Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Publication year range
1.
Am J Bioeth ; 22(7): 4-20, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293841

ABSTRACT

Machine intelligence already helps medical staff with a number of tasks. Ethical decision-making, however, has not been handed over to computers. In this proof-of-concept study, we show how an algorithm based on Beauchamp and Childress' prima-facie principles could be employed to advise on a range of moral dilemma situations that occur in medical institutions. We explain why we chose fuzzy cognitive maps to set up the advisory system and how we utilized machine learning to train it. We report on the difficult task of operationalizing the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and patient autonomy, and describe how we selected suitable input parameters that we extracted from a training dataset of clinical cases. The first performance results are promising, but an algorithmic approach to ethics also comes with several weaknesses and limitations. Should one really entrust the sensitive domain of clinical ethics to machine intelligence?


Subject(s)
Ethics, Clinical , Personal Autonomy , Algorithms , Beneficence , Humans
2.
Am J Bioeth ; 22(12): W1-W4, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36205553
3.
Cogn Sci ; 48(9): e13492, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226225

ABSTRACT

Early number skills represent critical milestones in children's cognitive development and are shaped over years of interacting with quantities and numerals in various contexts. Several connectionist computational models have attempted to emulate how certain number concepts may be learned, represented, and processed in the brain. However, these models mainly used highly simplified inputs and focused on limited tasks. We expand on previous work in two directions: First, we train a model end-to-end on video demonstrations in a synthetic environment with multimodal visual and language inputs. Second, we use a more holistic dataset of 35 tasks, covering enumeration, set comparisons, symbolic digits, and seriation. The order in which the model acquires tasks reflects input length and variability, and the resulting trajectories mostly fit with findings from educational psychology. The trained model also displays symbolic and non-symbolic size and distance effects. Using techniques from interpretability research, we investigate how our attention-based model integrates cross-modal representations and binds them into context-specific associative networks to solve different tasks. We compare models trained with and without symbolic inputs and find that the purely non-symbolic model employs more processing-intensive strategies to determine set size.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Humans , Cognition/physiology , Child Development/physiology , Child , Language , Learning , Mathematics , Child, Preschool , Mathematical Concepts
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL