Chronic Hepatitis B Finite Treatment: Similar and Different Concerns With New Drug Classes.

Chronic hepatitis B, a major cause of liver disease and cancer, affects >250 million people worldwide. Currently there is no cure, only suppressive therapies. Efforts to develop finite curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies are underway, consisting of combinations of multiple novel agents with or without nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. The HBV Forum convened a webinar in July 2021, along with subsequent working group discussions to address how and when to stop finite therapy for demonstration of sustained off-treatment efficacy and safety responses. Participants included leading experts in academia, clinical practice, pharmaceutical companies, patient representatives, and regulatory agencies. This Viewpoints article outlines areas of consensus within our multistakeholder group for stopping finite therapies in chronic hepatitis B investigational studies, including trial design, patient selection, outcomes, biomarkers, predefined stopping criteria, predefined retreatment criteria, duration of investigational therapies, and follow-up after stopping therapy. Future research of unmet needs are discussed.

Doravirine and Islatravir Have Complementary Resistance Profiles and Create a Combination with a High Barrier to Resistance.

Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), was approved for treatment of HIV-1 infection in 2018. In the pivotal phase 3 trials, DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD, 7 out of 747 (0.9%) treatment-naive participants treated with DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) met protocol-defined virologic failure criteria and showed phenotypic resistance to DOR at week 48. The most common DOR resistance-associated mutation (RAM) detected in 5 of the 7 resistant isolates was F227C. Six isolates bearing NRTI RAMs (M184V and/or K65R) were resistant to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) but not to other approved NRTIs. All DOR-resistant isolates were susceptible or hypersusceptible (fold change of <0.25) to islatravir (ISL), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI). Isolate hypersusceptibility to ISL required F227C, in contrast to zidovudine, an NRTI, which required M184V. Based on the frequent emergence of F227C, we hypothesized that DOR and ISL would create a combination (DOR/ISL) with a high barrier to resistance. In de novo resistance selection studies in MT4-GFP cells (MT4 cells engineered to express green fluorescent protein), DOR/ISL synergistically prevented viral breakthrough at a threshold of 2× the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). DOR/ISL exhibited a higher barrier to resistance than DOR/3TC and dolutegravir (DTG)/3TC. Resistance analysis showed no emergence of substitutions at F227, an observation consistent with its ability to confer hypersusceptibility to ISL. Overall, the data demonstrate that DOR/ISL creates a 2-drug combination with a higher barrier to resistance, consistent with the reported clinical activity.

Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Versus Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/TDF in Treatment-naive Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection: Week 96 Results of the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine (DOR) is a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor. In the phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD trial in treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared with efavirenz (EFV) and superior profiles for neuropsychiatric tolerability and lipids at 48 weeks. We present data through week 96. METHODS: DRIVE-AHEAD is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial in antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL. Participants were randomized to a daily fixed-dose tablet of DOR (100 mg), lamivudine (3TC; 300 mg) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) (DOR/3TC/TDF) or EFV (600 mg), emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) and TDF (300 mg) (EFV/FTC/TDF). The efficacy end point of interest at week 96 was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot Approach) with a predefined noninferiority margin of 10% to support week 48 results. Safety end points of interest included prespecified neuropsychiatric adverse events and the mean change in fasting lipids at week 96. RESULTS: Of 734 participants randomized, 728 received study drugs and were included in analyses. At week 96, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was achieved by 77.5% of DOR/3TC/TDF vs 73.6% of EFV/FTC/TDF participants, with a treatment difference of 3.8% (95% confidence interval, -2.4% to 10%). Virologic failure rates were low and similar across treatment arms, with no additional resistance to DOR observed between weeks 48 and 96. Prespecified neuropsychiatric adverse events and rash were less frequent in DOR/3TC/TDF than in EFV/FTC/TDF participants through week 96. At week 96, fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels increased in the EFV/FTC/TDF group but not in the DOR/3TC/TDF group; the mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio were similar. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02403674.

Once-daily Doravirine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected, Antiretroviral-naive Adults: An Integrated Efficacy Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine (DOR) demonstrated noninferior efficacy to darunavir plus ritonavir (DRV+r) and efavirenz (EFV) in 2 ongoing phase 3 trials: DRIVE-FORWARD (NCT02275780) and DRIVE-AHEAD (NCT02403674). METHODS: This prespecified analysis pooled efficacy data through the first 48 weeks of DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD from the DOR groups (DOR/lamivudine [3TC]/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF] or DOR [100 mg daily] with emtricitabine [FTC]/TDF or abacavir [ABC]/3TC [n = 747]) compared with DRV+r (800/100 mg daily) with FTC/TDF or ABC/3TC (n = 383) or EFV/FTC/TDF (600/200/300 mg daily; n = 364). Efficacy assessments included the proportion of participants with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA <50 copies/mL and change in CD4+ T-cell count. RESULTS: At week 48, DOR demonstrated noninferior efficacy to DRV+r and EFV, with 84.1% of DOR-treated participants achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL compared with 79.9% of the DRV+r and 80.8% of the EFV groups. Results were similar across demographic/prognostic subpopulations, including baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, gender, race, and HIV-1 subtype. Mean increases from baseline in CD4+ T-cell count through 48 weeks were 195.5 cells/mm3 for DOR, 185.6 cells/mm3 for DRV+r, and 188.4 cells/mm3 for EFV/FTC/TDF. CONCLUSIONS: DOR, as a single entity (in combination with other antiretroviral agents) and as a fixed-dose combination (DOR/3TC/TDF), demonstrated noninferior efficacy to DRV+r and EFV as assessed by the proportion of HIV-1-infected, treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02275780 and NCT02403674.

Once-daily Doravirine for Initial Treatment of Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1: An Integrated Safety Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A prespecified integrated safety analysis was conducted for 3 doravirine (DOR) double-blind trials (Phase IIb: P007 [NCT01632345]; Phase III: DRIVE-FORWARD [NCT02275780] and DRIVE-AHEAD [NCT02403674]). METHODS: DOR (100 mg) arms from these trials were compared with darunavir plus ritonavir (DRV+r) in DRIVE-FORWARD and efavirenz (EFV) in P007 and DRIVE-AHEAD. Background therapies were emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in P007; abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or FTC/TDF in DRIVE-FORWARD; and 3TC/TDF for DOR and FTC/TDF for EFV in DRIVE-AHEAD. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants discontinuing due to adverse events (AEs) through Week 48. RESULTS: Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar for participants on DOR and DRV+r (2.5% vs 3.1%, respectively) and lower for those on DOR than for those on EFV (2.5% vs 6.6%, respectively). Rates of drug-related AEs for DOR, DRV+r, and EFV were 30.9%, 32.1%, and 61.4%, respectively. In an analysis of DOR versus EFV, the treatment difference for discontinuations due to AEs was -3.4%, favoring DOR (95% confidence interval -6.2 to -0.8; P = .012). Fewer participants experienced neuropsychiatric AEs on DOR than on EFV (25.0% vs 55.9%, respectively), and fewer experienced diarrhea on DOR than on DRV+r (12.4% vs 22.5%, respectively). Changes from baseline in most lipid parameters also favored DOR. CONCLUSIONS: At Week 48, DOR at 100 mg had a favorable safety profile compared with EFV or DRV+r and a favorable tolerability profile compared with EFV. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01632345; NCT02275780 and NCT02403674.

Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate is Non-inferior to Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Treatment-naive Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection: Week 48 Results of the DRIVE-AHEAD Trial.

Background: Doravirine (DOR), a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is active against wild-type Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 and the most common NNRTI-resistant variants, and has a favorable and unique in vitro resistance profile. Methods: DRIVE-AHEAD is a phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with ≥1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily, fixed-dose DOR at 100 mg, lamivudine at 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to efavirenz at 600 mg, emtricitabine at 200 mg, and TDF at 300 mg (EFV/FTC/TDF) for 96 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach; non-inferiority margin 10%). Results: Of the 734 participants randomized, 728 were treated (364 per group) and included in the analyses. At week 48, 84.3% (307/364) of DOR/3TC/TDF recipients and 80.8% (294/364) of EFV/FTC/TDF recipients achieved <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (difference 3.5%, 95% CI, -2.0, 9.0). DOR/3TC/TDF recipients had significantly lower rates of dizziness (8.8% vs 37.1%), sleep disorders/disturbances (12.1% vs 25.2%), and altered sensorium (4.4% vs 8.2%) than EFV/FTC/TDF recipients. Mean changes in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were significantly different between DOR/3TC/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF (-1.6 vs +8.7 mg/dL and -3.8 vs +13.3 mg/dL, respectively). Conclusions: In HIV-1 treatment-naive adults, DOR/3TC/TDF demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to EFV/FTC/TDF at week 48 and was well tolerated, with significantly fewer neuropsychiatric events and minimal changes in LDL-C and non-HDL-C compared with EFV/FTC/TDF. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02403674.

Doravirine exposure and HIV-1 suppression after switching from an efavirenz-based regimen to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1. In a phase 1 trial, doravirine exposure was transiently decreased when treatment was started immediately after stopping efavirenz. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of participants who switched from an efavirenz-based regimen to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the phase 3 DRIVE-SHIFT trial, doravirine plasma levels at week 4 were similar to non-induced levels, and HIV-1 suppression was maintained at weeks 24 and 48.

Clinical Trial of the Anti-PD-L1 Antibody BMS-936559 in HIV-1 Infected Participants on Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy.

Background: Reversing immune exhaustion with an anti-PD-L1 antibody may improve human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific immunity and increase clearance of HIV-1-expressing cells. Methods: We conducted a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study of BMS-936559, including HIV-1-infected adults aged >18 to <70 years on suppressive antiretroviral therapy with CD4+ counts >350 cells/µL and detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA by single-copy assay. Data on single infusions of BMS-936559 (0.3 mg/kg) versus placebo are described. The primary outcomes were safety defined as any grade 3 or greater or immune-related adverse event (AE) and the change in HIV-1 Gag-specific CD8+ T cell responses from baseline to day 28 after infusion. Results: Eight men enrolled: 6 received 0.3 mg/kg of BMS-936559, and 2 received placebo infusions. There were no BMS-936559-related grade 3 or greater AEs. In 1 participant, asymptomatic hypophysitis (a protocol-defined immune-related AE) was identified 266 days after BMS-936559 infusion; it resolved over time. The mean percentage of HIV-1 Gag-specific CD8+ T cells expressing interferon γ increased from baseline (0.09%) through day 28 (0.20%; P = .14), driven by substantial increases in 2 participants who received BMS-936559. Conclusions: In this first evaluation of an immunologic checkpoint inhibitor in healthy HIV-1-infected persons, single low-dose BMS-936559 infusions appeared to enhance HIV-1-specific immunity in a subset of participants. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02028403.

Antiviral Activity, Safety, and Exposure-Response Relationships of GSK3532795, a Second-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Maturation Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination With Atazanavir With or Without Ritonavir in a Phase 2a Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Controlled Trial (AI468002).

BACKGROUND: GSK3532795 is a second-generation human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) maturation inhibitor that targets HIV-1 Gag, inhibiting the final protease cleavage between capsid protein p24 and spacer protein-1, producing immature, noninfectious virions. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, dose-ranging multipart trial. In part A, subtype B-infected subjects received 5-120 mg GSK3532795 (or placebo) once daily for 10 days. In part B, subtype B-infected subjects received 40 mg or 80 mg GSK3532795 once daily with atazanavir (ATV) with or without (±) ritonavir (RTV) or standard of care (SOC) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and ATV/RTV 300 mg/100 mg) for 28 days. In part C, subtype C-infected subjects received 40 mg or 120 mg GSK3532795 once daily (or placebo) for 10 days. Endpoints included change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline on day 11 (parts A/C) or day 29 (part B). RESULTS: A >1 log10 median decline in HIV-1 RNA was achieved by day 11 in parts A and C and day 29 in part B at GSK3532795 doses ≥40 mg; part B subjects receiving GSK3532795 and ATV ± RTV achieved similar declines to those receiving SOC. Median of the maximum declines in HIV-1 RNA were similar for the 40-120 mg once-daily dose groups regardless of baseline Gag polymorphisms. There were no deaths, adverse events leading to discontinuation, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GSK3532795 demonstrated potent antiviral activity against subtype B (monotherapy or with ATV ± RTV) and subtype C, and was generally well tolerated, which supported continued development of GSK3532795 in subjects with HIV-1 subtype B or subtype C. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01803074.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between BMS-626529, the active moiety of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor prodrug BMS-663068, and ritonavir or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in healthy subjects.

BMS-663068 is a prodrug of BMS-626529, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4(+) T cells. This open-label, multiple-dose, four-sequence, crossover study addressed potential two-way drug-drug interactions following coadministration of BMS-663068 (BMS-626529 is a CYP3A4 substrate), atazanavir (ATV), and ritonavir (RTV) (ATV and RTV are CYP3A4 inhibitors). Thirty-six healthy subjects were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive one of four treatment sequences with three consecutive treatments: BMS-663068 at 600 mg twice daily (BID), BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus RTV at 100 mg once daily (QD), ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD (RTV-boosted ATV [ATV/r]), or BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD. Compared with the results obtained by administration of BMS-663068 alone, coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r increased the BMS-626529 maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUCtau) by 68% and 54%, respectively. Similarly, coadministration of BMS-663068 with RTV increased the BMS-626529 Cmax and AUCtau by 53% and 45%, respectively. Compared with the results obtained by administration of ATV/r alone, ATV and RTV systemic exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated, and there were no adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation, serious AEs, or deaths. Moderate increases in BMS-626529 systemic exposure were observed following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r or RTV. However, the addition of ATV to BMS-663068 plus RTV did not further increase BMS-626529 systemic exposure. ATV and RTV exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with either ATV/r or RTV. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated alone or in combination with either RTV or ATV/r.

Genotypic correlates of susceptibility to HIV-1 attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, the active agent of the prodrug BMS-663068.

OBJECTIVES: In an 8 day monotherapy study of subjects infected with HIV-1 (subtype B) (NCT01009814), BMS-626529 (an attachment inhibitor that binds to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120), administered as the prodrug BMS-663068, produced substantial declines in plasma HIV-1 RNA. However, large variability in susceptibility to BMS-626529 was noted and virus with low susceptibility was less likely to be suppressed by BMS-663068 administration. The current analysis sought to investigate the genotypic correlates of susceptibility to BMS-626529. METHODS: In vitro selection experiments, evaluation of clinical samples of subtype B from the monotherapy study and evaluation of intrinsically resistant subtype AE viruses were conducted. Reverse genetics was used to identify key substitutions in envelope clones responsible for reduced susceptibility. RESULTS: An M426L or S375M change were the major substitutions associated with reductions in susceptibility to BMS-626529 in baseline samples of subtype B viruses from the monotherapy study, with M434I and M475I contributing to a lesser extent. Class resistance in subtype AE viruses was mapped to 375H and 475I substitutions, found in the vast majority of these viruses. Analysis of multiple envelope clones from infected subjects showed higher intrasubject variability in susceptibility to BMS-626529 compared with other classes of entry inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: These data define key genotypic substitutions in HIV-1 gp120 that could confer phenotypic resistance to BMS-626529.

Biotech's role in advancing HIV vaccine development.

HIV vaccine development has been hindered by significant challenges over four decades. Despite persistent efforts, all efficacy trials to date have yielded disappointing results. This has pushed the field back to the discovery phase and created uncertainty about the future involvement of large pharmaceutical companies. Currently, the HIV vaccine landscape is dominated by startup biotech firms, which face a complex array of obstacles. These include evolving HIV prevention methods, waning interest in vaccine research, and difficulties securing sustainable funding. This viewpoint explores the challenges faced by these biotech companies and the support mechanisms necessary for their continued involvement in HIV vaccine development. By leveraging insights from both pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, we propose a multi-faceted approach that includes enhanced communication, fostering innovation, and implementing strategic funding models.

VIR-2218 (elebsiran) plus pegylated interferon-alfa-2a in participants with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a global concern, with current treatments achieving low rates of HBsAg seroclearance. VIR-2218 (elebsiran), a small interfering RNA agent against HBV transcripts, reduces HBsAg concentrations. We aimed to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of VIR-2218 with and without pegylated interferon-alpha-2a treatment in participants with chronic HBV. METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 23 sites in six countries (New Zealand, Australia, Hong Kong, Thailand, South Korea, and Malaysia). Adults (aged 18-65 years) with chronic HBV infection without cirrhosis and with HBsAg more than 50 IU/mL and HBV DNA less than 90 IU/mL who were on continued nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy for 2 months or longer were eligible. Participants were enrolled into one of six cohorts to receive VIR-2218 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, with or without 180 µg subcutaneous pegylated interferon-alfa-2a once per week. Cohort 1 received six doses of VIR-2218 (total 20 weeks); cohort 2 received six doses of VIR-2218 starting at day 1, plus 12 doses of pegylated interferon-alfa-2a starting at week 12 (total 24 weeks); cohort 3 received six doses of VIR-2218 and 24 doses of pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (total 24 weeks); cohort 4 received six doses of VIR-2218 and up to 48 doses of pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (total 48 weeks); cohort 5 received up to 13 doses of VIR-2218 and up to 44 doses of pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (total 48 weeks); and cohort 6 received three doses of VIR-2218 and 12 doses of pegylated interferon-alfa-2a (total 12 weeks). The primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events and clinical assessments (including results of laboratory tests). Secondary endpoints were the mean maximum reduction of serum HBsAg at any timepoint; the proportion of participants with serum HBsAg seroclearance at any timepoint and for more than 6 months after the end of treatment; and the proportion of participants with anti-HBs seroconversion at any timepoint. For patients who were HBeAg-positive, we also assessed the proportion with HBeAg seroclearance or anti-HBe seroconversion at any timepoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03672188, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between July 2, 2020, and Nov 2, 2021, 124 individuals were screened for eligibility, 84 of whom were enrolled (15 in cohort 1, 15 in cohort 2, 18 in cohort 3, 18 in cohort 4, 13 in cohort 5, and five in cohort 6). Participants were predominantly HBeAg-negative, Asian, and male (66 [79%] participants were male and 18 [21%] were female). Most treatment emergent adverse events were grades 1-2. Three (20%) participants in cohort 1, four (27%) in cohort 2, eight (44%) in cohort 3, seven (39%) in cohort 4, six (46%) in cohort 5, and two (40%) in cohort 6 reported treatment-emergent adverse events related to VIR-2218. 12 (80%) participants in cohort 2, 12 (67%) in cohort 3, 14 (78%) in cohort 4, 13 (100%) in cohort 5, and three (60%) in cohort 6 reported treatment-emergent adverse events related to pegylated interferon-alfa-2a. Two (13%) participants in cohort 1 had elevations in alanine aminotransferase, compared with 13 (87%) participants in cohort 2, 15 (83%) in cohort 3, 17 (94%) in cohort 4, 11 (85%) in cohort 5, and three (60%) in cohort 6. The mean maximum change from baseline at any timepoint in HBsAg concentration was -2·0 log10 IU/mL (95% CI -2·1 to -1·8) in cohort 1, -2·2 log10 IU/mL (-2·5 to -1·8) in cohort 2, -2·5 log10 IU/mL (-2·8 to -2·1) in cohort 3, -2·4 log10 IU/mL (-3·1 to -1·8) in cohort 4, -3·0 log10 IU/mL (-3·7 to -2·3) in cohort 5, and -1·7 log10 IU/mL (-2·1 to -1·4) in cohort 6. 11 participants (one in cohort 2, one in cohort 3, five in cohort 4, and four in cohort 5) receiving VIR-2218 plus pegylated interferon-alfa-2a had HBsAg seroclearance at any timepoint. Of these, ten (91%; one in cohort 2, five in cohort 4, and four in cohort 5) had anti-HBs seropositivity. Six participants (one in cohort 2, three in cohort 4, and two in cohort 5) had sustained HBsAg seroclearance through to 24 weeks after the end of treatment. No participants receiving VIR-2218 monotherapy (cohort 1) or VIR-2218 plus pegylated interferon-alfa-2a 12-week regimen (cohort 6) had HBsAg seroclearance. 12 (42%) of 26 participants (one of four in cohort 1, two of six in cohort 2, four of seven in cohort 3, four of six in cohort 4, and one of three in cohort 5) who were HBeAg positive at baseline had HBeAg seroclearance or anti-HBe seroconversion. INTERPRETATION: The results of this phase 2 study support further development of VIR-2218 as a potential therapy for patients with chronic HBV infection. Additional clinical trials of VIR-2218 with and without pegylated interferon-alfa-2a in combination with an HBsAg-targeting monoclonal antibody are ongoing. FUNDING: Vir Biotechnology.

In vitro cross-resistance profile of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) BMS-986001 against known NRTI resistance mutations.

BMS-986001 is a novel HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). To date, little is known about its resistance profile. In order to examine the cross-resistance profile of BMS-986001 to NRTI mutations, a replicating virus system was used to examine specific amino acid mutations known to confer resistance to various NRTIs. In addition, reverse transcriptases from 19 clinical isolates with various NRTI mutations were examined in the Monogram PhenoSense HIV assay. In the site-directed mutagenesis studies, a virus containing a K65R substitution exhibited a 0.4-fold change in 50% effective concentration (EC50) versus the wild type, while the majority of viruses with the Q151M constellation (without M184V) exhibited changes in EC50 versus wild type of 0.23- to 0.48-fold. Susceptibility to BMS-986001 was also maintained in an L74V-containing virus (0.7-fold change), while an M184V-only-containing virus induced a 2- to 3-fold decrease in susceptibility. Increasing numbers of thymidine analog mutation pattern 1 (TAM-1) pathway mutations correlated with decreases in susceptibility to BMS-986001, while viruses with TAM-2 pathway mutations exhibited a 5- to 8-fold decrease in susceptibility, regardless of the number of TAMs. A 22-fold decrease in susceptibility to BMS-986001 was observed in a site-directed mutant containing the T69 insertion complex. Common non-NRTI (NNRTI) mutations had little impact on susceptibility to BMS-986001. The results from the site-directed mutants correlated well with the more complicated genotypes found in NRTI-resistant clinical isolates. Data from clinical studies are needed to determine the clinically relevant resistance cutoff values for BMS-986001.

Brief Report: Efficacy and Safety of Oral Islatravir Once Daily in Combination With Doravirine Through 96 Weeks for Treatment-Naive Adults With HIV-1 Infection Receiving Initial Treatment With Islatravir, Doravirine, and Lamivudine.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for treatment and prevention of HIV-1. We present efficacy and safety data for islatravir and doravirine (DOR) through 96 weeks of the phase 2b trial (NCT03272347). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial, participants initially received islatravir (0.25, 0.75, or 2.25 mg) with doravirine (100 mg) and lamivudine (3TC, 300 mg) or a fixed-dose combination of doravirine, 3TC, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) daily. Beginning at week 24, participants receiving islatravir stopped 3TC if HIV-1 RNA from the prior visit was <50 copies per milliliter and continued taking the assigned islatravir dose (still blinded) with doravirine. All islatravir groups transitioned to open-label use of 0.75 mg between weeks 60 and 84. Efficacy end points at week 96 included the proportion of participants maintaining HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies per milliliter (FDA Snapshot). Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one treatment-naive participants received the study drugs and were included in the analyses. Through week 96, HIV-1 RNA<50 copies per milliliter was maintained in 86.2% (25/29), 90.0% (27/30), and 67.7% (21/31) of participants in the 0.25-, 0.75-, and 2.25-mg islatravir groups, respectively, 81.1% (73/90) of the combined islatravir group, and 80.6% (25/31) of the DOR/3TC/TDF group. One participant in the 2.25-mg islatravir group had Protocol-Defined Virologic Failure after week 48. Drug-related AE rates were higher for DOR/3TC/TDF participants (22.6%) compared with islatravir (combined 7.8%). Two participants (2.2%) receiving islatravir with doravirine and one (3.2%) receiving DOR/3TC/TDF discontinued because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment regimens containing islatravir and doravirine maintained viral suppression through week 96 and were well tolerated regardless of dose.

Changes in weight and BMI with first-line doravirine-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in weight and BMI in adults with HIV-1 at 1 and 2 years after starting an antiretroviral regimen that included doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We evaluated weight change from baseline, weight gain at least 10%, and increase in BMI after 48 and 96 weeks of treatment with doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz-based regimens. Risk factors for weight gain and metabolic outcomes associated with weight gain were also examined. RESULTS: Mean (and median) weight changes were similar for doravirine [1.7 (1.0) kg] and ritonavir-boosted darunavir [1.4 (0.6) kg] and were lower for efavirenz [0.6 (0.0) kg] at week 48 but were similar across all treatment groups at week 96 [2.4 (1.5), 1.8 (0.7), and 1.6 (1.0) kg, respectively]. No significant differences between treatment groups were found in the proportion of participants with at least 10% weight gain or the proportion with BMI class increase at either time point. Low CD4 T-cell count and high HIV-1 RNA at baseline were associated with at least 10% weight gain and BMI class increase at both timepoints, but treatment group, age, sex, and race were not. CONCLUSION: Weight gains over 96 weeks were low in all treatment groups and were similar to the average yearly change in adults without HIV-1. Significant weight gain and BMI class increase were similar across the treatment groups and were predicted by low baseline CD4 T-cell count and high baseline HIV-1 RNA.

Islatravir in combination with doravirine for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection receiving initial treatment with islatravir, doravirine, and lamivudine: a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging trial.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of islatravir-based regimens for the treatment of HIV-1. METHODS: We did a phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, comparator-controlled, dose-ranging trial at 24 clinics or hospitals in four countries (Chile, France, the UK, and the USA). Treatment-naive adults (≥18 years) with plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations of at least 1000 copies per mL, CD4 T-cell counts of at least 200 cells per mL, and a calculated creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min (all within 60 days before study treatment) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) with a block size of four via an interactive voice and web response system to receive oral treatment with one of three doses of islatravir (0·25 mg, 0·75 mg, or 2·25 mg) plus doravirine (100 mg) and lamivudine (300 mg) or to doravirine (100 mg) plus lamivudine (300 mg) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) once daily with placebo (part 1). Treatment groups were stratified according to screening HIV-1 RNA concentration (≤100 000 copies per mL or >100 000 copies per mL). After at least 24 weeks of treatment, participants taking islatravir who achieved an HIV-1 RNA concentration lower than 50 copies per mL switched to a two-drug regimen of islatravir and doravirine (part 2). All participants and study investigators were masked to treatment in part 1; in part 2, the islatravir dose was masked to all participants and investigators, but the other drugs were given open label. The primary efficacy outcomes were the proportions of participants with an HIV-1 RNA concentration lower than 50 copies per mL at weeks 24 and 48 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach). The primary safety outcomes were the number of participants experiencing adverse events and the number of participants discontinuing study drug owing to adverse events. All participants who received at least one dose of any study drug were included in the analyses. This trial is ongoing, but closed to enrolment of new participants; herein, we report study findings through 48 weeks of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03272347. FINDINGS: Between Nov 27, 2017, and April 25, 2019, 121 participants (mean age 31 years [SD 10·9], 112 [93%] male, 92 [76%] white, 27 [22%] with HIV-1 RNA concentration >100 000 copies per mL) were randomly assigned: 29 to the 0·25 mg, 30 to the 0·75 mg, and 31 to the 2·25 mg islatravir groups, and 31 to the doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF group. At week 24, 26 (90%) of 29 participants in the 0·25 mg islatravir group, 30 (100%) of 30 in the 0·75 mg islatravir group, and 27 (87%) of 31 in the 2·25 mg islatravir group achieved HIV-1 RNA concentrations lower than 50 copies per mL compared with 27 (87%) of 31 in the doravirine plus lamivudine plus TDF group (difference 2·8%, 95% CI -14·9 to 20·4, for the 0·25 mg islatravir group; 12·9%, -1·6 to 27·5, for the 0·75 mg islatravir group; and 0·3%, -17·9 to 18·5, for the 2·25 mg islatravir group). At week 48, these data were 26 (90%) of 29 in the 0·25 mg islatravir group, 27 (90%) of 30 in the 0·75 mg islatravir group, and 24 (77%) of 31 in the 2·25 mg islatravir group compared with 26 (84%) of 31 in the doravirine plus lamivudine plus TDF group (difference 6·1%, 95% CI -12·4 to 24·4, for the 0·25 mg islatravir group; 6·2%, -12·2 to 24·6, for the 0·75 mg islatravir group; and -6·1%, -27·1 to 14·8, for the 2·75 mg islatravir group). 66 (73%) of participants in the islatravir groups combined and 24 (77%) of those in the doravirine plus lamivudine plus TDF group reported at least one adverse event. Two participants in the 2·25 mg islatravir group and one participant in the doravirine plus lamivudine plus TDF group discontinued owing to an adverse event. No deaths were reported up to week 48. INTERPRETATION: Treatment regimens containing islatravir and doravirine showed antiviral efficacy and were well tolerated regardless of dose. Doravirine in combination with islatravir has the potential to be a potent two-drug regimen that warrants further clinical development. FUNDING: Merck, Sharp, & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.

Rational Design of Doravirine: From Bench to Patients.

Since the approval of nevirapine, the first HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in 1996, NNRTIs have helped play a critical role in maintaining viral suppression in people living with HIV. The many positive attributes of the class, including potency and long plasma half-life, make them attractive drug discovery targets. Given the availability of multiple once-daily integrase-based treatments for HIV-1 infection, the challenge to develop a new antiretroviral agent that addresses the needs of today's patients is formidable. However, with the increased availability of antiretrovirals for treatment and new pre-exposure prophylaxis guidelines, which should globally expand the use of antiretrovirals in prevention, it will be increasingly important to have access to multiple regimens with options from different classes that are well tolerated and convenient to ensure a sustained impact on the global epidemic. Many attempts to improve upon the NNRTI class have failed to deliver a desirable clinical profile consistent with the current landscape of treatment options. Doravirine is the only NNRTI to successfully advance through phase 3 clinical development and approval in recent years. Learning from the liabilities of approved NNRTIs, as well as past development failures, facilitated a rational approach to the discovery of doravirine by focusing on addressing the known safety/tolerability issues of commonly prescribed NNRTIs, such as central nervous system toxicity with efavirenz and potential cardiotoxicity due to off-target effects on cardiac ion channels with rilpivirine, using structural biology and characterization of resistance in vitro to address resistance liabilities and concentrating on the metabolic profile to limit the potential for drug-drug interactions. These preclinical efforts were critical to the design and selection of doravirine as a novel NNRTI that possessed the desired next-generation profile with the ultimate proof that these attributes translate to patients derived from clinical trials.

Review of Doravirine Resistance Patterns Identified in Participants During Clinical Development.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients with no known DOR resistance-associated mutations. DOR was rationally designed to address limitations associated with other approved NNRTIs, particularly resistance from common NNRTI resistance-associated mutants containing K103N, Y181C, or G190A reverse transcriptase substitutions. SETTING: Data to date from both in vitro studies and clinical trials have been compiled to summarize the resistance profile of DOR. METHODS: We analyzed data from in vitro studies and phase 2 and 3 trials to assess the emergence of resistance-associated mutations and their impact on efficacy among participants treated with DOR. RESULTS: DOR exhibited a distinct resistance profile compared with efavirenz and rilpivirine in vitro and in vivo; mutant viruses that were resistant to DOR showed limited cross-resistance to efavirenz and rilpivirine. In clinical trials, the development of DOR resistance-associated substitutions in reverse transcriptase was uncommon. CONCLUSION: Overall, minimal cross-resistance across NNRTIs was observed for DOR and limited development of DOR-related resistance. These data should assist clinicians in further understanding the resistance profile of DOR, so appropriate treatment decisions can be made for their patients.