Supervised Exercise Training for Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is one of the most common forms of heart failure; its prevalence is increasing, and outcomes are worsening. Affected patients often experience severe exertional dyspnea and debilitating fatigue, as well as poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and a high mortality rate. Until recently, most pharmacological intervention trials for HFpEF yielded neutral primary outcomes. In contrast, trials of exercise-based interventions have consistently demonstrated large, significant, clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms, objectively determined exercise capacity, and usually quality of life. This success may be attributed, at least in part, to the pleiotropic effects of exercise, which may favorably affect the full range of abnormalities-peripheral vascular, skeletal muscle, and cardiovascular-that contribute to exercise intolerance in HFpEF. Accordingly, this scientific statement critically examines the currently available literature on the effects of exercise-based therapies for chronic stable HFpEF, potential mechanisms for improvement of exercise capacity and symptoms, and how these data compare with exercise therapy for other cardiovascular conditions. Specifically, data reviewed herein demonstrate a comparable or larger magnitude of improvement in exercise capacity from supervised exercise training in patients with chronic HFpEF compared with those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, although Medicare reimbursement is available only for the latter group. Finally, critical gaps in implementation of exercise-based therapies for patients with HFpEF, including exercise setting, training modalities, combinations with other strategies such as diet and medications, long-term adherence, incorporation of innovative and more accessible delivery methods, and management of recently hospitalized patients are highlighted to provide guidance for future research.

Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Consensus recommendations for cardiogenic shock (CS) advise transfer of patients in need of advanced options beyond the capability of "spoke" centers to tertiary/"hub" centers with higher capabilities. However, outcomes associated with such transfers are largely unknown beyond those reported in individual health networks. OBJECTIVES: To analyze a contemporary, multicenter CS cohort with the aim of comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients between transfer (between spoke and hub centers) and nontransfer cohorts (those primarily admitted to a hub center) for both acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and heart failure-related HF-CS. We also aim to identify clinical characteristics of the transfer cohort that are associated with in-hospital mortality. METHODS: The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry is a national, multicenter, prospective registry including high-volume (mostly hub) CS centers. Fifteen U.S. sites contributed data for this analysis from 2016-2020. RESULTS: Of 1890 consecutive CS patients enrolled into the CSWG registry, 1028 (54.4%) patients were transferred. Of these patients, 528 (58.1%) had heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and 381 (41.9%) had CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Upon arrival to the CSWG site, transfer patients were more likely to be in SCAI stages C and D, when compared to nontransfer patients. Transfer patients had higher mortality rates (37% vs 29%, < 0.001) than nontransfer patients; the differences were driven primarily by the HF-CS cohort. Logistic regression identified increasing age, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and higher number of vasoactive drugs prior to or within 24 hours after CSWG site transfer as independent predictors of mortality among HF-CS patients. Conversely, pulmonary artery catheter use prior to transfer or within 24 hours of arrival was associated with decreased mortality rates. Among transfer AMI-CS patients, BMI > 28 kg/m2, worsening renal failure, lactate > 3 mg/dL, and increasing numbers of vasoactive drugs were associated with increased mortality rates. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients with CS managed at high-volume CS centers were transferred from another hospital. Although transfer patients had higher mortality rates than those who were admitted primarily to hub centers, the outcomes and their predictors varied significantly when classified by HF-CS vs AMI-CS.

Association of Hemometabolic Trajectory and Mortality: Insights From the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a hemodynamic syndrome that can progress to systemic metabolic derangements and end-organ dysfunction. Prior studies have reported hemodynamic parameters at the time of admission to be associated with mortality but hemodynamic trajectories in CS have not been well described. We studied the association between hemodynamic profiles and their trajectories and in-hospital mortality in patients with CS due to heart failure (HF-CS) and acute myocardial infarction (MI-CS). Using data from the large multicenter Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry, we analyzed hemodynamic data obtained at the time of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) insertion (dataset at baseline) and at PAC removal or death (dataset at final time point). Univariable regression analyses for prediction of in-hospital mortality were conducted for baseline and final hemodynamic values, as well as the interval change (delta-P). Data was further analyzed based on CS etiology and survival status. A total of 2260 patients with PAC data were included (70% male, age 61 ± 14 years, 61% HF-CS, 27% MI-CS). In-hospital mortality was higher in the MI-CS group (40.1%) compared with HF-CS (22.4%, P < .01). In the HF-CS cohort, survivors exhibited lower right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), cardiac output/index (CO/CI), lactate, and higher blood pressure (BP) than nonsurvivors at baseline. In this cohort, during hospitalization, improvement in metabolic (aspartate transaminase, lactate), BP, hemodynamic (RAP, pulmonary artery pulsatility index [PAPi], pulmonary artery compliance for right-sided profile and CO/CI for left-sided profile), had association with survival. In the MI-CS cohort, a lower systolic BP and higher PAP at baseline were associated with odds of death. Improvement in metabolic (lactate), BP, hemodynamic (RAP, PAPi for right-sided profile and CO/CI for left-sided profile) were associated with survival. In a large contemporary CS registry, hemodynamic trajectories had a strong association with short-term outcomes in both cohorts. These findings suggest the clinical importance of timing and monitoring hemodynamic trajectories to tailor management in patients with CS.

Durable ventricular assist device in adult patients with single ventricle: a systematic literature review.

The worldwide experience with mechanical circulatory support in adult patients with single ventricle and Fontan palliation is limited. We aimed to see the outcomes in such patients on durable left ventricular assist device. We systematically reviewed the English language literature found on PubMed and Google Scholar, searching the terms "Fontan," "single ventricle," "ventricular assist device," "LVAD," and "mechanical circulatory support," and selected all individual cases with reported outcomes. We identified 4 patients on pulsatile left ventricular assist device, all of whom were successfully bridged to transplant, and 15 patients on continuous flow LVAD, age 25.9 ± 5.8, predominantly males. Mean time on LVAD support was 718.6 ± 616.5 days, and only 2 patients (13.3%) died. Durable left ventricular assist device support in adult patients with Fontan provides excellent results and should be used more frequently.

Multidisciplinary Care in Heart Failure Services.

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of American 2022 guidelines for heart failure (HF) recommend a multidisciplinary team approach for patients with HF. The multidisciplinary HF team-based approach decreases the hospitalization rate for HF and health care costs and improves adherence to self-care and the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. This article proposes the optimal multidisciplinary team structure and each team member's delineated role to achieve institutional goals and metrics for HF care. The proposed HF-specific multidisciplinary team comprises cardiologists, surgeons, advanced practice providers, clinical pharmacists, specialty nurses, dieticians, physical therapists, psychologists, social workers, immunologists, and palliative care clinicians. A standardized multidisciplinary HF team-based approach should be incorporated to optimize the structure, minimize the redundancy of clinical responsibilities among team members, and improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in their HF care.

Translating Pressure Into Practice: Operational Characteristics of Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring Program in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring (AHM) using an implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensor (CardioMEMS) is effective in improving outcomes for patients with heart failure. The operations of AHM programs are crucial to clinical efficacy of AHM yet have not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: An anonymous, voluntary, web-based survey was developed and emailed to clinicians at AHM centers in the United States. Survey questions were related to program volume, staffing, monitoring practices, and patient selection criteria. Fifty-four respondents (40%) completed the survey. Respondents were 44% (n = 24) advanced HF cardiologists and 30% (n = 16) advanced nurse practitioners. Most respondents practice at a center that implants left ventricular assist devices (70%) or performs heart transplantation (54%). Advanced practice providers provide day-to-day monitoring and management in most programs (78%), and use of protocol-driven care is limited (28%). Perceived patient nonadherence and inadequate insurance coverage are cited as the primary barriers to AHM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite broad US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with symptoms and at increased risk for worsening heart failure, the adoption of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring is concentrated at advanced heart failure centers, and modest numbers of patients are implanted at most centers. Understanding and addressing the barriers to referral of eligible patients and to broader adoption in community heart failure programs is needed to maximize the clinical benefits of AHM.

Choosing wisely: incorporating appropriate donor-recipient size matching in heart transplantation.

Historically, transplantation of a female donor heart to male recipient has been viewed with caution given evidence of suboptimal outcomes, particularly in special populations such as patients with pulmonary hypertension or those supported by ventricular assist devices. However, the use of predicted heart mass ratio for donor-recipient size matching demonstrated that the size of the organ rather than sex of the donor was most responsible for the outcomes. With the advent of the predicted heart mass ratio, avoiding female donor hearts for male recipients is no longer justified and may result in unnecessary waste of available organs. In this review, we highlight the value of donor-recipient sizing by predicted heart mass ratio and summarize the evidence of different approaches to the donor-to-recipient size and sex matching. We conclude that the utilization of predicted heart mass is currently considered a preferred method of matching heart donors and recipients.

Donor substance abuse and heart transplantation outcomes.

Heart failure continues to account for millions of cases and deaths worldwide. Heart transplant is the gold standard for treatment of advanced heart failure. Unfortunately, the supply of donor hearts continues to be limited with the increase in demand for heart transplantation. In this review, we aim to explore the safety and efficacy of using hearts from donors with history of substance use. Despite the theoretical effect of cocaine and alcohol on the cardiovascular system, several studies demonstrate no difference in outcomes (overall survival, graft rejection, graft vasculopathy) when using hearts from patients with history of cocaine and alcohol use. The opioid epidemic has expanded the potential donor pool where the current studies have not shown any adverse outcomes when considering donors with history of opioid use. The currently available evidence would support the use of donor hearts from patients with history of alcohol, cocaine, opioids, and marijuana use. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of using donor hearts from patients with history of nicotine use.

Evaluation of adjusted international normalized ratio goal in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate3 left ventricular assist device (HM3 LVAD) has shown a low incidence of thrombosis, but bleeding risk is as high as 43%. We aim to describe the impact of lower international normalization ratio (INR) goal on clinical outcomes. METHODS: In February 2019, our tertiary care institution lowered INR goal in HM3 patients from manufacturer recommendations to 1.8-2.2 and retrospectively analyzed the data. Two cohorts were compared: patients with lower INR goal upon implant (De novo) and those with subsequently lowered INR goal (Adjusted). The Adjusted group also served as its own historical control. Both groups continued aspirin 81 milligrams daily per manufacturer recommendations. The primary outcomes were incidences of bleed and thrombosis events within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to remove or replace the device and Rosendaal time in therapeutic range (TTR) over 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were evaluated for inclusion with 26 meeting criteria. Within 12 months, incidence of bleeding events was 25% and 28.6% in the De novo and Adjusted groups, respectively. Incidence of thrombotic events within 12 months was 0% in the De novo group and 7.1% in the Adjusted group. Twelve-month survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to remove or replace the device was higher over 12 months for patients in the De novo group (91.7% vs. 78.6%). Median 12-month TTR was 36%, which was primarily attributable to subtherapeutic deviations. CONCLUSIONS: A lower INR goal may be safe when initiated De novo following implantation of the HM3. This study informs the need for larger prospective studies.

Aortic root thrombosis leading to STEMI in a Heartmate 3 patient.

Despite left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy becoming established for end-stage heart failure (HF), complications remain. Thromboembolic complications are rare with the newest iteration of LVADs. We managed a case of a continuous-flow LVAD-related thromboembolic event that presented as an acute myocardial infarction. A 64-year-old male who underwent Heartmate III® LVAD implantation had crushing substernal chest pain and ventricular tachycardia with acute anterolateral myocardial infarction on electrocardiogram on post-operative day 9. Echocardiography showed closed aortic valve and mild aortic regurgitation, but CT angiography showed thrombus within the left coronary cusp despite full anticoagulation. Continuous suction of blood from the left ventricle despite pulsatile flow into the ascending aorta resulted in a minimally opening aortic valve and stagnation of blood leading to thrombosis on the coronary cusp. Apart from post-operative ventricular tachycardia and right ventricular failure, he had adequate body size (body surface area 2.13 m2) and no post-operative or coagulopathy which could predispose him to thrombosis. Coronary angiography revealed stable severe three-vessel disease and thrombus in left main and proximal circumflex artery, and he had aspiration thrombectomy, and international normalized ratio target was increased to 3-3.5 with aspirin 325 mg daily. He survived to discharge but died 60 days after LVAD implant with multiple low flow alarms, and cardiac arrest. We review the literature and propose a management algorithm for patients with impaired AV opening and aortic root thrombosis.

PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients After Heart Transplantation: a Retrospective Review and Literature Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Following cardiac transplantation, patients have an increased risk of developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Therefore, aggressive lipid management is indicated. Some patients do not achieve optimal lipid profiles with statin monotherapy, however, or discontinue statins due to intolerance. In this review, we investigated the use of PCSK9 inhibitors as an alternative treatment for hyperlipidemia following cardiac transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Nine published articles were identified that included 110 patients treated with alirocumab or evolocumab after cardiac transplantation. PCSK9 inhibitors were tolerated by all patients, and each study demonstrated an effective reduction of low-density lipoprotein ranging from 40 to 87% decrease from baseline. In our study, the 110 patients from literature review were added to a cohort of 7 similar patients from our institution for combined analysis. This report supports that PCSK9 inhibitors should be considered following cardiac transplantation when conventional medial therapy is not tolerated or ineffective.

Aortic Thrombosis in Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve (AV) thrombosis is an uncommon but ominous complication in patients managed with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. In this systematic review, we summarised the data on clinical presentations and outcomes in such patients. METHODS: We searched articles on PubMed and Google Scholar, reporting at least one adult patient with aortic thrombosis on MCS support and where the individual patient data could be extracted. We grouped the patients by the type of MCS (temporary or durable), and the type of the AV (prosthetic, surgically modified, or native) RESULTS: We identified reports on six patients with aortic thrombus on short-term MCS, and on 41 patients on durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). On temporary MCS, AV thrombus typically causes no symptoms and is found incidentally pre- or intra-operatively. For those with durable MCS, the occurrence of aortic thrombus forming on prosthetic or surgically modified valves appears to be more related to the intervention on the valve, rather than from the presence of LVAD. The mortality in this group was 18%. In patients with native AV on durable LVAD support, 60% of patients presented with acute myocardial infarction, acute stroke, or acute heart failure, and mortality in this cohort was 45%. In terms of management, heart transplantation was most successful. CONCLUSIONS: While the outcomes of aortic thrombosis were good in patients where temporary MCS was used in the setting of aortic valve surgery, patients with native AV who develop this complication on durable LVAD have high morbidity and mortality. Cardiac transplantation should be strongly considered in eligible candidates because other therapies provide inconsistent results.

Sacubitril/Valsartan Off-Label Uses for Heart Failure.

Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor that the Food and Drug Administration has indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below normal and with no specified ejection-fraction cut-off. However, clinically significant patient groups were excluded or minimally represented in sacubitril/valsartan's pivotal clinical trials. Clinicians often encounter scenarios in which a sacubitril/valsartan off-label use may be beneficial, but limited resources are available to evaluate the efficacy and safety in these patients. This state-of-the-art review describes contemporary literature for sacubitril/valsartan Food and Drug Administration off-label indications to help clinicians assess its appropriateness in these selected, clinically important groups of patients: those with acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, peripartum cardiomyopathy, chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, adult congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients, right ventricular failure, or durable left ventricular assist device.

New onset nonischemic cardiomyopathy post liver transplantation.

A new onset acute heart failure (HF) with a sudden drop in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post orthotopic liver transplant (LT) is a rare but a potentially fatal complication. Because in most of the cases there is no evidence of coronary thrombosis, it can be classified as nonischemic cardiomyopathy. More specifically, clinical presentation of this syndrome shares many features with stress-induced or takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The known factors that predispose these patients to acute HF during or shortly after LT include cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, rapid hemodynamic changes during LT surgery, and the large concentrations of catecholamines, either administered or released endogenously during surgery. The hemodynamic changes during surgery, such as the drop in preload during the anhepatic phase (occasionally requiring massive transfusions and vasopressors) and subsequent increase in preload with acidic and hyperkalemic plasma in the reperfusion phase, lead to rapid electrolyte and hemodynamic shifts. In several cases, intraoperative onset of HF, with or without ventricular arrythmia, could be timed to the reperfusion phase (and occasionally in the anhepatic and pre-anhepatic phases). In other cases, the HF syndrome started hours to days post-surgery. Recovery of cardiac function occurred in the majority of patients during the same admission; however, these patients generally need significantly longer hospitalizations and aggressive supportive care (occasionally requiring mechanical ionotropic and ventilatory support). If recover, the patients have a similar 1-year mortality as those LT patients that did not have this complication. Because no reliable risk stratification currently exists, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography might be the most dependable way of detecting and addressing this syndrome promptly. Given the mechanism of takotsubo cardiomyopathy, beta-blockade and a preferential use of non-catecholaminergic vasopressors may be a reasonable way to manage this syndrome.

Myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and adults: a cumulative experience of 2021.

Clinical course and outcomes of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination remain variable. We retrospectively collected data on patients > 12 years old from 01/01/2021 to 12/30/2021 who received COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination and were diagnosed with myocarditis within 60 days of vaccination. Myocarditis cases were based on case definitions by authors. We report on 238 patients of whom most were male (n = 208; 87.1%). The mean age was 27.4 ± 16 (range 12-80) years. Females presented at older ages (41.3 ± 21.5 years) than men 25.7 ± 14 years (p = 0.001). In patients > 20 years of age, the mean duration from vaccination to symptoms was 4.8 days ± 5.5 days, but in < 20, it was 3.0 ± 3.3 days (p = 0.04). Myocarditis occurred most commonly after the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (n = 183; 76.45) and after the second dose (n = 182; 80%). Symptoms started 3.95 ± 4.5 days after vaccination. The commonest symptom was chest pain (n = 221; 93%). Patients were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 105; 58.3%), colchicine (n = 38; 21.1%), or glucocorticoids (n = 23; 12.7%). About 30% of the patients had left ventricular ejection fraction but more than half recovered the on repeat imaging. Abnormal cardiac MRIs were common; 168 patients (96% of 175 patients that had MRI) had late gadolinium enhancement, while 120 patients (68.5%) had myocardial edema. Heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy use was common (n = 27; 15%). Eleven patients had cardiogenic shock; and 4 patients required mechanical circulatory support. Five patients (1.7%) died; of these, 3 patients had endomyocardial biopsy/autopsy-confirmed myocarditis. Most cases of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis are mild. Females presented at older ages than men and duration from vaccination to symptoms was longer in patients > 20 years. Cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support was seen and mortality was low. Future studies are needed to better evaluate risk factors, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine myocarditis.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in heart transplant recipients: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes and immunosuppression strategies.

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on heart transplant recipients is unknown. Literature is limited to case reports and series. The purpose of this study is to identify the clinical features, outcomes, and immunosuppression strategies of heart transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection. A systematic review was conducted using the search term "Coronavirus" or COVID," "SARS-CoV-2," "cardiac transplantation," and "heart transplant." Case reports and retrospective studies were gathered by searching Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Thirty-three articles were selected for review. We identified 74 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in heart transplant and heart-kidney transplant recipients. The mean age was 60.5 ± 15.8 years, and 82.4% were males with median time from transplant of 6.5 years. Commonest symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea, but new left ventricular (LV) dysfunction was rare. Leukocytosis, lymphopenia, elevated inflammatory markers, and bilateral ground-glass opacities were common. Mortality was high, with particularly poor survival in patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and older patients. Immunosuppression involved discontinuation of antimetabolites and steroids. COVID-19 infection in heart transplant (HT) recipients presents similarly to the general population, but new onset of LV dysfunction is uncommon. Immunosuppression strategies include increase in corticosteroids and discontinuation of antimetabolites.

Clinical variants of myocardial involvement in COVID-19-positive patients: a cumulative experience of 2020.

Myocardial injury, diagnosed by troponin elevation, is common in COVID-19 patients, but cardiac involvement with clinical manifestations occurs less frequently. We analyzed the literature on COVID-19 (2020) and systematically reviewed the cases where individual patient data were presented. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for "COVID," "COVID-19," and "coronavirus" in combination with "myocarditis," "heart failure," "takotsubo," "cardiomyopathy," and "cardiogenic shock." We identified 90 cases of COVID-19 with myocardial involvement, mean age 52.9 ± 18.3 years, 54.5% males. Of them, 55 survived (61.1%), 20 died (22.2%), and in 15 (16.7%) the outcome was unknown at the time of publication. Among patients with known outcome, mortality was 26%. The nadir LVEF was 31.7 ± 13.1% and recovered to 50.1 ± 16.0%. Pericardial effusion was a common finding, reported in 21 (23.3%) of patients, including moderate size effusion in 8.9% and large in 7.8%. The effusion caused tamponade in 11 (12.2%) of patients. Out of 83 patients who experienced a decrease in LVEF, 30 could be classified as takotsubo syndrome. The takotsubo patients were older than those with myocarditis, and with relatively high proportion of males. About one third of the cases was complicated by cardiogenic shock. Myocardial involvement in COVID-19 patients most often presents as a new, rapid decrease in LVEF, although normal LVEF or takotsubo-like wall motion pattern does not rule out myocarditis. Moderate and large pericardial effusion is common, and cardiac tamponade occurs in 12.2% of patients. Cardiogenic shock develops in one third of the patients. Mortality appears to be high at 26%.

Long-Term Ambulatory Intravenous Milrinone Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The role of intravenous (IV) inotropes in the treatment of ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure (HF) remains controversial. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with advanced HF. Patients on home IV milrinone, who remained on it for at least 3 months, were included. We compared the data from 3 months before starting IV milrinone to 3 months after initiating therapy. A subset of patients who remained on milrinone for 6 months or longer was analysed separately. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients remained on continuous IV milrinone for 3 months, and 55 patients were treated for 6 months or longer. In both groups, improvements in cardiac index (1.86-2.25, p<0.001 and 1.9-2.38, p<0.0001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (3.32-2.76, p<0.0001 and 3.25-2.72, p=0.001), and liver function were noted. In the 6-month group, there was also a decrease in mean hospitalised days per patient (9.40 vs 4.12, p<0.001) and an improved tolerance of beta blocker therapy (83.3% vs 98.1%, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Long-term IV use of milrinone is associated with improvement in haemodynamics, functional class, tolerance of medical therapy, and decrease in hospitalised days.

Subjective and Objective Impact of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Systemic Right Ventricle Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) who have an anatomic right ventricle supporting the systemic circulation have increased mortality and morbidity from heart failure (HF). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) have emerged as a standard of therapy for adults with HF. However, the effects of this therapy have not been extensively studied in ACHD patients, especially those with systemic right ventricle (SRV). HYPOTHESIS: ARNIs are associated with subjective and objective improvement in SRV patients. METHODS: Eighteen (18) SRV patients were prescribed ARNI at our institution in the last 5 years. Data before and during treatment, including demographics, medical history, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA FC), labs, cardiac computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), echocardiographic measurements, cardiopulmonary stress test (CPET), and hospitalisation for HF were obtained by review of the electronic medical record. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: Eighteen (18) SRV patients (mean age 40 yrs, 72% male) were treated with ARNI (median duration 13 mo) in addition to other HF medications. All patients tolerated ARNI without symptomatic or asymptomatic hypotension or worsening kidney function. High ARNI dose (97/103 mg) was achieved in three (17%) patients, and moderate (49/51 mg) in three (17%). At baseline, nine patients were NYHA FC 2, seven FC 3, and two FC 4. Mean baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and echocardiographic data were: oxygen uptake (VO2) 18 mL/kg/min, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) 38, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) 32%, fractional area change (FAC) 21%. Significant tricuspid regurgitation was present in 33% (28% moderate, and 5% severe) and mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was 9.4 mm. With treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in blood pressure, labs, testing, or imaging. There was a statistically significant improvement in median NYHA FC (2 vs 2.5, p=0.005). When compared to an equal pre-ARNI median timeframe, there was a noted decrease in cardiac hospitalisation (4 vs 9) that did not reach statistical significance (p=0.313). CONCLUSION: In adult patients with failing systemic right ventricle, ARNI is safe and well tolerated. Their use is associated with improvement in functional status. Prospective studies on a larger group of patients are warranted to better understand the causes of this improvement.

The spectrum of lupus myocarditis: from asymptomatic forms to cardiogenic shock.

Lupus myocarditis is a serious, potentially deadly disease. When it presents as an acute or fulminant myocarditis in a patient without an established diagnosis of lupus, lupus as an etiology of the condition is not commonly suspected. Meanwhile, it has a distinct treatment which may be lifesaving. Review of the literature can shed more light as current management is mostly based on clinical experience and case reports rather than randomized control trials. In this review we are discussing this diagnostic entity, focusing on cardiogenic shock as a manifestation of lupus myocarditis, and discussing management including aggressive immunosuppression, mechanical circulatory support, and cardiac transplantation.