Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 114
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 2023 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938386

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To validate an AI system for standalone breast cancer detection on an entire screening population in comparison to first-reading breast radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All mammography screenings performed between August 4, 2014, and August 15, 2018, in the Region of Southern Denmark with follow-up within 24 months were eligible. Screenings were assessed as normal or abnormal by breast radiologists through double reading with arbitration. For an AI decision of normal or abnormal, two AI-score cut-off points were applied by matching at mean sensitivity (AIsens) and specificity (AIspec) of first readers. Accuracy measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and recall rate (RR). RESULTS: The sample included 249,402 screenings (149,495 women) and 2033 breast cancers (72.6% screen-detected cancers, 27.4% interval cancers). AIsens had lower specificity (97.5% vs 97.7%; p < 0.0001) and PPV (17.5% vs 18.7%; p = 0.01) and a higher RR (3.0% vs 2.8%; p < 0.0001) than first readers. AIspec was comparable to first readers in terms of all accuracy measures. Both AIsens and AIspec detected significantly fewer screen-detected cancers (1166 (AIsens), 1156 (AIspec) vs 1252; p < 0.0001) but found more interval cancers compared to first readers (126 (AIsens), 117 (AIspec) vs 39; p < 0.0001) with varying types of cancers detected across multiple subgroups. CONCLUSION: Standalone AI can detect breast cancer at an accuracy level equivalent to the standard of first readers when the AI threshold point was matched at first reader specificity. However, AI and first readers detected a different composition of cancers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Replacing first readers with AI with an appropriate cut-off score could be feasible. AI-detected cancers not detected by radiologists suggest a potential increase in the number of cancers detected if AI is implemented to support double reading within screening, although the clinicopathological characteristics of detected cancers would not change significantly. KEY POINTS: • Standalone AI cancer detection was compared to first readers in a double-read mammography screening population. • Standalone AI matched at first reader specificity showed no statistically significant difference in overall accuracy but detected different cancers. • With an appropriate threshold, AI-integrated screening can increase the number of detected cancers with similar clinicopathological characteristics.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 580, 2023 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37670282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many factors determine empirical antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to describe the empirical antibiotic treatment CAP patients with an acute hospital visit and to determine if the current treatment algorithm provided specific and sufficient coverage against Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Clamydophila pneumoniae (LMC). METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional, multicenter study of all adults with an acute hospital visit in the Region of Southern Denmark between January 2016 and March 2018 was performed. Using medical records, we retrospectively identified the empirical antibiotic treatment and the microbiological etiology for CAP patients. CAP patients who were prescribed antibiotics within 24 h of admission and with an identified bacterial pathogen were included. The prescribed empirical antibiotic treatment and its ability to provide specific and sufficient coverage against LMC pneumonia were determined. RESULTS: Of the 19,133 patients diagnosed with CAP, 1590 (8.3%) patients were included in this study. Piperacillin-tazobactam and Beta-lactamase sensitive penicillins were the most commonly prescribed empirical treatments, 515 (32%) and 388 (24%), respectively. Our analysis showed that 42 (37%, 95% CI: 28-47%) of 113 patients with LMC pneumonia were prescribed antibiotics with LMC coverage, and 42 (12%, 95% CI: 8-15%) of 364 patients prescribed antibiotics with LMC coverage had LMC pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Piperacillin-tazobactam, a broad-spectrum antibiotic recommended for uncertain infectious focus, was the most frequent CAP treatment and prescribed to every third patient. In addition, the current empirical antibiotic treatment accuracy was low for LMC pneumonia. Therefore, future research should focus on faster diagnostic tools for identifying the infection focus and precise microbiological testing.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Legionella pneumophila , Pneumonia , Humans , Adult , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Emergency Service, Hospital
3.
Acta Radiol ; 64(2): 814-820, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35297745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation is a promising minimally invasive, nephron-sparing treatment of small renal carcinoma (RCC) in co-morbid patients. PURPOSE: To assess the safety, efficacy, and cancer-specific outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided cryoablation of stage T1 (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 122 consecutive patients with 128 tumors treated with cryoablation during 2016-2017. All patients had biopsy-verified T1 RCC. RESULTS: Median age was 69 years (IQR=59-76); 69% were male. Median tumor size was 26 mm (± 20-33); 9% were stage T1b. Mean follow-up time was 36.3±12.0 months. In total, 14 (11%) procedures led to complications, of which 4 (3%) were intraoperative, 5 (4%) appeared ≤30 days and 5 (4%) >30 days after treatment. Major complications arose after 4 (3%) procedures. Statistically significant associations were found between major complications and stage T1b (P = 0.039), RENAL score (P = 0.010), and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.004). Residual tumor was detected after 4 (3%) procedures and 5 (4%) tumors had local tumor progression. Of 122 patients, 3 (2%) advanced to metastatic disease. Significant statistical associations were found between local tumor progression and T1b stage tumors and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.05 and P = 0.004, respectively). For patients with T1a tumors, the one- and three-year disease-free survival was 98% and 95%, respectively, and for T1b 100% after one year and 75% after three years. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment of stage T1 RCC and suggests that in selecting candidates for cryoablation of RCC, the tumor characteristics are more critical than patients' baseline health status.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Cryosurgery , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Aged , Female , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
4.
Eur Radiol ; 32(7): 4667-4678, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122492

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of pre-cryoablation biopsy for small renal masses (SRMs) and the effects of increasing uptake on histological results of treated SRMs. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, patients with sporadic T1N0M0 SRMs undergoing percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open cryoablation from 14 European institutions within the European Registry for Renal Cryoablation (EuRECA) were included for the retrospective analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used to evaluate the trends, histological results, and the factors influencing use of pre-cryoablation biopsy. RESULTS: In total, 871 patients (median (IQR) age, 69 (14), 298 women) undergoing cryoablation were evaluated. The use of pre-cryoablation biopsy has significantly increased from 42% (65/156) in 2015 to 72% (88/122) in 2019 (p < 0.001). Patients treated for a benign histology are significantly more likely to have presented later in the trend, where pre-cryoablation biopsy is more prevalent (OR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81, p < 0.001). Patients treated for undiagnosed histology are also significantly less likely to have presented in 2018 compared to 2016 (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.97, p = 0.044). Patients aged 70+ are less likely to be biopsies pre-cryoablation (p < 0.05). R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of 10+ and a Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 are factors associated with lower likelihood to not have received a pre-cryoablation biopsy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An increased use of pre-cryoablation biopsy was observed and cryoablation patients treated with a benign histology are more likely to have presented in periods where pre-cryoablation biopsy is not as prevalent. Comparative studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the effect of pre-cryoablation biopsy on SRM treatments. KEY POINTS: • The use of biopsy pre-ablation session has increased significantly from 42% of all patients in 2015 to 74% in 2019. • Patients are less likely to be treated for a benign tumour if they presented later in the trend, where pre-cryoablation biopsy is more prevalent, compared to later in the trend (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81, p < 0.001). • Patients with comorbidities or a complex tumour (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score > 10) are less likely to not undergo biopsy as a separate session to cryoablation.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Cryosurgery , Kidney Neoplasms , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Cryosurgery/methods , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 33(11): 1375-1383.e7, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842025

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess and compare complications and readmissions after partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for cT1 RCC between 2019 and 2021 were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Complications recorded within 30 and 90 days were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and percutaneous cryoablation was graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification of adverse events. Major complications were defined as complications with a grade of ≥3 based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Readmission within 30 days was recorded. RESULTS: The cohort included 86 partial nephrectomies and 104 cryoablations. The complication rate within 90 days was 23% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation (P = .98), with major complication rates of 3% after partial nephrectomy and 10% after cryoablation (P = .15). The readmission rates were 14% and 11% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation, respectively (P = .48). Double-J stents were associated with overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 9.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18-44.68; P = .003) and readmissions (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.37-21.06; P = .015) after cryoablation. A high versus low radius-endophytic-nearness-anterior-location score (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.08-31.81; P = .040) and endophytic location (OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.72-34.50; P = .008) were associated with a higher complication rate after cryoablation. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with major complications after partial nephrectomy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.30; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy and cryoablation are comparable regarding complications within 90 days after treatment. Tumor complexity and double-J stents were associated with complications after cryoablation, and a high CCI was associated with complications after partial nephrectomy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Cryosurgery , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Cryosurgery/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery
6.
Ann Fam Med ; 20(3): 211-219, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606122

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Researchers aimed to describe general practitioners' understanding of appropriate ultrasound use, to record actual scanning practices of early adopters in general practice, and to identify differences between attitudes and actual practice via a mixed methods analysis. METHODS: This study was part of a larger multistage mixed methods research framework exploring the use of ultrasound in general practice in Denmark. We used an exploratory sequential approach in the data collection with initial qualitative findings from an interview study applied to building a quantitative questionnaire utilized in a cohort study. In addition, we merged the qualitative and quantitative data using joint display analysis to compare and contrast the results from the 2 stages of the study. RESULTS: In the interviews, general practitioners described appropriate ultrasound use as point-of-care examinations with a clear purpose and limited to predefined specific conditions within delimited anatomic areas. They stated that general practitioners should receive formalized ultrasound training and be skilled in the examinations they perform. In the cohort study, general practitioners performed ultrasound examinations of anatomic areas with or without a defined clinical suspicion. Some performed ultrasound examinations for which they had no previous training or skills. CONCLUSIONS: We found a difference between the ideas about the appropriate uses for ultrasound in general practice and the actual use by early adopters in clinical practice. Our findings suggest a need for evidence-based guidelines to support general practitioners in choosing which examinations to perform and strategies for developing and maintaining scanning competency.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Humans , Primary Health Care , Ultrasonography
7.
Acta Radiol ; 63(3): 336-344, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33663246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (ULD-CT) could improve detection of acute chest conditions. PURPOSE: To determine (i) whether diagnostic accuracy of ULD-CT is superior to supine chest X-ray (sCXR) for acute chest conditions and (ii) the feasibility of ULD-CT in an emergency department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1 February to 31 July 2019, 91 non-traumatic patients from the Emergency Department were prospectively enrolled in the study if they received an sCXR. An ULD-CT and a non-contrast chest CT (NCCT) scan were then performed. Three radiologists assessed the sCXR and ULD-CT examinations for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion. Resources and effort were compared for sCXR and ULD-CT to evaluate feasibility. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for sCXR and ULD-CT using NCCT as the reference standard. RESULTS: The mean effective dose of ULD-CT was 0.05±0.01 mSv. For pleural effusion and cardiogenic pulmonary edema, no difference in diagnostic accuracy between ULD-CT and sCXR was observed. For pneumonia and pneumothorax, sensitivities were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69-100) and 50% (95% CI 7-93) for ULD-CT and 60% (95% CI 26-88) and 0% (95% CI 0-0) for sCXR, respectively. Median examination time was 10 min for ULD-CT vs. 5 min for sCXR (P<0.001). For ULD-CT 1-2 more staff members were needed compared to sCXR (P<0.001). ULD-CT was rated more challenging to perform than sCXR (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: ULD-CT seems equal or better in detecting acute chest conditions compared to sCXR. However, ULD-CT examinations demand more effort and resources.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Exposure , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Reference Standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
8.
Ultraschall Med ; 43(1): 72-81, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32259873

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is utilized in an increasing array of medical fields, including thoracic medicine. However, the technique is still relatively new and only sporadically mentioned in current guidelines and recommendations. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a literature overview and to critically appraise the current clinical applications of contrast-enhanced thoracic ultrasound (CETUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search using major electronic databases and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies with a primary focus on CETUS of thoracic disorders compared to a standard reference test were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. RESULTS: The search identified 43 articles: 1 randomized controlled study, 6 non-randomized controlled studies, 16 non-randomized non-controlled studies, 5 case series, 10 single case reports, and 5 animal studies. The overall risk of bias was judged to be high. Diagnostic accuracy measurements of noninvasive applications of CETUS were only reported in a few studies and they were too dissimilar for meta-analysis. Six studies compared CETUS-guided versus ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of thoracic masses. They individually reported a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy in favor of CETUS guidance but were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: The current literature on CETUS is overall heterogeneous with a few high evidence level studies, small study populations and a high risk of bias. CETUS-guided biopsy is the most frequent clinical application and increases diagnostic accuracy compared to ultrasound guidance by an average of 14.6 percentage points.


Subject(s)
Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Contrast Media , Humans
9.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 147(3): 1011-1019, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32679209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is a global health problem. Different allergen immunotherapy regimes are marketed but have low adherence because they are expensive, complex, and time-consuming. New allergen immunotherapy forms are needed. OBJECTIVE: In a 3-year follow-up double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of intralymphatic allergen immunotherapy (ILIT). METHODS: Patients with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were treated with 3 ILIT injections and an ILIT booster 1 year later, 3 ILIT injections and a placebo booster, or 3 placebo injections and a placebo booster. Primary outcome was improvement in a combined symptom and medication score (cSMS). A novel evaluation tool with a linear regression model of cSMS and grass pollen counts was developed. Secondary outcomes were changes in grass specific immunoglobulins and skin and nasal provocation tests to grass pollen. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were included. Log10-transformed cSMS was reduced by 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.49; P = .002), equaling 48.5% (95% CI, 24.5%-62%), in the entire 3-year follow-up period, significant only in the first follow-up season but not in the second and third seasons. The regression model showed a 37% (P < .001) reduction in cSMS. The booster injection 1 year later had no additional effect. Secondary, repeated measures of IgE and IgG4 to grass showed significant between-group difference and within-group change in the ILIT groups. No change in provocation test results was found. CONCLUSIONS: ILIT gives a substantial reduction in grass pollen allergy symptoms and use of rescue medication, significant in the first season after treatment. A booster injection had no additional effect.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic/therapy , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intralymphatic , Male , Placebo Effect , Poaceae/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
10.
Respiration ; 100(1): 34-43, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454705

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As ultrasound becomes more accessible, the use of point-of-care ultrasound examinations performed by clinicians has increased. Sufficient theoretical and practical skills are prerequisites to integrate thoracic ultrasound into a clinical setting and to use it as supplement in the clinical decision-making. Recommendations on how to educate and train clinicians for these ultrasound examinations are debated, and simulation-based training may improve clinical performance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound compared to training on healthy volunteers. METHOD: A total of 66 physicians with no previous experience in thoracic ultrasound completed a training program and assessment of competences from November 2018 to May 2019. After a theoretical session in ultrasound physics, sonoanatomy, and thoracic ultrasound, the physicians were randomized into one of three groups for practical training: (1) simulation-based training, (2) training on a healthy volunteer, or (3) no training (control group). Primary outcome was difference in the clinical performance score after the training period. RESULTS: Using a multiple comparison, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, there was no statistical significant difference between the two trained groups' performance score: 45.1 points versus 41.9 points (minimum 17 points, maximum 68 points; p = 0.38). The simulation-based training group scored significantly higher than the control group without hands-on training, 36.7 points (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The use of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound does not improve the clinical performance score compared to conventional training on healthy volunteers. As focused, thoracic ultrasound is a relatively uncomplicated practical procedure when taught; focus should mainly be on the theoretical part and the supervised clinical training in a curriculum. However, simulation can be used instead or as an add-on to training on simulated patients.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation , Education, Medical, Continuing , Education , Respiratory Tract Diseases/diagnosis , Simulation Training/methods , Ultrasonography , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Education/methods , Education/standards , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Educational Measurement , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Point-of-Care Testing , Program Evaluation , Thoracic Diseases/diagnosis , Ultrasonography/methods , Ultrasonography/standards
11.
Ultraschall Med ; 42(2): 154-166, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307594

ABSTRACT

The well-established Bosniak renal cyst classification is based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography determining the malignant potential of cystic renal lesions. Ultrasound has not been incorporated into this pathway. However, the development of ultrasound contrast agents coupled with the superior resolution of ultrasound makes it possible to redefine the imaging of cystic renal lesions. In this position statement, an EFSUMB Expert Task Force reviews, analyzes, and describes the accumulated knowledge and limitations and presents the current position on the use of ultrasound contrast agents in the evaluation of cystic renal lesions.


Subject(s)
Cysts , Kidney Diseases, Cystic , Kidney Neoplasms , Contrast Media , Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
12.
Ultraschall Med ; 41(2): 148-156, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414162

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for identifying frequent conditions in the post-operative phase after lung transplantation (LTx). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and clinical ability of LUS to identify pulmonary complications such as pleural effusions and pneumonias in the early postoperative phase after LTx. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients who consecutively underwent single LTx (SLTx) or double LTx (DLTx) at the National Lung Transplantation Center in Denmark from May 1 to October 31, 2015 was conducted. LUS was performed at four time points corresponding to post-transplant day 3, and weeks 2, 6, and 12 (LUS #1-4) to detect and monitor variation in pathological LUS findings over time. Concurrent with LUS #4, a high-resolution computed tomography examination of the thorax (HRCT) was also performed. RESULTS: 14 patients (1 SLTx/13 DLTx, 7 (50 %) women, mean age: 50.4 years) who had undergone the four prespecified LUS examinations were included. Pleural effusion was the most common condition and most pronounced at post-LTx week 2. Findings consistent with pneumonia increased during week 2 and subsequently decreased. Corresponding to LUS #1, 2, 3, and 4, pleural effusion occurred in 85.7 %, 92.9 %, 85.7 %, and 78.6 %, and pneumonia in 21.4 %, 28.6 %, 14.3 %, and 14.3 %, respectively. HRCT findings at post-LTx week 12 were predominantly presented by unspecific ground glass opacities. CONCLUSION: In a post-LTx setting, LUS represents a clinical novelty as a feasible diagnostic and monitoring tool to identify pathological pulmonary complications in the early post-operative phase.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Lung , Denmark , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography
13.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 98(9): 1139-1147, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30970147

