A prospective intervention study on higher-dose oseltamivir treatment in adults hospitalized with influenza a and B infections.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if higher-dose oseltamivir provides benefit beyond the standard dose in influenza patients who require hospitalization. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was performed in 2 acute care general hospitals in Hong Kong over 4 seasonal peaks (2010-2012). Adults (≥18 years) with laboratory-confirmed influenza (85 A/H3N2, 34 A/H1N1pdm09, 36 B) infections who presented within 96 hours were recruited. Study regimen of either 150 mg or 75 mg oseltamivir twice daily for 5 days was allocated by site, which was switched after 2 seasons. Subjects with preexisting renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 40-60 mL/minute) received 75 mg oseltamivir twice daily. Viral clearance by day 5 and clinical responses were compared between groups. Plasma steady-state trough oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Altogether, 41 and 114 patients received 150 mg and 75 mg twice-daily oseltamivir, respectively; their enrollment characteristics (mean age, 61 ± 18 vs 66 ± 16 years) and illness severity were comparable. Trough OC levels were higher in the 150-mg group (501.0 ± 237.0 vs 342.6 ± 192.7 ng/mL). There were no significant differences in day 5 viral RNA (44.7% vs 40.2%) or culture negativity (100.0% vs 98.1%), RNA decline rate, and durations of fever, oxygen supplementation, and hospitalization. Results were similar when analyzed by study arm (all cases and among those without renal impairment). Subanalysis of influenza B patients showed faster RNA decline rate (analysis of variance, F = 4.14; P = .05) and clearance (day 5, 80.0% vs 57.1%) with higher-dose treatment. No oseltamivir resistance was found. Treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: We found no additional benefit of higher-dose oseltamivir treatment in adults hospitalized with influenza A, but an improved virologic response in influenza B. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01052961.

Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza A virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense.

To further understand the role of cytokine responses in symptom formation and host defenses in influenza infection, we determined the levels of IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-alpha, TGF-beta, and TNF-alpha in nasal lavage fluid, plasma, and serum obtained serially from 19 volunteers experimentally infected with influenza A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1) and correlated these levels with various measures of infection and illness severity. We found that IL-6 and IFN-alpha levels in nasal lavage fluids peaked early (day 2) and correlated directly with viral titers, temperature, mucus production, and symptom scores. IL-6 elevations were also found in the circulation at this time point. In contrast, TNF-alpha responses peaked later (day 3 in plasma, day 4 in nasal fluids), when viral shedding and symptoms were subsiding. Similarly, IL-8 peaked late in the illness course (days 4-6) and correlated only with lower respiratory symptoms, which also occurred late. None of IL-1beta, IL-2, or TGF-beta levels increased significantly. These data implicate IL-6 and IFN-alpha as key factors both in symptom formation and host defense in influenza.

Emergence and transmission of influenza A viruses resistant to amantadine and rimantadine.

Amantadine- and rimantadine-resistant viruses have been recovered from approximately 30% of patients treated for acute H3N2 subtype influenza and less often from their close contacts receiving drug prophylaxis. The limited data suggest that resistant viruses can emerge rapidly during drug therapy, as early as 2-3 days into treatment. These viruses retain their resistance phenotype during multiple passages in the laboratory and appear to be genetically stable in this regard. Studies in families and in nursing homes indicate that resistant isolates appear to be transmissible from treated patients and cause typical influenza in contacts receiving drug prophylaxis. It is unknown whether resistant human viruses are capable of competing with wild-type ones during multiple cycles of infection in the absence of the drug. These viruses appear to be pathogenic, and no evidence indicates that they differ from wild-type strains. Thus, these viruses clearly possess the biologic properties that are associated with clinically important drug resistance. However, limited information is available to assess their actual impact. It is unknown what degree of selective drug pressure would be required to cause substantial transmission of resistant viruses during community outbreaks. Natural selection of antigenic variants and disappearance of previous variants may prevent the emergence of viruses that have been altered in the genes coding both for the surface glycoproteins and for the M2 protein. However, the emergence of drug-resistant influenza viruses appears to pose potential clinical problems in certain epidemiologic situations involving close contact with treated patients.

Therapeutic options for the management of influenza.

Over the past few years a novel class of antiviral agents, the neuraminidase inhibitors, has been found to be safe and effective in the prevention and treatment of influenza. Previously available agents, the M2 inhibitors amantadine and rimantadine, could only be used to treat influenza A infections and resistance develops rapidly. Zanamivir (Relenza) and oseltamivir (Tamiflu), the two clinically available neuraminidase inhibitors, are effective for treating both influenza A and B infections in adults and children and have also been shown to reduce the frequency of antibiotic-requiring complications of influenza infections. Inhaled zanamivir has shown benefit in treating acute influenza with mild to moderate underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Studies are needed to examine the use of these agents, alone or in combination with M2 inhibitors or ribavirin, in the management of severe infections in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised hosts. Studies are also needed to address other groups at increased risk for influenza complications, such as pregnant women and children below one year of age.

Impact of zanamivir on antibiotic use for respiratory events following acute influenza in adolescents and adults.

BACKGROUND: Influenza infections commonly lead to respiratory tract complications that result in antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine frequency of respiratory events leading to antibiotic use following influenza illness in adolescents and adults, and to assess whether treatment with topical zanamivir prevents these complications. METHODS: Meta-analysis of 7 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials; 3815 mainly healthy adolescents and adults (mean age, 34 years) with an influenzalike illness of less than 2 days' duration were randomly assigned to receive combined inhaled and intranasal zanamivir, inhaled zanamivir, or corresponding placebos. Twelve percent of enrolled subjects were high-risk patients. The main outcome was the incidence of respiratory events leading to antibiotic prescriptions in patients with proven influenza. RESULTS: Influenza infections were laboratory confirmed in 2499 (66%) of 3815 patients (influenza A in 88% and B in 12%). Placebo recipients developed a respiratory event leading to antibiotic use in 17% of cases, mainly for acute bronchitis or acute sinusitis. Among zanamivir-treated patients (n = 1494) the incidence of respiratory events leading to the use of antimicrobials was 11% (relative risk [RR] compared with placebo, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.84). Intranasal and inhaled zanamivir seemed to reduce the number of upper (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97) and lower respiratory tract events (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.38-1.08). Inhaled zanamivir reduced the number of lower respiratory tract events (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.85), but the reduction in the number of upper respiratory tract events was not statistically significant (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory complications or worsening of symptoms leading to antibiotic use occurred in about 17% of adolescents or adults with influenza infection. Early treatment of influenza illness with zanamivir reduced the number of these antibiotic prescriptions. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3234-3240.

Intravenous ribavirin by constant infusion for serious influenza and parainfluenzavirus infection.

Three patients with severe lower respiratory tract influenza or parainfluenzavirus infections were treated with continuous ribavirin infusion, given as a 5 mg/kg/hour (h) loading infusion for 8 h followed by 1.5 mg/kg/h for 2 to 6 days. This regimen was generally well tolerated. Plasma ribavirin concentrations were 40 to 60 microM in two patients during the continuous infusion phase and lower concentrations were detectable in tracheobronchial secretions. In temporal association with ribavirin administration, viral shedding diminished in one patient and ceased in two patients, one of whom had developed virus resistant to amantadine. The strategy of continuous ribavirin infusion warrants controlled testing for its antiviral and possible clinical effectiveness.

Safety and efficacy of once daily intranasal zanamivir in preventing experimental human influenza A infection.

Zanamivir, a potent inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases, is protective against experimental human influenza when given intranasally twice daily. We conducted two studies to assess the pharmacokinetics and protective efficacy of a reduced frequency dosing regimen of topical zanamivir. In the first study, 36 uninfected volunteers received a single dose of zanamivir by intranasal spray (6.4 mg), intranasal drops (16 mg) or dry powder oral inhalation (10 mg). At 4 h, median nasal wash concentrations were 50-fold higher after intranasal dosing than after inhalation. Substantial levels (spray group, median 4,596 ng/ml; drop group, 1,239 ng/ml) were detected in nasal wash 48 h after intranasal dosing. In the double-blinded efficacy study, 47 sero-susceptible volunteers were randomized to receive either placebo or zanamivir intranasal spray (6.4 mg). Among the 43 subjects evaluated, decreases in viral shedding occurred in the group receiving one dose of zanamivir 4 h prior to inoculation, whereas no significant benefit was observed in those receiving a single dose 48 h prior to challenge. In the group given three daily doses, reductions were seen in viral shedding and infection. In the two regimens providing zanamivir 4 h prior to inoculation, significant reductions in nasal mucus weight were observed. Decreases in total symptom scores and the incidence of upper respiratory illness also occurred, but they did not reach statistical significance. The efficacy of a single dose of zanamivir given 4 h prior to inoculation supports the hypothesis that influenza virus neuraminidase is essential for initial virus spread through respiratory secretions. These findings indicate that once daily dosing of zanamivir is protective against experimental influenza A infection.

Oral oseltamivir in human experimental influenza B infection.

Oseltamivir is the prodrug of Ro64-0802 (GS4071), a potent and selective inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases. Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluated oral oseltamivir for early treatment (75 or 150 mg twice daily for 5 days) or prevention (75 mg once or twice daily for 7 days) of experimental influenza B virus infection in healthy susceptible adults. Treatment study A (n=60) demonstrated similar trends to treatment study B (n=117), in which 75 mg doses of oseltamivir introduced 24 h after inoculation reduced median area under curve (AUC) virus titre (oseltamivir, 22.7; placebo, 131.1 log10 TCID50 x h/ml; P=0.002) and duration of viral shedding (oseltamivir, 23.9 h; placebo, 95.8 h; P=0.0005). In prevention study C (n=58), oseltamivir did not reduce infection rates (85 versus 84%) but significantly reduced median AUC virus titre (10.0 versus 66.9 log10 TCID50 x h/ml; P=0.03) and duration of viral shedding (36 versus 84 h; P=0.03) compared with placebo. Oseltamivir was well tolerated. No emergence of drug-resistant variants was detected by testing last-day isolates (n=112) in neuraminidase inhibition assays. These results indicate that oseltamivir has significant antiviral activity in experimental human influenza B virus infection when used for prophylaxis or early treatment.

Prevention and treatment of influenza in immunocompromised patients.

Influenza A and B viruses cause serious, sometimes fatal, disease in immunocompromised patients, particularly bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients. Protracted disease has also been recognized in certain oncology and HIV-infected patients. Currently available inactivated vaccines are variably immunogenic in such groups. Poor humoral immune responses are seen within 2 years of bone marrow transplantation, often following solid organ transplantation, and commonly in patients with advanced HIV infection. Oral amantadine and rimantadine are useful for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A virus infections, but their efficacy, particularly in treatment of severe disease, has not been rigorously established in immunocompromised hosts. Case reports document the emergence of drug-resistant variants and prolonged viral shedding in some patients. Aerosol and intravenous ribavirin has been used to treat severe influenza in small numbers of immunosuppressed patients, but the efficacy of ribavirin by either route has not been established in such patients. The neuraminidase inhibitor GG167 is active in experimental influenza but requires topical application to the respiratory tract and has had limited clinical study in natural influenza. More effective interventions for serious influenza infections will likely require combinations of antiviral drugs.

Counterimmunoelectrophoresis of urine for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in pediatric outpatients.

Thirty-eight pediatric outpatients with pneumonia were studied by counterimmunoelectrophoresis for the presence of Haemophilus influenzae type b or pneumococcal antigenuria. Of the 38 patients eight (21%) had H influenzae type b antigenuria and two (5%) had pneumococcal antigenuria. H influenzae type b antigenuria was detected more frequently in patients less than 2 years of age than in older children. Urine counterimmunoelectrophoresis appears to be a useful tool for the etiologic diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia and should facilitate further studies of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical spectrum of this disease.

Detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and coronavirus infections in acute otitis media by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequencies of human rhinovirus (HRV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and coronavirus (HCV) infection in children with acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: Middle ear fluids (MEF) collected by tympanocentesis and nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) at the time of the AOM diagnosis were examined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for HRV, RSV, and HCV RNA. PATIENTS: Ninety-two children aged 3 months to 7 years during a 1-year period. RESULTS: Virus RNA was detected in a total of 69 children (75%) and in 44 MEF samples (48%) and 57 NPA samples (62%) at the time of AOM diagnosis. HRV RNA was detected in both MEF and NPA in 18 (20%), in MEF alone in 4 (4%), and in NPA alone in 10 (11%). RSV was detected in both MEF and NPA in 12 (13%), in MEF alone in 5 (5%), and in NPA alone in 9 (10%). HCV RNA was detected in both MEF and NPA in 5 (5%), in MEF alone in 2 (2%), and in NPA alone in 9 (10%). Dual viral infections were detected in 5% of children. HRV and RSV were detected simultaneously in 2 MEF samples and in 2 NPA samples; RSV and HCV were detected in 1 NPA sample. Bacterial pathogens were detected in 56 (62%) MEF from 91 children. Viral RNA was detected in 20 (57%) MEF of 35 bacteria-negative and in 25 (45%) of 56 bacteria-positive MEF samples. No important differences in the risk of treatment failure, relapse, or occurrence of late secretory otitis media were noted between children with virus-positive and virus-negative MEF aspirates. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the importance of common respiratory viruses, particularly HRV and RSV, in predisposing to and causing AOM in young children.

Risk factors for acute wheezing in infants and children: viruses, passive smoke, and IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of viral infection, passive smoke exposure, and IgE antibody to inhaled allergens in infants and children treated for acute wheezing. DESIGN: Case-control study of actively wheezing children who were compared with children without respiratory tract symptoms. SETTING: University of Virginia Pediatric Emergency Room. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 99 wheezing patients (2 months to 16 years of age) and 57 control patients (6 months to 16 years of age). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Serum IgE antibody to inhalant allergens, measured by radioallergosorbent test (RAST), was uncommon in wheezing and control patients under age 2. After 2 years of age, the percentage of RAST-positive patients increased markedly and was significantly higher in wheezing patients than controls after age 4 (72%, n = 54, and 30%, n = 40, respectively, P < .001). Total IgE levels and nasal eosinophilia were strongly correlated with a positive RAST after age 2. Viral pathogens, predominantly respiratory syncytial virus, were identified in nasal washes from 70% (n = 20) of wheezing patients younger than 2 years of age compared with 20% of controls (n = 10), P < .05. After age 2, viruses, particularly rhinovirus, were isolated in washes from 31% (n = 70) of wheezing patients, 64% of whom were also RAST-positive. Levels of cotinine, a nicotine metabolite, were elevated (> or = 10 ng/mL) in saliva from a large percentage of smoke-exposed, wheezing patients under 2 (74%, n = 19) compared with those over 2 (14%, n = 51), P < .001. Odds ratios for wheezing were significant for virus (8.2, confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 5.0), and cotinine (4.7, CI = 1.0 to 21.3) in children under 2, and IgE antibody by RAST (4.5, CI = 2.0 to 10.2), virus (3.7, CI = 1.3 to 10.6), and the combination of IgE antibody and virus (10.8, CI = 1.9 to 59.0) were significant risk factors after age 2. CONCLUSION: Wheezing children younger than 2 years of age had a high rate of viral infection and a low rate of IgE antibody to inhalant allergens. When these children were exposed to passive smoke, salivary cotinine levels were elevated suggesting heavy exposure. After 2 years of age, sensitization to inhaled allergens became increasingly important and viruses remained a significant risk factor for wheezing. These data support recommendations to reduce tobacco smoke exposure at home, especially for young patients, and to consider sensitization to inhaled allergens and allergen avoidance in wheezing children at an early age, particularly after age 2 years.

New approaches to influenza chemotherapy. Neuraminidase inhibitors.

Epidemic influenza continues to be associated with significant morbidity in the general population, and mortality in the elderly and other high risk patients. Although the case fatality rate averages less than 0.01%, tens of thousands of deaths occur each year. Control through immunisation programmes has not been possible due to incomplete protective efficacy and antigenic variations that occur frequently. Currently available anti-influenza medications (amantadine and rimantadine) have had limited success due to underutilisation, lack of activity against influenza B, the rapid development of viral resistance to the drugs, and adverse effects. A new class of antiviral agents designed to inhibit influenza neuraminidase, an important surface glycoprotein, is currently under active development for use in the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A and B infections. Two of these compounds, zanamivir (GG167) and GS4104 (the ethyl ester prodrug of GS4071) have reached clinical trials. Most studies of zanamivir have involved topical administration by inhalation of dry powder aerosols and/or intranasal doses of aqueous solutions. These routes rapidly provide high local concentrations at the sites of delivery. GS4104 is administered orally, which allows for greater ease of administration, and probably more uniform distribution of the parent compound GS4071 in the respiratory tract. Both have shown potent inhibitory activity against influenza in animal models and experimental human influenza with excellent tolerability profiles. Zanamivir treatment has been shown to reduce the severity and duration of naturally occurring, uncomplicated influenza illness in adults. Clinical resistance to these drugs has not been recognised as a significant problem to date, although strains resistant to each agent have been produced in the laboratory. This class of agents shows considerable promise as a novel approach to prophylaxis and treatment of influenza infections. Ongoing studies should provide the data needed to allow the addition of 1 or more of the neuraminidase inhibitors to the clinician's anti-influenza armamentarium.

Ineffectiveness of oral terfenadine in natural colds: evidence against histamine as a mediator of common cold symptoms.

The role of histamine in the pathogenesis of infectious rhinitis is unclear, as is the efficacy of antihistaminic drugs in the treatment of the common cold. This study evaluated the short-term efficacy of oral terfenadine (Seldane) in the treatment of the common cold. Over a 5-week period, the authors recruited 250 adults who had developed cold symptoms within 6 to 48 hours prior to enrollment. Volunteers had a primary complaint of runny or stuffy nose; at least one other respiratory symptom; no fever or exudative pharyngitis; and no history of atopy, sinusitis, or use of cold preparations within 1 week of enrollment. Out of the eligible subjects, 126 were randomly assigned terfenadine (60 mg), and 124 received placebo. Volunteers self-administered either terfenadine or placebo twice a day on Days 1, 2 and 3, and a final dose on the morning of Day 4. They also recorded the severity of their clinical symptoms (runny nose, sniffles, sneezing, postnasal drip, cough and sore throat) on symptom cards. Both groups reported similar severity scores throughout the treatment period. Average symptom burdens declined at almost identical rates for both groups. Terfenadine was well tolerated and had a low incidence of side effects. According to subject evaluation, terfenadine was no more effective than placebo. The mean +/- SD score of global efficacy was 2.2 +/- 1.1 in the terfenadine group and 2.1 +/- 1.3 in the placebo group (P = NS). Slightly fewer terfenadine recipients (41%) than placebo recipients (48%) said they would use the study medication again for treating cold symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Oral oseltamivir treatment of influenza in children.

BACKGROUND: Oral oseltamivir administration is effective treatment for influenza in adults. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oseltamivir in children with influenza. METHODS: In this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, children 1 through 12 years with fever [> or =100 degrees F (> or =38 degrees C)] and a history of cough or coryza <48 h duration received oseltamivir 2 mg/kg/dose or placebo twice daily for 5 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to resolution of illness including mild/absent cough and coryza mild/absent, return to normal activity and euthermia. RESULTS: Of 695 enrolled children 452 (65%) had influenza (placebo, n = 235; oseltamivir, n = 217). Among infected children the median duration of illness was reduced by 36 h (26%) in oseltamivir compared with placebo recipients (101 h; 95% confidence interval, 89 to 118 vs. 137 h; 95% confidence interval, 125 to 150; P < 0.0001). Oseltamivir treatment also reduced cough, coryza and duration of fever. New diagnoses of otitis media were reduced by 44% (12% vs. 21%). The incidence of physician-prescribed antibiotics was significantly lower in influenza-infected oseltamivir (68 of 217, 31%) than placebo (97 of 235, 41%; P = 0.03) recipients. Oseltamivir therapy was generally well-tolerated, although associated with an excess frequency of emesis (5.8%). Discontinuation because of adverse events was low in both groups (1.8% with oseltamivir vs. 1.1% with placebo). Oseltamivir treatment did not affect the influenza-specific antibody response. CONCLUSIONS: Oral oseltamivir administration is an efficacious and well-tolerated therapy for influenza in children when given within 48 h of onset of illness.

Performance of virus isolation and Directigen Flu A to detect influenza A virus in experimental human infection.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist to assess the sensitivity of different specimen types for viral detection during the course of influenza virus infection. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the relationships between quantitative influenza A virus replication and antigen detectability by the enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) Directigen Flu A in different type of samples during experimental human infection. STUDY DESIGN: Fourteen volunteers were inoculated with influenza A virus A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1). Four specimens types were collected in sequence for quantitative isolation in cell culture and antigen testing from days 1 to 8 after inoculation. RESULTS: Seventy-one (63%) of nasopharyngeal wash specimens were culture positive, compared to 51 (46%) of throat gargles, 51 (46%) of nasal swabs, and 27 (24%) of throat swabs. All subjects shed virus in their nasopharyngeal wash at least one day and 86% of subjects had a positive nasopharyngeal wash culture on day 2 after inoculation. The mean viral titers were highest on day 2 post inoculation for all specimen types and averaged 3.6 log10 TCID50/ml for nasal washes, 1.2 log10 TCID50/ml for throat gargles, 1.8 log10 TCID50/ml for the nasopharyngeal swabs, and 0.6 log10 TCID50/ml for the throat swabs. Mean viral titers in the nasal washes were significantly different (P<0.05) compared to other specimen types. The peak of sensitivity of EIA (compared to culture) was the second day after inoculation. Nasopharyngeal and throat swab results were combined for this analysis and considered positive by culture if positive in either or both samples. Thus, on day 2 the number of EIA positive samples relative to the number culture positive was 9/12 (75%) for nasopharyngeal wash specimens, 2/9 (22%) for throat gargles, and 7/11 (64%) for the combined throat and nasal swabs specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Nasopharyngeal washes are the most sensitive sample type detecting influenza A virus in adults. For rapid diagnosis the Directigen Flu A is an alternative with a sensitivity compared to culture ranging between 64 and 78% if performed on nasopharyngeal specimens on day two or three after experimental infection in adults. However, if performed on other specimens or later in the course of infection the sensitivity is lower.

Clinical features of patients with acute respiratory illness and rhinovirus in their bronchoalveolar lavages.

BACKGROUND: Several reports in selected populations suggest that human rhinovirus (HRV) may be responsible for lower respiratory tract infections or pneumonia. We describe clinical features of all patients with rhinovirus cultured from their bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) during a 10-yr period in a tertiary care center. METHODS: Results for viral culture of all lower respiratory specimens performed during a 10-year period at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center were reviewed. A case was defined as any patient with a positive culture for HRV in a BAL specimen. A comprehensive review of the patients' medical records was performed. In one case, in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed in order to identify whether rhinoviral RNA was present in bronchial biopsy specimens. RESULTS: During the 10-year study period viruses were identified in 431 lower respiratory tract specimens, and were most frequently cytomegalovirus or herpes simplex virus. Twenty patients (ages, 2.5-86 year) had a bronchoalveolar specimen culture positive for HRV. All had an abnormal chest radiograph, 60% were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 25% expired during their hospitalization. In 18 patients (90%) various severe underlying conditions were identified including solid organ transplants in seven, malignancies in four and AIDS in two. An immunosuppressive disease or condition requiring immunosuppressive therapy was present in all cases. In addition to HRV, one or more potential pathogens were identified in respiratory specimens from 14 patients (70%). Histopathological abnormalities, ranging from fibropurulent debris in alveoli to diffuse alveolar damage, were present in 6 of 13 bronchial biopsies. In two cases without any other significant pathogens than HRV, acute inflammations with fibropurulent debris in alveoli were observed. One lung transplant patient showed intermittent recovery of HRV in her respiratory specimens during a 15-week time period, but ISH did not show HRV RNA in bronchial epithelial cells. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that HRV recovery from BALs or lower respiratory tract samples in highly immunocompromised patients is associated with severe lower respiratory tract illness. Whether HRV directly causes viral pneumonia or predispose to pulmonary injury and/or superinfection remains uncertain.

Clinical applications of antiviral agents for chemophrophylaxis and therapy of respiratory viral infections.

Table III summarizes clinical applications of antiviral agents in respiratory viral infections. (table: see text) For influenza A virus infections, both oral amantadine and rimantadine are effective when used for seasonal prophylaxis and for prophylaxis in institutional populations. Both of these drugs, as well as aerosolized ribavirin, have antiviral and therapeutic effects in uncomplicated influenza. It remains to be determined whether any of these modalities or possibly their combined use [44] will be useful in treating severe influenza hospitalized patients or whether they can prevent the development of complications in high risk patients. Unfortunately, there is no parenteral formulation of amantadine or rimantadine for use in critically ill patients. Aerosolized ribavirin has also been shown to have modest therapeutic effects in influenza B virus infection. However, a major need exists for an antiviral which is active against influenza B virus and which can be used on an outpatient basis. Controlled clinical trials have shown that aerosolized ribavirin therapy improves arterial oxygenation and modifies the severity of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and pneumonia [3,5]. Its role in treating life-threatening disease or in modifying the long-term sequelae of RSV infections are unknown at the present time. Again, a specific antiviral agent is needed for outpatient use in preventing or treating RSV infections. Finally, after over a decade of work since the original observation that intranasal interferon could prevent experimental rhinovirus infection [11], recent studies have established that intranasal rIFN-a2 is effective in the postexposure prophylaxis of rhinovirus colds in families [42]. This strategy needs to be studied with regard to the prevention of infection and its complications in high risk patients and it remains to be determined whether intranasal interferon will have therapeutic activity in established colds.

Combination antiviral therapy for respiratory virus infections.

A limited number of antiviral drug combinations have been shown to have enhanced activity for important human respiratory viruses. Rimantadine or amantadine combined with ribavirin shows increased antiviral effects in vitro and in experimental animal models. This combination warrants testing in human influenza. Immunoglobulin containing neutralizing anti-RSV antibody combined with ribavirin shows enhanced antiviral effects in experimental animal infections and provides clinical benefit in severe RSV infections of transplant patients. Generally, more effective treatments for acute respiratory viral infections will likely involve combinations of both antivirals and agents that modulate host inflammatory responses to infection.

Protective effect of rhinovirus receptor blocking antibody in human fibroblast cells.

Infection of HeLa cells by human rhinoviruses (RV) of the major receptor group is inhibited by a HeLa-derived rhinovirus receptor murine monoclonal antibody (RRMA). In yield reduction studies in human embryonic lung fibroblast cells, pretreatment with 1.0 or 10 micrograms/ml of RRMA partially protected (greater than 90% titer reduction) against infection by RV 39 or coxsackie A21 (members of the major receptor family), but not by RV 1A (member of the minor receptor family). The protection afforded by RRMA persisted at least 72 h after a 2-h exposure. These results suggest that RV receptors can be effectively blocked for prolonged periods in cultured fibroblast cells.