Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 33(6): 402-411, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259112

ABSTRACT

Background Optimal outcomes in microsurgery have been attributed to a range of factors, with performing of end-to-end (ETE) versus end-to-side (ETS) influencing anastomotic complications and flap outcomes. Methods A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relative risks of anastomotic complications with ETE versus ETS approaches, for arterial and venous anastomoses looking at risk ratios (RRs) for thrombosis and overall flap failure. Results RRs of thrombosis and flap failure in ETS versus ETE venous anastomosis groups were 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-3.21) and 1.50 (95% CI: 0.85-2.67), respectively. The RRs of thrombosis and flap failure in ETS versus ETE arterial anastomosis groups were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.32-3.35) and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.72-1.48), respectively. Conclusion Differences in rates of thrombosis and flap failure between ETE and ETS venous and arterial anastomoses are marginal and nonsignificant. As such, the type of anastomotic technique is best decided on a case-by-case basis, dependent on anatomical, surgical, and patient factors.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Microsurgery/methods , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Odds Ratio , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 30(6): 413-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24960200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various reports suggest the augmentation of venous drainage through performing two venous anastomoses as a means of reducing the rate of thrombosis in free flap surgery. However, some suggest dual venous drainage may actually reduce venous blood flow velocity causing a potential risk for thrombosis. METHODS: On the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematics Reviews and Meta-analysis statement, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Medline databases. A total of 12,190 articles relating to "free flaps" and "one versus two venous anastomoses" were found between January 1992 and November 2012. Of the 12,190 articles, 23 studies were included in a meta-analysis performed using STATA 11.2 (StrataCorp, College Station, TX). Studies with case control groups for both single and double venous anastomoses and clearly defined results for flap failure and venous thrombosis were included. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each study and pooled in both fixed and random-effects models for both flap failure and venous thrombosis events. RESULTS: The analysis shows a significant reduction in flap failure (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41-0.99; p = 0.03) and venous thrombosis (risk ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97; p = 0.047) when performing two venous anastomoses compared with one in free flap surgery. CONCLUSION: The results show that performing two venous anastomoses is associated with a reduction in the incidence of flap failure by 36% and venous thrombosis by 34% compared with one venous anastomoses. Given that the performing of an additional venous anastomoses confers a lower risk of complication and is technically feasible, where possible two venous anastomoses should be performed in free flap procedures, however, this should be decided on a flap by flap basis.


Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Microsurgery , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 89(7-8): 940-944, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30706623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of lip defects following neoplasia and trauma is a common procedure in plastic surgery. Reconstruction of large lip defects is a difficult undertaking and some degree of residual functional impairment and disability are likely to occur. Microsurgical reconstruction is the recommended technique for large lip defects; however, limitations exist regarding optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes with current free flap options. METHOD: We propose a new composite flap design based on the innervated pronator quadratus with the radial forearm free flap for a more dynamic reconstruction of total or near total lip defects. Results of our series of four patients have been reviewed. RESULTS: The radial forearm flap - innervated pronator quadratus flap has been used in four patients thus far for lip reconstruction. This flap, in our limited series has shown excellent results in achieving oral competence, good motor function and acceptable cosmetic appearance. CONCLUSION: The composite radial forearm-pronator quadratus flap is a promising new lip reconstruction technique that has potential to provide a higher level of oral competence, sphincteric function and symmetrical lip movement, than current microsurgical options in dynamic lip reconstruction. This method warrants further investigation in plastic surgery literature.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Lip/surgery , Muscle, Skeletal/transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Forearm , Humans , Lip/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Recovery of Function
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(5): 337-42, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26331293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Free vascularized bone flaps are widely recognized as the optimal reconstruction for patients who undergo mandibular resection. The fibula-free flap is currently considered the gold standard, workhorse flap for mandibular reconstruction. Although previous studies have analysed individual success of each flap type, few have compared iliac- and fibula-free flaps. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in line with the PRISMA protocol searching the PubMed and EBSCO databases. Twenty-four studies were included as per predetermined inclusion criteria. Double-arm random effect meta-analysis was conducted with STATA 12, and single-arm meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Meta-XL. RESULTS: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that there is no significant difference in total flap loss between fibula- and iliac-free flap reconstruction of mandibular defects. In terms of recipient site complication, there was a significantly higher risk of delayed healing and suture line breakdown in the iliac flap group (P = 0.05). Donor site complications showed a trend towards being higher in the fibula flap group. Osseointegrated dental implant loss in fibula flaps was higher than in iliac flaps (5.3% compared with 1.7%). CONCLUSION: Both iliac- and fibula-free flaps should be considered for use in mandibular reconstruction. We suggest the iliac crest as the first choice for mandibular angle or body defects (better contour match) or also defects requiring greater soft-tissue bulk for intra-oral lining. The fibula flap is best when bony length is required such as in subtotal or total mandibulectomy.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation/methods , Fibula/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps , Ilium/transplantation , Mandibular Reconstruction/methods , Humans
5.
ANZ J Surg ; 85(3): 121-7, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25345755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a general consensus among reconstructive surgeons that preoperative radiotherapy is associated with a higher risk of flap failure and complications in head and neck surgery. Opinion is also divided regarding the effects of radiation dose on free flap outcomes and timing of preoperative radiation to minimize adverse outcomes. Our meta-analysis will attempt to address these issues. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in concordance to PRISMA protocol. Data were combined using STATA 12 and Open Meta-Analyst software programmes. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included comparing 2842 flaps performed in irradiated fields and 3491 flaps performed in non-irradiated fields. Meta-analysis yielded statistically significant risk ratios for flap failure (RR 1.48, P = 0.004), complications (RR 1.84, P < 0.001), reoperation (RR 2.06, P < 0.001) and fistula (RR 2.05, P < 0.001). Mean radiation dose demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of flap failure, but this was not statistically significant. On subgroup analysis, flaps with >60 Gy radiation had a non-statistically significant higher risk of flap failure (RR 1.61, P = 0.145). CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiation is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of flap complications, failure and fistula. Preoperative radiation in excess of 60 Gy after radiotherapy represents a potential risk factor for increased flap loss and should be avoided where possible.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Graft Survival , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Models, Statistical , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
ANZ J Surg ; 85(6): 408-13, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25582050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a popular procedure for patients with pulmonary metastases. It can be achieved via the traditional open thoracotomy or the more recently developed video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, there has been much debate as to which approach is better in terms of detection of pulmonary metastases and, in turn, survival and recurrence outcomes. We aim to compare the two different approaches in terms of survival and recurrence outcomes. METHODS: Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant publications dated prior to May 2013. The bibliographies of the included articles were examined for additional relevant articles that were not included in the search. All publications reporting on overall survival and recurrence-free survival were included. The articles were carefully examined and data were extracted. STATA 12L and RevMan5.2 software were used to combine the data using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 1960 studies were identified through the search. Thirty-two articles had extractable data regarding overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, only eight articles were included in the end as the other 24 articles had incomplete data. From the included articles, we found that the VATS group had slightly higher odds of 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival with odds ratios of 1.53, 1.69 and 1.41, respectively, and also higher odds of 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival with odds ratios of 1.29, 1.54 and 1.54, respectively. CONCLUSION: VATS offers a suitable alternative to open thoracotomy for the treatment of pulmonary metastases.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Metastasectomy/methods , Pneumonectomy/methods , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted , Thoracotomy , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 5(1): 46-56, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24490042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ablative strategies have been used to treat and facilitate hepatic resection (HR) in patients with otherwise unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We evaluated the efficacy of HR, concomitant HR and ablation and isolated ablation on recurrence and survival outcomes after treatment of CLM in patients with 1-4 and ≥5 lesions, respectively. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected hepatobiliary surgery database was performed on patients who underwent treatment for isolated CLM between 1990 and 2010. Pre-operative and treatment characteristics were compared between patients who underwent HR, concomitant HR and ablation and ablation alone. The impact of treatment modality on survival and recurrence outcomes was determined. RESULTS: A total of 701 patients met inclusion criteria; 550 patients (78%) had 1-4 lesions and 151 patients (22%) had ≥5 lesions. Overall median survival for the entire cohort was 35 months with 5- and 10-year survival of 33% and 20%, respectively. Overall median and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 13 months and 21%, respectively. For patients with 1-4 lesions, median survival was 37 months with 5-year survival of 36%. Stratified by procedure type, 5-year survival was 41% in patients who underwent HR, 35% in patients who underwent concomitant HR and ablation and 13% in patients who underwent ablation alone (P<0.001). For patients with ≥5 lesions, median survival was 28 months with 5-year survival of 23% without difference between treatment groups (P=0.078). CONCLUSIONS: HR appears to be the most effective strategy for patients with 1-4 lesions. When ≥5 lesions are present, ablative strategies are useful in facilitating HR in otherwise unresectable patients.

8.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 15(3): 199-206, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24572338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a known complication of cardiac surgery. There is a paucity of data on the effects of POAF on short-term and long-term outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR-CABG ). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on patients without preexisting arrhythmia who underwent isolated first-time AVR-CABG between June 2001 and December 2009 using the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database Program. Preoperative characteristics, early postoperative outcomes and late survival were compared between patients who developed POAF and those who did not. Propensity score matching was performed to account for the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Isolated AVR-CABG surgery was performed in 2028 patients without preexisting arrhythmias at 18 Australian institutions, of whom 894 (44.1%) developed POAF. POAF patients were generally older (mean age, 75 vs. 73 years, P < 0.001). From the initial study population, 715 propensity-matched patient-pairs were derived; the overall matching rate was 80.0%. In the matched groups, 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (3.5 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.16). Patients with POAF, however, were more likely to develop perioperative complications, including new renal failure, prolonged ventilation (>24 h), multisystem failure and readmission within 30 days of surgery (all P < 0.05). Patients with POAF also had a significantly greater length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Seven-year survival was not significantly different between the two groups (72 vs. 75%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: POAF was not associated with an increased risk of early or late mortality. It is, however, associated with poorer perioperative outcomes. It is important to evaluate potential treatment strategies for POAF.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Australia/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL