Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Food Microbiol ; 120: 104478, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431324

ABSTRACT

An optimized digital RT-PCR (RT-dPCR) assay for the detection of human norovirus GI and GII RNA was compared with ISO 15216-conform quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) assays in an interlaboratory study (ILS) among eight laboratories. A duplex GI/GII RT-dPCR assay, based on the ISO 15216-oligonucleotides, was used on a Bio-Rad QX200 platform by six laboratories. Adapted assays for Qiagen Qiacuity or ThermoFisher QuantStudio 3D were used by one laboratory each. The ILS comprised quantification of norovirus RNA in the absence of matrix and in oyster tissue samples. On average, results of the RT-dPCR assays were very similar to those obtained by RT-qPCR assays. The coefficient of variation (CV%) of norovirus GI results was, however, much lower for RT-dPCR than for RT-qPCR in intra-laboratory replicates (eight runs) and between the eight laboratories. The CV% of norovirus GII results was in the same range for both detection formats. Had in-house prepared dsDNA standards been used, the CV% of norovirus GII could have been in favor of the RT-dPCR assay. The ratio between RT-dPCR and RT-qPCR results varied per laboratory, despite using the distributed RT-qPCR dsDNA standards. The study indicates that the RT-dPCR assay is likely to increase uniformity of quantitative results between laboratories.


Subject(s)
Norovirus , Ostreidae , Animals , Humans , Norovirus/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Seafood/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 78(3): 878-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22138987

ABSTRACT

A total of 91 fig and 185 date samples were analyzed by reverse transcription (RT) real-time PCR for the presence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) RNA. Two batches of dates tested positive, and the HAV RNA detected was genotyped as IA. These findings warrant further development of methods applicable to food which is consumed untreated and is exported from countries in which HAV is endemic.


Subject(s)
Arecaceae/virology , Ficus/virology , Food Microbiology , Fruit/virology , Hepatitis A virus/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Genotype , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Analysis, DNA
3.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 344: 109089, 2021 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662900

ABSTRACT

Contamination of bivalve molluscs with viruses is well recognized as a food safety risk. A microbiological criterion for norovirus (NoV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) in shellfish, however, does not exist in the European Union currently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contamination levels of these viruses for fluctuation over a long period (2013-2017) in oyster (n = 266) and mussel samples (n = 490) using a method based on ISO/TS 15216-1: 2013. Samples were taken at different points in the food chain, either directly post-harvest, at Dutch dispatch centers or in retail stores, from September until March of each year. Altogether, 53.1% of the mussel and 31.6% of the oyster samples tested positive for NoV RNA. Simultaneous presence of NoV GI and GII RNA was observed in 31.6% of mussel and 10.2% of oyster samples. Contamination levels in NoV positive mussel samples collected post-harvest from B-areas were significantly higher than in those collected post-harvest from A-areas, or at dispatch centers or retail stores. Levels in oysters from dispatch were significantly lower than those collected in retail stores. Ready for sale mussels and oysters contained 2.04 and 1.76 mean log10 transformed NoV genome copies/gram (gc/g), respectively. GII levels were at a constant level in ready for sale mussels throughout all sampling periods in the study. This seemed to be true for oysters as well. HAV RNA was detected in only one of the tested mussel samples (n = 392) (typed HAV 1A) and in none of the tested oyster samples (n = 228). Critical evaluation of NoV and HAV levels in shellfish can be of help for risk assessment and risk management actions.


Subject(s)
Caliciviridae Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis A virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Ostreidae/virology , Animals , Caliciviridae Infections/veterinary , Food Chain , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Safety , Hepatitis A/veterinary , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Norovirus/genetics , Shellfish/virology
4.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 333: 108791, 2020 Nov 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758861

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to assess raw pork sausages collected on the Dutch market for the presence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA. 46 of 316 (14.6%) products sampled from Dutch retail stores in 2017-2019 were positive for HEV RNA. HEV RNA was detected in 10.8% of "cervelaat" (n = 74), 18.5% of salami (n = 92), 26.1% of "metworst" (n = 46), 16.3% of "snijworst" (n = 43) samples. This was significantly more often than in other raw pork sausages like dried sausages, fuet or chorizo (3.3%, n = 61). The percentage of HEV RNA positive products was not significantly different for products sold as either sliced or unsliced deli meat. The average viral load in positive tested products was 2.76 log10 genome copies per 5 g, incidentally reaching up to 4.5 log10 genome copies per 5 g. The average HEV RNA level was significantly higher in samples collected in 2017 than those in samples collected in 2018, and most of the samples in 2019. Typing by sequence analysis was successful for 33 samples, all revealing genotype 3c. The results support recent epidemiological studies that identified specific raw pork sausages as risk factor for hepatitis E virus infection in the Netherlands. Persons at risk, including Dutch transplant recipients, have been advised to avoid the consumption of raw pork sausages. The study warrants a continuation of monitoring to follow the HEV RNA levels in pork products for use in risk assessments and risk management.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E/veterinary , Meat Products/virology , Red Meat/virology , Swine Diseases/virology , Animals , Genome/genetics , Genotype , Hepatitis E/virology , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Risk , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Viral Load
5.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 296: 58-64, 2019 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849707

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to assess pork liver and meat products present on the Dutch market for the presence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA. HEV RNA was detected in 27.3% of 521 products sampled from Dutch retail stores in 2016. 12.7% of livers were positive for HEV RNA (n = 79), 70.7% of liverwurst (n = 99), 68.9% of liver pate (n = 90), but in none of the pork chops (n = 98), fresh sausages (n = 103) or wild boar meat (n = 52). The highest level of HEV RNA contamination was observed in a liver (reaching up to 1 × 106 copies/g), followed by ready to eat liverwurst and liver pate (up to 3 × 104 copies/g and 7 × 104 copies/g respectively). Sequence analyses revealed mainly genotype 3c, but also some 3a, 3e and 3f strains. One strain derived from a liver sample was 100% (493 nt) identical with one isolated from a HEV case with onset of disease close in time and geography, although no direct epidemiological link could be established. Despite liverwurst and liver pate undergo heat treatment (information dd. Mid 2017) that may be sufficient to inactivate HEV, persons at risk, including Dutch transplant recipients, have been advised to avoid the consumption of raw liver as well as liverwurst and liver pate.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Liver/virology , Meat Products/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , Red Meat/virology , Animals , Food Microbiology/methods , Genotype , Hepatitis E/transmission , Hepatitis E/virology , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sus scrofa , Swine , Swine Diseases/transmission , Swine Diseases/virology
6.
PLoS One ; 13(10): e0206316, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359449

ABSTRACT

A multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) was developed and evaluated for the simultaneous detection of Salmonella spp., S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis in various (food) matrices. Early and fast detection of these pathogens facilitates effective intervention and prevents further distribution of contaminated food products on the market. Three primer and probe sets were designed to target the invA gene, the STM4200 gene, and the SEN1392 gene to detect and differentiate Salmonella spp., S. Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis, respectively. The multiplex qPCR targeting these three genes was optimized for efficiency and linearity. By testing 225 Salmonella isolates and 34 non-Salmonella isolates from various sources the inclusivity and exclusivity were determined. The inclusivity of the multiplex qPCR was 100% for all Salmonella isolates, including 72 S. Typhimurium isolates, and 53 S. Enteritidis isolates. The exclusivity for Salmonella spp., S. Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis was 100%, 94.6%, and 100%, respectively. No positive results were reported for non-Salmonella isolates. The limit of detection (LOD) for the qPCR was determined for the matrices poultry, minced meat, egg, herbs/spices, powdered milk, fish, animal feed, boot-socks with chicken feces and chicken down. LOD values for qPCR and the conventional culture methods were similar, except for the matrix boot-socks and down, for which the LOD for the conventional culture methods performed better than the qPCR method. In conclusion, the multiplex qPCR assay developed allows for rapid screening of Salmonella spp., S. Typhimurium, and S. Enteritidis in various (food) matrices.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Food Microbiology , Food Safety/methods , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Salmonella/classification , Animals , Limit of Detection , Meat/microbiology , Poultry/microbiology , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Seafood/microbiology
7.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 257: 225-231, 2017 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28692890

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of porcine blood(products) in food could be a risk for a hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. HEV RNA was detected in 33/36 batches of (non-heated) liquid products and in 7/24 spray dried powder products. Contamination levels varied among the products, but were highest in liquid whole blood, plasma and fibrinogen reaching levels of 2.2×102 to 2.8×102 HEV genome copies per 0.2g. Sequence analyses revealed genotype 3 strains, of which two were 100% (493nt) identical to recently diagnosed HEV cases, although no direct epidemiological link was established. The industry provided information on processing of blood products in (ready-to-eat)-meat. From this, it was concluded that blood products as an ingredient of processed meat may not be sufficiently heated prior to consumption, and therefore could be a vehicle for transmission.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Hepatitis E/transmission , Hepatitis E/veterinary , Meat Products/virology , Meat/analysis , Swine Diseases/transmission , Animals , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Female , Genotype , Hepatitis E/virology , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Humans , Netherlands , RNA, Viral/analysis , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL