Is the time right for a new initiative in mathematical modeling of the lower urinary tract? ICI-RS 2023.

INTRODUCTION: A session at the 2023 International Consultation on Incontinence - Research Society (ICI-RS) held in Bristol, UK, focused on the question: Is the time right for a new initiative in mathematical modeling of the lower urinary tract (LUT)? The LUT is a complex system, comprising various synergetic components (i.e., bladder, urethra, neural control), each with its own dynamic functioning and high interindividual variability. This has led to a variety of different types of models for different purposes, each with advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: When addressing the LUT, the modeling approach should be selected and sized according to the specific purpose, the targeted level of detail, and the available computational resources. Four areas were selected as examples to discuss: utility of nomograms in clinical use, value of fluid mechanical modeling, applications of models to simplify urodynamics, and utility of statistical models. RESULTS: A brief literature review is provided along with discussion of the merits of different types of models for different applications. Remaining research questions are provided. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequacies in current (outdated) models of the LUT as well as recent advances in computing power (e.g., quantum computing) and methods (e.g., artificial intelligence/machine learning), would dictate that the answer is an emphatic "Yes, the time is right for a new initiative in mathematical modeling of the LUT."

Should hormone replacement therapy (any route of administration) be considered in all postmenopausal women with lower urinary tract symptoms? Report from the ICI-RS 2023.

AIMS: This International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society report aims to summarize the evidence and uncertainties regarding the use of hormone replacement therapy by any route in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI), with a review of special considerations for the elderly. Research question proposals to further this field have been highlighted. METHODS: An overview of the existing evidence, guidelines, and consensus regarding the use of topical or systemic estrogens in the management of LUTS. RESULTS: There are currently evidence and recommendations to offer topical estrogens to postmenopausal women with overactive bladder symptoms as well as postmenopausal women with rUTIs. Systemic estrogens however have been shown in a meta-analysis to have a negative effect on LUTS and, therefore are not currently recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Although available evidence and recommendations exist for the use of topical estrogens, few women are commenced on these in primary care. There remain large gaps still within our knowledge of the use of estrogens within the management of LUTS, particularly on when it should be commenced, the length of time treatment should be continued for, and barriers to prescribing.

Do we have adequate data to construct a valid algorithm for management of synthetic midurethral sling complications? ICI-RS 2019.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic midurethral sling (MUS) procedures, purported for the last two decades as the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence, have been in creasingly scrutinized in recent years with regard to the rate and severity of complications. METHODS: During the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society meeting held in Bristol, UK, in 2019, a multidisciplinary panel held a think tank and discussed the contemporary evidence pertaining to the classification, investigation, and treatment of MUS complications. RESULTS: The current classification system of mesh-related complications was discussed, and shortcomings were identified. The lack of a standardized clinical pathway was noted, and the value of clinical investigations and surgical treatments was difficult to fully evaluate. The paucity of high-level evidence was a common factor in all discussions, and the difficulties with setting up relevant randomized-controlled trials were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the think-tank discussions is summarized with a set of recommendations designed to stimulate future research.

Do we need better information to advise women with stress incontinence on their choice of surgery? Report from the ICI-RS 2018.

AIMS: The regulatory warnings about the safety of the synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) had a significant effect on how patients and physicians approach surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In this changing landscape, the purpose of this research Think Tank (TT) was to provide an update of the current knowledge about the safety and efficacy of SUI surgery, to review patient goals and expectations and to identify factors affecting the decision making for surgery. METHODS: This is a consensus report of the proceedings of TT3: "Do we need better information to advise women with stress incontinence on their choice of surgery?" from the annual International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS), June 2018. RESULTS: Despite the body of evidence supporting the continued use of MUS, the short follow-up of most of the studies and the lack of "real life" data regarding pain and sexual dysfunction make the development of recommendations challenging. Women with SUI are often happy to "trade" efficacy for a procedure with less associated morbidity and therefore it is not always the procedure with the highest success rate that is ultimately chosen. However, a number of factors influence treatment decision and there is limited evidence about what level of all these factors women are willing to tolerate for a given success rate, or how much success they are willing to trade for a lower complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The ICI-RS proposed research questions which may be able to assist in improving the counseling and management of women with SUI.

Recommendations and future research initiative to optimize bladder management in pregnancy and childbirth International Consultation on Incontinence - Research society 2018.

With increasing birth rates globally, obstetric bladder care and long term pelvic floor dysfunction continues to be a issue. This paper aims to provide an overview of the concerns in the antenatal, intrapartum an post partum periods and presents recommendation for the research requirements necessary and education to challenge current practice.

Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery has significantly evolved with the introduction of synthetic midurethral slings (MUS). However, following reports from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Commission, the use of vaginal meshes in urogynaecology has been largely scrutinised. We analysed trends in female SUI surgery in England from 2000 to 2017. METHODS: The Hospital Episode Statistics database was retrieved from the Health and Social Care Information Centre website. Specific four-character codes of the evolving OPCS-4 coding system were used to quantify SUI operations. RESULTS: We analysed 180,773 admissions from 2000 to 2017. A steep rise in MUS use was noted until 2008-2009, followed by a consistent drop, with a nadir of 6383 procedures in 2016-2017. Removal of MUS has become increasingly popular, with a peak of 591 in 2012-2013. Numbers for traditional continence operations remained low. Colposuspensions markedly decreased to 189 in 2012-2013, with a slight positive trend only in the last few years, while autologous sling use costantly dropped from 262 to 124 throughout the study period. Admissions for urethral bulking agents increased from 650 to 1324 in the last 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: MUS represents the most commonly performed procedure for SUI, despite an obvious reduction in the last 8 years. Urethral bulking agents are becoming more popular, while the numbers of colposuspensions and autologous slings are still low. Training programmes should take into account current shifts in surgical practice.

Does assessing urethral function allow the selection of the optimal therapy for recurrent SUI? Report from the ICI-RS 2017.

AIMS: The management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence following failed previous continence surgery remains challenging. Whilst the role of urodynamic investigations has been questioned in the management of primary stress incontinence there is a widely held view that women with recurrent symptoms require further investigation although there is no agreement regarding which tests are required. We sought to understand what testing is recommended prior to managing this difficult cohort of patients. METHOD: This research proposal was presented at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society (ICI-RS) in order to clarify our current knowledge regarding the assessment of urethral function and to set research priorities for the future. RESULTS: Whilst the majority of clinicians would advocate urodynamic evaluation of women with recurrent stress incontinence following previous surgery there is no consensus of opinion as to which tests should be performed, on whom or where. The available evidence to date suggests that urethral function tests do have a role with regard to prognosis following surgery and also in planning the most appropriate surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The ICI-RS developed a list of research questions which may be able to assist in improving the investigation and management of women with recurrent SUI. Questions included whether patients felt the information gained via urethral function tests had an important role in their counseling regarding outcome of repeat SUI surgery.

Trends in prolapse surgery in England.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women have a lifetime risk of undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery of 11-19%. Traditional native tissue repairs are associated with reoperation rates of approximately 11% after 20 years. Surgery with mesh augmentation was introduced to improve anatomic outcomes. However, the use of synthetic meshes in urogynaecological procedures has been scrutinised by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Commission (SCENIHR). We aimed to review trends in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in England. METHODS: Data were collected from the national hospital episode statistics database. Procedure and interventions-4 character tables were used to quantify POP operations. Annual reports from 2005 to 2016 were considered. RESULTS: The total number of POP procedures increased from 2005, reaching a peak in 2014 (N = 29,228). With regard to vaginal prolapse, native tissue repairs represented more than 90% of the procedures, whereas surgical meshes were considered in a few selected cases. The number of sacrospinous ligament fixations (SSLFs) grew more than 3 times over the years, whereas sacrocolpopexy remained stable. To treat vault prolapse, transvaginal surgical meshes have been progressively abandoned. We also noted a steady increase in uterine-sparing, and obliterative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Following FDA and SCENIHR warnings, a positive trend for meshes has only been seen in uterine-sparing surgery. Native tissue repairs constitute the vast majority of POP operations. SSLFs have been increasingly performed to achieve apical support. Urogynaecologists' training should take into account shifts in surgical practice.

Is there any association between urodynamic variables and severity of overactive bladder in women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity?

AIMS: The lack of a validated detrusor overactivity (DO) severity tool limits the clinical value of urodynamics in the management of patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). The aim of this study, was to identify urodynamic variables that correlate with validated OAB severity measures. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling consecutive women with idiopathic DO. The 24 hr urgency episodes and the score of the Incontinence Impact (II) domain of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) were used to assess the severity of OAB. RESULTS: The study enrolled 299 women with idiopathic DO. The cystometric capacity, compliance, and the threshold volume for the first involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC) showed a statistically significant negative correlation with the II domain of the KHQ and the 24 hr urgency episodes. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the amplitude of first IDC and the OAB severity measures, but only borderline for the amplitude of the highest IDC. There were no statistically significant differences between women with and without leakage per urethram during a detrusor contraction. CONCLUSIONS: Cystometric capacity, compliance (measured in ml/cm H2 O), threshold volume, and amplitude of the first IDC could be routinely documented in everyday clinical practice. The measures more commonly used for describing the severity of DO, such as leakage per urethram during a detrusor contraction and amplitude of the highest detrusor contraction, have a limited role confirming the complicated interaction between the detrusor muscle, the urethral sphincter, and the pelvic floor in women. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:780-783, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

When should video be added to conventional urodynamics in adults and is it justified by the evidence? ICI-RS 2014.

AIMS: To debate and evaluate the evidence base regarding the added value of video to urodynamics in adults and to define research questions. METHODS: In the ICI-RS Meeting 2014 a Think Tank analyzed the current guidelines recommending video urodynamics (VUD) and performed a literature search to determine the level of evidence for the additional value of the imaging with urodynamic assessment of both neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. RESULTS: Current guidelines do not specify the added value of imaging to urodynamics. Recommendations are based on single center series and expert opinion. Standard imaging protocols are not available and evidence regarding the balance between number and timing of pictures, patient positioning, and exposure time on the one hand and diagnosis on the other hand is lacking. On the basis of expert consensus VUD is relevant in the follow-up of patients with spinal dysraphism. Evidence for the value of VUD in non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction is sparse. There is some evidence that VUD is not necessary in uncomplicated female SUI, but expert opinion suggests it might improve the evaluation of patients with recurrent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: There is only low level evidence for the addition of video to urodynamics. The ICI-RS Think Tank encourages better reporting of results of imaging and systematic reporting of X-ray doses. Specific research hypotheses regarding the added value of imaging are recommended. The panel suggests the development of standards for technically optimal VUD that is practically achievable with machines that are on the market.

Early postoperative voiding dysfunction after insertion of retropubic midurethral tape.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A significant proportion of patients develop voiding dysfunction after midurethral tape (MUT) insertion, which reduces patient satisfaction. The study's purpose was to identify predictive factors of voiding dysfunction after a retropubic MUT procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients who underwent only a retropubic MUT procedure between January 2010 and December 2011. Early voiding dysfunction was defined when patients required a Foley catheter within 48 h. Data including demographic information, urogenital symptoms, previous surgery, preoperative uroflowmetry and urodynamic parameters were analysed using SPSS v22. Univariate analysis of all demographic variables was performed; those significant at 10 % were entered into a multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Fourteen patients required Foley catheter insertion, with a median age of 58 years (26-83 years), median BMI 28 kg/m(2) (20-48 kg/m2), and median parity 2 (0-4). Univariate analysis revealed peak flow rate <15 ml/s (OR 3.79; 1.07, 13.4; p = 0.046), bladder capacity (p = 0.044), stress incontinence versus mixed or urge incontinence (p = 0.064) and previous surgery (OR 4.39; 1.34, 14.41; p = 0.015) to be associated with voiding dysfunction. Multivariate analysis showed only previous pelvic floor surgery to be independently associated (OR 3.76; 1.14, 12.23, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Only previous pelvic-floor surgery was found to be a strong predictive factor of voiding dysfunction. The rate of voiding dysfunction was similar to those of published data. Previous studies revealed different predictive factors. A larger cohort is needed to provide a definite answer. Those with previous surgery appear to be those most at risk and pre-surgical counselling for these women could be suggested.

Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, measured in centimetres using a ruler (e.g. POPstix®), is recommended to quantify prolapse severity. POPstix® are costly (US $1/ruler). Home-made devices are used instead, but these have not been shown to be reproducible. HYPOTHESIS: Digitally assessed POP-Q (DPOP-Q) is as reliable, reproducible and acceptable as POP-Q assessed using POPstix®. METHODS: In this randomised crossover diagnostic agreement trial, each assessor measured the index finger of their dominant hand using a ruler. At visit one, patients were randomised to either POPstix® POP-Q assessment in a modified lithotomy position or DPOP-Q in both modified a lithotomy and a standing position. After the first clinician conducted this assessment, a second blinded clinician then carried out the remaining assessment on the same patient. For each examination, duration was recorded, along with a patient-completed discomfort score. Twenty-five women were invited for visit two, at which DPOP-Q was recorded by the same clinician who undertook DPOP-Q at the first visit. This allowed evaluation of inter- and intraobserver agreement together with examination acceptability. RESULTS: One hundred and nine women were recruited [median age 55 years, parity 2, body mass index (BMI) 27.1]. Of the 25 patients invited, 23 returned for visit two. DPOP-Q had high interobserver reliability [κ = 0.94, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.878-0.996] and intraobserver reliability (α = 0.96) with POPstix®. DPOP-Q was significantly quicker (p = 0.02) and less uncomfortable (p < 0.01) than POPstix® POP-Q. CONCLUSION: DPOP-Q is reliable, acceptable and cost effective.

Role of urodynamics before prolapse surgery.

The role of urodynamic studies (UDS) before prolapse surgery is contentious and a hotly debated topic in urogynaecology. Previous studies in women with prolapse and women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have focused on women without preoperative incontinence. Currently, it has not been possible to reach a universal consensus on the role of UDS before prolapse surgery in women with concomitant symptomatic or occult SUI. It is clear that UDS could add some information in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery and could facilitate counselling of patients. However, there is no evidence that the outcome of surgery is altered by prior UDS. New well-designed randomized studies are necessary to improve our understanding of this topic.

Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Synthetic midurethral slings (MUS) have gained popularity in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), due to their efficacy and minimally invasive nature. As there are no robust data to guide management of persistent or recurrent SUI after failed MUS, the aim of this study was to evaluate the management of these cases among IUGA members. METHODS: A pretested, web-based survey designed to explore assessment, surgical management and views about future research was sent to IUGA members. RESULTS: A total of 385 participants opened the survey and 331 eligible responses were obtained. Conventional laboratory urodynamics were the most commonly used investigation (72.6 %). The type of previous surgery, urodynamic findings and surgeon's preference/experience were considered to be the most important factors in choosing the type of surgical management. Retropubic sling (RPS) was the preferred surgical option in most of the clinical scenarios with urethral bulking agents (UBA) being more popular in the absence of urethral hypermobility after a failed RPS. While the vast majority of the respondents (93.0 %) recognized the urgent need for good quality research, they were less willing to participate in randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing redo MUS with autologous fascial sling or colposuspension. CONCLUSIONS: Members of IUGA prefer RPS in most patients and UBA in patients with absent urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. There is a recognized need for good quality research, but IUGA members are reluctant to participate in RCTs comparing minimally invasive to conventional surgical techniques.

What is the best surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence in the very young and very old? An International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society update.

An increasing number of continence procedures are being performed in women of all ages. An overview of the existing literature and consensus regarding surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the young and the old was presented and discussed at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society Think Tank. This manuscript reflects the Think Tank's summary and opinion. Despite the increasing number of continence procedures, there are relatively few data to guide management in the very young and the very old. When considering continence surgery in the young, long-term efficacy and safety are paramount, and the future effects of pregnancy and childbirth need to be carefully considered. Conversely, in the elderly, minimally invasive procedures with low morbidity are important, especially in the frail elderly who may have significant co-morbidities. Further research including prospective randomised trials, cohort studies and national registries, should help guide our management in these two challenging groups of patients.

Do patients with symptoms and signs of lower urinary tract dysfunction need a urodynamic diagnosis? ICI-RS 2013.

AIMS: The ICI-RS Think Tank discussed the diagnostic process for patients who present with symptoms and signs of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction. This manuscript reflects the Think Tank's summary and opinion. METHODS: An overview of the existing evidence and consensus regarding urodynamic testing was presented and discussed in relation to contemporary treatment strategies. RESULTS: Evidence of the validity of the diagnostic process in relation to the contemporary management paradigm is incomplete, scattered, and sometimes conflicting and therefore a process redesign may be necessary. The Think Tanks' suggestion, contained in this manuscript, is that the symptoms and signs that the patients present can be more precisely delineated as syndromes. The overactive bladder syndrome (OAB-S); the stress urinary incontinence syndrome (SUI-S); the urinary incontinence syndrome (UI-S); the voiding dysfunction syndrome (VD-S); and or the neurogenic LUT dysfunction syndrome (NLUTD-S) may become evidence based starting point for initial management. Consistent addition of the word syndrome, if adequately defined, acknowledges the uncertainty, but will improve outcome and will improve selection of patients that need further (invasive) diagnosis before management. CONCLUSIONS: The ICS-RS Think Tank has summarized the level of evidence for UDS and discussed the evidence in association with the currently changing management paradigm. The ICI-RS Think Tank recommends that the diagnostic process for patients with LUTD can be redesigned. Carefully delineated and evidence based LUTD syndromes may better indicate, personalize and improve the outcome of initial management, and may also contribute to improved and rational selection of patients for invasive UDS. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:581-586, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) position statement on the use of laser vaginal devices for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vaginal laxity, pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

One in three women will experience pelvic floor disorders in her lifetime and nearly 60 percent of postmenopausal women are affected by vaginal dryness. Conservative management is recommended as first line treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Also, vaginal estrogens are often prescribed for symptomatic vaginal atrophy. Lasers have been used in cosmetic industry for connective tissue remodeling and repair of skin. Their use in the last decade for treating genitourinary symptoms of menopause, pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence has gained popularity but there is lack of robust evidence to support its use in routine practice. The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology calls for high quality evidence with patient related outcome measures before adopting to routine clinical practice.

A national survey of UK practice for day-case vaginal prolapse surgery: Unrealistic expectations?

OBJECTIVE: The UK NHS Getting It Right First Time report (2021) recommended that a significant proportion of native tissue vaginal prolapse operations should be undertaken as day-case procedures (target: 80% anterior compartment, 70% posterior compartment, 60% combined anterior/posterior compartment). The evidence for perioperative care, options for anaesthesia and outcomes of day-case vaginal prolapse surgery is limited. This study aimed to establish current practice amongst UK gynaecologists and explore perceived barriers to implementing day-case surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Study design A pre-tested 16-item survey was emailed to British Society of Urogynaecology members in July 2022. This survey recorded rates of day-case prolapse surgeries, barriers to implementation and practices for managing urethral catheters, vaginal packs, intraoperative anaesthetics and perioperative care. Responses to free-text questions were independently analysed by two of the authors and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: 121 eligible responses were received (28 % response-rate): 41 % never undertook day-case prolapse repair, 16 % undertook < 5 per year and 26 % undertook > 20 cases per year. There was no significant difference in training level or hospital setting between those groups. Reasons cited for not undertaking day-case prolapse surgery included concerns about vaginal packs and urinary catheters (92 %) postoperative complications (67 %), early discharge of elderly patients (60 %) and a lack of published evidence (39 %) or national guidance (35 %). For those currently undertaking day-case prolapse surgery; 67 % used general anaesthesia, 15 % spinal with short-acting local anaesthetic, 14 % spinal with long-acting local anaesthetic and 3 % local anaesthetic alone. Vaginal packs and self-retaining urethral catheters were used by 68 % and 70 % respectively. Concerns regarding the management of vaginal packs and urinary catheters were the most frequently cited barrier to implementing day-case surgery for pelvic organ prolapse amongst free-text responses. There were wide variations in managing catheters and packs, and in managing readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in uptake and practice for day-case prolapse surgery in the UK, with legitimate clinical concerns a barrier to its implementation. Further evaluation and development of robust, evidence-based management pathways are required to make day-case prolapse surgery consistent, feasible and defensible in clinical practice.

Is there a difference between women with or without detrusor overactivity complaining of symptoms of overactive bladder?

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and what does the study add?: Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a highly prevalent medical condition, which is linked to the urodynamic observation of detrusor overactivity (DO). Urodynamics detect DO in about half of female patients with OAB. Our study detects significant differences between female patients with OAB with and without DO. DO could be considered as a more severe form in the wide OAB spectrum and the two terms should not be used interchangeably. The detected differences should be taken into account in the design of studies for the assessment of new selective or combination treatments of OAB and in the provision of treatment in everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are differences between female patients complaining of symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) with and without detrusor overactivity (DO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study was a cross-sectional study of consecutive women attending a one-stop urodynamic assessment clinic with OAB symptoms. The King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and a 3-day bladder diary incorporating the Patient's Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) were used to assess symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The participants underwent multichannel urodynamics (UDS) according to the International Continence Society (ICS) recommendations. Patients whose symptom of urgency was not reproduced during the laboratory test underwent a 4-h ambulatory UDS test. RESULTS: Of the 556 patients who were included in the study, 43% were diagnosed with DO by either laboratory (227/556) or ambulatory UDS (11/39). There was no difference between the groups in age, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status or the presence of prolapse. Patients with DO had a smaller functional bladder capacity (P < 0.001), higher urgency episode frequency (P < 0.001) and larger maximum and mean urge ratings (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in daytime or nocturnal micturitions between the groups. The presence of DO had a more negative impact on the quality of life, with a statistically significant difference between the groups in six of the domains of the KHQ. CONCLUSIONS: The present study detects objective and subjective differences between female patients with OAB with and without DO. Women with DO experience more significant impairment to their quality of life and have a greater degree of bladder dysfunction.