Mapping Spinal Cord Stimulation-Evoked Muscle Responses in Patients With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) has shown promise for restoring some volitional motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI). Maximizing therapeutic response requires effective spatial stimulation generated through careful configuration of anodes and cathodes on the eSCS lead. By exploring the way the spatial distribution of low frequency stimulation affects muscle activation patterns, we investigated the spatial specificity of stimulation-evoked responses for targeted muscle groups for restoration after chronic SCI (cSCI) in participants in the Epidural Stimulation After Neurologic Damage (E-STAND) trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen participants with Abbreviated Injury Scale A cSCI from the E-STAND study were evaluated with a wide range of bipolar spatial patterns. Surface electromyography captured stimulation-evoked responses from the rectus abdominis (RA), intercostal, paraspinal, iliopsoas, rectus femoris (RF), tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL), and gastrocnemius muscle groups bilaterally. Peak-to-peak amplitudes were analyzed for each pulse across muscles. Stimulation patterns with dipoles parallel (vertical configurations), perpendicular (horizontal configurations), and oblique (diagonal configurations) relative to the rostral-caudal axis were evaluated. RESULTS: Cathodic stimulation in the transverse plane indicated ipsilaterally biased activation in RA, intercostal, paraspinal, iliopsoas, RF, TA, EHL, and gastrocnemius muscles (p < 0.05). We found that caudal cathodic stimulation was significantly more activating only in the RF and EHL muscle groups than in the rostral (p < 0.037 and p < 0.006, respectively). Oblique stimulation was found to be more activating in the RA, intercostal, paraspinal, iliopsoas, and TA muscle groups than in the transverse (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cathodic stimulation provides uniform specificity for targeting laterality. Few muscle groups responded specifically to variation in rostral/caudal stimulation, and oblique stimulation improved stimulation responses when compared with horizontal configurations. These relations may enable tailored targeting of muscle groups, but the surprising amount of variation observed suggests that monitoring these evoked muscle responses will play a key role in this tailoring process. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03026816.

The safety of epidural spinal cord stimulation to restore function after spinal cord injury: post-surgical complications and incidence of cardiovascular events.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) improves volitional motor and autonomic function after spinal cord injury (SCI). While eSCS has an established history of safety for chronic pain, it remains unclear if eSCS in the SCI population presents the same risk profile. We aimed to assess safety and autonomic monitoring data for the first 14 participants in the E-STAND trial. SETTING: Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis and Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minnesota, USA. METHODS: Monthly follow-up visits assessed surgical and medical device-related safety outcomes as well as stimulation usage. Beat-by-beat blood pressure (BP) and continuous electrocardiogram data were collected during head-up tilt-table testing with and without eSCS. RESULTS: All participants had a motor-complete SCI. Mean (SD) age and time since injury were 38 (10) and 7 (5) years, respectively. There were no surgical complications but one device malfunction 4 months post implantation. Stimulation was applied for up to 23 h/day, across a broad range of parameters: frequency (18-700 Hz), pulse width (100-600 µs), and amplitude (0.4-17 mA), with no adverse events reported. Tilt-table testing with eSCS demonstrated no significant increases in the incidence of elevated systolic BP or a greater frequency of arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: eSCS to restore autonomic and volitional motor function following SCI has a similar safety profile as when used to treat chronic pain, despite the prevalence of significant comorbidities and the wide variety of stimulation parameters tested.

Neuromodulation Through Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Ability to Voluntarily Cycle After Motor Complete Paraplegia.

Abstract Epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) of the lower thoracic spinal cord has been shown to partially restore volitional movement in patients with complete chronic spinal cord injury (cSCI). Combining eSCS with intensive locomotor training improves motor function, including standing and stepping, but many patients with cSCI suffer from long-standing muscle atrophy and loss of bone mineral density, which may prohibit safe implementation. Safe, accessible, and effective avenues for pairing neuromodulation with activity-based therapy remain unexplored. Cycling is one such option that can be utilized as an eSCS therapy given its low-risk and low-weight-bearing requirement. We investigated the feasibility and kinematics of motor-assisted and passive cycle-based therapy for cSCI patients with epidural spinal cord stimulation. Seven participants who underwent spinal cord stimulation surgery in the Epidural Stimulation After Neurologic Damage (E-STAND) trial (NCT03026816) participated in a cycling task using the motor assist MOTOmed Muvi 300. A factorial design was used such that participants were asked to cycle with and without conscious effort with and without stimulation. We used mixed effects models assessing maximum power output and time pedaling unassisted to evaluate the interaction between stimulation and conscious effort. Cycling was well-tolerated and we observed no adverse events, including in participants up to 17 years post-initial injury and up to 58 years old. All participants were found to be able to pedal without motor assist, which primarily occurred when stimulation and effort were applied together (p = 0.001). Additionally, the combination of stimulation and intention was significantly associated with higher maximum power production (p < 0.0001) and distance pedaled (p = 0.0001). No association was found between volitional movement and participant factors: age, time since injury, and spinal cord atrophy. With stimulation and conscious effort, all participants were able to achieve active cycling without motor assistance. Thus, our stationary cycling factorial study design demonstrated volitional movement restoration with eSCS in a diverse study population of cSCI participants. Further, motor-assist cycling was well-tolerated without any adverse events. Cycling has the potential to be a safe research assessment and physical therapy modality for cSCI patients utilizing eSCS who have a high risk of injury with weight bearing exercise. The cycling modality in this study was demonstrated to be a straightforward assessment of motor function and safe for all participants regardless of age or time since initial injury.

Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Bayesian Preference Learning and Its Validation.

Epidural spinal cord stimulation has been reported to partially restore volitional movement and autonomic functions after motor and sensory-complete spinal cord injury (SCI). Modern spinal cord stimulation platforms offer significant flexibility in spatial and temporal parameters of stimulation delivered. Heterogeneity in SCI and injury-related symptoms necessitate stimulation personalization to maximally restore functions. However, the large multi-dimensional stimulation space makes exhaustive tests impossible. In this paper, we present a Bayesian optimization strategy for identifying personalized optimal stimulation patterns based on the participant's expressed preference for stimulation settings. We present companion validation protocols for investigating the credibility of learned preference models. The results obtained for five participants in the E-STAND spinal cord stimulation clinical trial are reported. Personalized preference models produced by the proposed learning and optimization algorithm show that there is more similarity in optimal frequency than in pulse width across participants. Across five participants, the average model prediction accuracy is 71.5% in internal cross-validation and 65.6% in prospective validation. Statistical tests of both validation studies show that the ability of the preference models to correctly predict unseen preference data is significantly greater than chance. The personalized preference models are also shown to be significantly correlated with motor task performance across participants. We show that several aspects in participants' quality of life has been improved over the course of the trial. Overall, the results indicate that the Bayesian preference optimization algorithm could assist clinicians in the systematic programming of individualized therapeutic stimulation settings and improve the therapeutic outcomes.

Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation.

Background: Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) portends a low probability of recovery, especially in the most severe subset of motor-complete injuries. Active spinal cord stimulation with or without intensive locomotor training has been reported to restore movement after traumatic SCI. Only three cases have been reported where participants developed restored volitional movement with active stimulation turned off after a period of chronic stimulation and only after intensive rehabilitation with locomotor training. It is unknown whether restoration of movement without stimulation is possible after stimulation alone. Objective: We describe the development of spontaneous volitional movement (SVM) without active stimulation in a subset of participants in the Epidural Stimulation After Neurologic Damage (ESTAND) trial, in which locomotor training is not prescribed as part of the study protocol, and subject's rehabilitation therapies are not modified. Methods: Volitional movement was evaluated with the Brain Motor Control Assessment using sEMG recordings and visual examination at baseline and at follow-up visits with and without stimulation. Additional functional assessment with a motor-assisted bicycle exercise at follow-up with and without stimulation identified generated work with and without effort. Results: The first seven participants had ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A or B thoracic SCI, a mean age of 42 years, and 7.7 years post-injury on average. Four patients developed evidence of sustained volitional movement, even in the absence of active stimulation after undergoing chronic epidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS). Significant increases in volitional power were found between those observed to spontaneously move without stimulation and those unable (p < 0.0005). The likelihood of recovery of spontaneous volitional control was correlated with spasticity scores prior to the start of eSCS therapy (p = 0.048). Volitional power progressively improved over time (p = 0.016). Additionally, cycling was possible without stimulation (p < 0.005). Conclusion: While some SVM after eSCS has been reported in the literature, this study demonstrates sustained restoration without active stimulation after long-term eSCS stimulation in chronic and complete SCI in a subset of participants. This finding supports previous studies suggesting that "complete" SCI is likely not as common as previously believed, if it exists at all in the absence of transection and that preserved pathways are substrates for eSCS-mediated recovery in clinically motor-complete SCI. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03026816.

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) Outperforms S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B (S100B) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as Predictor for Positive Computed Tomography of the Head in Trauma Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are largely underdiagnosed and may have persistent refractory consequences. Current assessments for acute TBI are limited to physical examination and imaging. Biomarkers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) have shown predictive value as indicators of TBI and potential screening tools. METHODS: In total, 37 controls and 118 unique trauma subjects who received a clinically ordered head computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center were evaluated. Blood samples collected at 0-8 hours (initial) and 12-32 hours (delayed) postinjury were analyzed for GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B concentrations. These were then compared in CT-negative and CT-positive subjects. RESULTS: Median GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B concentrations were greater in CT-positive subjects at both timepoints compared with CT-negative subjects. In addition, median UCH-L1 and S100B concentrations were lower at the delayed timepoint, whereas median GFAP concentrations were increased. As predictors of a positive CT of the head, GFAP outperformed UCH-L1 and S100B at both timepoints (initial: 0.89 sensitivity, 0.62 specificity; delayed: 0.94 sensitivity, 0.67 specificity). GFAP alone also outperformed all possible combinations of biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B demonstrated utility for rapid prediction of a CT-positive TBI within 0-8 hours of injury. GFAP exhibited the greatest predictive power at 12-32 hours. Furthermore, these results suggest that GFAP alone has greater utility for predicting a positive CT of the head than UCH-L1, S100B, or any combination of the 3.