Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 19: E47, 2022 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926561

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but 3 of 4 US adults do not have their blood pressure adequately controlled. Million Hearts (US Department of Health and Human Services) is a national initiative that promotes a set of priorities and interventions to optimize delivery of evidence-based strategies to manage cardiovascular disease, including hypertension. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, has disrupted routine care and preventive service delivery. We identified examples of clinical and health organizations that adapted services and care processes to continue a focus on monitoring and controlling hypertension during the pandemic. Eight Hypertension Control Exemplars were identified and interviewed. They reported various adapted care strategies including telemedicine, engaging patients in self-measured blood pressure monitoring, adapting or implementing medication management services, activating partnerships to respond to patient needs or expand services, and implementing unique patient outreach approaches. Documenting these hypertension control strategies can help increase adoption of adaptive approaches during public health emergencies and routine care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Adult , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control
2.
J Community Health ; 46(1): 127-138, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32564288

ABSTRACT

Self-measured blood pressure monitoring (SMBP), the regular measurement of blood pressure by a patient outside the clinical setting, plus additional support, is a proven, cost-effective but underutilized strategy to improve hypertension outcomes. To accelerate SMBP use, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the National Association of Community Health Centers, the YMCA of the USA, and Association of State and Territorial Health Officials to develop cross-sector care models to offer SMBP to patients with hypertension. The project aimed to increase the use of SMBP through the coordinated action of health department leaders, community organizations and clinical providers. From 1/31/2017 to 6/30/2018, nine health centers in Kentucky, Missouri, and New York partnered with seven local Y associations (local Y) and their local health departments to design and implement care models that adapted existing primary care SMBP practices by leveraging capacities and resources in community and public health organizations. Nine collaborative care models emerged, shaped by available community assets, strategic priorities, and organizational culture. Overall, 1421 patients were recommended for SMBP; of those, 795 completed at least one cycle of SMBP (BP measurements morning and evening for at least three consecutive days). Of those recommended for SMBP, 308 patients were referred to a local Y to receive additional SMBP and healthy lifestyle support. Community and public health organizations can be brought into the health care delivery process and can play valuable roles in supporting patients in SMBP.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Hypertension/diagnosis , Adult , Blood Pressure/physiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/prevention & control , Kentucky , Male , Middle Aged , Missouri , New York , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(29): 798-802, 2018 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30048423

ABSTRACT

Approximately 11 million U.S. adults with a usual source of health care have undiagnosed hypertension, placing them at increased risk for cardiovascular events (1-3). Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC developed the Million Hearts Hypertension Prevalence Estimator Tool, which allows health care delivery organizations (organizations) to predict their patient population's hypertension prevalence based on demographic and comorbidity characteristics (2). Organizations can use this tool to compare predicted prevalence with their observed prevalence to identify potential underdiagnosed hypertension. This study applied the tool using medical billing data alone and in combination with clinical data collected among 8.92 million patients from 25 organizations participating in American Medical Group Association (AMGA) national learning collaborative* to calculate and compare predicted and observed adult hypertension prevalence. Using billing data alone revealed that up to one in eight cases of hypertension might be undiagnosed. However, estimates varied when clinical data were included to identify comorbidities used to predict hypertension prevalence or describe observed hypertension prevalence. These findings demonstrate the tool's potential use in improving identification of hypertension and the likely importance of using both billing and clinical data to establish hypertension and comorbidity prevalence estimates and to support clinical quality improvement efforts.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular , Hypertension/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 15: E73, 2018 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29885674

ABSTRACT

Approximately 1 in 3 US adults has hypertension, but only half have their blood pressure controlled. We identified characteristics of health care practices and systems (hereinafter practices) effective in achieving control rates at or above 70% by using data collected via applications submitted from April through June 2017 for consideration in the Million Hearts Hypertension Control Challenge. We included 96 practices serving 635,000 patients with hypertension across 34 US states in the analysis. Mean hypertension control rate was 77.1%; 27.1% of practices had a control rate of 80% or greater. Although many practices served large populations with multiple risk factors for uncontrolled hypertension, high control rates were achieved with implementation of evidenced-based strategies.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/therapy , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Delivery of Health Care , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prevalence , Rural Population , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population
7.
Ann Epidemiol ; 27(12): 796-800, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29122432

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Recent national trends show decelerating declines in heart disease mortality, especially among younger adults. National trends may mask variation by geography and age. We examined recent county-level trends in heart disease mortality by age group. METHODS: Using a Bayesian statistical model and National Vital Statistics Systems data, we estimated overall rates and percent change in heart disease mortality from 2010 through 2015 for four age groups (35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 65-74 years) in 3098 US counties. RESULTS: Nationally, heart disease mortality declined in every age group except ages 55-64 years. County-level trends by age group showed geographically widespread increases, with 52.3%, 58.5%, 69.1%, and 42.0% of counties experiencing increases with median percent changes of 0.6%, 2.2%, 4.6%, and -1.5% for ages 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 65-74 years, respectively. Increases were more likely in counties with initially high heart disease mortality and outside large metropolitan areas. CONCLUSIONS: Recent national trends have masked local increases in heart disease mortality. These increases, especially among adults younger than age 65 years, represent challenges to communities across the country. Reversing these trends may require intensification of primary and secondary prevention-focusing policies, strategies, and interventions on younger populations, especially those living in less urban counties.


Subject(s)
Cause of Death/trends , Heart Diseases/mortality , Mortality/trends , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bayes Theorem , Female , Geography , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
8.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 14(8): 670-8, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16232098

ABSTRACT

The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provides breast and cervical cancer screening to low-income women who are uninsured or underinsured. For women with three consecutive annual Pap tests with normal findings, the NBCCEDP supports extending the screening interval to every 3 years. Thirteen telephone focus groups were conducted with physician providers in 17 states and the District of Columbia to investigate familiarity with NBCCEDP's triennial Pap test policy, the Pap test intervals actually used, and the factors influencing screening interval selection. No participants were familiar with NBCCEDP's triennial Pap test policy, and none reported routinely extending the screening interval after three consecutive annual Pap tests with normal findings. Two patterns of screening interval use were reported: annual screeners continued performing yearly Pap tests, and selective extended screeners offered an extended interval to select patients. Annual and selective extended screeners reported that both unique and common factors influenced the screening intervals they used. The NBCCEDP has established its cancer screening priorities to focus limited resources on the goal of providing services to eligible women who have rarely or never been screened. Increased efforts are needed to educate physicians about the science supporting an extended Pap screening interval and overcome the barriers associated with its adoption.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Poverty , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/standards , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Focus Groups , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears/economics
9.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 54(6): 327-44, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15537576

ABSTRACT

Clinical breast examination (CBE) seeks to detect breast abnormalities or evaluate patient reports of symptoms to find palpable breast cancers at an earlier stage of progression. Treatment options for earlier-stage cancers are generally more numerous, include less toxic alternatives, and are usually more effective than treatments for later-stage cancers. For average-risk women aged 40 and younger, earlier detection of palpable tumors identified by CBE can lead to earlier therapy. After age 40, when mammography is recommended, CBE is regarded as an adjunct to mammography. Recent debate, however, has questioned the contributions of CBE to the detection of breast cancer in asymptomatic women and particularly to improved survival and reduced mortality rates. Clinicians remain widely divided about the level of evidence supporting CBE and their confidence in the examination. Yet, CBE is practiced extensively in the United States and continues to be recommended by many leading health organizations. It is in this context that this report provides a brief review of evidence for CBE's role in the earlier detection of breast cancer, highlights current practice issues, and presents recommendations that, when implemented, could contribute to greater standardization of the practice and reporting of CBE. These recommendations may also lead to improved evidence of the nature and extent of CBE's contribution to the earlier detection of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Diseases/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Examination/standards , Education, Medical , Female , Humans , Medical History Taking , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL