How Fellowship Training Affects Complication Rate After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty is performed by orthopedic surgeons with various fellowship training backgrounds. Whether surgeons performing shoulder arthroplasty with different types of fellowship training have differing rates of complications and reoperation remains unknown. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner database was retrospectively queried from the years 2010-2022. Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were selected using the CPT code 23472. Those undergoing revision arthroplasty and those with a history of fracture, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Fellowship was determined and verified via online search. Only surgeons who performed a minimum of 10 cases were selected; and PearlDiver was queried using their provider ID codes. Primary outcome measures included 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year rates of complication and reoperation. A Bonferroni correction was utilized in which the significance threshold was set at p≤0.00023 RESULTS: In total, 150,385 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Analysis of surgical trends revealed that Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow fellowship- trained surgeons are performing an increasing percentage of all shoulder arthroplasty over time, with each cohort exhibiting am 11.3% and 4.2% increase from 2010 to 2022, respectively. The geographic region with the highest proportion of cases performed by Sports Medicine surgeons was the West, while the Northeast has the highest proportion of cases performed by Shoulder and Elbow surgeons. Shoulder and Elbow surgeons operated on patients that were significantly younger and had fewer comorbidities. Both Shoulder and Elbow and Sports Medicine surgeons had lower rates of postoperative complications at 90 days, 1 year and 5 years in comparison to surgeons who completed another type of fellowship or no fellowship. Across each time point, the rates of individual complications between Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow were comparable, but the pooled complication rate was lowest in the Shoulder and Elbow cohort. CONCLUSION: Surgeons who have completed either a Sports Medicine or Shoulder and Elbow fellowship are performing an increasing proportion of shoulder arthroplasty over time. Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow-trained surgeons have significantly lower complication rates at 90 days, 1 year and 5 years postoperatively. The individual complication rates between Sports Medicine and Shoulder and Elbow are comparable, but Shoulder and Elbow has the lowest pooled complication rates overall.

Bisphosphonate Use May be Associated With an Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Hip Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is common among patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bisphosphonate treatment on osteoporotic patients undergoing primary THA. METHODS: Using a national database, 30,137 patients who had osteoporosis before primary elective THA were identified during 2010 to 2020. Patients undergoing nonelective THA and those using corticosteroids or other medications for osteoporosis were excluded. Bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate naïve patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and a history of obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were used to compare 2-year outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Among matched cohorts of 9,844 patients undergoing primary THA, bisphosphonate use was associated with a significantly higher 2-year rate of periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.61, P = .022). There was a trend toward increased risk of any revision with bisphosphonate use (odds ratio 1.19, confidence interval 1.00 to 1.41, P = .056). Rates of infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, and mortality were not statistically different between bisphosphonate users and bisphosphonate-naïve patients. CONCLUSION: In osteoporotic patients, bisphosphonate use before primary THA is an independent risk factor for periprosthetic fracture. Additional longer-term data are needed to determine the underlying mechanism for this association and identify preventative measures.

Low Risk of Acute Iatrogenic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Prosthetic Joint Aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid analysis is an essential tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, concern exists that aspiration may introduce infection into a noninfected joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic PJI following diagnostic knee aspiration done within 6 months of the primary TKA. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, the senior surgeon performed over 4,000 primary TKAs and aspirated 155 knees in 137 patients for whom there was a suspicion for PJI within 6 months of their primary TKA. There were 22 knees diagnosed as infected from the initial aspiration and therefore were excluded from the study. The remaining 133 aspirates in 115 patients who were negative for infection were followed for 6 months for signs and symptoms of PJI to elucidate whether aspiration introduced infection into an initially noninfected joint. RESULTS: There were 70 of 133 knees (52.6%) aspirated between 0 and 6 weeks after index TKA, 40 of 133 (30.1%) between 6 weeks and 3 months, and 23 of 133 (17.3%) between 3 and 6 months. At final follow-up, none of the 133 initially noninfected knees exhibited evidence of subsequent iatrogenic PJI or had subsequent surgery for infection. CONCLUSION: While joint aspiration is a procedure with inherent risks, this study shows that the rate of iatrogenic PJI is extremely low (0%). Therefore, if infection is suspected, the surgeon should consider joint aspiration, even in the initial postoperative period, as the risk for introducing infection is far outweighed by the risk of missing an infection.

Double-Row Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Optimizes Retear Rates After Small to Medium Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the different interventions described in the literature for the surgical treatment of small and medium complete rotator cuff tears. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of small-medium, full-thickness rotator cuff tears published since 2000 was performed. Clinical characteristics, re-tear rates, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked for each domain (re-tear risk, pain, ROM, and PROs) via surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies comprising 2046 shoulders (47% females, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean follow-up 21 ± 5 months) were included. Interventions that ranked highest for minimizing re-tear risk included arthroscopic single-row repair (A+SR) or double-row repair (A+DR) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Open repair and A+SR repair with acromioplasty (ACP) ranked highest for pain relief. Interventions that ranked highest for ROM improvement included open repair, PT, and A+DR with or without ACP. Interventions that ranked highest for PROs included arthroscopic footprint microfracture with or without SR, open repair, and A+SR with or without ACP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a network meta-analysis of level 1 studies, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a SR or DR construct demonstrates similar retear rates, PROs, and clinical outcomes. The highest-ranking treatment for minimizing retears was arthroscopic repair with DR constructs and PRP augmentation, although open repair and arthroscopic SR remain reliable options with excellent clinical outcomes. Addition of PRP to DR constructs trended toward a 56% decreased risk of retear as compared to DR repair alone. Although no single treatment emerged superior, several interventions offered excellent clinical improvements in pain, ROM, and PROs that exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies.

Does Youth Baseball Result in Morphologic Changes of the Lateral Elbow? A Prospective MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: Stress from overhead throwing results in morphologic changes to the shoulder in youth baseball players. With greater valgus torque stresses, the elbow experiences injuries specifically attributed to throwing. However, no previous work that we know of has assessed throwing-related morphologic changes of the elbow without associated conditions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do children who play competitive baseball have enlargement or overgrowth of their radial head shape and/or capitellum compared with the nondominant elbow on MRI? (2) Do children who stop playing year-round baseball have less enlargement of the lateral elbow structures than children who maintain a high level of play? METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between 2015 and 2018 on preadolescent boys who underwent voluntary MRI of their bilateral elbows before the start of the spring baseball season. Twenty-six children agreed to participate out of a four-team league that was asked to participate; their first MRI was obtained at a mean (range) age of 12 years (10 to 13). We also obtained their history related to throwing and performed a physical examination. Players had a mean of 5.6 years of playing before their first MRI, and half the children (13 of 26) were year-round baseball players. Sixty-two percent (16 of 26) reported being either or both a pitcher or catcher as their primary position. No child was excluded from participation. Three years later, these boys were asked to return for repeat MRI and physical examinations. Fifty-eight percent (15 of 26) of players were still playing at the 3-year MRI. Continued play or new onset of pain was documented. Radiographic measurements were then compared between dominant and nondominant arms, and the differences of these changes were compared between those who had continued playing during the study period and those who had quit. The measurements were made in all three planes of the radial head and capitellum, both osseous and cartilaginous. Measurement intrarater and interrater reliability were in the good-to-excellent range (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.77 to 0.98). RESULTS: When we compared dominant and nondominant arms, we found there was no dominant arm overgrowth (difference between baseline and 3-year measurements) in any measurement; for example, sagittal capitellum measurements in dominant arms were 2.5 ± 1.1 mm versus non-dominant arms: 2.8 ± 1.1 mm (mean difference -0.23 [95% CI -0.55 to 0.08]; p = 0.13). There was only undergrowth of the cartilaginous axial diameter of the radial head (change in dominant: 2.5 ± 1.3 mm; change in nondominant: 3.2 ± 1.7 mm; mean difference -0.64 mm [95% CI -1.2 to -0.06]; p = 0.03). There was no enlargement of the lateral elbow structures when children who continued to play were compared with children who stopped playing; for example, the difference in the bone-only growth ratio of the sagittal radial head to humerus of those still playing was 0.001 ± 0.03 and it was 0.01 ± 0.03 for those not playing (mean difference -0.01 [95% CI -0.04 to 0.01]; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In healthy children who play baseball for multiple years between the ages of 6 to 11 years, continued torque at the elbow from throwing does not result in morphologic changes as it does in the shoulder. Despite evidence that injuries and surgery because of long-term participation in a throwing sport results in a larger radial head and capitellum, our study presents evidence that outside an injured elbow, throwing alone does not appear to change the morphology of the lateral elbow. Therefore, changes to the radial head size could presuppose other elbow pathology and future study could be performed to better evaluate the correlation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study.

Publicly Available Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Rehabilitation Protocols Show High Variability and Frequent Divergence from the 2020 ASSET Recommendations.

Background: In 2020, the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists (ASSET) published an evidence-based consensus statement outlining postoperative rehabilitation guidelines following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to (1) quantify the variability in online anatomic TSA rehabilitation protocols, and (2) assess their congruence with the ASSET consensus guidelines. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional investigation of publicly available, online rehabilitation protocols for anatomic TSA. A web-based search was conducted in April 2022 of publicly available rehabilitation protocols for TSA. Each collected protocol was independently reviewed by two authors to identify recommendations regarding immobilization, initiation, and progression of passive (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM), as well as the initiation and progression of strengthening and post-operative exercises and activities. The time to initiation of various components of rehabilitation was recorded as the time at which the activity or motion threshold was permitted by the protocol. Comparisons between ASSET start dates and mean start dates from included protocols were performed. Results: Of the 191 academic institutions included, 46 (24.08%) had publicly available protocols online, and a total of 91 unique protocols were included in the final analysis. There were large variations seen among included protocols for the duration and type of immobilization post-operatively, as well as for the initiation of early stretching, PROM, AROM, resistance exercises, and return to sport. Of the 37 recommendations reported by both the ASSET and included protocols, 31 (83.78%) were found to be significantly different between groups (p\<0.05). Conclusion: Considerable variability was found among online post-operative protocols for TSA with substantial deviation from the ASSET guidelines. These findings highlight the lack of standardization in rehabilitation protocols following anatomic TSA. Level of Evidence: 3b.

Analysis of patient-directed search content and online resource quality for ulnar collateral ligament injury and surgery.

Background: Patients use the Internet to learn information about injuries, yet online content remains largely unstudied. This study analyzed patient questions posed online regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears or UCL surgical management. Methods: Three separate search strings about UCL tear and UCL surgery were queried on the Google search engine. The 300 most commonly asked questions were compiled for each topic and associated webpage information was collected from the "People also ask" section. Questions were categorized using the Rothwell classification and webpages by Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Results: The most frequent UCL tear questions were "how long does it take to heal a torn UCL?" and "what is nonsurgical treatment for the UCL?" The most frequent UCL surgery question was "can you retear your UCL after surgery?" The Rothwell classification of questions for UCL tear/UCL surgery was 55%/32% policy, 38%/57% fact, and 7%/11% value with highest subcategories being indications/management (46%/25%) and technical details (24%/25%). The most common webpages were academic (39%/29%) and medical practice (24%/26%). Mean JAMA score for all 600 webpages was low (1.2), with journals (mean = 3.4) having the highest score. Medical practice (mean = 0.5) and legal websites (mean = 0.0) had the lowest JAMA scores. Only 30% of webpages provided UCL-specific information. Conclusion: Online UCL patient questions commonly pertain to technical details and injury management. Webpages suggested by search engines contain information specific to UCL tears and surgery only one-third of the time. The quality of most webpages provided to patients is poor, with minimal source transparency.

Financial impact of electric scooters: a review of injuries over 27 months at an urban level 1 trauma center (cost of e-scooter injuries at an urban level 1 trauma center).

BACKGROUND: Electric scooters (e-scooters) have become a widespread method of transportation due to convenience and affordability. However, the financial impact of medical care for sustained injuries is currently unknown. The purpose of this study is to characterize total billing charges associated with medical care of e-scooter injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with e-scooter injuries presenting to the trauma bay, emergency department or outpatient clinics at an urban level 1 trauma center was conducted from November 2017 to March 2020. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Primary outcomes of interest were total billing charges and billing to insurance (hospital and professional). Multivariable models were used to identify preventable risk factors associated with higher total billing charges. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were identified consisting of 42 (66.7%) males, average age 40.19 (SD 13.29) years and 3.2% rate of helmet use. Patients sustained orthopedic (29%, n=18), facial (48%, n=30) and cranial (23%, n=15) injuries. The average total billing charges for e-scooter clinical encounters was $95 710 (SD $138 215). Average billing to insurance was $86 376 (SD $125 438) for hospital charges and $9 334 (SD $14 711) for professional charges. There were no significant differences in charges between injury categories. On multivariable regression, modifiable risk factors independently associated with higher total billing charges included any intoxication prior to injury ($231 377 increase, p=0.02), intracranial bleeds ($75 528, p=0.04) and TBI ($360 898, p=0.006). DISCUSSION: Many patients sustain high-energy injuries during e-scooter accidents with significant medical and financial consequences. Further studies may continue expanding the financial impact of e-scooter injuries on both patients and the healthcare system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Electric Scooter Orthopaedic Injury Demographics at an Urban Level I Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVES: This study highlights demographics and orthopaedic injuries of electric scooter-related trauma that presented to our institution over a 27-month period. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Urban Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients presenting to the emergency department, trauma bay, or outpatient clinic after electric scooter injury were identified from November 2017 through January 2020 using ICD-10 diagnosis codes. MAIN OUTCOMES: Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, imaging, treatment, perioperative data, and Injury Severity Scores. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five patients presented during the study period. Of these, 44% had orthopaedic injuries, including 30% with pelvis or extremity fractures. There were 21 (10%) polytraumatized patients in the orthopaedic cohort. The age ranged from 16 to 79 years (average 36 years), with 58% men, and 18% were visitors from out of town. Of 49 patients requiring orthopaedic surgery, 8 underwent surgery on an urgent basis. The average Injury Severity Score for orthopaedic patients was 8.4 with a median of 5.0 for nonoperative injuries versus a significantly higher median of 16.0 for operative injuries. Twenty-nine percent of patients were intoxicated and only 2% wore a helmet. CONCLUSIONS: Electric scooter injuries are increasing, and many patients sustain high-energy injuries. As electric scooter use continues to increase, the prevalence of orthopaedic injuries is also likely to rise. Further studies are needed to fully understand the impact scooter-related injuries have on individual patients and the health care system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.