Determinants of the interindividual variability in serum cytidine deaminase activity of patients with solid tumours.

AIMS: Cytidine deaminase (CDA) activity in cancer patients' serum has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for efficacy and toxicity of nucleoside analogues. However, discrepant results about its predictive value have been reported due to the high interindividual variability in CDA activity. This study aimed at identifying determinants of this interindividual variability. METHODS: From December 2014 to November 2015, 183 patients were prospectively included. Serum CDA activity, biological and clinical characteristics as well as five common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CDA gene (c.-451C > T, c.-92A > G, c.-33_-31delC, c.79A > C, c.435 T > C) were analysed. Associations between clinical characteristics, pharmacogenetic variants and CDA activity were univariately tested. P < 0.1-candidate variables were analysed through a multivariate analysis. The association between CDA activity and toxicity was assessed for the 56 gemcitabine-treated patients. Intraindividual variability in CDA activity was explored in six pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine. RESULTS: Median CDA activity was 3.97 U mg-1 (range 1.53-15.49 U mg-1 ). A univariate analysis showed that CDA activity was statistically associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, mild or severe malnutrition, inflammatory syndrome, leucocyte count, neutrophil count, albumin, C-reactive protein and -c.-33_-31delC single nucleotide polymorphism. A multivariate analysis identified that only neutrophil count (P < 0.0001) and severe malnutrition (P = 0.0278) were independently associated with CDA activity. Low CDA activity (<2 U mg-1 ) was not statistically associated with severe gemcitabine-related toxicities (P = 0.16). A decrease in CDA activity was observed during the longitudinal follow-up of six pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neutrophil count and malnutrition should be considered for the interpretation of pretherapeutic CDA activity.

[Multidisciplinary and systematic preoperatory-assessment in geriatric urologic oncology surgery: Feasibility and results]. / Évaluation pluridisciplinaire préopératoire systématique en chirurgie cancérologique urologique gériatrique : faisabilité et résultats.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cancer increases with age, especially for urological cancers. The frailty of the elderly persons may expose them to more postoperative complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity or even increased mortality, and delayed or impossible return to normal life. In such cases, the benefit of surgery and therefore its realization can be questioned. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This article reports the experience of a pre-operative risk assessment in a population of elderly patients treated for urologic cancer. This retrospective study aims to report the feasibility and the main results of this systematic preoperative multi-professional evaluation. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and February 2017, 31 elderly patients were evaluated. The evaluation revealed: moderate to severe malnutrition in 59 % of cases, a patient judged from a geriatric point of view fit, intermediate or fragile in respectively 25 %, 35 % and 40 % of cases. This evaluation led to propose a modification of an element of care for 66 % of patients and to propose therapeutic abstention for only 3 patients. CONCLUSION: An evaluation whose purpose is to adapt to the physiological age of patients and their overall state of health, surgical treatment and postoperative management is feasible and seems to help unmask elements of fragility usually not detected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Use of chemotherapy near the end of life: what factors matter?

Background: Use of chemotherapy near the end of life in patients with metastatic cancer is often ineffective and toxic. Data about the factors associated with its use remain scarce, especially in Europe. Methods: Nationwide, register-based study including all hospitalized patients aged ≥20 years who died from metastatic solid tumors in France between 2010 and 2013. Results: A total of 279 846 hospitalized patients who died from metastatic cancer were included. During the last month before death, 19.5% received chemotherapy (including 11.3% during the last 2 weeks). Female sex (OR= 0.96, 95% CI= 0.93-0.98), older age (OR= 0.70, 95% CI= 0.69-0.71 for each 10-year increase) and higher number of chronic comorbidities (OR= 0.83, 95% CI= 0.82-0.84) were independently associated with lower rates of chemotherapy. Although patients with chemosensitive tumors were statistically more likely to receive chemotherapy during the last month before death (OR= 1.21, 1.18-1.25), this association was mostly fueled by testis and ovary tumors and we found no obvious pattern between the expected chemosensitivity of different cancers and the rates of chemotherapy use close to death. Compared with university hospitals, patients who died in for-profit clinics/hospital (OR= 1.40, 95% CI= 1.34-1.45), or comprehensive cancer centers (OR= 1.43, 95% CI= 1.36-1.50) were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Finally, high-volume centers and hospitals without palliative care units reported greater-than-average rates of chemotherapy near the end of life. Conclusion: among hospitalized patients with cancer, young individuals, treated in comprehensive cancer centers or in high-volume centers without palliative care units were the most likely to receive chemotherapy near the end of life. We found no evident pattern between the expected chemosensitivity of different cancers and the probability for patients to receive chemotherapy close to death.

[Advance directives in dermato-oncology: The current situation and future prospects]. / Directives anticipées en dermato-oncologie : situation actuelle et perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Patient information and advance directives (AD) are described in the French laws of 4 March 2002 and 22 April 2005, which concern the decisions of subjects regarding end-of-life treatment. At present, practitioners rarely seek the opinion of patients on this matter. The Claeys-Leonetti law requires doctors to identify any advance directives by patients, which are binding upon medical staff. The present study sought to analyse the extent of application of the laws of 2002 and 2005 and to collect the observations of clinicians in dermato-oncology regarding the new legislation. METHODS: We contacted members of the French dermato-oncology group by email and asked them to assess their practices with regard to information provision, patient surrogates and advance directives. RESULTS: To 111 requests we received 34 replies from hospital dermatologists, i.e. a response rate of 31 %. In all, 85 % of clinicians informed patients with metastasis that their disease was incurable, and 94 % stated that they have procedures in place concerning the appointment of a patient surrogate. One third of respondents reported having a procedure in place for provision of information or collection of advance directives. According to 91 % of clinicians, the binding nature of advance directives did not constitute any loss of chance for the patient in question; 59 % felt that the new law would affect their practices, but of these, paradoxically, 60 % felt that this would have no impact on their therapeutic decision-making. In all, 26 clinicians (76.5 %) did not intend to modify their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: The law of 2002 is generally better known than that of 2005. Dermato-oncologists are not aware of the practical consequences of the new binding nature of advance directives with regard to the doctor-patient relationship and the actual decision-making process.

Role of the lean body mass and of pharmacogenetic variants on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib is a multikinase inhibitor active in various cancers types including renal cancers and endocrine tumors. The study analyzed the influence of the lean body mass (LBM) and of pharmacogenetic variants on the exposure to sunitinib and its active metabolite, SU12662, and on sunitinib toxicity and clinical activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 was assessed on days 10 and 21 during the first treatment cycle. Acute toxicity was graded using the NCI 4.0 CTCAE ver. 4.0. The LBM and 14 common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP3A4/3A5, NR1I2, NR1I3, ABCB1, and ABCG2 genes were analyzed according to the drug exposure at day 10. Determinants (including sunitinib exposure and pharmacogenetic variants) for toxicities were assessed, as well as the relationship between drug exposure and survival in renal cancer patients. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (60 % with renal cancer) were assessable for pharmacokinetics, toxicity and survival, and 66 for genetic analysis. The LBM (p < 0.0001) and a polymorphism in the ABCG2 transporter (421C>A) (p = 0.014) were two independent parameters accounting for the variability of composite (sunitinib + SU12662) exposure. Advanced age (OR = 1.47 [1.01-2.15], p = 0.048) and high sunitinib exposure (OR = 1.16 [1.05-1.28], p = 0.005) were independently associated with any grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, and high SU12662 exposure was associated with grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia (OR = 1.27 [1.03-1.57], p = 0.028). A high composite area under the curve (AUC) >1,973 ng/mL∙h at day 21 was associated with a doubled survival (35.2 vs 16.7 months; log-rank p = 0.0051) in renal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that LBM and drug monitoring may be helpful in the management of sunitinib-treated patients.

A phase I schedule dependency study of the aurora kinase inhibitor MSC1992371A in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: MSC1992371A is an aurora kinase inhibitor with potential antitumor activity. METHODS: This trial established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of oral MSC1992371A given before or after gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) in a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced malignancies. In schedule 1 (n = 31), gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 followed by escalating doses of MSC1992371A on days 2 and 9. In schedule 2 (n = 35), MSC1992371A was given on days 1 and 8 followed by gemcitabine on days 2 and 9. Patients had a range of solid tumors, the most frequent of which was colorectal (n = 19). RESULTS: In both schedules, the 37 mg/m(2) dose level was defined as the MTD. The main DLT was grade 4 neutropenia. Adverse events consisted of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, asthenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea. Administration of MSC1992371A prior to gemcitabine had no effect on the metabolism or elimination of gemcitabine. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for MSC1992371A increased proportionally with dose. Exploration of drug-target-related and tumor biomarkers did not identify predictors of biologic activity or response. Two patients (1 with lung carcinoma and 1 with hepatocellular carcinoma) had durable partial responses in schedule 2, and 5 patients had stable disease (SD) lasting 6 - 14 months. CONCLUSION: Oral MSC1992371A can be administered at a MTD of 37 mg/m(2) in combination with the standard 1,000 mg/m(2) dose of gemcitabine, but hematologic toxicity requires careful monitoring. Preliminary signs of efficacy were indicated by durable responses and SD.

Sarcopenia and body mass index predict sunitinib-induced early dose-limiting toxicities in renal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on factors predicting sunitinib toxicity. Recently, the condition of low muscle mass, named sarcopenia, was identified as a significant predictor of toxicity in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated whether sarcopenia could predict early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurrence in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. METHODS: Consecutive mRCC patients treated with sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. A DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. Body composition was evaluated using CT scan obtained within 1 month before treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 61 patients eligible for analysis, 52.5% were sarcopenic and 32.8% had both sarcopenia and a body mass index (BMI)<25 kg m(-2). Eighteen patients (29.5%) experienced a DLT during the first cycle. Sarcopenic patients with a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced more DLTs (P=0.01; odds ratio=4.1; 95% CI: (1.3-13.3)), more cumulative grade 2 or 3 toxicities (P=0.008), more grade 3 toxicities (P=0.04) and more acute vascular toxicities (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Patients with sarcopenia and a BMI<25 kg m(-2) experienced significantly more DLTs during the first cycle of treatment.

Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a critical role for pharmacokinetics?

BACKGROUND: Inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability can lead to suboptimal drug exposure, and therefore might impact the efficacy of sorafenib. This study reports long-term pharmacokinetic monitoring of patients treated with sorafenib and a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis in melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Heavily pretreated patients with stage IV melanoma were started on sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (bid). In the absence of limiting toxicity, dose escalation of 200 mg bid levels was done every 2 weeks. Plasma sorafenib measurement was performed at each visit, allowing a retrospective pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic analysis for safety and efficacy. RESULTS: In all, 19 of 30 patients underwent dose escalation over 400 mg bid, and 28 were evaluable for response. The overall disease control rate was 61% (95% confidence interval (CI): 42.6-78.8), including three confirmed responses (12%). Disease control rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were improved in patients with high vs low exposure (80% vs 32%, P=0.02, and 5.25 vs 2.5 months, P=0.005, hazard ratio (HR)=0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.73)). In contrast, drug dosing had no effect on PFS. In multivariate analysis, drug exposure was the only factor associated with PFS (HR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.13-0.99)). Diarrhoea and anorexia were correlated with drug dosing, while hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction were correlated with drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Although sorafenib had modest efficacy in melanoma, these results suggest a correlation between exposure and efficacy of sorafenib. Therefore, dose optimisation in patients with low exposure at standard doses should be evaluated in validated indications.

Immunogenicity and safety of the influenza A H1N1v 2009 vaccine in cancer patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy: the VACANCE study.

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended to cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but vaccine coverage remains low. During the 2009 influenza pandemic, French recommendations were to vaccinate immunocompromised patients with two doses of adjuvanted vaccine. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine immunogenicity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VACANCE is a prospective open-label study that evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of two doses of AS03A-adjuvanted H1N1v vaccine in cancer patients receiving cytotoxic and/or targeted therapies. Serum haemagglutination-inhibited antibody titres against influenza A H1N1v were measured at days 1, 21, and 42, to estimate the proportion of participants with antibody titres ≥ 1 : 40 [seroprotection rate (SPR)], the efficacy of seroconversion, and factors that increased the geometric mean titre. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included. At baseline, 5% of patients had vaccine strain titres of specific haemagglutination inhibition antibodies that were ≥ 1 : 40. After one and two doses of vaccine, SPRs were 48% and 73%, respectively, and seroconversion rates were 44% and 73%, respectively. Vaccine-related adverse events were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of AS03-adjuvanted A/H1N1 vaccine triggered a low immune response in cancer patients on chemotherapy depending on their treatment type and frequency. Two doses are needed for these cancer patients.

Efficacy of venlafaxine for the prevention and relief of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: results of EFFOX, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity is dose limiting and may present as acute symptoms and/or cumulative peripheral neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to May 2008, patients with oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity were randomized into a double-blind study, to receive either venlafaxine 50 mg 1 h prior oxaliplatin infusion and venlafaxine extended release 37.5 mg b.i.d. from day 2 to day 11 or placebo. Neurotoxicity was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity and experienced relief under treatment, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and the oxaliplatin-specific neurotoxicity scale. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 100% relief under treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (27 males, median age: 67.6 years). Most patients had colorectal cancer (72.9%). Median number of cycles administered at inclusion was 4.5 (mean cumulative oxaliplatin dose: 684.6 mg). Twenty out of 24 patients in arm A (venlafaxine) and 22 out of 24 patients in arm B (placebo) were assessable for neurotoxicity. Based on the NRS, full relief was more frequent in the venlafaxine arm: 31.3% versus 5.3% (P=0.03). Venlafaxine side-effects included grade 1-2 nausea (43.1%) and asthenia (39.2%) without grade 3-4 events. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine has clinical activity against oxaliplatin-induced acute neurosensory toxicity.

Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic bone disease are living longer in the metastatic stage due to improvements in cancer therapy, making strategies to prevent the aggravation of bone disease and its complications, such as skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, increasingly important. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: In this phase 3 trial in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma, denosumab reduced the risk of radiation to bone by 22% relative to zoledronic acid (P = 0.026), prevented worsening of pain and pain interference (2-point increase in Brief Pain Inventory score; P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid), and reduced the frequency of a shift from no/weak opioid analgesic use to strong opioids (P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid at months 3-5). Denosumab delayed the time to moderate-to-severe pain compared with zoledronic acid in patients with mild or no pain at the baseline (P = 0.04), supporting early treatment. Health-related quality-of-life scores were similar in both groups. The number needed to treat to avoid one SRE for denosumab was 3 patient-years versus placebo and 10 patient-years versus zoledronic acid. CONCLUSION: The use of denosumab was associated with better prevention of the complications of metastatic bone disease secondary to solid tumors or multiple myeloma versus zoledronic acid.

Tumor invasion induced by oxidative stress is dependent on membrane ADAM 9 protein and its secreted form.

Oxidative stress plays a role in the regulation of cancer cell metastasis which involves cell invasion and adhesion that could be supported by ADAM proteins through the activities of their metalloprotease and disintegrin domains. We hypothesized that oxidative stress could act through the induction of ADAM9 protein in some cancer cells. Indeed, Western blot analysis for ADAM9 performed on A549 cells exposed to H(2) O(2) reveals a dose-dependent induction of two proteins (80 and 68 kDa) correlated with a sharp increase of the ADAM protease activity measured in supernatant while the activity measured on the cell layer was slightly affected. The 80kDa protein corresponds to the mature form of ADAM9. Immunoprecipitation analysis performed on concentrated supernatants revealed that the 68 kDa protein is a secreted form of ADAM9. When exposed to H(2) O(2) , A549 cells cocultured with confluent endothelial vascular cells resulted in a 5.5 fold (p < 0.001) increase in the number of adherent cells. Similarly, matrigel assay revealed a 3.25 fold (p < 0.01) increase in the number of invasive cells. The suppression of ADAM9 expression by specific small interfering RNA reduced oxidative stress-induced invasiveness and adhesiveness. These functions could be mediated by an interaction between ADAM9 and ß1 integrin because each of them were inhibited when the experiment is performed in presence of mAbs targeting ADAM9 ectodomain or ß1-integrin. These results emphasize the importance of oxidative stress in the regulation of cancer cell metastasis and suggest that ADAM9 and its secreted isoform can be important determinants in the ability of cancer cells to disseminate.

Phase I study of BIBF 1120 with docetaxel and prednisone in metastatic chemo-naive hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: BIBF 1120 is an oral, potent, tyrosine kinase inhibitor that simultaneously targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptors α and ß, and fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3, as well as FLT3 and Src. Currently, the molecule is in phase III development for second-line non-small cell lung cancer and first-line ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: This phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety and maximum tolerated dose of continuous daily treatment with BIBF 1120 plus standard-dose docetaxel (75 mg m(-2), every 3 weeks) and prednisone (5 mg BID) in patients with metastatic, chemo-naive, hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Secondary objectives were characterisation of BIBF 1120 and docetaxel pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumour activity. RESULTS: Patients received BIBF 1120 100 mg BID (n=3), 150 mg BID (n=3), 200 mg BID (n=3), and 250 mg BID (n=12). The most frequent drug-related adverse events were diarrhoea (71.4%), asthenia (61.9%), nausea (28.6%), vomiting (28.6%), and alopecia (23.8%). The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg BID of BIBF 1120. Overall, reversible grade 3/4 liver enzyme elevations occurred in six of twelve patients at this dose level. Among 19 assessable patients, 13 (68.4%) showed a ≥50% reduction in prostate serum antigen levels from baseline and among 6 evaluable patients with measurable lesions 1 patient experienced a partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours criteria. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no interactions between BIBF 1120 and docetaxel/prednisone. CONCLUSION: Based on the overall safety profile, 200 mg BID was the recommended dose for the combination of BIBF 1120 with the standard dose of 75 mg m(-2) of docetaxel and prednisone that might be further investigated in HRPC patients. This combination was well tolerated, with preliminary signs of efficacy and no indication of PK interaction between BIBF 1120 and docetaxel.

Low immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine among patients receiving docetaxel for a solid tumour: results of a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving cytotoxic therapy for solid tumours are at risk of severe influenza. However, few data are available regarding the immunogenical efficacy of influenza vaccine in these patients. METHODS: In this prospective study, 25 patients with breast (n=13) or prostate (n=12) cancer received a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine along with docetaxel (Taxotere) administration. The influenza virus type A and B antibody titres were measured using haemagglutinin inhibition (Garten et al, 2009) before and 21 days after the vaccination. Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of patients with an increase in the serum titres ≥ 4 after vaccination. RESULTS: Median age was 65 years (range: 33-87 years); 52% were females. Seroconversion rates were low: 28% (95% CI: 23.1-33.3) for H1N1, 8% (95% CI: 7.7-8.3) for H3N2 and 16% (95% CI: 7.7-25) for the B strain. The geometric mean titres ratios were 2.16 (H1N1), 1.3 (H3N2) and 1.58 (B). No serious adverse event (AE) related to the vaccine was reported. All the reported AE were from mild-to-moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: In the patients receiving docetaxel for solid tumours, influenza vaccine triggers an immune response in only one third. Strategies using more immunogenic influenza vaccines must be evaluated in such patients.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is as chemosensitive as non-pregnancy-associated breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the chemosensitivity of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) in the neoadjuvant setting by comparing the observed pathological complete response (pCR) rate with the rate predicted by a validated nomogram. METHODS: Data from 48 PABC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were collected. To predict the response rate to chemotherapy, we used well-calibrated logistic regression-based nomograms to calculate individual probability of pCR. RESULTS: Observed rates of pCR were concordant with predictions in the whole sample and in the analyzed subgroups. For the whole sample, the area under the receiver-operated curve (AUC) was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.87). The calibration of predicted and observed probabilities was excellent. In the subgroup analyses (NACT initiated during pregnancy or postpartum, NACT with only anthracycline or both anthracycline and taxanes), discriminations assessed by AUC were significantly above 0.5, except for patients treated with anthracycline only. The interpretation was limited by a lack of power. CONCLUSION: Through the use of nomograms, our study demonstrates that PABC is as chemosensitive as non-PABC and suggests that taxanes should be part of the NACT regimen for PABC. Further studies are warranted to increase the power of the presented data.

[Use of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular or renal carcinoma]. / Bon usage du sorafénib chez les patients pris en charge pour un carcinome hépatocellulaire ou un cancer du rein.

Therapeutic approaches of cancers have been recently improved by the development of targeted therapies. Amongst these new drugs, some anti-angiogenic molecules have been approved by either the EMEA or the Food and Drug Administration. Sorafenib, one of these inhibitors of angiogenesis, has been established as the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular and renal carcinoma. This paper reviews the safety profile of sorafenib and presents guidelines for the prevention and the treatment of the main side effects associated with this molecule.