Effect of the Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management Through the Emergency Department (TEAM-ED) Program on Asthma Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a telemedicine-based program in reducing asthma morbidity among children who present to the emergency department (ED) for asthma, by facilitating primary care follow-up and promoting delivery of guideline-based care. STUDY DESIGN: We included children (3-12 years of age) with persistent asthma who presented to the ED for asthma, who were then randomly assigned to Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management through the Emergency Department (TEAM-ED) or enhanced usual care. TEAM-ED included (1) school-based telemedicine follow-ups, completed by a primary care provider, (2) point-of-care prompting to promote guideline-based care, and 3) an opportunity for 2 additional telemedicine follow-ups. The primary outcome was the mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs) over 2 weeks at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: We included 373 children from 2016 through 2021 (participation rate 68%; 54% Black, 32% Hispanic, 77% public insurance; mean age, 6.4 years). Demographic characteristics and asthma severity were similar between groups at baseline. Most (91%) TEAM-ED children had ≥1 telemedicine visit and 41% completed 3 visits. At 3 months, caregivers of children in TEAM-ED reported more follow-up visits (66% vs 48%; aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.28-3.33), preventive asthma medication actions (90% vs 79%; aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.56-6.89), and use of a preventive medication (82% vs 69%; aOR, 2.716; 95% CI, 1.45-5.08), compared with enhanced usual care. There was no difference between groups in medication adherence or asthma morbidity. When only prepandemic data were included, there was greater improvement in SFDs over time for children in TEAM-ED vs enhanced usual care. CONCLUSIONS: TEAM-ED significantly improved follow-up and preventive care after an ED visit for asthma. We also saw improved SFDs with prepandemic data. The lack of overall improvement in morbidity and adherence indicates the need for additional ongoing management support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02752165.

Feasibility of text message follow-up for pediatric asthma care after an emergency department visit.

Background: Many children seen in the Emergency Department (ED) for asthma do not follow-up with their primary care provider. Text messaging via short message service (SMS) is a ubiquitous, but untested means of providing post-ED asthma follow-up care.Objective: To evaluate responses to an asthma assessment survey via SMS following an ED visit and estimate the likelihood of response by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We recruited 173 parents of children 2-17 years-old presenting for ED asthma care to receive a follow-up text (participation rate: 85%). One month later, parents received via SMS a 22-item survey that assessed asthma morbidity. We assessed response rates overall and by various sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including age, parental education, and indicators of asthma severity.Results: Overall, 55% of parents (n = 95) responded to the SMS survey. In multivariable logistic regression (MLR), parents who graduated high school had a four-fold higher response rate compared to parents with less than a high school degree (OR: 4.05 (1.62, 10.13)). More parents of children with oral steroid use in the prior 12 months responded to survey items (OR: 2.53 (1.2, 5.31)). Reported asthma characteristics included: 48% uncontrolled, 22% unimproved/worse, 21% with sleep disruption, and 10% who were hospitalized for asthma.Conclusions: Text messaging may be a viable strategy to improve post-ED asthma assessment and to identify children with persistent symptoms in need of enhanced care or modification of care plans.

Medication fill duration in pediatric hypertension: adherence, blood pressure control, and disparities.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is a barrier to hypertension control. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends prescribing 90-day fills for maintenance medications yet antihypertensives are often dispensed as 30-day fills. Our objectives were to examine how often patients receive 30-day supplies of medication despite prescriptions for longer duration and to examine the effect of medication fill duration on adherence and hypertension control. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with hypertension over a 3-year period. For each patient, days prescribed per fill were compared to days dispensed per fill using pharmacy reports and insurance claim data. Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) was calculated to estimate adherence. Hypertension control was determined by provider assessment of control and blood pressure measurement at the final visit. RESULTS: Final cohort included 449 patients. A total of 70% had at least one prescription for ≥ 90 days but only 37% had at least one dispense for ≥ 90 days. There was no difference in the likelihood of being prescribed a 90-day fill by insurance type (public vs. private); however, patients with public insurance were less likely to be dispensed a 90-day fill (OR = 0.068, p < 0.001). Patients who received 90-day fills had better adherence (median PDC 77.5% vs. 58.1%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have hypertension control based on provider assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Longer fill duration is associated with improved adherence and hypertension control. Patients with public insurance are markedly less likely to be dispensed 90-day fills, a modifiable barrier to improving adherence.

The prevalence of childhood asthma: interpreting falling rates in the context of shifting measurement and the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The estimated prevalence of childhood asthma in the United States, as measured by the National Health Information Survey (NHIS), has decreased by 30% since 2017. This review provides context for observed changes in asthma rates by describing recent shifts in NHIS data collection and analysis, and considers whether the COVID-19 pandemic might impact asthma prevalence in years to come. RECENT FINDINGS: The NHIS underwent a planned redesign in 2019 with updated sampling weights to better match the U.S. population. In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in unplanned modifications to NHIS implementation, which may have included fewer children from populations at a heightened risk for asthma. Decreasing prevalence estimates in recent years are likely at least in part due to these survey changes rather than true epidemiologic shift. However, pandemic-related changes to risk factors for childhood asthma (including exposure to rhinovirus infections and allergic sensitization) may also influence prevalence in the future. SUMMARY: Recent changes in estimated rates of childhood asthma in the USA are likely driven by changes to survey methods and implementation, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional years of data are needed to determine whether a true shift in disease prevalence is occurring.

Allergic rhinitis co-morbidity on asthma outcomes in city school children.

BACKGROUND: School based asthma programs have demonstrated that preventive asthma therapy administered in school reduces asthma morbidity. The burden of co-morbid allergic disease on asthma outcomes in a large school based asthma cohort has been unexplored. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in historically minoritized school children with persistent asthma, and determine if AR is an independent risk factor for asthma morbidity. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of AR in children enrolled in 3 NIH funded school based asthma programs in Rochester, NY. We used linear regression and multivariate analyses to compare asthma outcomes for children whose caregivers did and did not report AR. RESULTS: We used data from 1,029 children with asthma (mean age 7.4, 60.4% Black, 29.5% Hispanic, 72.8% insured with Medicaid). 63% of children reported AR. Children with AR had significantly fewer symptom free days over 2 weeks compared to children without AR (7.2 vs. 8.3, p < 0.001). Children with AR also had more daytime symptoms, (4.7 vs. 3.7, p < 0.001), more rescue medication use (4.5 vs. 3.4, p < 0.01), and more activity limitation due to asthma (3.6 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001). Only 44% of children with AR reported allergy medication use. CONCLUSIONS: Among a large school-based cohort of minoritized children with asthma, we found that the majority of children have comorbid allergic rhinitis, which was associated with increased asthma morbidity. Inadequate recognition and treatment for allergic rhinitis likely represents substantial preventable morbidity for this group.

Utilization of the emergency department as a routine source of care among children with asthma.

Objective: To describe characteristics of children with persistent asthma in the ED who receive most of their healthcare in emergency settings; and determine whether recent asthma experiences or historic patterns of care are associated with identifying the ED as a typical location for care.Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of baseline data from Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management through the Emergency Department (TEAM-ED), an RCT of children (3-12 years) presenting to the ED with persistent asthma (2016-2020). Caregivers identified reasons for seeking emergency care, including if their child received most overall healthcare in the ED ('ED Care'; primary outcome) or not ('Other Care'). Independent variables included demographics, recent symptoms and quality of life (QOL), and historic preventive care and healthcare use. We compared responses between ED Care and Other Care groups using bivariate and multivariate analyses.Results: We analyzed data for 355 children (31% ED Care, 69% Other Care). Compared with Other Care, ED Care respondents were more likely to identify the ED as the closest source of healthcare; report fewer symptom nights but a poorer quality of life; and describe the ED as a usual place for sick care, despite most having a PCP.Conclusions: Many children with asthma use the ED as a typical source of healthcare, and are distinguished by need for proximity, poorer caregiver QOL, and historic patterns of care-seeking. Efforts to improve timely access to outpatient care and reinforce the role of PCP-directed asthma management, such as through telemedicine, may reduce preventable morbidity including ED visits.

The relationship between teen-reported nocturnal asthma symptoms and daily functioning.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify associations between nocturnal asthma awakenings and functional health outcomes in a cohort of teenagers with asthma. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from teenagers enrolled in SB-ACT, an NIH-funded RCT. During an at-home baseline survey, teenagers with asthma answered questions about demographics, recent asthma symptoms, and functional health outcomes. We conducted regression analyses to explore the relationship between persistent nocturnal asthma symptoms (≥2 nights of nocturnal asthma awakenings in the past 14 days) and functional health measures. RESULTS: Of the 430 teens enrolled (Participation rate = 79%, Mean Age = 13.4), 30% reported persistent nocturnal asthma symptoms. Compared to teens with intermittent nocturnal asthma symptoms, teens with persistent nocturnal asthma symptoms were more likely to report physical limitation during strenuous activities (OR = 1.9, 1.3-3.0), moderate activities (OR = 1.9, 1.2-3.1), and school gym (OR = 2.4, 1.5-3.8). They were also more likely to report depressive symptoms (OR = 2.3, 1.5-3.6), more asthma-related school absenteeism in the past 14 days (0.81 vs 0.12, p < 0.01) and poorer quality of life (4.6 vs 5.9, p < 0.01). These findings remained significant when controlling for daytime asthma symptoms, weight status, race, ethnicity, gender, age, and smoke exposure. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional study, persistent nighttime asthma symptoms were associated with poor functional health outcomes among teens, independent of day-time symptoms. Identifying nighttime symptoms and improving asthma control at night may positively impact daily functioning for these teens.

Use of a validated asthma questionnaire to increase inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in the pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend assessment of asthma control and treatment with an ICS when appropriate. Children seen for asthma in the ED often have poorly controlled asthma. Validated questionnaires are rarely used in the ED and ICS are prescribed at less than 5% of ED asthma encounters, leaving many children at risk for continued poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of a validated asthma questionnaire can increase the proportion of children who receive an ICS prescription during an ED asthma visit. METHODS: We administered a validated asthma questionnaire (Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version [PACCI-ED]) to parents of children 2 - 17 years old presenting for asthma care at a large, urban, academic pediatric ED. Based on national asthma guidelines, the PACCI-ED results were used to determine ICS dose recommendations. ED physicians reviewed the PACCI-ED results and ICS dose recommendations and chose whether to prescribe an ICS upon discharge. ICS prescribing rates during the intervention period were assessed via medical record review and compared to historical controls. We also surveyed parents to examine the association of sociodemographic factors with receipt of an ICS prescription, and surveyed physicians regarding their prescribing decisions. RESULTS: Thirteen physicians and seventy-nine children participated. Historically, the ICS prescribing rate for asthma exacerbations discharged from the ED was 13%. The intervention increased ICS prescribing to 56% (p < 0.001). Children with ≥2 asthma exacerbations in the prior year (p < 0.02) and those with moderate-severe persistent asthma (p < 0.02) were more likely to receive an ICS prescription. There were no statistically significant differences in ICS prescribing by sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: A validated asthma questionnaire increased ICS prescribing for children presenting for to the ED for asthma care. Additional strategies are needed to promote prescribing in this setting and ensure that all eligible children receive guideline-based asthma care.

Effect of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity: a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Urban adolescents with asthma often have inadequate preventive care. We tested the effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity and preventive medication adherence.Methods:Subjects/Setting- 12-16yr olds with persistent asthma in Rochester, NY schools. Design- 3-group randomized trial (2014-2019). SB-ACT Intervention- Two core components: 1) Directly observed therapy (DOT) of preventive asthma medications, provided in school for at least 6-8 weeks for the teen to learn proper technique and experience the benefits of daily preventive therapy; 2) 4-6 weeks later, 3 sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss potential benefits from DOT and enhance motivation to take medication independently. We included 2 comparison groups: 1) DOT-only for 6-8wks, and 2) asthma education (AE) attention control. Masked follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 5, and 7mos. Outcomes- Mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs)/2 weeks and medication adherence. Analyses- Modified intention-to-treat repeated measures analysis.Results: We enrolled 430 teens (56% Black, 32% Hispanic, 85% Medicaid). There were no group differences at baseline. We found no difference in SFDs at any follow-up timepoint. More teens in the SB-ACT and DOT-only groups reported having a preventive asthma medication at each follow-up (p<.001), and almost daily adherence at 3 and 5-months (p<.001, p=.003) compared to AE. By 7 months there were no significant differences between groups in adherence (p=.49).Conclusion: SB-ACT improved preventive medication availability and short-term adherence but did not impact asthma symptoms. Further work is needed to create developmentally appropriate and effective interventions for this group.

Children with under-diagnosed asthma presenting to a pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed asthma in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for respiratory illnesses might be associated with subsequent asthma morbidity and repeat ED visits. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of undiagnosed asthma among children presenting for ED care, and explore associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We surveyed parents of children ages 2-17 years seeking ED care for respiratory symptoms (including asthma) regarding sociodemographic characteristics, asthma symptoms, prior asthma care and morbidity, and prior asthma diagnosis. Undiagnosed asthma was defined as a positive screening for asthma and no prior diagnosis. We compared sociodemographic and clinical factors of those with diagnosed versus undiagnosed asthma using chi-square, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 362 children, 36% had undiagnosed asthma. Undiagnosed children were younger, had younger parents, and had parents less likely to speak English versus diagnosed children (all p < 0.05). Among undiagnosed children, 42% had moderate or severe asthma and 66% reported ≥1 exacerbation in the prior 12 months. Parent-reported controller medication use was higher among diagnosed versus undiagnosed children (60% vs. 21%, p=.001). In a multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for insurance, education, income and preferred language), no controller usage (aOR 4.26), no asthma exacerbations in the prior year (aOR 2.41) and younger age (aOR 0.76) were significantly associated with undiagnosed asthma. CONCLUSION: Children presenting to the ED with undiagnosed asthma commonly experience significant prior asthma morbidity. Strategies to improve asthma diagnosis and messaging to their parents may reduce future morbidity.

Going mobile with primary care: smartphone-telemedicine for asthma management in young urban adults (TEAMS).

BACKGROUND: The majority of adults with persistent asthma have chronically uncontrolled disease and interventions to improve outcomes are needed. We evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a multi-component smartphone-telemedicine program (TEAMS) to deliver asthma care remotely, support provider adherence to asthma management guidelines, and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: TEAMS utilized: (1) remote symptom monitoring, (2) nurse-led smartphone-telemedicine with self-management training for patients, and (3) Electronic medical record-based clinical decision support software. Adults aged 18-44 (N = 33) and primary care providers (N = 4) were recruited from a safety-net practice in Upstate New York. Asthma control, quality of life, and FEV1 were measured at 0, 3 and 6 months. Acceptability was assessed via survey and end-of-study interviews. Paired t-test and mixed effects modeling were used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on asthma outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, 80% of participants had uncontrolled asthma. By 6-months, 80% classified as well-controlled. Improvements in control and quality of life were large (d = 1.955, d = 1.579). FEV%pred increased 4.2% (d = 1.687) with the greatest gain in males, smokers, and lower educational status. Provider adherence to national guidelines increased from 43.3% to 86.7% (CI = 22.11-64.55) and patient adherence to medication increased from 45.58% to 85.29% (CI = 14.79-64.62). Acceptability was 95.7%; In follow up interviews, 29/30 patients and all providers indicated TEAMS worked better than usual care, supported effective self-management, and reduced symptoms over time, which led to greater self-efficacy and motivation to manage asthma. DISCUSSION: Based on these findings, we conclude that smartphone telemedicine could substantially improve clinical asthma management, adherence to guidelines, and patient outcomes.

A pilot school-based health center intervention to improve asthma chronic care in high-poverty schools.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility and effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention administered through school-based health centers (SBHCs) to improve asthma control for children in high-poverty schools with not well controlled asthma. METHODS: Students 4-14 years old with persistent asthma were enrolled from three SBHCs. The centers' advanced practice providers received training on evidence-based asthma guidelines. Students randomized to the intervention received directly observed therapy of their asthma controller medication, medication adjustments as needed by the centers' providers, and daily self-management support. Students randomized to usual care were referred back to their primary care provider (PCP) for routine asthma care. RESULTS: We enrolled 29 students. Students in the intervention group received their controller medication 92% of days they were in school. Ninety-four percent of follow-up assessments were completed. During the study, 11 of 12 intervention students had a step-up in medication; 2 of 15 usual care students were stepped up by their PCP. Asthma Control Test scores did not differ between groups, although there were significant improvements from baseline to the 7 month follow-up within each group (both p < .01). Both FEV1% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio significantly worsened in the usual care group (both p = .001), but did not change in the intervention group (p = .76 and .28 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data suggest that a multifaceted intervention can be feasibly administered through SBHCs in communities with health disparities. Despite the small sample size, spirometry detected advantages in the intervention group. Further study is needed to optimize the intervention and evaluate outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03032744.

A mixed-methods analysis of younger adults' perceptions of asthma, self-management, and preventive care: "This isn't helping me none".

BACKGROUND: Young adults (ages 18-44) have increased emergency department use for asthma and poor adherence to medications. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to understand experiences with and approaches to managing asthma, of which little is known in this age group. METHODS: Surveys (Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) and 1:1 semi-structured interviews were used to explore experiences with asthma, symptoms, self-management behaviours, and relationship to asthma control and quality of life. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis techniques. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were used to examine distributive characteristics and associations between variables. RESULTS: Forty urban adults participated (mean age 32.7 ± 6.2, 1σ). Coughing was reported nearly 46% more often than wheezing, with 42.5% (17/40) coughing until the point of vomiting most days. Most participants delayed using medication for symptoms due to misperceptions about inhalers. Higher symptom frequency and worse asthma control were associated with greater use of non-pharmacologic symptom management strategies (r = 0.645, P < .001; r = 0.360, P = .022, respectively). Five themes were identified regarding young adults experiences with asthma: (1) having asthma means being limited and missing out on life; (2) health care for asthma is burdensome, and other things are more important; (3) there is not enough personal benefit in medical interactions to make preventive care worthwhile; (4) there are insufficient support and education about asthma for adults; and (5) people normalize chronic symptoms over time and find ways of coping that fit with their lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Young adults may tolerate symptoms without using quick-relief medication or seeking preventive care. Increasing engagement with preventive services will require decreasing perceived burdens and increasing the personal benefits of care. Evaluating for non-pharmacologic approaches to managing symptoms and asthma-related coughing may identify uncontrolled asthma. Enhanced training for clinicians in patient-centric asthma care may be needed.

Nurse-delivered outpatient asthma education for children and caregivers: a pilot study to promote shared asthma management.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of nurse-delivered asthma education for caregiver/child dyads in a busy clinic setting, and measure the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study of nurse-delivered asthma education in a busy outpatient clinic. We enrolled a convenience sample of children (7-16 years) with uncontrolled persistent asthma who had a prescription for an inhaled controller medication and public health insurance. After provider visits, nurses taught dyads using picture-based materials, teach-back methods, and colored labels applied to asthma medications. The intervention was repeated at 1-month follow-up. We assessed feasibility by reviewing nurse documentation in the electronic medical record, detailing whether each component was implemented and the time required for education at each visit. We measured preliminary effectiveness by surveying children and caregivers separately before each clinic visit about asthma management responsibility, self-efficacy, caregiver quality of life, and symptoms; caregivers also completed a final telephone survey 2 months after the follow-up visit. We examined pre-post differences in continuous outcomes within-subjects using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: We enrolled 22 child/caregiver dyads. Nursing documentation indicated a high rate of component delivery at each visit; the initial and 1-month visits required 25 and 15 min, respectively. We observed significant increases in child responsibility, child/caregiver self-efficacy, caregiver quality of life, and child symptoms at each follow-up. CONCLUSION: This intervention of patient-centered asthma education can be delivered by nurses to caregiver/child dyads with high fidelity in a busy pediatric practice. Preliminary data indicate potential benefit for both children and caregivers.

Health-related internet use among adolescents with uncontrolled persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVES: To describe internet use for health information among adolescents with uncontrolled persistent asthma, and to examine whether health-related internet use is associated with responsibility for home asthma management. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) Trial, which included adolescents (12-16 years) in an urban school district who had uncontrolled persistent asthma per caregiver report. We asked adolescents whether they had ever used the Internet to look for health or medical information (Y/N). Teens then described family responsibility for 9 asthma management tasks (e.g. full caregiver responsibility, shared responsibility, or full teen responsibility). We examined responsibility sum scores in addition to responsibility for individual management tasks. We used bivariate and multivariate analyses to compare health-related internet use with participant characteristics, teen-reported asthma symptoms, and management responsibility. RESULTS: We examined data for 425 adolescents (mean age 13.4 years). Almost half (45%) reported seeking health information on the Internet. In adjusted analyses, health-related internet use was strongly associated with teen responsibility (sum score and tasks relating to carrying and using medications); internet use was also more likely among teens who were older, female, or reported uncontrolled disease. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with persistent asthma who share responsibility for home management or report uncontrolled disease are more likely to seek health information online. Future interventions to support teens who co-manage asthma should work to engage patients in both clinical and digital spaces, and ensure that all patients can access accurate, patient-centered asthma information when needed.

Parental preferences for survey mode of administration, interview versus self-administered, with an asthma management questionnaire.

Background: National asthma guidelines encourage use of patient surveys to aid clinical assessment. Little is known about how these should be administered in acute care settings such as the emergency department (ED).Objective: Evaluate if parents have a preference for interview versus self-administered surveys in an ED, understand the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by choice of survey mode of administration, and assess if there is a difference by mode in the parent's perception of an asthma management tool.Methods: A research assistant (RA) surveyed parents of children 2-17 years of age seeking ED asthma care. Parents chose to either self-administer or have an RA-administered survey that included the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version (PACCI-ED). We compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and perceptions about the PACCI-ED by mode of survey administration.Results: Of 174 parent participants, 60% chose interviewer-administered surveys. Parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys had lower income, lower educational attainment, and children with uncontrolled asthma (p < .05). Bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys tended to rate the PACCI-ED more favorably.Conclusions: EDs wishing to systematically use an asthma survey may need to plan appropriate resources for staff to administer them, particularly if they serve populations of lower socioeconomic status.

Food allergy in at-risk adolescents with asthma: A key area for focus.

BACKGROUND: Asthma affects more than 6.2 million children in the United States and is a major source of chronic disease burden. Concurrent food allergy (FA) may be a risk factor for worse asthma outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of FA among a cohort of adolescents with persistent asthma and assess whether FA is an independent risk factor for asthma morbidity. METHODS: We included 342 adolescents aged 12 to 16 years with persistent asthma from the Rochester city school district who participated in the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens trial between 2014 and 2018. Multivariable models were used to estimate the association between FA and asthma morbidity. RESULTS: Overall, 29% of adolescents with asthma reported having a FA. Although there were no statistically significant differences in daytime asthma symptoms, teens with FA had higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (47.5 vs 33.9 P = .002) and reported more days with activity limitation owing to asthma (3.1 vs 2.3 days/2 weeks, P = .03) compared with teens without FA. Less than half (42%) of adolescents with FA had an epinephrine autoinjector. CONCLUSION: This study found FA to be common among this cohort of adolescents with asthma. Although FA was not related to asthma symptom severity, adolescents with FA had higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide and more activity limitation, and most did not have epinephrine autoinjectors. A history of FA and lack of epinephrine autoinjector may increase near-fatal outcomes in adolescents with asthma. Preventive measures in addition to standard asthma treatments are warranted for these teens.

Improving teacher comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management.

Background: Asthma is common among urban school-age children. Though teachers should be prepared to assist children during an asthma attack, studies show they lack self-efficacy in managing asthma.Objective: To assess feasibility of implementing an asthma workshop for elementary school teachers, describe themes of questions raised, and determine workshop's impact on teachers' comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management.Methods: We developed and implemented an asthma workshop for teachers from four Bronx elementary schools (2012-2014). Teachers completed a questionnaire evaluating their comfort and self-efficacy in asthma management before and after the workshop. Questions asked during the sessions were recorded and analyzed for themes. Paired t-test and McNemar tests compared before/after scores.Results: 65 out of 70 teachers (92.9%) participated in the educational sessions. Teachers asked questions about school policy for inhalers, medication administration guidelines, and physical activity and asthma. 64/65 (98.5%) teachers completed pre/post surveys (mean age 39.7 years; mean years at the school 8.0). Post-intervention, more teachers reported knowing how to manage an asthma attack (93.8% vs. 64.1%, p < .0001); and felt comfortable assessing (50.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.019) and handling an asthma attack (52.3% vs. 33.8%, p = .023). The overall mean self-efficacy score increased post-intervention (43.0 vs. 38.1, p < .0001), as did 8/12 individual self-efficacy items. Post-workshop, 95.3% of teachers agreed that teacher in-service asthma education should be done annually.Conclusions: An asthma workshop was successfully implemented in the school setting and improved teacher comfort and self-efficacy in managing asthma. Annual training may improve teachers' confidence in assisting students with asthma.

Identifying which children with persistent asthma have preventive medications available at home.

Objective: To compare caregiver-reported preventive medication use and pharmacy data with medications available at home for children with persistent asthma, and identify factors associated with having preventive medication at home.Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the School-Based Telemedicine Enhanced Asthma Management (SB-TEAM) study, including medication use, symptoms, and demographics. Research assistants documented all asthma medications available during home visits. We reviewed pharmacy records for a subset of children. Bivariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with having any preventive medication in the home.Results: We included 335 children (mean 7.7 years, 56% Black, 34% Hispanic, 77% Medicaid; participation 79%). Most caregivers (69%) reported preventive medication use, yet only 45% had preventive medication at home. Compared to families with preventive medication at home, more families without preventive medication reported discontinuous insurance in the prior year (7% vs. 15%, p = .02) and medication sharing (22% vs. 32%, p = .04). For the subset with pharmacy records (n = 192), 40% filled a preventive medication in the past year and 15% had a preventive medication at home. In multivariate analyses, children were less likely to have preventive medication at home when caregivers reported no preventive medication use in the past 2 weeks (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.14, 0.43), discontinuous insurance (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19, 0.97), medication sharing (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32, 0.91), or caregiver education ≥ HS (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.35, 0.99).Conclusion: Among urban children with persistent asthma, neither caregiver report nor pharmacy data reflect home preventive medication availability. Inquiring about insurance coverage and medication sharing may improve preventive medication availability for these children.

Comparing inhaled medications reported by adolescents with persistent asthma and their caregivers.

Objectives: To compare concordance (agreement) between teens with persistent asthma and their caregivers on the reported number of inhaled asthma medications used (rescue and controller); examine concordance specific to controller medications; and determine whether concordance over controller medications within caregiver/teen dyads is associated with demographics or clinical outcomes.Methods: We used baseline data from the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) trial in urban Rochester, NY. Caregivers and teens (12-16 yrs.) with poorly controlled persistent asthma separately reported the teens' inhaled therapy, and could name up to two rescue and two controller medications. We compared the total number of medications and number of controller medications reported by each dyad member with Cohen's Kappa, and assessed whether concordance over the number of controller medications was associated with demographics, symptoms, or healthcare utilization using chi-square and t-tests.Results: Of 210 dyads (79% public health insurance, 61% Black teens), 132 (63%) were disconcordant in reporting the overall number of inhaled medications. Teens or caregivers from 173 dyads (82%) reported any controller medication; however, a majority (61%) were discordant in the reporting of controller medications. Compared with concordant dyads, fewer caregivers from dyads with controller medication discordance reported education past high school (35% vs. 51%, p = 0.04); no other differences in demographics, symptoms, or healthcare utilization were identified based on controller medication concordance.Conclusions: Most dyads identified different numbers of inhaled medications, with substantial disagreement over controller medications. Working to ensure a basic understanding of treatment plans may promote successful self-management in persistent childhood asthma.