ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology as a personalized medicine tool to identify targetable genetic alterations and to guide treatment decisions. However, the optimal NGS test strategy and target genes for clinical use are still being discussed. The aim was to compare the performance of the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) (targeted gene panel) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) to investigate somatic single and multiple nucleotide variants and small indels in ovarian cancer patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh frozen samples of five high-grade serous (HGSC) and three clear cell ovarian (oCCC) cancer patients. Exome sequencing libraries were prepared by using the Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY kit, whereas libraries for OCAv3 were prepared using by Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit Plus. Sequencing was performed using the Ion S5XL System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). When including only variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic or unknown significance based on ClinVar database verdicts and comparing overlapping regions covered both by the OCAv3 assay and WES, 23 variants were detected by both assays. However, OCAv3 detected additionally two variants: ARID1A: p.Gln563Ter and TP53: p.Ser261ValfsTer84 that have not passed WES filtering criteria due to low coverage. CONCLUSIONS: With the present treatment possibilities, OCAv3 panel testing provided higher diagnostic yield due to better coverage. Our study emphasizes that WES, although offering the potential to identify novel findings in genes not covered by OCAv3, might overlook variants in genes relevant for OC.
Subject(s)
Exome Sequencing , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Exome Sequencing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Transcription Factors/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Mutation/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is a lethal gynecological cancer and no reliable minimally invasive early diagnosis tools exist. High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is often diagnosed at advanced stages, resulting in poorer outcome than those diagnosed in early stage. Circulating microRNAs have been investigated for their biomarker potential. However, due to lack of standardization methods for microRNA detection, there is no consensus, which microRNAs should be used as stable endogenous controls. We aimed to identify microRNAs that are stably expressed in plasma of HGSOC and benign ovarian tumor patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We isolated RNA from plasma samples of 60 HGSOC and 48 benign patients. RT-qPCR was accomplished with a custom panel covering 40 microRNAs and 8 controls. Stability analysis was performed using five algorithms: Normfinder, geNorm, Delta-Ct, BestKeeper and RefFinder using an R-package; RefSeeker developed by our study group [1]. Among 41 analyzed RNAs, 13 were present in all samples and eligible for stability analysis. Differences between stability rankings were observed across algorithms. In HGSOC samples, hsa-miR-126-3p and hsa-miR-23a-3p were identified as the two most stable miRNAs. In benign samples, hsa-miR-191-5p and hsa-miR-27a-3p were most stable. In the combined HGSOC and benign group, hsa-miR-23a-3p and hsa-miR-27a-3p were identified by both the RefFinder and Normfinder analysis as the most stable miRNAs. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus regarding normalization approaches in microRNA studies is needed. The choice of endogenous microRNAs used for normalization depends on the histological content of the cohort. Furthermore, normalization also depends on the algorithms used for stability analysis.
Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , Ovarian Neoplasms , Female , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , BiomarkersABSTRACT
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is treated with cetuximab 250 mg/m2 administered weekly over 1 hour or biweekly (q2w) over 3.5 hours when combined with irinotecan. This prospective study investigated cetuximab 500 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m2 administered q2w over 1.5 hours independent of RAS or BRAF mutation status in mCRC patients in a third-line setting. The intention-to-treat population included 181 patients. No patients had complete response, 18% had partial responses (PR) and 48% stable disease (SD). For cetuximab, a relative dose intensity of ≥90% was reached in 78% and for irinotecan in 67% of the patients. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were pain (17%), fatigue (9%), neutropenia (8%), diarrhea (8%), rash (8%), infection (7%) and hypersensitivity (3%). No deaths occurred. Next-generation sequencing in 96.7% of the patients revealed that 50.3% had RAS and BRAFV600E wild type (WT), with a mutation type (MT) in 45.1% of the RAS and 4.4% of the BRAFV600E genes. In patients with RAS-WT and RAS-MT tumors, a PR was obtained in 32% and 4% (P = .000003) and an SD in 43% and 53%, respectively, with a superior PFS (6.2 vs 3.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] 2.12, P = .00001) and OS (12.9 vs 8.8 months; HR 1.71, P = .0008). Treatment efficacy was poor in 7.4% of patients with an RAS mutation outside KRAS exon 2 and in 38% of patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations. Administration of cetuximab and irinotecan q2w, shortening treatment time from 3.5 to 1.5 hours, is recommended as standard therapy.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To develop and validate a biomarker-based index to optimize referral and diagnosis of patients with suspected ovarian cancer. Furthermore, to compare this new index with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A training study, consisting of patients with benign ovarian disease (n=809) and ovarian cancer (n=246), was used to develop the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) utilizing the variables serum HE4, serum CA125 and patient age. Eight international studies provided the validation population; comprising 1060 patients with benign ovarian masses and 550 patients with ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 2665 patients were included. CPH-I was highly significant in discriminating benign from malignant ovarian disease. At the defined cut-off of 0.070 for CPH-I the sensitivity and specificity were 95.0% and 78.4% respectively in the training cohort and 82.0% and 88.4% in the validation cohort. Comparison of CPH-I, ROMA and RMI demonstrated area-under-curve (AUC) at 0.960, 0.954 and 0.959 respectively in the training study and 0.951, 0.953 and 0.935 respectively in the validation study. Using a sensitivity of 95.0%, the specificities for CPH-I, ROMA and RMI in the training cohort were 78.4%, 71.7% and 81.5% respectively, and in the validation cohort 67.3%, 70.7% and 69.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: All three indices perform well at the clinically relevant sensitivity of 95%, but CPH-I, unlike RMI and ROMA, is independent of ultrasound and menopausal status, and may provide a simple index to optimize referral of women with suspected ovarian cancer.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Membrane Proteins/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteins/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Multivariate Analysis , Ovarian Diseases/blood , Ovarian Diseases/diagnosis , Ovarian Diseases/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2 , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of handling and storage on HE4 and CA125 serum and EDTA plasma levels to clarify any important consequences for a clinical setting. METHODS: Blood samples from 13 ovarian cancer (OC) patients were collected and allowed to clot or sediment for up to 72 hours at 4 °C or 20 °C, then processed into serum and EDTA plasma. Furthermore, the effects of up to eight repetitive cycles of freeze/thaw were investigated. HE4 and CA125 were analyzed using a Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay on the Architect i2000sr System. RESULTS: No significant effect of processing time for HE4 could be shown. HE4 EDTA plasma levels were insignificantly lower (3%) than serum levels (p = 0.41). Similarly, no significant effect of processing time for CA125 could be demonstrated. CA125 levels at 4 °C were significantly reduced compared to levels at 20 °C (p = 0.024). No significant difference between CA125 serum and plasma levels were found (p = 0.46). Serum and EDTA plasma samples were stable during the eight cycles of freezing and thawing (CA125: all p > 0.2; HE4: all p > 0.5). CONCLUSION: No systematic difference could be demonstrated for HE4. CA125 is not dependent on processing time, EDTA plasma or serum. Levels of CA125 are significantly reduced at 4 °C compared to levels at 20°C, but this difference was less than 6% and is not considered clinically relevant.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Proteins/metabolism , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2ABSTRACT
Bio-and GenomeBank, Denmark (RBGB) is a nationwide infra-structure. Danish CancerBiobank (DCB) is a biobank in RBGB. The aim is to describe the degree of biological material collected and stored in DCB for patients diagnosed with primary ovarian cancer registered in The Danish Gynecologic Cancer Database (DGCD). Furthermore, to investigate the concordance between predicted organ of disease registered in RBGB at time of sampling (presumed diagnosis) with final diagnosis for patient. Data extraction from DGCD and DCB. Biological materials are present for 1.347 (62%) of 2.172 patients with primary ovarian cancer (OC). The median age of OC patients were 68 years (range: 18-90 years). Median age of patients with biological material in DCB was 67 years and for patients without biological material in DCB 69 years (p ≤ 0.0001). The histological subtypes for the 1347 OC patients with biological material were 911 (68%) serous adenocarcinoma, 97 (7%) endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 80 (6%) mucinous adenocarcinoma, 58 (4%) clear cell carcinoma, and for 201 (15%) no information were registered. For 327 patients (24%), the presumed diagnosis was hematological with a final diagnosis of OC. Using clinical data and biological material including pre-analytical data regarding the biological material the possibility for translational research is optimal. Furthermore, information registered through daily working procedures may propose the need for additional biomarkers to aid clinicians to stratify patients to treatment in correct fast-track packages.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Translational Research, Biomedical , Biological Specimen Banks , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , DenmarkABSTRACT
When performing expression analysis either for coding RNA (e.g., mRNA) or non-coding RNA (e.g., miRNA), reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a widely used method. To normalize these data, one or more stable endogenous references must be identified. RefFinder is an online web-based tool using four almost universally used algorithms for assessing candidate endogenous references-delta-Ct, BestKeeper, geNorm, and Normfinder. However, the online interface is presently cumbersome and time consuming. We developed an R package, RefSeeker, which performs easy and straightforward RefFinder analysis by enabling raw data import and calculation of stability from each of the algorithms and provides data output tools to create graphs and tables. This protocol uses RefSeeker R package for fast and simple RefFinder stability analysis. Key features Perform stability analysis using five algorithms: Normfinder, geNorm, delta-Ct, BestKeeper, and RefFinder. Identification of endogenous references for normalization of RT-qPCR data. Create publication-ready graphs and tables output. Step-by-step guide dialog window for novice R users.
ABSTRACT
The fetal insulin hypothesis proposes that low birthweight and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adulthood may be two phenotypes of the same genotype. In this study we aimed to explore this theory further by testing the effects of GWAS-identified genetic variants related to insulin release and sensitivity on fetal growth and blood flow from week 20 of gestation to birth and on placental weight at birth. We calculated genetic risk scores (GRS) of first phase insulin release (FPIR), fasting insulin (FI), combined insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia (IR + DLD) and insulin sensitivity (IS) in a study population of 665 genotyped newborns. Two-dimensional ultrasound measurements with estimation of fetal weight and blood flow were carried out at week 20, 25, and 32 of gestation in all 665 pregnancies. Birthweight and placental weight were registered at birth. Associations between the GRSs and fetal growth, blood flow and placental weight were investigated using linear mixed models. The FPIR GRS was directly associated with fetal growth from week 20 to birth, and both the FI GRS, IR + DLD GRS, and IS GRS were associated with placental weight at birth. Our findings indicate that insulin-related genetic variants might primarily affect fetal growth via the placenta.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Insulin Resistance , Humans , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Insulin , Placenta/physiology , Birth Weight/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Fetal Development/genetics , Insulin Resistance/genetics , Fetal WeightABSTRACT
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules regulating gene expression with diagnostic potential in different diseases, including epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC). As only a few studies have been published on the identification of stable endogenous miRNA in EOC, there is no consensus which miRNAs should be used aiming standardization. Currently, U6-snRNA is widely adopted as a normalization control in RT-qPCR when investigating miRNAs in EOC; despite its variable expression across cancers being reported. Therefore, our goal was to compare different missing data and normalization approaches to investigate their impact on the choice of stable endogenous controls and subsequent survival analysis while performing expression analysis of miRNAs by RT-qPCR in most frequent subtype of EOC: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). 40 miRNAs were included based on their potential as stable endogenous controls or as biomarkers in EOC. Following RNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues from 63 HGSC patients, RT-qPCR was performed with a custom panel covering 40 target miRNAs and 8 controls. The raw data was analyzed by applying various strategies regarding choosing stable endogenous controls (geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, the comparative ΔCt method and RefFinder), missing data (single/multiple imputation), and normalization (endogenous miRNA controls, U6-snRNA or global mean). Based on our study, we propose hsa-miR-23a-3p and hsa-miR-193a-5p, but not U6-snRNA as endogenous controls in HGSC patients. Our findings are validated in two external cohorts retrieved from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database. We present that the outcome of stability analysis depends on the histological composition of the cohort, and it might suggest unique pattern of miRNA stability profiles for each subtype of EOC. Moreover, our data demonstrates the challenge of miRNA data analysis by presenting various outcomes from normalization and missing data imputation strategies on survival analysis.
Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/genetics , Biomarkers , RNA, Small Nuclear/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Biomarkers, Tumor/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has revolutionised cancer treatment but has no convincing effect in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). It has been suggested that a combination of CPI and hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may work synergistically, and recent trials have supported this. We hypothesise that adding SBRT to CPI treatment can improve response rates in patients with mCRPC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CheckPRO trial is an open-label, randomised, two-stage, phase II trial. We aim to enrol and randomise 80 evaluable patients with mCRPC who progressed following ≥2 lines of treatment. Enrolment started in November 2019 with 38 months expected enrolment period. The participants receive treatment for 52 weeks including four cycles of ipilimumab and nivolumab with or without concomitant SBRT (24 Gray in three fractions) to a single soft tissue or bone metastasis, followed by 10 cycles of nivolumab. Participants are followed until progression, death, or for 12 months after the end of treatment.Co-primary endpoints are the objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Secondary endpoints include safety, radiographic progression-free survival, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, PSA-progression-free survival beyond 12 weeks, quality of life and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include translational analyses of tumour biopsies and consecutive blood samples. Biopsies from metastatic sites are collected at baseline, before the third treatment and at the end of treatment. Blood sampling for immune monitoring and circulating tumour DNA is performed consecutively at baseline and every radiographic assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study follows the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the Danish Ethics Committee System (journal no. H-19016100). All participants must receive written and oral information and provide a signed informed consent document prior to inclusion. The study results will be published in an international peer-review journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number: 2018-003461-34. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID NCT05655715.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Radiosurgery , Male , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/radiotherapy , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic factors are needed to improve the currently used serum CA125 and risk of malignancy index (RMI) in differentiating ovarian cancer (OC) from other pelvic masses, thereby achieving precise and fast referral to a tertiary center and correct selection for further diagnostics. The aim was to evaluate serum Human Epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) for these purposes. METHODS: Serum from 1218 patients in the prospective ongoing pelvic mass study was collected prior to diagnosis. The HE4 and CA125 data were registered and evaluated separately and combined in ROMA and compared to RMI. RESULTS: 809 benign tumors, 79 borderline ovarian tumors, 252 OC (64 early and 188 late stage), 9 non-epithelial ovarian tumors and 69 non-ovarian cancers were evaluated. Differentiating between OC and benign disease the specificity was 62.2 (CA125), 63.2 (HE4), 76.5 (ROMA) and 81.5 (RMI) at a set sensitivity of 94.4 which corresponds to RMI=200. The areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.854 (CA125), 0.864 (HE4), 0,897 (ROMA) and 0.905 (RMI) for benign vs. early stage OC. For premenopausal benign vs. OC AUC were 0.925 (CA125), 0.905 (HE4), 0.909 (ROMA) and 0.945 (RMI). CONCLUSION: HE4 and ROMA helps differentiating OC from other pelvic masses, even in early stage OC. ROMA performs equally well as the ultrasound depending RMI and might be valuable as a first line biomarker for selecting high risk patients for referral to a tertiary center and further diagnostics. Further improvements of HE4 and ROMA in differentiating pelvic masses are still needed, especially regarding premenopausal women.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Decision Support Techniques , Membrane Proteins/blood , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pelvic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteins/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Pelvic Neoplasms/blood , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2 , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Risk of malignancy index (RMI), based on a serum cancer antigen 125 level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, is used to discriminate ovarian cancer from benign pelvic mass. In Denmark, patients with pelvic mass and RMI ≥200 are referred to tertiary gynecologic oncology centers according to the national guidelines for ovarian cancer treatment. The guidelines include recalculation of RMI at the tertiary center and, if indicated, positron emission tomography/computed tomography and fast-track surgery by specialists in cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to validate the use of RMI ≥200 as a tool for preoperative identification of ovarian cancer at a tertiary center. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A tertiary center in Copenhagen, Denmark. POPULATION: One thousand one hundred and fifty-nine women with pelvic mass. METHODS: The RMI was calculated after ultrasound examination and blood sampling for serum cancer antigen 125 analysis within two weeks before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated to evaluate the ability of RMI to distinguish between ovarian cancer and benign pelvic mass. RESULTS: There were 778 women diagnosed with benign pelvic mass, while 251 had ovarian cancer and 74 had borderline ovarian tumor. Fifty-six women were diagnosed with other forms of cancer. Sensitivity and specificity for ovarian cancer vs. benign pelvic mass for RMI ≥200 were 92 and 82%, respectively. Corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 62 and 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of malignancy index ≥200 is a reliable tool for identifying patients with ovarian cancer pelvic masses at a tertiary centre to select patients for further preoperative examinations.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/diagnosis , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs involved in gene expression regulation and have been investigated as potential biomarkers for various diseases, including ovarian cancer (OC). However, lack of standardized protocols regarding e.g., RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, spike-in controls for experimental steps, and data normalization, impacts cross validation of results across research groups and hinders implementation of miRNAs as clinical biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA was isolated from matching fresh-frozen tissue (FF), formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue, and plasma samples from twenty women diagnosed with OC using three commercial kits: miRNeasy Tissue/Cells, miRNeasy FFPE, and miRNeasy Serum/Plasma (Qiagen, Copenhagen, Denmark). RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and PCR performance were tested using miRCURY LNA miRNA Quality Control PCR (QC) Panels (Qiagen). Finally, miRNA stability was assessed using five algorithms: BestKeeper, Normfinder, GeNorm, comparative delta-Ct and comprehensive ranking provided by a web-based RefFinder tool. RESULTS: RNA from FF, FFPE and plasma was extracted using commercially available kits and the differences in yield and purity were examined. We developed a simple method for identifying and potentially excluding samples based on their crossing point values from RT-qPCR data, which could improve existing manufacture guidelines. Moreover, we discussed how assessment of miRNA stability differs between algorithms, possibly leading to inconsistent results. CONCLUSION: We present guidelines for RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and data normalization for successful miRNA expression profiling using RT-qPCR in corresponding biological OC specimens. We recommend QC panels in combination with spike-in controls and interplate controls to monitor process efficiencies.
Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , Ovarian Neoplasms , Biomarkers , DNA, Complementary , Female , Formaldehyde , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , MicroRNAs/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Paraffin Embedding/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tissue Fixation/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown that the proteomic markers apolipoprotein A1, hepcidin, transferrin, inter-alpha trypsin IV internal fragment, transthyretin, connective-tissue activating protein 3 and beta-2 microglobulin may discriminate between a benign pelvic mass and ovarian cancer (OC). The aim was to determine if these serum proteomic biomarkers alone as well as in combination with age and serum CA125, could be helpful in triage of women with a pelvic mass. METHODS: We included prospectively 144 patients diagnosed with (OC), 40 with a borderline tumor and 469 with a benign tumor. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight-mass spectrometry was used for analyses. The Danish Index (DK-Index) based on the proteomic data, age and CA125 was developed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the selected proteomic markers, CA125 and age were independent predictors of OC and the combination of these is proposed as the DK-index. A sensitivity (SN) of 99% had a specificity (SP) of 57% for DK-index and 49% for CA125. At a SN of 95%, the SP increased to 81% for DK-index compared to 68% for CA125 alone. For stage I+II the SP was 58% for DK-index and 49% for CA125. For stage III+IV the corresponding values were 94% and 86% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The DK-index warrants further evaluation in independent cohorts.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Neoplasm Proteins/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteomics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Data analysis has become a crucial aspect in clinical oncology to interpret output from next-generation sequencing-based testing. NGS being able to resolve billions of sequencing reactions in a few days has consequently increased the demand for tools to handle and analyze such large data sets. Many tools have been developed since the advent of NGS, featuring their own peculiarities. Increased awareness when interpreting alterations in the genome is therefore of utmost importance, as the same data using different tools can provide diverse outcomes. Hence, it is crucial to evaluate and validate bioinformatic pipelines in clinical settings. Moreover, personalized medicine implies treatment targeting efficacy of biological drugs for specific genomic alterations. Here, we focused on different sequencing technologies, features underlying the genome complexity, and bioinformatic tools that can impact the final annotation. Additionally, we discuss the clinical demand and design for implementing NGS.
ABSTRACT
Among women, ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most severe forms of malignancy, accounting for a low 5-year survival rate, of approximately 52%. Early symptoms are unspecific and hence hard to detect. The origin of OC and its subtypes are still unclear, underlying the need for efficient diagnostic biomarkers. In that regard, epigenetics studies are emerging in cancer diagnostics, with encouraging outcomes. Among them, DNA methylation profiling has shown that the origins of the cancer epigenome are associated with molecular factors that are crucial to carcinogenesis, such as regulation of oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Furthermore, those events have been detected in abnormal cell morphology before neoplastic formation, indicating its potential crucial use in the OC diagnostics in the future. Nonetheless, studies are limited, and whether methylation analysis can be performed optimally in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) preparations of OC cases is still elusive. In the present report, we investigated the performance of DNA methylation analysis in FFPE samples, compared to their matched fresh frozen tissue in a small cohort of OC samples. We found that the overall DNA methylation profile in FFPE tissue showed high concordance to that found in fresh frozen tissue, and accounting for the small cohort size, the differentially methylated sites found primarily in frozen tissue, compared to benign samples, were also reproducible in FFPE. Overall, by using samples from our current clinical setting of tissue preservation, these preliminary observations might provide insights into the clinical use of FFPE tissues in methylation studies without critically compromising the outcome.
Subject(s)
DNA Methylation/physiology , Formaldehyde/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Paraffin Embedding/methods , Tissue Fixation/methods , Cohort Studies , Epigenomics/methods , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
Ovarian cancer (OC), the eighth-leading cause of cancer-related death among females worldwide, is mainly represented by epithelial OC (EOC) that can be further subdivided into four subtypes: serous (75%), endometrioid (10%), clear cell (10%), and mucinous (3%). Major reasons for high mortality are the poor biological understanding of the OC mechanisms and a lack of reliable markers defining each EOC subtype. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression primarily by targeting messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts. Their aberrant expression patterns have been associated with cancer development, including OC. However, the role of miRNAs in tumorigenesis is still to be determined, mainly due to the lack of consensus regarding optimal methodologies for identification and validation of miRNAs and their targets. Several tools for computational target prediction exist, but false interpretations remain a problem. The experimental validation of every potential miRNA-mRNA pair is not feasible, as it is laborious and expensive. In this study, we analyzed the correlation between global miRNA and mRNA expression patterns derived from microarray profiling of 197 EOC patients to identify the signatures of miRNA-mRNA interactions associated with overall survival (OS). The aim was to investigate whether these miRNA-mRNA signatures might have a prognostic value for OS in different subtypes of EOC. The content of our cohort (162 serous carcinomas, 15 endometrioid carcinomas, 11 mucinous carcinomas, and 9 clear cell carcinomas) reflects a real-world scenario of EOC. Several interaction pairs between 6 miRNAs (hsa-miR-126-3p, hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-23a-5p, hsa-miR-27a-5p, hsa-miR-486-5p, and hsa-miR-506-3p) and 8 mRNAs (ATF3, CH25H, EMP1, HBB, HBEGF, NAMPT, POSTN, and PROCR) were identified and the findings appear to be well supported by the literature. This indicates that our study has a potential to reveal miRNA-mRNA signatures relevant for EOC. Thus, the evaluation on independent cohorts will further evaluate the performance of such findings.
Subject(s)
MicroRNAs/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/genetics , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/genetics , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/genetics , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology , Databases, Genetic , Female , Gene Regulatory Networks/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Survival RateABSTRACT
The usage of next generation sequencing in combination with targeted gene panels has enforced a better understanding of tumor compositions. The identification of key genomic biomarkers underlying a disease are crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapeutic responses. The Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) covers 161 cancer-associated genes and is routinely employed to support clinical decision making for a therapeutic course. An improved version, Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA-Plus), has been recently developed, covering 501 genes (144 overlapping with OCAv3) in addition to microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) assays in one workflow. The validation of MSI and TMB was not addressed in the present study. However, the implementation of new assays must be validated and confirmed across multiple samples before it can be introduced into a clinical setting. Here, we report the comparison of DNA sequencing results from 50 ovarian cancer formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples subjected to OCAv3 and OCA-Plus. A validation assessment of gene mutations identified using OCA-Plus was performed on the 144 overlapping genes and 313,769 intersecting nucleotide positions of the OCAv3 and the OCA-Plus. Our results showed a 91% concordance within variants classified as likely-pathogenic or pathogenic. Moreover, results showed that a region of PTEN is poorly covered by the OCA-Plus assay, hence, we implemented rescue filters for those variants. In conclusion, the OCA-Plus can reflect the mutational profile of genomic variants compared with OCAv3 of 144 overlapping genes, without compromising performance.
ABSTRACT
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is characterized by dismal prognosis, partially due to its low sensitivity to standard chemotherapy regimen. It is also well-known for presenting unique molecular features in comparison to other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes. Here, we aim to identify potential subgroups of patients in order to (1) determine their molecular features and (2) characterize their mutational signature. Furthermore, we sought to perform the investigation based on a potentially clinically relevant setting. To that end, we assessed the mutational profile and genomic instability of 55 patients extracted from the Gynecologic Cancer Database (DGCD) by using a panel comprised of 409 cancer-associated genes and a microsatellite assay, respectively; both are currently used in our routine environment. In accordance with previous findings, ARID1A and PIK3CA were the most prevalent mutations, present in 49.1% and 41.8%, respectively. From those, the co-occurrence of ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations was observed in 36.1% of subjects, indicating that this association might be a common feature of OCCC. The microsatellite instability frequency was low across samples. An unbiased assessment of signatures identified the presence of three subgroups, where "PIK3CA" and "Double hit" (with ARID1A and PIK3CA double mutation) subgroups exhibited unique signatures, whilst "ARID1A" and "Undetermined" (no mutations on ARID1A nor PIK3CA) subgroups showed similar profiles. Those differences were further indicated by COSMIC signatures. Taken together, the current findings suggest that OCCC presents distinct mutational landscapes within its group, which may indicate different therapeutic approaches according to its subgroup. Although encouraging, it is noteworthy that the current results are limited by sample size, and further investigation on a larger group would be crucial to better elucidate them.
ABSTRACT
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common type of cancer for women worldwide. The current diagnostic and prognostic routine available for OC management either lack specificity or are very costly. Gene expression profiling has shown to be a very effective tool in exploring new molecular markers for patients with OC, although association of such markers with patient survival and clinical outcome is still elusive. Here, we performed gene expression profiling of different subtypes of OC to evaluate its association with patient overall survival (OS) and aggressive forms of the disease. By global mRNA microarray profiling in a total of 196 epithelial OC patients (161 serous, 15 endometrioid, 11 mucinous, and 9 clear cell carcinomas), we found four candidates-HSPA1A, CD99, RAB3A and POM121L9P, which associated with OS and poor clinicopathological features. The overexpression of all combined was correlated with shorter OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the combination of at least two markers were further associated with advanced grade, chemotherapy resistance, and progressive disease. These results indicate that a panel comprised of a few predictors that associates with a more aggressive form of OC may be clinically relevant, presenting a better performance than one marker alone.