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Deep infiltrating endometriosis is a common cause of pelvic pain. However, some patients have limited problems that may be controlled by medical treatment, so avoiding the potentially severe complications of major surgery. This approach requires detailed knowledge on quality of life and clinical symptoms over time. The aim of the study was to monitor these parameters in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis treated with oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, and/or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Moreover, nodule size measurements performed with transvaginal sonography were correlated to severity of symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Conservatively treated patients on oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device underwent transvaginal sonography and answered a self-administered questionnaire regarding clinical symptoms and quality of life (Short Form 36 and Endometriosis Health Profile 30) at baseline, and 6 and 12 months later. RESULTS: Eighty women completed the follow up. Scores of quality of life were comparable to normative data for Danish women of similar age and did not change with time. No association between change in size of the rectosigmoid nodule and change in symptoms was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that simple treatment with oral contraceptives, oral gestagens, or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device represents a viable therapeutic approach to rectosigmoid Deep infiltrating endometriosis, provided that proper selection of patients in need of surgery exists.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Contraceptives, Oral/therapeutic use , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Progestins/therapeutic use , Rectal Diseases/drug therapy , Sigmoid Diseases/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Denmark , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rectal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Sigmoid Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Respiration ; 97(4): 329-336, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30404101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical lung ultrasound (LUS) is a fast bedside diagnostic tool which can assist clinicians in decisions regarding the treatment and monitoring of patients with respiratory symptoms. LUS training and education differ widely, and is often done in a clinical setting, with potential risks for patients if decisions are made based on the wrong interpretations. No clear guidelines or recommendations for objective and standardized assessment of LUS skills exist, and those that do are often based on a fixed time-frame or an arbitrary number of examinations performed; this does not ensure adequate competencies. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to develop and gather validity evidence for a practical, simulation-based test in LUS. METHODS: Nine cases were developed in collaboration with 3D Systems Healthcare, Littleton, CO, USA, representing the most common diagnosis and sonographic findings in patients with respiratory symptoms. Thirty-six participants with different levels of competence in LUS, completed the test. The participants were divided into groups, i.e., novices, intermediates, and experienced, according to their experience with LUS, the number of examinations they had performed, and any research they had conducted. Their answers were used for item analyses. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbachs' α, was 0.69 summarized, and there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the novices and the trained participants (intermediates and experienced). A pass/fail score of 16 points was calculated according to the contrasting-groups method. CONCLUSION: We developed a test for the assessment of clinical competencies in LUS. The test proved solid validity evidence, and a pass/fail standard without any false-negatives, and only 2 explained false-positives.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Educational Measurement/standards , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Simulation Training/standards , Ultrasonography/standards , Adult , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Point-of-Care Testing , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
15.
Respiration ; 98(3): 221-229, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for many common pulmonary diseases, but theoretic knowledge in sonographic physics, thoracic anatomy and physiology, and sonopathologic patterns is required to develop competence. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to develop and gather validity evidence for a theoretical test in TUS and to establish a pass/fail standard. METHODS: Content was provided based on expert interviews, leading to the creation of 113 initial multiple-choice question (MCQ) items. Consensus was reached on 92 proceeding items through a Delphi process, and items were presented to physicians with different knowledge and experience in TUS. Answers were used for item statistics in order to select the items with the most optimal item discrimination and difficulty (i.e., level I items) to be included in the final test. Mean scores of the novice, intermediate and experienced groups were compared, and a pass/fail score was established using the contrasting groups' standard setting method. RESULTS: Item statistics revealed 38 level I items, of which 30 were selected to be included in the final test. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Differences in mean scores were 8.6 points (p < 0.001), 6.3 points (p = 0.01), and 14.9 points (p < 0.001) between novices and intermediates, intermediates and experienced, and novices and experienced, respectively. A pass/fail standard of 20 points was established. CONCLUSION: The established MCQ test can distinguish between physicians with different levels of competence in TUS and enables an objective, evidence-based approach for assessing the theoretical knowledge of trainees undergoing an educational programme in TUS.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Health Physics , Physicians , Students, Medical , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Adult , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Middle Aged , Point-of-Care Systems , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
16.
BMC Fam Pract ; 20(1): 89, 2019 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: General practitioners increasingly use point-of-care ultrasonography despite a lack of evidence-based guidelines for their appropriate use in primary care. Little is known about the integration of ultrasonography in general practice consultations and the impact of its use on patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore general practitioners' experiences of using ultrasonography in the primary care setting. METHODS: Adopting an explorative phenomenological approach, we performed semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who used ultrasonography in their daily work. Thirteen general practitioners were recruited stepwise, aiming for maximum variation in background characteristics. Interviews were conducted at the general practitioner's own clinic. Transcription and systematic text condensation analysis began immediately after conducting each interview. RESULTS: The general practitioners described using ultrasonography for both selected focused examinations and for explorative examinations. The two types of examinations were described differently for each of the following emerging themes: motivation for using ultrasonography, ultrasonography as part of the consultation, selection of an ultrasound catalogue, and consequences of the general practitioner's ultrasound examination. The general practitioners had chosen and integrated their own individual ultrasound catalogue of focused examinations as a natural part of their consultations. The focused examinations were used to answer simple clinical questions and they had a significant impact on the patients' diagnoses, clinical pathways and treatments. The general practitioners considered their own catalogue of focused examinations as their comfort zone. However, they also performed explorative ultrasound examinations outside their catalogue. These scans were performed to train, gain or maintain ultrasound competences or as explorative examinations driven by curiosity. The explorative ultrasound examinations rarely had an impact on patient care. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes how general practitioners found their own way of using ultrasonography in general practice and selected a personal catalogue of ultrasound examinations that was applicable, relevant and meaningful for their daily clinical routines. This study may serve to inform implementation strategies in general practice by offering insights into central aspects that drive general practitioners' behaviours.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Point-of-Care Testing , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Ultrasonography , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Qualitative Research
18.
Acta Radiol ; 59(4): 491-496, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28718664

ABSTRACT

Background Ultrasound-guided percutaneous kidney tumor biopsy (UGPKB) plays an important role in the diagnosis of renal tumor but there are no consensuses with respect to the length and the extend of the post-biopsy observation period. Purpose To assess the short-term complication rate after UGPKB and to evaluate whether the onset of complications allows for the procedure to be performed in an outpatient setting with same-day discharge. Material and Methods Between March 2012 and March 2014, a total of 287 UGPKB were performed in an outpatient setting at a Danish university referral center. All patient records were retrospectively reviewed and post-biopsy complications as well as biochemical parameters were registered. Results The overall complication rate was 3.8% (11 patients). Major complications occurred in 1.0% of all cases (three patients); one patient with ongoing bleeding that required intervention and two patients with septicemia. Minor complications occurred in 2.8% of cases (eight patients); six patients with self-limiting gross hematuria, one patient with small asymptomatic subcapsular hematoma, and one patient with vasovagal syncope. The timing of both minor and major complication onset ranged from the time of biopsy and up to four days after discharge. Conclusion UGPKB of indeterminate renal masses in adult patients in an outpatient setting appears to be a safe procedure with a very low rate of major complications. Same-day discharge after renal mass biopsy seems feasible.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Denmark , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Kidney/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
19.
BMC Emerg Med ; 18(1): 60, 2018 12 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30587153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can improve patient management in the emergency department (ED). However, previous studies have focused only on selected groups of patients, such as trauma, shock, dyspnea, or critically ill patients, or patients with an already known diagnosis. Most patients seen in the ED do not match these criteria. We aim to present total prevalence of positive findings when basic POCUS is applied to the broad population of patients seen in an emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective explorative observational study of 405 unselected patients aged 18 years or over. A structured whole-body ultrasound examination was performed on all patients within 2 h of arrival to the ED. The ultrasound examination consisted of focused cardiac ultrasound, focused abdominal ultrasound, focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), and focused lung ultrasound. RESULTS: We managed to perform 94.5% of all planned examinations. The study revealed positive findings in 39.3% of all included patients. This study presents the prevalence of positive findings among subgroups of patients. Divided among the categories of chief complaint, we found 62 positive examinations in 58 (14.3%; 95% CI, 10.9-17.7) unique patients with orthopedic complaints, 77 positive examinations among 59 (14.6%; 95% CI, 11.1-18.0) unique patients with medical complaints, and 55 positive examinations among 42 (10.4%; 95% CI, 7.4-13.3) unique patients with abdominal surgical complaints. CONCLUSION: POCUS revealed positive findings in more than one third of unselected patients in the emergency department. The study presents the findings and distribution among categories of chief complaints. Future investigations are necessary to elucidate the implication of the findings.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Point-of-Care Testing , Ultrasonography , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography/methods
20.
Ultraschall Med ; 38(6): 642-647, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ultrasound training is associated with a long learning curve and use of substantial faculty resources. Self-directed ultrasound training may decrease the need for faculty-led teaching. Mobile apps seem promising for use in self-directed ultrasound training, but no studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of mobile app-guided training versus traditional formats such as textbook-guided training. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of mobile app-guided versus textbook-guided ultrasound training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: First-year residents (n = 38) with no previous ultrasound experience were randomized into mobile app-guided versus textbook-guided self-directed ultrasound training groups. Participants completed a transfer test involving four patient cases and a theoretical test on diagnostic accuracy. Two ultrasound experts assessed the residents' performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale. The costs of developing mobile app and textbook material were calculated and used for the analysis of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: 34 participants completed the transfer test. There was no statistically significant difference in test performance or diagnostic accuracy between the mobile app-guided (mean-OSAUS 42.3 % [95 %CI38.5 - 46.0 %]) and textbook-guided groups (mean-OSAUS 45.3 % [95 %CI39.3 - 51.3 %]) (d.f. [1.33] = 0.45, p = 0.41). However, development costs differed greatly for each instructional format. Textbook-guided training was significantly more cost-effective than mobile app-guided training (Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio -861 967 [95 %CI-1071.7 to-3.2] USD/pct. point change in OSAUS score). CONCLUSION: Mobile app-guided ultrasound training is less cost-effective than textbook-guided self-directed training. This study underlines the need for careful evaluation of cost-effectiveness when introducing technological innovations for clinical skills training.


Subject(s)
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma , Mobile Applications , Radiology , Ultrasonography , Clinical Competence , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Radiology/education , Ultrasonography/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL