Innovation in resuscitation: A novel clinical decision display system for advanced cardiac life support.

INTRODUCTION: The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Clinical Decision Display System (CDDS) is a novel application designed to optimize team organization and facilitate decision-making during ACLS resuscitations. We hypothesized that resuscitation teams would more consistently adhere to ACLS guideline time intervals in simulated resuscitation scenarios with the CDDS compared to without. METHODS: We conducted a simulation-based, non-blinded, randomized, crossover-design study with resuscitation teams comprised of Emergency Medicine physicians, registered nurses, critical care technicians, and paramedics. Each team performed 4 ACLS scenarios in randomized sequences, half with the CDDS and half without. We analyzed the resuscitations and recorded the times of interventions that have defined intervals by ACLS: rhythm checks, epinephrine administration, and shock delivery. In addition, we surveyed each resuscitation team regarding their experience using the CDDS. RESULTS: On average, teams performed rhythm checks 4.9 s closer to ACLS guidelines with the CDDS (p = 0.0358). Teams were also more consistent; on average, teams reduced the variation of time between consecutive doses of epinephrine by 45% (p = 0.0001) and defibrillation by 47% (p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of participants indicated they would use the CDDS if available in real cardiac arrests. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the CDDS improves the accuracy and precision of timed ACLS interventions in a simulated setting. Resuscitation teams were strongly in favor of utilizing the CDDS in clinical practice. Further investigations of the introduction of the platform into real time clinical environments will be needed to assess true efficacy and patient outcomes.

A flexible simulation platform to quantify and manage emergency department crowding.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based Emergency Departments are struggling to provide timely care to a steadily increasing number of unscheduled ED visits. Dwindling compensation and rising ED closures dictate that meeting this challenge demands greater operational efficiency. METHODS: Using techniques from operations research theory, as well as a novel event-driven algorithm for processing priority queues, we developed a flexible simulation platform for hospital-based EDs. We tuned the parameters of the system to mimic U.S. nationally average and average academic hospital-based ED performance metrics and are able to assess a variety of patient flow outcomes including patient door-to-event times, propensity to leave without being seen, ED occupancy level, and dynamic staffing and resource use. RESULTS: The causes of ED crowding are variable and require site-specific solutions. For example, in a nationally average ED environment, provider availability is a surprising, but persistent bottleneck in patient flow. As a result, resources expended in reducing boarding times may not have the expected impact on patient throughput. On the other hand, reallocating resources into alternate care pathways can dramatically expedite care for lower acuity patients without delaying care for higher acuity patients. In an average academic ED environment, bed availability is the primary bottleneck in patient flow. Consequently, adjustments to provider scheduling have a limited effect on the timeliness of care delivery, while shorter boarding times significantly reduce crowding. An online version of the simulation platform is available at http://spark.rstudio.com/klopiano/EDsimulation/. CONCLUSION: In building this robust simulation framework, we have created a novel decision-support tool that ED and hospital managers can use to quantify the impact of proposed changes to patient flow prior to implementation.