Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Int J Cancer ; 133(9): 2207-15, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23616284

ABSTRACT

Serious concern arose in the scientific literature about the state of and progress in cancer survival among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients in the recent years. We provide an up-to-date international comparison of survival among AYA patients. Using population-based cancer data from 11 German cancer registries and the SEER Program of the United States (covering populations of 39 and 33 million people, respectively), standardized tumor group classifications, period analysis and modeling, we compared the 5-year relative survival of AYA patients in the age groups 15-29 and 30-39 to survival seen among adults aged 40-49 for the 2002-2006 period. Additionally, we also provide an age-specific survival comparison between the two countries. In 2002-2006, for the overwhelming majority of the more than 30 types of cancer examined, AYA patients aged both 15-29 and 30-39 years had higher or similar survival than patients in the age group 40-49 in both countries. A numerically large and statistically significant survival deficit among AYA patients was only found for breast carcinomas in both populations, and colorectal and stomach carcinoma in the United States for the age group 15-29. Overall, results of the country-specific comparisons did not indicate systematic differences. With very few exceptions, no survival deficit between AYA patients and adults aged 40-49 years was found in either of the examined countries in the first decade of the 21st century.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/mortality , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , International Agencies , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prognosis , Survival Rate , United States , Young Adult
2.
Acta Oncol ; 51(7): 906-14, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22524212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophagus and stomach cancers are associated with poor prognosis. But most published population-based cancer survival estimates for stomach and esophagus cancer refer to survival experience of patients diagnosed in the 1990s or earlier years. The aim of this study was to provide up-to-date survival estimates and trends for patients with stomach and esophagus cancer in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our analysis is based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries, covering 33 million inhabitants. Patients diagnosed with stomach and esophagus cancer in 1997-2006 were included. Period analysis was used to derive five-year relative survival estimates and trends by age, sex, cancer subsite, and stage for the time period of 2002-2006. German and US survival estimates were compared utilizing the SEER 13 database. RESULTS: Overall age-standardized five-year relative survival was 31.8% and 18.3% for stomach and esophagus cancer, respectively, compared to 27.2% and 17.4% in the US. Survival was somewhat higher among female than among male patients for both cancer sites (33.6% vs. 30.6% and 21.5% vs. 17.5%, respectively) and much higher for non-cardia stomach cancer (40.4%) than for cardia cancer (23.4%). From 2002 to 2006, a moderate increase in five-year relative survival by 2.7 percent units was observed for non-cardia stomach cancer patients in Germany (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Five-year relative cancer survival has reached levels around 40% for patients with non-cardia stomach cancer in Germany in the early 21st century, whereas it remained at lower levels around 20% for patients with esophagus and cardia cancer.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , SEER Program , Sex Distribution , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
3.
Biol Psychiatry ; 61(3): 348-58, 2007 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16815322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little population-based data exist on the prevalence or correlates of eating disorders. METHODS: Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders from the National Comorbidity Replication, a nationally representative face-to-face household survey (n = 9282), conducted in 2001-2003, were assessed using the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence estimates of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder are .9%, 1.5%, and 3.5% among women, and .3% .5%, and 2.0% among men. Survival analysis based on retrospective age-of-onset reports suggests that risk of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder increased with successive birth cohorts. All 3 disorders are significantly comorbid with many other DSM-IV disorders. Lifetime anorexia nervosa is significantly associated with low current weight (body-mass index <18.5), whereas lifetime binge eating disorder is associated with current severe obesity (body-mass index > or =40). Although most respondents with 12-month bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder report some role impairment (data unavailable for anorexia nervosa since no respondents met criteria for 12-month prevalence), only a minority of cases ever sought treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Eating disorders, although relatively uncommon, represent a public health concern because they are frequently associated with other psychopathology and role impairment, and are frequently under-treated.


Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders/complications , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Anorexia Nervosa/complications , Anorexia Nervosa/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Bulimia/epidemiology , Cohort Effect , Comorbidity , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Population , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , United States/epidemiology
4.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 60(2): 184-9, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12578436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Public Law 102-321 established a block grant for adults with "serious mental illness" (SMI) and required the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to develop a method to estimate the prevalence of SMI. METHODS: Three SMI screening scales were developed for possible use in the SAMHSA National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF) scale, the K10/K6 nonspecific distress scales, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS). An enriched convenience sample of 155 respondents was administered all screening scales followed by the 12-month Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). We defined SMI as any 12-month DSM-IV disorder, other than a substance use disorder, with a GAF score of less than 60. RESULTS: All screening scales were significantly related to SMI. However, neither the CIDI-SF nor the WHO-DAS improved prediction significantly over the K10 or K6 scales. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SMI was 0.854 for K10 and 0.865 for K6. The most efficient screening scale, K6, had a sensitivity (SE) of 0.36 (0.08) and a specificity of 0.96 (0.02) in predicting SMI. CONCLUSIONS: The brevity and accuracy of the K6 and K10 scales make them attractive screens for SMI. Routine inclusion of either scale in clinical studies would create an important, and heretofore missing, crosswalk between community and clinical epidemiology.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Mass Screening , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Probability , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States/epidemiology , United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
5.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 13(2): 69-92, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15297905

ABSTRACT

The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) is a survey of the prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in the US that was carried out between February 2001 and April 2003. Interviews were administered face-to-face in the homes of respondents, who were selected from a nationally representative multi-stage clustered area probability sample of households. A total of 9,282 interviews were completed in the main survey and an additional 554 short non-response interviews were completed with initial non-respondents. This paper describes the main features of the NCS-R design and field procedures, including information on fieldwork organization and procedures, sample design, weighting and considerations in the use of design-based versus model-based estimation. Empirical information is presented on non-response bias, design effect, and the trade-off between bias and efficiency in minimizing total mean-squared error of estimates by trimming weights.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bias , Cluster Analysis , Comorbidity/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiologic Research Design , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sampling Studies , Statistics as Topic/trends , United States/epidemiology
6.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 22(3): 122-33, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12757277

ABSTRACT

We analyzed survey data from Canada, Chile, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United States to study the prevalence and treatment of mental and substance abuse disorders. Total past-year prevalence estimates range between 17.0 percent (Chile) and 29.1 percent (U.S.). Many cases are mild. Although disorder severity is strongly related to treatment, one- to two-thirds of serious cases receive no treatment each year. Most treatment goes to minor and mild cases. Undertreatment of serious cases is most pronounced among young poorly educated males. Outreach is needed to reduce barriers to care among serious cases and young people at risk of serious disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Chile/epidemiology , Developed Countries , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health Services/supply & distribution , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
7.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 65(6): 625-33, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18519820

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Child maltreatment is a significant risk factor for adult mental disorders and physical illnesses. Although the child welfare system routinely places severely abused and/or neglected children in foster care, no controlled studies exist to determine the effectiveness of this intervention in improving the long-term health of maltreated youth. OBJECTIVE: To present results of the first quasi-experimental study, to our knowledge, to evaluate the effects of expanded foster care treatment on the mental and physical health of adult foster care alumni. DESIGN: We used a quasi-experimental design to compare adult outcomes of alumni of a model private foster care program and 2 public programs. The latter alumni were eligible for but not selected by the private program because of limited openings. Propensity score weights based on intake records were adjusted for preplacement between-sample differences. Personal interviews administered 1 to 13 years after leaving foster care assessed the mental and physical health of alumni. SETTING/ PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 479 adult foster care alumni who were placed in foster care as adolescents (14-18 years of age) between January 1, 1989, and September 30, 1998, in private (n = 111) or public (n = 368) foster care programs in Oregon and Washington. More than 80% of alumni were traced, and 92.2% of those traced were interviewed. INTERVENTION: Caseworkers in the model program had higher levels of education and salaries, lower caseloads, and access to a wider range of ancillary services (eg, mental health counseling, tutoring, and summer camps) than caseworkers in the public programs. Youth in the model program were in foster care more than 2 years longer than those in the public programs. RESULTS: Private program alumni had significantly fewer mental disorders (major depression, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders), ulcers, and cardiometabolic disorders, but more respiratory disorders, than did public program alumni. CONCLUSION: Public sector investment in higher-quality foster care services could substantially improve the long-term mental and physical health of foster care alumni.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/prevention & control , Child Abuse/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/prevention & control , Foster Home Care/methods , Psychophysiologic Disorders/prevention & control , Social Environment , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Case Management , Child , Child Abuse/psychology , Child Welfare/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Foster Home Care/psychology , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team , Private Sector , Psychophysiologic Disorders/psychology , Public Sector , Social Adjustment , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Washington
8.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 48(7): 703-13, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17593151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is a leading cause of referral for youth mental health services; yet, many uncertainties exist about ODD given it is rarely examined as a distinct psychiatric disorder. We examined the lifetime prevalence, onset, persistence, and correlates of ODD. METHODS: Lifetime prevalence of ODD and 18 other DSM-IV disorders was assessed in a nationally representative sample of adult respondents (n = 3,199) in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Retrospective age-of-onset reports were used to test temporal priorities with comorbid disorders. RESULTS: Lifetime prevalence of ODD is estimated to be 10.2% (males = 11.2%; females = 9.2%). Of those with lifetime ODD, 92.4% meet criteria for at least one other lifetime DSM-IV disorder, including: mood (45.8%), anxiety (62.3%), impulse-control (68.2%), and substance use (47.2%) disorders. ODD is temporally primary in the vast majority of cases for most comorbid disorders. Both active and remitted ODD significantly predict subsequent onset of secondary disorders even after controlling for comorbid conduct disorder (CD). Early onset (before age 8) and comorbidity predict slow speed of recovery of ODD. CONCLUSIONS: ODD is a common child- and adolescent-onset disorder associated with substantial risk of secondary mood, anxiety, impulse-control, and substance use disorders. These results support the study of ODD as a distinct disorder. Prospective and experimental studies are needed to further delineate the temporal and causal relations between ODD and related disorders.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/diagnosis , Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/epidemiology , Conduct Disorder/epidemiology , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Comorbidity , Conduct Disorder/diagnosis , Convalescence , Demography , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Severity of Illness Index , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
9.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 46(11): 1019-27, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17696195

ABSTRACT

We studied gene expression in 18 melanocytic nevi with and four nevi without the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene using HG-U133A 2.0 microarray with 22,277 transcripts. Data analysis revealed 92 genes up-regulated and 105 genes down-regulated in nevi with the mutation compared to nevi without mutation. Pathway analysis showed that differentially regulated genes mapped to 10 genetic networks. The major network included genes involved in cell death, cell cycle, and cellular growth and proliferation. Up-regulated genes in nevi with the mutation included CDKN2A, CDKN1C, and MITF; whereas down-regulated genes included those involved in apoptotic and other pathways. Principal component analysis identified 22 probe sets (20 genes) that caused separate segregation of nevi with and without mutations. In conclusion, our data showed differences in gene expression between nevi with and without the V600E BRAF mutation. Moreover, nevi with mutations showed over-expression of genes involved in melanocytic senescence and cell cycle inhibition.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression , Mutation , Nevus, Pigmented/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
10.
Psychol Med ; 36(5): 699-710, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16438742

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that conduct disorder (CD) is associated with a range of co-morbid mental disorders. However, the actual prevalence, subtypes and patterns of co-morbidity of DSM-IV-defined CD in the general US population remains unknown. METHOD: Retrospective assessment of CD and other DSM-IV disorders was conducted using fully structured diagnostic interviews among a nationally representative sample of respondents (n=3199) in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). RESULTS: The estimated lifetime prevalence of CD in the US is 9.5% (12.0% among males and 7.1% among females), with a median age-of-onset of 11.6 (0.2) years. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified five CD subtypes characterized by rule violations, deceit/theft, aggression, severe covert behaviors, and pervasive CD symptoms. A dose-response relationship was revealed between CD subtype severity and risk of subsequent disorders. Results also indicated that CD typically precedes mood and substance use disorders, but most often occurs after impulse control and anxiety disorders. Although both active and remitted CD is associated with increased risk of the subsequent first onset of other mental disorders, remitted CD is associated with significantly lower risk of subsequent disorders. CONCLUSIONS: CD is prevalent and heterogeneous in the US population, and more severe subtypes and the presence of active CD are associated with higher risk of co-morbid disorders. Future prospective studies using general population samples will further inform the nature and course of this disorder.


Subject(s)
Conduct Disorder/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Child , Comorbidity , Conduct Disorder/classification , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
11.
Psychol Med ; 35(2): 245-56, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15841682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A self-report screening scale of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the World Health Organization (WHO) Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) was developed in conjunction with revision of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The current report presents data on concordance of the ASRS and of a short-form ASRS screener with blind clinical diagnoses in a community sample. METHOD: The ASRS includes 18 questions about frequency of recent DSM-IV Criterion A symptoms of adult ADHD. The ASRS screener consists of six out of these 18 questions that were selected based on stepwise logistic regression to optimize concordance with the clinical classification. ASRS responses were compared to blind clinical ratings of DSM-IV adult ADHD in a sample of 154 respondents who previously participated in the US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), oversampling those who reported childhood ADHD and adult persistence. RESULTS: Each ASRS symptom measure was significantly related to the comparable clinical symptom rating, but varied substantially in concordance (Cohen's kappa in the range 0.16-0.81). Optimal scoring to predict clinical syndrome classifications was to sum unweighted dichotomous responses across all 18 ASRS questions. However, because of the wide variation in symptom-level concordance, the unweighted six-question ASRS screener outperformed the unweighted 18-question ASRS in sensitivity (68.7% v. 56.3%), specificity (99.5% v. 98.3%), total classification accuracy (97.9% v. 96.2%), and kappa (0.76 v. 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical calibration in larger samples might show that a weighted version of the 18-question ASRS outperforms the six-question ASRS screener. Until that time, however, the unweighted screener should be preferred to the full ASRS, both in community surveys and in clinical outreach and case-finding initiatives.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Mass Screening/methods , Self Psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Calibration , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Reference Values , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL