Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Lancet ; 368(9532): 287-98, 2006 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16860698

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy has greatly reduced HIV mortality and morbidity. However, the best sequence of regimens and implications of initial regimen for long-term therapeutic success are not well defined. METHODS: In INITIO, a large international randomised trial, we compared antiretroviral therapy with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine+stavudine) plus either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz, EFV) or a protease inhibitor (nelfinavir, NFV), or both (EFV/NFV), in patients with HIV-1 infection who had not previously received antiretroviral drugs. Primary outcomes were proportion with undetectable HIV RNA in plasma, and change in CD4 count from baseline at 3 years. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN44582462. FINDINGS: We followed up 911 participants (297 EFV, 311 NFV, 303 EFV/NFV). At 3 years, the proportion with HIV RNA less than 50 copies per mL was highest in the EFV group (188 [74%] EFV, 162 [62%] NFV, 155 [62%] EFV/NFV; p=0.004). Mean (95% CI) increases in CD4 count were 316x10(6) cells per L (288-343) for EFV, 289x10(6) cells per L (262-316) for NFV, and 274x10(6) cells per L (231-291) for EFV/NFV (p=0.1). Fewer participants in the EFV group than in the other groups stopped adequate antiretroviral therapy for more than 30 days (p=0.005). Participants in the EFV/NFV group had shorter time to stopping the initial regimen (p<0.0001) and to a treatment modifying adverse event (p=0.04) than those in the other groups. INTERPRETATION: Starting antiretroviral therapy with a three-drug/two-class regimen including efavirenz was better than starting with regimens including nelfinavir or efavirenz plus nelfinavir in terms of virological suppression and durability of the initial regimen. The shorter time on adequate antiretroviral therapy or to a treatment-modifying adverse event might explain the absence of additional benefit for the four-drug regimen.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , HIV-1 , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Female , Humans , Male , Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Viral Load
2.
J Virol Methods ; 88(2): 117-24, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10960699

ABSTRACT

This study compares the performance of a line probe assay (LiPA) for the detection of the major mutations associated with reduced sensitivity to nucleoside analogues with a well characterised point mutation assay (PMA). Plasma samples obtained from patients in a trial of four reverse transcriptase inhibitors (MRC Quattro Trial) were tested by both LiPA and PMA at baseline, 32nd and 64th weeks for the presence of drug resistance associated mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene. HIV-1 RNA was extracted from plasma by the Boom method and amplified by RT-PCR prior to being tested by LiPA or PMA. Assay discrepancies were further investigated by sequencing of the RT gene. Of 275 samples available from 98 trial subjects, 246 samples were successfully amplified by PCR and analysed by LiPA and PMA for six mutations. Of the 1476 individual codons analysed, LiPA successfully assayed 1444 (97.8%) and PMA gave a result with 1418 (96.1%). LiPA failed to give a result for 32 codons from 22 samples and PMA failed with 58 codons from 38 samples. Gross differences between the two assays, in which one scored a codon as wild-type only and the other as mutant only or vice versa, occurred at 28 codons analysed (1.9%) representing 26 samples from 20 subjects. Sequencing of 22 of the 26 samples confirmed the LiPA result in nine cases, the PMA result in 11 and detected a novel variant at codon 215 in four cases. The PMA and LiPA approach to the detection of the major mutations that are genotypically associated with reduced sensitivity to nucleoside analogues can correctly detect mutations in 97% of the cases.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Nucleosides/pharmacology , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Acetamides/pharmacology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Acetophenones/pharmacology , Acetophenones/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Codon , DNA/blood , DNA Mutational Analysis , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Therapy, Combination , Evaluation Studies as Topic , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV-1/enzymology , Humans , Lamivudine/pharmacology , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Nucleosides/therapeutic use , Point Mutation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Zalcitabine/pharmacology , Zalcitabine/therapeutic use , Zidovudine/pharmacology , Zidovudine/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL