Exercise echocardiography as a screening test for coronary artery disease and correlation with coronary arteriography.

We evaluated exercise echocardiography as a screening test for coronary artery disease in 228 patients, all of whom underwent subsequent coronary angiography. After an echocardiogram at rest was obtained, each patient performed maximal, symptom-limited, upright treadmill exercise, immediately after which repeat imaging was performed. The exercise echocardiogram was abnormal if any segment failed to become hypercontractile with exercise, and these regional wall motion abnormalities were used to predict the extent and distribution of coronary disease. At subsequent angiography, coronary stenosis was defined as significant if luminal diameter was reduced greater than or equal to 50%. Compared with electrocardiography, exercise echocardiography was more sensitive (97 vs 51%) and specific (64 vs 62%), and had higher positive (90 vs 82%) and negative (87 vs 28%) predictive accuracies. Exercise echocardiography was also highly predictive of the extent (no, 1-, 2- or 3-vessel disease) and distribution (which vessel) of coronary stenoses. It is concluded that exercise echocardiography is an excellent screening test for the presence, extent and distribution of coronary artery disease.

Early exercise training in patients older than age 65 years compared with that in younger patients after acute myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass grafting.

To evaluate potential benefits that elderly cardiac patients might gain from early exercise programs, 361 such patients were studied: group I--60 patients aged 44 years or younger; group II--114 patients aged 45 to 54 years; group III--111 patients aged 55 to 64 years; and group IV--76 elderly patients aged 65 years or older. All patients participated in a 12-week exercise program within 6 weeks of acute myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients performed symptom-limited exercise tests before and after completion of the exercise program. Between tests, elderly patients manifested significant differences in body weight (76.9 to 75.2 kg), percent body fat (22.3 to 20.8 kg), heart rate at rest (77 to 68 beats/min), maximal heart rate (126 to 138 beats/min), maximal METs (5.3 to 8.1), submaximal average double product (17,305 to 14,071), and submaximal average rating of perceived exertion (12 to 10 [p less than 0.05]). Magnitudes of change were similar among groups, although the elderly patient group had a significantly lower absolute physical work capacity at testing after training than the other 3 groups (p less than 0.05). In the 25 elderly patients who received beta-blocking drugs, METs increased from 5.1 to 7.8 (p less than 0.05). In the remaining 51 elderly patients not receiving beta-blocking drugs, METs increased from 5.4 to 8.2 (p less than 0.05). The magnitude of increase in patients who received beta-blocking drugs was not significantly different from that in patients not receiving beta-blocking drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)