. By comparison, MRS2500 behaved as surmountable antagonist rightward-shifting concentration-response curves of all three agonists in a parallel manner for all signaling pathways measured. Thus, we demonstrated a previously undocumented phenomenon that P2Y1R antagonism patterns could vary in different signaling pathways, which could be related to conformational selection, signaling amplification, and probe dependence. This phenomenon may apply generally to other receptors considering that antagonism by a specific ligand is often not compared at multiple signaling pathways. Thus, antagonism can be surmountable or insurmountable depending on the signaling pathways measured and the agonists used, which should be of broad relevance to drug discovery and disease treatment.
Subject(s)
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/metabolism , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y1/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology , Adenosine Diphosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Diphosphate/metabolism , Adenosine Diphosphate/pharmacology , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , Allosteric Regulation/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Protein Structure, Secondary , Receptors, Purinergic P2Y1/chemistry , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Thionucleotides/metabolism , Thionucleotides/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Eight G protein-coupled P2Y receptor (P2YR) subtypes are important physiologic mediators. The human P2YRs are fully activated by ATP (P2Y2 and P2Y11), ADP (P2Y1, P2Y12, and P2Y13), UTP (P2Y2 and P2Y4), UDP (P2Y6 and P2Y14), and UDP glucose (P2Y14). Their structural elucidation is progressing rapidly. The X-ray structures of three ligand complexes of the Gi-coupled P2Y12R and two of the Gq-coupled P2Y1Rs were recently determined and will be especially useful in structure-based ligand design at two P2YR subfamilies. These high-resolution structures, which display unusual binding site features, complement mutagenesis studies for probing ligand recognition and activation. The structural requirements for nucleotide agonist recognition at P2YRs are relatively permissive with respect to the length of the phosphate moiety, but less so with respect to base recognition. Nucleotide-like antagonists and partial agonists are also known for P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y12Rs. Each P2YR subtype has the ability to be activated by structurally bifunctional agonists, such as dinucleotides, typically, dinucleoside triphosphates or tetraphosphates, and nucleoside polyphosphate sugars (e.g., UDP glucose) as well as the more conventional mononucleotide agonists. A range of dinucleoside polyphosphates, from triphosphates to higher homologs, occurs naturally. Earlier modeling predictions of the P2YRs were not very accurate, but recent findings have provided much detailed structural insight into this receptor family to aid in the rational design of new drugs.