Modeling the adenosine receptors: comparison of the binding domains of A2A agonists and antagonists.

A three-dimensional model of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) and its docked ligands was built by homology to rhodopsin and validated with site-directed mutagenesis and the synthesis of chemically complementary agonists. Different binding modes of A(2A)AR antagonists and agonists were compared by using the FlexiDock automated docking procedure, with manual adjustment. Putative binding regions for the 9H-purine ring in agonist NECA 3 and the 1H-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline ring in antagonist CGS15943 1 overlapped, and the exocyclic amino groups of each were H-bonded to the side chain of N(6.55). For bound agonist, H-bonds formed between the ribose 3'- and 5'-substituents and the hydrophilic amino acids T(3.36), S(7.42), and H(7.43), and the terminal methyl group of the 5'-uronamide interacted with the hydrophobic side chain of F(6.44). Formation of the agonist complex destabilized the ground-state structure of the A(2A)AR, which was stabilized through a network of H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions in the transmembrane helical domain (TM) regions, facilitating a conformational change upon activation. Both flexibility of the ribose moiety, required for the movement of TM6, and its H-bonding to the receptor were important for agonism. Two sets of interhelical H-bonds involved residues conserved among ARs but not in rhodopsin: (1) E13(1.39) and H278(7.43) and (2) D52(2.50), with the highly conserved amino acids N280(7.45) and S281(7.46), and N284(7.49) with S91(3.39). Most of the amino acid residues lining the putative binding site(s) were conserved among the four AR subtypes. The A(2A)AR/3 complex showed a preference for an intermediate conformation about the glycosidic bond, unlike in the A(3)AR/3 complex, which featured an anti-conformation. Hydrophilic amino acids of TMs 3 and 7 (ribose-binding region) were replaced with anionic residues for enhanced binding to amine-derivatized agonists. We identified new neoceptor (T88D)-neoligand pairs that were consistent with the model.

N6-Substituted adenosine derivatives: selectivity, efficacy, and species differences at A3 adenosine receptors.

The activation of the human A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) by a wide range of N(6)-substituted adenosine derivatives was studied in intact CHO cells stably expressing this receptor. Selectivity of binding at rat and human ARs was also determined. Among N(6)-alkyl substitutions, small N(6)-alkyl groups were associated with selectivity for human A(3)ARs vs. rat A(3)ARs, and multiple points of branching were associated with decreased hA(3)AR efficacy. N(6)-Cycloalkyl-substituted adenosines were full (/=6 carbons) hA(3)AR agonists. N(6)-(endo-Norbornyl)adenosine 13 was the most selective for both rat and human A(1)ARs. Numerous N(6)-arylmethyl analogues, including substituted benzyl, tended to be more potent in binding to A(1) and A(3) vs. A(2A)ARs (with variable degrees of partial to full A(3)AR agonisms). A chloro substituent decreased the efficacy depending on its position on the benzyl ring. The A(3)AR affinity and efficacy of N(6)-arylethyl adenosines depended highly on stereochemistry, steric bulk, and ring constraints. Stereoselectivity of binding was demonstrated for N(6)-(R-1-phenylethyl)adenosine vs. N(6)-(S-1-phenylethyl)adenosine, as well as for the N(6)-(1-phenyl-2-pentyl)adenosine, at the rat, but not human A(3)AR. Interestingly, DPMA, a potent agonist for the A(2A)AR (K(i)=4nM), was demonstrated to be a moderately potent antagonist for the human A(3)AR (K(i)=106nM). N(6)-[(1S,2R)-2-Phenyl-1-cyclopropyl]adenosine 48 was 1100-fold more potent in binding to human (K(i)=0.63nM) than rat A(3)ARs. Dual acting A(1)/A(3) agonists (N(6)-3-chlorobenzyl- 29, N(6)-(S-1-phenylethyl)- 39, and 2-chloro-N(6)-(R-phenylisopropyl)adenosine 53) might be useful for cardioprotection.

2,2'-Pyridylisatogen tosylate antagonizes P2Y1 receptor signaling without affecting nucleotide binding.

The effect of 2,2'-pyridylisatogen tosylate (PIT) on the human P2Y(1) receptor and on other recombinant P2Y receptors has been studied. We first examined the modulation by PIT of the agonist-induced accumulation of inositol phosphates. PIT blocked 2-methylthio-ADP (2-MeSADP)-induced accumulation of inositol phosphates in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells stably expressing human P2Y(1) receptors in a non-competitive and concentration-dependent manner. The IC(50) for reduction of the maximal agonist effect was 0.14microM. In contrast, MRS2179, a competitive P2Y(1) receptor antagonist, parallel-shifted the agonist concentration-response curve to the right. PIT also concentration-dependently blocked the P2Y(1) receptor signaling induced by the endogenous agonists, ADP and ATP. A simple structural analogue of PIT was synthesized and found to be inactive as a P2Y(1) receptor antagonist, suggesting that the nitroxyl group of PIT is a necessary structural component for P2Y(1) receptor antagonism. We next examined the possible modulation of the binding of the newly available antagonist radioligand for the P2Y(1) receptor, [3H] MRS2279. It was found that PIT (0.01-10microM) did not inhibit [3H] MRS2279 binding to the human P2Y(1) receptor. PIT (10microM) had no effect on the competition for [3H] MRS2279 binding by agonists, ADP and ATP, suggesting that its antagonism of the P2Y(1) receptor may be allosteric. PIT had no significant effect on agonist activation of other P2Y receptors, including P2Y(2), P2Y(4), P2Y(6), P2Y(11) and P2Y(12) receptors. Thus, PIT selectively and non-competitively blocked P2Y(1) receptor signaling without affecting nucleotide binding.

Structural determinants of efficacy at A3 adenosine receptors: modification of the ribose moiety.

We have found previously that structural features of adenosine derivatives, particularly at the N6- and 2-positions of adenine, determine the intrinsic efficacy as A3 adenosine receptor (AR) agonists. Here, we have probed this phenomenon with respect to the ribose moiety using a series of ribose-modified adenosine derivatives, examining binding affinity and activation of the human A3 AR expressed in CHO cells. Both 2'- and 3'-hydroxyl groups in the ribose moiety contribute to A3 AR binding and activation, with 2'-OH being more essential. Thus, the 2'-fluoro substitution eliminated both binding and activation, while a 3'-fluoro substitution led to only a partial reduction of potency and efficacy at the A3 AR. A 5'-uronamide group, known to restore full efficacy in other derivatives, failed to fully overcome the diminished efficacy of 3'-fluoro derivatives. The 4'-thio substitution, which generally enhanced A3 AR potency and selectivity, resulted in 5'-CH2OH analogues (10 and 12) which were partial agonists of the A3 AR. Interestingly, the shifting of the N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenine moiety from the 1'- to 4'-position had a minor influence on A3 AR selectivity, but transformed 15 into a potent antagonist (16) (Ki = 4.3 nM). Compound 16 antagonized human A3 AR agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP with a K(B) value of 3.0 nM. A novel apio analogue (20) of neplanocin A, was a full A3 AR agonist. The affinities of selected, novel analogues at rat ARs were examined, revealing species differences. In summary, critical structural determinants for human A3 AR activation have been identified, which should prove useful for further understanding the mechanism of receptor activation and development of more potent and selective full agonists, partial agonists and antagonists for A3 ARs.

Effects of the allosteric modulator SCH-202676 on adenosine and P2Y receptors.

The G protein-coupled receptor allosteric modulator SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-(2H)-ylidene)methanamine), which affects a wide range of structurally unrelated G protein-coupled receptors, has highly divergent effects on purine receptors. SCH-202676 inhibited radioligand binding to human adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors (IC(50) = 0.5-0.8 microM) and affected dissociation kinetics, but at the human P2Y(1) nucleotide receptor it had no effect. SCH-202676 (10 microM) selectively accelerated agonist dissociation at adenosine A(3) receptors and either slowed (adenosine A(1) receptors) or accelerated (adenosine A(2A) receptors) antagonist dissociation. Thus, SCH-202676 differentially modulated A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors as well as agonist- and antagonist-occupied receptors.

Exploring human adenosine A3 receptor complementarity and activity for adenosine analogues modified in the ribose and purine moiety.

In this paper we investigated the influence on affinity, selectivity and intrinsic activity upon modification of the adenosine agonist scaffold at the 3'- and 5'-positions of the ribofuranosyl moiety and the 2- and N6-positions of the purine base. This resulted in the synthesis of various analogues, that is, 3-12 and 24-33, with good hA3AR selectivity and moderate-to-high affinities (as in 32, Ki=27 nM). Interesting was the ability to tune the intrinsic activity depending on the substituent introduced at the 3'-position.

Identification of essential residues involved in the allosteric modulation of the human A(3) adenosine receptor.

We examined the effects on allosteric modulation and ligand binding of the mutation of amino acid residues of the human A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) that are hypothesized to be near one of three loci: the putative sodium binding site, the putative ligand binding site, and the DRY motif in transmembrane helical domain 3. The effects of three heterocyclic allosteric modulators [the imidazoquinoline 2-cyclopentyl-4-phenylamino-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinoline (DU124183), the pyridinylisoquinoline 4-methoxy-N-[7-methyl-3-(2-pyridinyl)-1-isoquinolinyl]benzamide (VUF5455), and the amiloride analog 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride] on the dissociation of the agonist radioligand, N(6)- (4-amino-3-[(125)I]iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine, were compared at wild-type (WT) and mutant A(3)ARs. The F182A(5.43) and N274A(7.45) mutations eliminated the allosteric effects of all three modulators but had little effect on agonist binding. The N30A(1.50) and D58N(2.50) mutations abolished the allosteric effects of DU124183 and VUF5455, but not HMA, whereas the D107N(3.49) mutation abolished the effects of DU124183, but not HMA or VUF5455. The T94A(3.36), H95A(3.37), K152A(EL2), W243A(6.48), L244A(6.49), and S247A(6.52) mutations did not influence allosteric effects of the modulators. Sodium ions (100 mM), which modulate agonist binding at a variety of receptors, caused an approximately 80% inhibition of agonist binding in WT A(3)ARs but did not show any effect on D58N(2.50), D107N(3.49), and F182A(5.43) mutant receptors. In contrast, NaCl induced a modest increase of agonist binding in N30A(1.50) and N274A(7.45) mutant receptors. NaCl decreased the dissociation rate of the antagonist radioligand [(3)H]8-ethyl-4-methyl-2-phenyl-(8R)-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[2.1-i]purin-5-one (PSB-11) at the WT A(3)ARs, but not the D58N(2.50) mutant receptor. The results were interpreted using a rhodopsin-based molecular model of the A(3)AR to suggest multiple binding modes of the allosteric modulators.

Structure-activity relationships of thiazole and thiadiazole derivatives as potent and selective human adenosine A3 receptor antagonists.

4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-aminothiazole and 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-aminothiadiazole derivatives have been synthesized and evaluated as selective antagonists for human adenosine A3 receptors. A methoxy group in the 4-position of the phenyl ring and N-acetyl or propionyl substitutions of the aminothiazole and aminothiadiazole templates displayed great increases of binding affinity and selectivity for human adenosine A3 receptors. The most potent A3 antagonist of the present series, N-[3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-[1,2,4]thiadiazol-5-yl]-acetamide (39) exhibiting a Ki value of 0.79 nM at human adenosine A3 receptors, showed antagonistic property in a functional assay of cAMP biosynthesis involved in one of the signal transduction pathways of adenosine A3 receptors. Molecular modeling study of conformation search and receptor docking experiments to investigate the dramatic differences of binding affinities between two regioisomers of thiadiazole analogues, (39) and (42), suggested possible binding mechanisms in the binding pockets of adenosine receptors.

Exploring distal regions of the A3 adenosine receptor binding site: sterically constrained N6-(2-phenylethyl)adenosine derivatives as potent ligands.

We synthesized phenyl ring-substituted analogues of N(6)-(1S,2R)-(2-phenyl-1-cyclopropyl)adenosine, which is highly potent in binding to the human A(3)AR with a Ki value of 0.63 nM. The effects of these structural changes on affinity at human and rat adenosine receptors and on intrinsic efficacy at the hA(3)AR were measured. A 3-nitrophenyl analogue was resolved chromatographically into pure diastereomers, which displayed 10-fold stereoselectivity in A(3)AR binding in favor of the 1S,2R isomer. A molecular model defined a hydrophobic region (Phe168) in the putative A(3)AR binding site around the phenyl moiety. A heteroaromatic group (3-thienyl) could substitute for the phenyl moiety with retention of high affinity of A(3)AR binding. Other related N(6)-substituted adenosine derivatives were included for comparison. Although the N(6)-(2-phenyl-1-cyclopropyl) derivatives were full A(3)AR agonists, several other derivatives had greatly reduced efficacy. N(6)-Cyclopropyladenosine was an A(3)AR antagonist, and adding either one or two phenyl rings at the 2-position of the cyclopropyl moiety restored efficacy. N(6)-(2,2-Diphenylethyl)adenosine was an A(3)AR antagonist, and either adding a bond between the two phenyl rings (N(6)-9-fluorenylmethyl) or shortening the ethyl moiety (N(6)-diphenylmethyl) restored efficacy. A QSAR study of the N(6) region provided a model that was complementary to the putative A(3)AR binding site in a rhodopsin-based homology model. Thus, a new series of high-affinity A(3)AR agonists and related nucleoside antagonists was explored through both empirical and theoretical approaches.

Modulation of adenosine receptor affinity and intrinsic efficacy in adenine nucleosides substituted at the 2-position.

We studied the structural determinants of binding affinity and efficacy of adenosine receptor (AR) agonists. Substituents at the 2-position of adenosine were combined with N(6)-substitutions known to enhance human A(3)AR affinity. Selectivity of binding of the analogues and their functional effects on cAMP production were studied using recombinant human A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)ARs. Mainly sterically small substituents at the 2-position modulated both the affinity and intrinsic efficacy at all subtypes. The 2-cyano group decreased hA(3)AR affinity and efficacy in the cases of N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl) and N(6)-(trans-2-phenyl-1-cyclopropyl), for which a full A(3)AR agonist was converted into a selective antagonist; the 2-cyano-N(6)-methyl analogue was a full A(3)AR agonist. The combination of N(6)-benzyl and various 2-substitutions (chloro, trifluoromethyl, and cyano) resulted in reduced efficacy at the A(1)AR. The environment surrounding the 2-position within the putative A(3)AR binding site was explored using rhodopsin-based homology modeling and ligand docking.