Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Gut ; 69(12): 2203-2213, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341018

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is rare compared with other chronic viral infections, despite that newborns have an immature, and possibly more susceptible, immune system. It further remains unclear to what extent prenatal and perinatal exposure to HCV affects immune system development in neonates. DESIGN: To address this, we studied B cells, innate immune cells and soluble factors in a cohort of 62 children that were either unexposed, exposed uninfected or infected with HCV. Forty of these infants were followed longitudinally from birth up until 18 months of age. RESULTS: As expected, evidence for B cell maturation was observed with increased age in children, whereas few age-related changes were noticed among innate immune cells. HCV-infected children had a high frequency of HCV-specific IgG-secreting B cells. Such a response was also detected in some exposed but uninfected children but not in uninfected controls. Consistent with this, both HCV-exposed uninfected and HCV-infected infants had evidence of early B cell immune maturation with an increased proportion of IgA-positive plasma cells and upregulated CD40 expression. In contrast, actual HCV viraemia, but not mere exposure, led to alterations within myeloid immune cell populations, natural killer (NK) cells and a distinct soluble factor profile with increased levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSION: Our data reveal that exposure to, and infection with, HCV causes disparate effects on adaptive B cells and innate immune cell such as myeloid cells and NK cells in infants.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Hepatitis C/immunology , CD40 Antigens/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Male , Myeloid Cells/immunology , Up-Regulation
2.
Antibodies (Basel) ; 12(2)2023 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366655

ABSTRACT

Assessing the levels of serum IgG antibodies is widely used to measure immunity to influenza and the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after natural infection or vaccination with specific vaccines, as well as to study immune responses to these viruses in animal models. For safety reasons, sometimes serum specimens collected from infected individuals are subjected to heat inactivation at 56 °C to reduce the risk of infecting personnel during serological studies. However, this procedure may affect the level of virus-specific antibodies, making the results of antibody immunoassays uninterpretable. Here, we evaluated the effect of the heat inactivation of human, ferret and hamster serum samples on the binding of IgG antibodies to the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 antigens. For this, serum samples of naive and immune hosts were analyzed in three variants: (i) untreated sera, (ii) heated at 56 °C for 1 h, and (iii) treated with receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE). The samples were studied through an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using whole influenza virus or recombinant proteins corresponding to nucleocapsid (N) protein and the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 Spike (RBD) as antigens. We demonstrated that the heat inactivation of the naive serum samples of various hosts can lead to false-positive results, while RDE treatment abolished the effect of the non-specific binding of IgG antibodies to the viral antigens. Furthermore, RDE also significantly decreased the level of virus-specific IgG antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 and influenza-immune sera of humans and animals, although it is unknown whether it actually removes true virus-specific IgG antibodies or only non-specifically binding artifacts. Nevertheless, we suggest that the RDE treatment of human and animal sera may be useful in preventing false-positive results in various immunoassays, while also neutralizing infectious virus, since the standard protocol for the use of RDE also includes heating the sample at 56 °C.

3.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 9(9)2023 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755035

ABSTRACT

We studied the risk factors, etiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment outcomes of COVID-19-associated invasive candidiasis (COVID-IC) in adult patients admitted to six medical facilities in St. Petersburg. (November 2020-December 2022). In this retrospective study, we included 72 patients with COVID-IC with a median age of 61 years (range 29-96), 51% of whom were women. The predisposing factors for COVID-IC were a central venous catheter (CVC) for more than 10 days (the odds ratio (OR) = 70 [15-309]), abdominal surgical treatment performed in the previous 2 weeks (OR = 8.8 [1.9-40.3]), bacteremia (OR = 10.6 [4.8-23.3]), pulmonary ventilation (OR = 12.9 [5.9-28.4]), and hemodialysis (OR = 11.5 [2.5-50.8]). The signs and symptoms of COVID-IC were non-specific: fever (59%), renal failure (33%), liver failure (23%), and cardiovascular failure (10%). Candida albicans (41%) predominated among the pathogens of the candidemia. The multidrug-resistant Candida species C. auris (23%) and C. glabrata (5%) were also identified. Empirical therapy was used in 21% of COVID-IC patients: azole-93%, echinocandin-7%. The majority of COVID-IC patients (79%) received, after laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis of IC, fluconazole (47%), voriconazole (25%), echinocandin (26%), and amphotericin B (2)%. The 30 days overall survival rate was 45%. The prognosis worsened concomitant bacteremia, hemodialysis, and long-term therapy by systemic glucocorticosteroids (SGCs), bronchial colonization with Candida spp. The survival prognosis was improved by the early change/replacement of CVC (within 24 h), the initiation of empirical therapy, and the use of echinocandin. Conclusions: We highlighted the risk factors that predispose COVID-19 patients to candidiasis and worsen the survival prognosis. Their individual effects in patients with COVID-19 must be well understood to prevent the development of opportunistic co-infections that drastically lower chances of survival.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36231850

ABSTRACT

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The Central and East Europe (CEE) region consists of countries with highly diversified HIV epidemics, health care systems and socioeconomic status. The aim of the present study was to describe variations in CKD burden and care between countries. The Euroguidelines in the CEE Network Group includes 19 countries and was initiated to improve the standard of care for HIV infection in the region. Information on kidney care in HIV-positive patients was collected through online surveys sent to all members of the Network Group. Almost all centres use regular screening for CKD in all HIV (+) patients. Basic diagnostic tests for kidney function are available in the majority of centres. The most commonly used method for eGFR calculation is the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Nephrology consultation is available in all centres. The median frequency of CKD was 5% and the main cause was comorbidity. Haemodialysis was the only modality of treatment for kidney failure available in all ECEE countries. Only 39% of centres declared that all treatment options are available for HIV+ patients. The most commonly indicated barrier in kidney care was patients' noncompliance. In the CEE region, people living with HIV have full access to screening for kidney disease but there are important limitations in treatment. The choice of dialysis modality and access to kidney transplantation are limited. The main burden of kidney disease is unrelated to HIV infection. Patient care can be significantly improved by addressing noncompliance.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Nephrology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Europe, Eastern/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/therapy , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy
5.
World J Gastroenterol ; 27(23): 3279-3289, 2021 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34163111

ABSTRACT

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a significant public health problem worldwide. The aim of the present review is to summarize the actual trends in the management of CHB in pregnant women. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in pregnant women is usually comparable to that in the general population in the corresponding geographic area. All women have to be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) during pregnancy. Additional examinations of pregnant women with CHB may include maternal hepatitis B e antigen, HBV viral load, alanine aminotransferase level, and HBsAg level. The management of pregnancy depends on the phase of the HBV infection, which has to be determined before pregnancy. In women of childbearing age with CHB, antiviral therapy can pursue two main goals: Treatment of active CHB, and vertical transmission prevention. During pregnancy, tenofovir is the drug of choice in both cases. A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and vaccine against hepatitis B should be administered within the first 12 h to all infants born to mothers with CHB. In such cases, there are no contraindications to breastfeeding.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic , Hepatitis B , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Female , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B e Antigens , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnant Women , Viral Load
6.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 7(12)2021 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34947041

ABSTRACT

We studied the risk factors, etiology, clinical features and the effectiveness of therapy of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) in adult patients. In this retrospective study, we included 45 patients with proven (7%) and probable (93%) CAPA. The ECMM/ISHAM, 2020 criteria were used to diagnose CAPA. A case-control study was conducted to study the risk factors of CAPA; the control group included 90 adult COVID-19 patients without IA. In CAPA patients, the main underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus (33%), and hematological and oncological diseases (31%). The probability of CAPA developing significantly increased with lymphocytopenia >10 days (OR = 8.156 (3.056-21.771), p = 0.001), decompensated diabetes mellitus (29% vs. 7%, (OR = 5.688 (1.991-16.246), p = 0.001)), use of glucocorticosteroids (GCS) in prednisolone-equivalent dose > 60 mg/day (OR = 4.493 (1.896-10.647), p = 0.001) and monoclonal antibodies to IL-1ß and IL-6 (OR = 2.880 (1.272-6.518), p = 0.01). The main area of localization of CAPA was the lungs (100%). The clinical features of CAPA were fever (98% vs. 85%, p = 0.007), cough (89% vs. 72%, p = 0.002) and hemoptysis (36% vs. 3%, p = 0.0001). Overall, 71% of patients were in intensive care units (ICU) (median-15.5 (5-60) days), mechanical ventilation was used in 52% of cases, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurred at a rate of 31%. The lung CT scan features of CAPA were bilateral (93%) lung tissue consolidation (89% vs. 59%, p = 0.004) and destruction (47% vs. 1%, p = 0.00001), and hydrothorax (26% vs. 11%, p = 0.03). The main pathogens were A. fumigatus (44%) and A. niger (31%). The overall survival rate after 12 weeks was 47.2%.

7.
Lancet HIV ; 8(4): e185-e196, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33794181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a need for more convenient, less frequent treatment to help address challenges associated with daily oral HIV treatment in people living with HIV, including stigma, pill burden, drug-food interactions, and adherence. The phase 3 ATLAS and FLAIR studies showed non-inferiority of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine dosed every 4 weeks compared with standard oral therapy for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1 over 48 weeks. We present the 96-week findings. METHODS: FLAIR is a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study done in 11 countries investigating whether switching to long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine is non-inferior to daily dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine in virologically suppressed adults living with HIV-1. Antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants received induction therapy with daily oral dolutegravir (50 mg), abacavir (600 mg), and lamivudine (300 mg) for 20 weeks. After 16 weeks, participants with less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue the standard of care regimen (standard care group) or switch to receive daily oral cabotegravir 30 mg and rilpivirine 25 mg for at least 4 weeks followed by long-acting cabotegravir 400 mg and rilpivirine 600 mg, administered as two 2 mL intramuscular injections, every 4 weeks for at least 96 weeks (long-acting group). Randomisation was stratified by baseline (preinduction) HIV-1 RNA (<100 000 or ≥100 000 copies per mL) and sex at birth and used GlaxoSmithKline-verified randomisation software (RandAll NG, version 1.3.3) for treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA of 50 copies per mL or more assessed as per the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm at week 48, which has been reported previously. Here, we report the proportion of participants with 50 or more HIV-1 RNA copies per mL using the FDA Snapshot algorithm at week 96 (intention-to-treat population; non-inferiority margin 6%). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02938520. FINDINGS: Between Oct 27, 2016, and March 24, 2017, 809 participants were screened. 631 (78%) participants entered the induction phase and 566 (70%) were randomly assigned to either the standard care group (283 [50%] participants) or the long-acting group (283 [50%]). Median age was 34 years (IQR 29 to 43), 62 (11%) were 50 years or older, 127 (22%) were women (sex at birth), and 419 (74%) were white. At week 96, nine (3%) participants in each arm had 50 or more HIV-1 RNA copies per mL, with an adjusted difference of 0·0 (95% CI -2·9 to 2·9), consistent with non-inferiority established at week 48. Across both treatment groups, adverse events leading to withdrawal were infrequent (14 [5%] participants in the long-acting group and four [1%] in the standard care group). Injection site reactions were the most common adverse event, reported by 245 (88%) participants in the long-acting group; their frequency decreased over time. Median injection site reaction duration was 3 days (IQR 2 to 4), and 3082 (99%) of 3100 reactions were grade 1 or 2. No deaths occurred during the maintenance phase. INTERPRETATION: The 96-week results reaffirm the 48-week results, showing long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine continued to be non-inferior compared with continuing a standard care regimen in adults with HIV-1 for the maintenance of viral suppression. These results support the durability of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine, over an almost 2-year-long period, as a therapeutic option for virally suppressed adults with HIV-1. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Research and Development.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Rilpivirine/administration & dosage , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HIV Infections/virology , HIV Integrase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , HIV Integrase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Middle Aged , Pyridones/adverse effects , RNA, Viral/blood , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Rilpivirine/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL