Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Br J Biomed Sci ; 68(4): 174-80, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22263430

ABSTRACT

Otitis externa is a ubiquitous inflammatory disease; although it arises most commonly from an infection, there is no consensus in the UK for the reporting of ear swab culture results. This study aims to review current microbiology laboratory reporting of ear swab specimens to primary care and reach an evidence-based consensus for a reporting policy. Fifty consecutive ear swab reports were reviewed from each of 12 laboratories in the South West region to determine and discuss reporting practice. The Health Protection Agency (HPA) GP Microbiology Laboratory Use Group reviewed the underlying evidence and worked towards a consensus of expert microbiology opinion for laboratory reporting of ear swab results using a modified version of the Delphi technique. A total of 487 reports from primary care were reviewed (54% female; 46% male). Cultures most commonly yielded Pseudomonas species (36%), Staphylococcus species (21%), Streptococcus species (15%) and fungi (11%). Five reporting policies were agreed: Policy 1: Common pathogens such as group A beta-haemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus - Always reported by name with antibiotic susceptibilities. Policy 2: Pseudomonas species - Always reported, but antibiotic susceptibilities only reported in severe disease. Policy 3: Aspergillus, Candida, coliforms and Proteus species, as well as non-group A streptococci and anaerobes - Only reported if moderate numbers of colonies and it is the predominant organism present; if appropriate report antibiotic susceptibilities. Policy 4: Coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids and enterococci - Not reported by name; generic terms used and antibiotic susceptibilities not reported. Policy 5: When antibiotic susceptibilities reported these must include susceptibility to a topical antibiotic. It is suggested that laboratories should consider adopting this evidence-based reporting consensus for ear swab culture results from primary care patients with otitis externa.


Subject(s)
Infections/diagnosis , Infections/epidemiology , Microbiology/statistics & numerical data , Otitis Externa/diagnosis , Otitis Externa/epidemiology , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Consensus , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mandatory Reporting , Microbiology/standards , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/standards
2.
Br J Cancer ; 103(2): 209-16, 2010 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the prevalence of type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) infections is necessary to predict the expected, and to monitor the actual, impact of HPV immunisation and to design effective screening strategies for vaccinated populations. METHODS: Residual specimens of cervical cytology (N=4719), CIN3/CGIN and cervical cancer biopsies (N=1515) were obtained from sites throughout England, anonymised and tested for HPV DNA using the Linear Array typing system (Roche). RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV 16 and/or 18 (with or without another high-risk (HR) type) was 76% in squamous cell carcinomas, 82% in adeno/adenosquamous carcinomas and 63% and 91% in CIN3 and CGIN, respectively. Of all HR HPV-infected women undergoing cytology, non-vaccine HPV types only were found in over 60% of those with mild dyskaryosis or below, and in <20% of those with cancer. In women of all ages undergoing screening, HR HPV prevalence was 16% and HPV 16 and/or 18 prevalence was 5%. CONCLUSION: Pre-immunisation, high-grade cervical disease in England was predominantly associated with HPV 16 and/or 18, which promises a high impact from HPV immunisation in due course. Second-generation vaccines and screening strategies need to consider the best ways to detect and prevent disease due to the remaining HR HPV types.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Adult , Biopsy , England/epidemiology , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Prevalence , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 138(5): 686-96, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20149266

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylocccus aureus (MSSA and MRSA) carriage in care homes, with particular focus on dementia. A point-prevalence survey of 748 residents in 51 care homes in Gloucestershire and Greater Bristol was undertaken. Dementia was assessed by the clock test or abbreviated mini-mental test. Nasal swabs were cultured for S. aureus on selective agar media. Multivariable analysis indicated that dementia was not a significant risk factor for MSSA (16.2%) or MRSA (7.8%); and that residents able to move around the home unassisted were at a lower risk of MRSA (P=0.04). MSSA carriage increased with increasing age (P=0.03) but MRSA carriage decreased with increasing age (P=0.05). Hospitalization in the last 6 months increased the risk of MSSA (P=0.04) and MRSA (P=0.10). We concluded that cross-infection through staff caring for more dependent residents may spread MRSA within care homes and from the recently hospitalized. Control of MSSA and MRSA in care homes requires focused infection control interventions.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Dementia , Homes for the Aged , Nursing Homes , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carrier State/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Nose/microbiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , United Kingdom
4.
J Wound Care ; 17(8): 353-8, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18754197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate microbiology laboratory reporting policies, whether practitioners working in primary care adhered to the relevant guidelines when submitting swabs from venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and the impact of laboratory reports on antibiotic usage forVLUs. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to all microbiology laboratories in England and Wales, and to clinicians who had submitted VLU swabs to one laboratory. RESULTS: Ninety-five (47%) laboratories responded. Laboratories processed a mean of 7.3 leg ulcer swabs/100,000 population/week but were often unable to identify the leg ulcer aetiology from the clinical details provided. All laboratories stated that they routinely reported group A haemolytic streptococci and meticillin-sensitive and resistant Staphylococcus aureus; 75% always reported antibiotic susceptibility for these isolates. The majority reported other beta-haemolytic streptococci. A total of 126 clinicians (64%) returned their questionnaires; 100 had confirmed in their swab submission that the ulcer was of venous aetiology and so were included in the analysis. Eighty per cent of the swabs were submitted in accordance with guidelines, with increased pain (61%) being the most common reason. Discharge/exudate (52%) and malodour (41%) were common reasons for swab submissions, even though the guidelines do not cite them as clinical signs of infection. Reporting of antibiotic susceptibilities was associated with increased antibiotic usage. CONCLUSION: Clinicians in primary care generally adhere to guidelines when submittingVLU specimens for microbiological investigation. Clinicians need to include clinical information with the swab so that laboratories can interpret the microbiology results. To reduce the use of antibiotics in the management ofVLUs, laboratories need to be selective in their organism and antibiotic-susceptibility reporting.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence , Microbiological Techniques/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Varicose Ulcer/microbiology , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Notification , England , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Laboratories , Primary Health Care , Specimen Handling , Wales , Wound Infection/diagnosis , Wound Infection/drug therapy
5.
J Clin Pathol ; 60(9): 966-74, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17259298

ABSTRACT

This ninth best-practice review examines two series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) potassium abnormalities and (ii) venous leg ulcer microbiology. The review is presented in question-and-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.


Subject(s)
Hyperkalemia/diagnosis , Hypokalemia/diagnosis , Leg Ulcer/microbiology , Primary Health Care/methods , Bacteriological Techniques , Humans
6.
Br Dent J ; 201(4): 217-22; discussion 216, 2006 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16902573

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of educational outreach visits on antibiotic prescribing for acute dental pain in primary care. STUDY DESIGN: RCT. SETTING: General dental practices in four health authority areas in Wales. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: General dental practitioners were recruited to the study and randomly allocated to one of the three study groups (control group, guideline group or intervention group). Following the intervention, practitioners completed a standardised questionnaire for each patient that presented with acute dental pain. INTERVENTIONS: The control group received no intervention. The guideline group received educational material by post. The intervention group received educational material by post and an academic detailing visit by a trained pharmacist. The educational material included evidence-based guidelines on prescribing for acute dental pain and patient information leaflets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of antibiotic prescriptions issued to patients presenting with dental pain and the number of 'inappropriate' antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotics were considered to be inappropriate if the patient did not have symptoms indicative of spreading infection. RESULTS: A total of 1,497 completed questionnaires were received from 23, 20 and 27 general dental practitioners in the control, guideline and intervention group respectively. Patients in the intervention group received significantly fewer antibiotic prescriptions than patients in the control group (OR (95% CI) 0.63 (0.41, 0.95)) and significantly fewer inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions (OR (95% CI) 0.33 (0.21, 0.54)). However, antibiotic and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were not significantly different in the guideline group compared to the control group (OR (95% CI) 0.83 (0.55, 1.21) and OR (95% CI) 0.82 (0.53, 1.29) respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies based upon educational outreach visits may be successfully employed to rationalise antibiotic prescribing by dental practitioners.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Education, Dental, Continuing/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Dentists' , Toothache/drug therapy , Adult , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Wales
7.
Vaccine ; 32(1): 26-32, 2013 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24211166

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reduction in the prevalence of vaccine type HPV infection in young women is an early indication of the impact of the HPV immunisation programme and a necessary outcome if the subsequent impact on cervical cancer is to be realised. METHODS: Residual vulva-vaginal swab (VVS) specimens from young women aged 16-24 years undergoing chlamydia screening in community sexual health services (formerly known as family planning clinics), general practice (GP), and youth clinics in 2010-2012 were submitted from 10 laboratories in seven regions around England. These specimens were linked to demographic and sexual behaviour data reported with the chlamydia test, anonymised, and tested for type-specific HPV DNA using a multiplex PCR and Luminex-based genotyping test. Estimated immunisation coverage was calculated and findings were compared to a baseline survey conducted prior to the introduction of HPV immunisation in 2008. RESULTS: A total of 4664 eligible specimens were collected and 4178 had a valid test result. The post-immunisation prevalence of HPV 16/18 infection was lowest in this youngest age group (16-18 years) and increased with age. This increase with age was a reversal of the pattern seen prior to immunisation and was inversely associated with estimates of age-specific immunisation coverage (65% for 16-18 year olds). The prevalence of HPV 16/18 infection in the post-immunisation survey was 6.5% amongst 16-18 year olds, compared to 19.1% in the similar survey conducted prior to the introduction of HPV immunisation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are the first indication that the national HPV immunisation programme is successfully preventing HPV 16/18 infection in sexually active young women in England. The reductions seen suggest, for the estimated coverage, high vaccine effectiveness and some herd-protection benefits. Continued surveillance is needed to determine the effects of immunisation on non-vaccine HPV types.


Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , England/epidemiology , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Odds Ratio , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sexual Behavior , Vaccination , Young Adult
9.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 55(2): 143-9, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15649989

ABSTRACT

Chronic leg and foot wounds represent an increasing burden to healthcare systems as the age of the population increases. The deep dermal tissues of all chronic wounds harbour microorganisms, however, the precise interaction between microbes in the wounds and impaired healing is unknown. With regard to antibiotic therapy, there is a lack of evidence concerning its effectiveness, optimal regimens or clinical indications for treatment. Despite this lack of evidence, antibiotics are frequently a feature of the management of chronic wounds and these patients receive significantly more antibiotic prescriptions (both systemic and topical) than age and sex-matched patients. Current guidelines for antibiotic prescribing for such wounds are often based on expert opinion rather than scientific fact and may present difficulties in interpretation and implementation to the clinician. Although the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance is widely recognized, the relationships between antibiotic resistance, chronic wound microbiology and rationales for antibiotic therapy have yet to be determined. This review discusses the role of microbes in chronic wounds from a clinical perspective with particular focus on the occurrence of bacteria and their impact on such wounds. The evidence and role of antibiotics in the treatment of such wounds are outlined and current practice of antibiotic usage for chronic wounds in the primary care setting described. The implications of antibiotic usage with regard to antibiotic resistance are also considered.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Wounds and Injuries/microbiology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chronic Disease , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/physiology , Humans , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wound Healing/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL