ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate whether serum metabolomics differ between ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) compared with individuals with typical development and whether functional capacity is associated with metabolite abundance. METHOD: Thirty-eight adolescents and young adults were enrolled (CP: n = 19; typical development: n = 19). After functional capacity testing (10-meter walk, sit-to-stand, and peak knee flexion/extension torques), blood was drawn. Targeted serum metabolomics on hydrophilic metabolites were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution and tandem mass spectrometry. Metabolite dimensionality reduction, pathway analysis, fold change, and t-tests evaluated changes in metabolite abundance. Associations were tested between functional measures and metabolite abundance. RESULTS: Individuals with CP had a significant increase in the abundance of essential amino acids, catabolic products of protein metabolism, and tricarboxylic acid cycle substrates, such as valine, tryptophan, kynurenic acid, and pyruvate (p < 0.05). Importantly, the abundance of numerous metabolites was only highly associated with functional capacity in individuals with CP such that greater abundance was associated with greater capacity, but not in those with typical development. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show clear increases in serum metabolites in individuals with CP, which are associated with functional capacity for movement. The altered metabolite profile measured after exercise might reflect increased energy production needed for movement. Appropriate nutritional intake during exercise might be needed given increased energy requirements.
ABSTRACT
Vision-impaired (VI) golf is a global para-sport currently played under several different classification systems under different bodies. This study aimed to gather expert opinion to determine whether the current classification systems are fit for the purpose intended and to identify any particular issues where VI impacts the game of golf for the disabled (G4D). A panel of 20 participants with expertise in G4D took part in a three-round Delphi study. The panel agreed that the current classification system(s) for VI golf did not or only partially fulfilled the aim to minimise the impact of VI on the outcome of competition and that there should be one, internationally recognised, classification system. It was agreed that other metrics of VI, in addition to the measurement of visual acuity (VA), need to be considered. Intentional misrepresentation of VI was identified as a cause for concern. The panel agreed that the current classification system does not fully achieve its purpose. Any changes that are made to these classification systems need to be evidence based specific to VI golf. Further research is required to determine how measures of VI affect golfing performance and whether other metrics other than VA are required.
Subject(s)
Athletes , Golf , Visual Acuity , Delphi Technique , Disabled Persons , HumansABSTRACT
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability in the United States. The condition has most commonly been associated with elderly sedentary individuals; however, it also can affect those who participate in regular athletic activities. The diagnosis and management of these individuals can be challenging because of both their higher level of physical activity and their overall athletic goals. Treatment requires an appropriate exercise regimen, rehabilitation program, and education of both the athlete and the coach. The focus of our article is to provide an up-to-date overview of the evaluation and management of the athletic individual who presents with symptomatic early knee OA, in particular, the nonsurgical rehabilitation treatment options available to the practitioner and the evidence to support these recommendations.
Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Physical Conditioning, Human/methods , Athletic Injuries/complications , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Patient Positioning , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To report the incidence of symptomatic heterotopic ossification (HO) in a defined civilian amputee population, describe its characteristics, and compare these findings to published data in military amputees. DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis from July 1998 to July 2009. SETTING: Ambulatory amputee clinic within a large university medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with lower limb amputation (N=158). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients with symptomatic HO confirmed by radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 261 patients were evaluated; 158 met inclusion criteria, with 59% having traumatic etiology, 18% vascular etiology, 22% infection, and 1% tumor. Symptomatic HO was diagnosed in 36 (22.8%) patients, and 94% patients had mild HO on radiographic scoring. Rate of HO in amputations related to trauma was not increased compared with those of other etiologies. Surgical resection of the ectopic bone was required in 4 (11%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: HO is seen commonly after civilian lower limb amputation regardless of etiology. The prevalence was less than that observed in previous reports from military populations. This is the first report estimating the prevalence of HO in adult civilian amputees.
Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Amputation, Traumatic/epidemiology , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Ossification, Heterotopic/epidemiology , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Amputation, Traumatic/complications , Artificial Limbs/adverse effects , Artificial Limbs/statistics & numerical data , Causality , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnostic imaging , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Ossification, Heterotopic/surgery , Pennsylvania , Prevalence , Radiography , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of disability in the United States. With an aging population, its incidence is only likely to rise. Articular cartilage has a poor capacity to heal. The advent of regenerative medicine has heralded a new approach to early treatment of degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis by focusing on regenerating damaged tissue rather than focusing on replacement. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one such treatment that has received much recent attention and has been used particularly for tendon healing. Recent studies have focused on assessing its use on degenerative conditions such as OA. In this article, we review the evidence for the pathologic basis for the use of PRP in OA and also the clinical outcomes pertaining to its use. Finally, we also consider reasons for the inconsistent clinical success pertaining to its use.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis/therapy , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Animals , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Osteoarthritis/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Viscosupplements/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have potential to identify early signs of joint disease. This study compared joint pain and function in adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy compared with individuals without. METHODS: This cross-sectional study compared individuals with cerebral palsy ( n = 20), aged 13-30 yrs with Gross Motor Function Classification System I-III and age-matched individuals without cerebral palsy ( n = 20). Knee and hip joint pain measured using Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score surveys. Objective strength and function were also measured. Biomarkers for tissue turnover (serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen) and cartilage degradation (serum matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 3) were measured in blood and urinary samples. FINDINGS: Individuals with cerebral palsy had increased knee and hip joint pain, reduced leg strength, reduced walking and standing speeds, and ability to carry out activities of daily living ( P < 0.005) compared with controls. They also had higher serum matrix metalloproteinase 1 ( P < 0.001) and urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen levels ( P < 0.05). Individuals with cerebral palsy who were Gross Motor Function Classification System I and II demonstrated reduced hip joint pain ( P = 0.02) and higher matrix metalloproteinase 1 levels ( P = 0.02) compared with Gross Motor Function Classification System III. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with cerebral palsy with less severe mobility deficits had higher matrix metalloproteinase 1 levels likely due to more prolonged exposure to abnormal joint loading forces but experienced less joint pain.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Joint Diseases , Osteoarthritis , Adolescent , Humans , Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 , Collagen Type II , Cross-Sectional Studies , Activities of Daily Living , Pain , Biomarkers , ArthralgiaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pathologies significantly affect the rehabilitation course for patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). The impact of a specialized inpatient MSK consult service has not been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the demographics, pathologies, and impact on pain scores of patients who were evaluated by a specialized MSK consult service. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive analysis of patients at an IRF who were evaluated by the MSK consult service. SETTING: Academic IRF. PARTICIPANTS: 230 patients evaluated by the MSK consult service over 4.5 years. INTERVENTIONS: MSK consult service composed of sports medicine fellowship-trained physiatrists who use history, physical examination, point-of-care ultrasound, and specialized MSK knowledge to assess and address MSK barriers to functional improvement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary rehabilitation diagnosis, length of stay, discharge destination, reason for consult, MSK diagnosis, need for injection, change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) pain scores, change in Functional Independence Measures (FIM). RESULTS: A total of 230 consults met inclusion criteria for analysis. The most common symptoms were shoulder pain (47%), knee pain (30%), and hip/groin pain (10.4%). The MSK consult service made 82 different musculoskeletal and neuromuscular diagnoses. The most common primary rehabilitation diagnosis was stroke (28.3%). Injections were performed in 44.3% of consults, with an average reduction in NPRS pain score of 2.3 (SD 1.9) and a statistically significant reduction in average NPRS pain scores in patients who underwent injections compared to those who did not (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to examine the use of an innovative inpatient MSK physiatry consult service in an IRF. This promising consult service can play a pivotal role in patient care by reducing functionally limiting MSK pain to allow for better toleration of therapies and to optimize functional gains.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Referral and Consultation , Rehabilitation Centers , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement , Aged , Adult , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although physical activity physical activity has been shown to have significant benefits for individuals living with cancer, engaging lung cancer survivors (LCS) in increasing routine physical activity participation has been particularly challenging. PURPOSE: To describe enablers of, barriers to, and patterns of physical activity among LCS and to characterize interest in a physical activity program as a first step to improving physical activity engagement. METHODS: The study consisted of a cross-sectional survey (n = 100) of adult LCS recruited from a thoracic oncology clinic assessing multiple domains of physical activity (engagement, perceived barriers, benefits, physical function, psychosocial factors, self-efficacy, and programmatic preferences). RESULTS: Only 12% of LCS in our cohort (average age 67 years, 54% male, 81% with stage III or IV disease) met American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) physical activity guidelines. Participants engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, with an average (SD) of 48.4 (91.8) minutes per week. The most commonly reported barriers to physical activity were fatigue (49%), dyspnea (39%), and difficulty with daily activities (34%). Regression analysis demonstrated a positive association between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and higher income (r = 0.241, p = .016), physical function (r = 0.281, p = .005), and physical activity self-efficacy (r = 0.270, p = .007). Qualitative results demonstrated a strong interest in physical activity programming that is lung-cancer specific with a high level of support and guidance. CONCLUSION: This study identified that LCS had low levels of physical activity with fatigue, dyspnea, socioeconomic, and functional limitations contributing. The majority of LCS are interested in an exercise program and believe that exercise engagement will produce functional benefits. The present study presents a framework to guide development of community-based interventions to increase LCS physical activity participation among LCS.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Participation in adaptive sports can mitigate the risk for obesity and social isolation/loneliness in individuals with disabilities (IWDs). The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and related changes in physical activity exacerbated existing barriers to participation in adaptive sports. There is limited literature assessing the potentially disproportionate effect of pandemic-related changes to physical activity in IWDs. OBJECTIVE: To determine how golf benefits IWDs and understand the effect of changes to golfing habits during the pandemic. DESIGN: A survey was distributed to all registered players (n = 1759) of the European Disabled Golf Association (April 2021). It assessed participants' demographic information (age, sex, race/ethnicity, nationality, impairment, golf handicap), golf habits before/after the pandemic, and perceived impact of golf and COVID-19-related golf restrictions to physical/mental health and quality of life (QoL). SETTING: European Disabled Golf Association (EDGA) worldwide database. PATIENTS: Responses were received from 171 IWDs representing 24 countries. Age 18 years or older and registration with EDGA were required for inclusion. INTERVENTIONS: Survey. OUTCOMES: Self-reported golfing habits, mental/physical health, and QoL. RESULTS: Mean participant age was 51.4 ± 12.9 years. Most respondents were amputees (41.5%) or had neurological diagnoses (33.9%). Pre-pandemic, 95% of respondents indicated that golf provided an opportunity to socialize, and most participants reported that golf positively affected physical/mental health and QoL. During the pandemic, more than 20% of participants reported golfing with fewer partners and 24.6% of participants reported playing fewer rounds per month (p < .001 for both); these findings were consistent across geographical region, ethnicity, and type of disability. Most participants (68.4%) perceived that their ability to golf had been impacted by COVID-19 and that these changes negatively affected their mental/physical health and QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Golf benefits the physical/mental health and QoL of IWDs internationally. Changes to golfing habits throughout the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected these individuals. This highlights the need to create opportunities for physical activity engagement and socialization among adaptive athletes during a global pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disabled Persons , Golf , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Quality of Life , COVID-19/epidemiology , Exercise , Golf/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a medial off-loader brace with sensor monitoring capabilities and associated phone application in improving outcomes for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of participants with knee OA, aged 40-75 with two groups: 1) brace-only 2) brace+sensor (sensor providing walking time, knee range of motion and 7-day activity streak). Both groups received a prefabricated custom-fitted medial off-loader brace and 12-week self-guided exercise therapy program. Baseline and post-intervention assessments included subjective and objective outcomes. RESULTS: 60 participants were recruited (n = 30/group). The brace+sensor group demonstrated higher study retention(88.89%) compared to the brace-only group(73.33%). Significant improvement in KOOS knee pain and other KOOS sub-scores compared to baseline was observed for both groups. However, only the brace+sensor group improved beyond the established minimal clinically important difference for KOOS pain(11.31+/-13.87). KOOS ADL was also significantly improved in the brace+sensor group compared to brace only group(p = 0.049). Both treatment groups had significant improvement in functional outcomes(10 m walk, 5x sit-to-stand, p < 0.05). Only the brace+sensor group had significant improvements in the 6-minute walk test(p = 0.02) and reduction in participant weight(p = 0.01) at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Incorporating wearable technology in standard bracing for individuals with knee OA has potential in improving clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The establishment of rehabilitation goals for hospitalized cancer patients depends on accurate medical prognosis and matching goals to clinical timelines. Current tools for estimating prognosis are limited. We hypothesized that bed mobility is a predictor of mortality in cancer patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort of 187 subjects with nonneurologic cancer admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, Functional Independence Measure scores and 6-mo mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: In the cohort, survival rate was 71% at 6 mos. In univariate analysis, discharge bed mobility score (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.61-0.90, P = 0.003), bed mobility Functional Independence Measure gain (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.85, P = 0.002), and bed mobility Functional Independence Measure efficiency (odds ratio = 0.011, 95% confidence interval = 0.00032-0.21, P = 0.006) were inversely associated with 6-mo mortality after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facility. In multivariate analysis with additional motor Functional Independence Measure items, only bed mobility (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-0.97, P = 0.029) and grooming (odds ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.99, P = 0.041) were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Lower discharge and lower change in bed mobility Functional Independence Measure scores are associated with mortality in cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation. Bed mobility could serve as a clinical tool for estimating medical prognosis in hospitalized cancer patients and should be validated in prospective studies.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Patient Discharge , Humans , Male , Female , Neoplasms/rehabilitation , Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Mobility Limitation , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Rehabilitation CentersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 infection can have long-term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long-term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine SDOH factors related to long-term independence and QoL of COVID-19 patients after IRF stay. DESIGN: Multisite cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two urban IRFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were Post-COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post-IRF stay for severe COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF-36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥$70,000, p = .004), and living in the city (p = .046). Similarly, patients who were of the male gender (p = .004) and had higher income (≥$70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow-up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow-up care reported lower SF-36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long-term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID-19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has introduced a new subset of patients with acute end-stage lung damage for which lung transplantation has been successfully performed. OBJECTIVE: To describe the inpatient rehabilitation course of patients who underwent bilateral lung transplant due to severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Free-standing, academic, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen patients aged 28-67 years old (mean 53.9 ± 10.7) who developed COVID-19 respiratory failure and underwent bilateral lung transplant. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program including physical, occupational, and speech therapy tailored to the unique functional needs of each individual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures of functional improvements, include mobility and self-care scores on section GG of the Functional Abilities and Goals of the Improving Post-Acute Care Transformation Act, as defined as quality measures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Other functional measures included 6 minute walk test, Berg balance scale, Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), and Cognition and Memory Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to evaluate statistical significance of change between admission and discharge scores. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed inpatient rehabilitation. Self-care (GG0130) mean score improved from 20.9 to 36.1. Mobility (GG0170) mean score improved from 30.7 to 70.7. Mean 6-minute walk distance improved from 174.1 to 467.6 feet. Mean Berg balance scores improved from 18.6/56 to 36.3/56. MASA scores improved from 171.3 to 182.3. All functional measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements with p value ≤ .008, except for cognition and memory FIM scores, which did not show a statistically significant difference. A majority (76%) of patients discharged home. CONCLUSION: This new and unique patient population can successfully participate in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program and achieve functional improvements despite medical complications.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Transplantation , United States , Humans , Aged , Adult , Middle Aged , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Treatment Outcome , Medicare , Rehabilitation Centers , Length of StayABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Survivors of hospitalization for severe acute COVID-19 infection faced significant functional impairments necessitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for intensive rehabilitation prior to discharge home. There remains a lack of large cohort studies of the functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs with COVID-19-related impairments and the relationship to patient-specific factors. OBJECTIVE: To characterize functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related debility and to investigate associations between functional outcomes and patient-specific factors. DESIGN: Multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multiple IRFs in a large urban city. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to IRFs for rehabilitation after hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included change in GG Self-Care and Mobility Activities subscales and Functional Independence Measure scores from admission to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Linear regression analysis was used to relate functional changes to demographic, medical, and hospitalization-specific factors. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination from the IRF. RESULTS: The analysis included n = 362 patients admitted to IRFs for COVID-19-related rehabilitation needs. This cohort showed significant improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition congregate scores (216.0%, 174.3%, 117.6% respectively). Patient-specific factors associated with functional improvement, included age, body mass index, premorbid employment status, history of diabetes and cardiac disease and medications received in acute care, and muscle strength upon admission to IRF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for COVID-19-related functional deficits made significant functional improvements in mobility, self-care, and cognition. Many significant associations were found between patient-specific factors and functional improvement, which support further investigation of these factors as possible predictors of functional improvement in an IRF for COVID-19-related deficits.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the known benefits of music therapy (MT) and its potential applications in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), there remains a lack of access to MT in a significant number of hospitals in the United States. Exploration of stakeholder (e.g., physician, therapist, and patient) perceptions as a potential barrier to uptake has been limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the favorability of patients admitted to an IRF toward MT through the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. We hypothesized that patient domain scores would reflect a favorable perception of MT across rehabilitation diagnoses. DESIGN: Descriptive and cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Free-standing, acute IRF. PATIENTS: A total of 119 English-speaking, adult patients across three impairment categories (general rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, and brain injury) were recruited over a 3-month period and during each patient's hospital stay. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A modified version of the Global Complementary/Alternative and Music Therapy Assessment (GCAMTA) measured the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. RESULTS: An overall response rate of 79.3% was achieved. Most patients (n = 95; 79.8%) scored in either the favorable or neutral ranges of the instrument. Age correlated negatively (r = -0.193, p < .05) with total score, whereas highest level of education correlated positively (rs = 0.222, p < .05). There were no significant differences in scores across impairment categories (V = 0.068, p = .232). Knowledge scores, controlling for education and age, predicted 30.4% of the variance in attitudes and beliefs scores (R2 = 0.304, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that patient perceptions are a barrier to MT uptake. Younger, more educated patients have higher knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about MT. Increasing patient knowledge about MT may improve their attitudes and beliefs, thereby further optimizing this therapy for widespread use.
Subject(s)
Music Therapy , Adult , Humans , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Inpatients , Rehabilitation Centers , United States , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that over 400 million individuals worldwide lack access to medical care. In addition, clinicians are more likely to treat underserved patients during their careers if they have exposure to these populations during their training. OBJECTIVES: To analyze what forms of didactic experiences are available and which opportunities are the most valuable with domestic/international underserved populations in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency programs in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using REDCap software. SETTING: PM&R residency programs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 137 participants in Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited PM&R residencies in the United States (24 program directors and 113 residents). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surveys collected information regarding demographic data, prior global health training experiences, current residency training experiences involving domestic/international underserved populations being offered, participants' perceived importance of training experiences with domestic/international underserved population, barriers that impede these experiences, and if availability of these opportunities affected resident recruitment. RESULTS: Participants reported that their PM&R programs did not offer global health simulations (91.2%), educational tracks (75.2%), international electives (71.5%), or rotations with domestic underserved populations (48.9%). Residents viewed exposure to simulation labs (3.25/5), educational tracks (3.42/5), and electives (4.02/5) more importantly than attending physicians. Conversely, attending physicians viewed lectures (3.92/5), journal clubs (3.58), and rotations treating domestic underserved populations (4.42/5) more favorably. Both residents and attending physicians endorse lack of financial support and mentorship as barriers to these opportunities. Participants from all regions outside the Midwest reported that these educational opportunities would affect residency recruitment (56% vs. 31%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study assessing the current state of global health training opportunities for PM&R residents as well as the perceived value of such experiences. Many PM&R medical trainees desire exposure to global health medicine curriculum, and many would alter their residency selection based on its availability.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine , Humans , United States , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Medical, Graduate , Surveys and Questionnaires , CurriculumABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the discharge destinations and associated patient-specific factors among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a single-site tertiary acute care hospital. RESULTS: Among 2872 patients, discharge destination included home without services ( n = 2044, 71.2%), home with services ( n = 379, 13.2%), skilled nursing facility (117, 4.1%), long-term acute care hospital ( n = 39, 1.3%), inpatient rehabilitation facility ( n = 97, 3.4%), acute care facility ( n = 23, 0.8%), hospice services ( n = 20, 0.7%), or deceased during hospitalization ( n = 153, 5.3%). Adjusting by covariates, patients had higher odds of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care hospital, or inpatient rehabilitation facility) than home (with or without services) when they were older (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-3.11; P < 0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3-6: OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.34-4.15; P = 0.003; ≥7: OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.56-4.86; P < 0.001), were intubated or required critical care (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.48-3.13; P < 0.001), or had a longer hospitalization (3-7 days: OR, 12.48; 95% CI, 3.77-41.32; P < 0.001; 7-14 days: OR, 28.14; 95% CI, 8.57-92.43; P < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility if they received remdesivir (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization should be considered by physicians when prognosticating patient rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Patient Discharge , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Patients , Skilled Nursing FacilitiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status and pain reduction from epidural steroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: The retrospective cohort consisted of patients undergoing epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy ( n = 544). Numeric Pain Rating Scale was measured at baseline and 2 wks after epidural steroid injection. Socioeconomic status was estimated using median family income in patients' ZIP code. Linear and mixed models examined demographic and clinical differences in pain before and after injection and whether family income moderated the effect. RESULTS: Majority of patients were White (72.4%), female (56.4%), engaged in physical activity (68.2%), and underwent unilateral, transforaminal epidural steroid injection (86.0% and 92.1%, respectively). Non-White patients and those who did not engage in physical activity had higher baseline pain ( P < 0.05). Lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher baseline pain (ß = 0.06 per $10,000, P = 0.01). Patients with lower socioeconomic status experienced larger improvement in pain after epidural steroid injection: -1.56 units for patients in the 10th percentile of family income versus -0.81 for 90th percentile. Being a current smoker was associated with higher pain (ß = 0.76, P = 0.03) and engaging in structured physical activity with less pain (ß = -0.07 P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lower socioeconomic status was independently associated with higher pain alleviation after controlling for other potentially influential demographics. Modifiable lifestyle factors may be a target of potential intervention.
Subject(s)
Radiculopathy , Humans , Female , Radiculopathy/drug therapy , Injections, Epidural , Retrospective Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae , Steroids/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Pain , Social ClassABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although inpatient rehabilitation can improve functional independence in patients with cancer, the role of cachexia in this population is unknown. Our objectives were to:1) Establish prevalence of cachexia in a cohort of cancer patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation and its association with demographic and oncological history.2) Determine the relationship between the presence of cachexia and functional recovery and whether these patients in inpatient rehabilitation have a distinct prognosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 250 patients over 330 admissions to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Body weight loss threshold and Weight Loss Grading Scale identified patients with and without cachexia. Main outcomes were functional independence measure scores, discharge destination, and 6-mo survival. RESULTS: Prevalence of cachexia in inpatient rehabilitation was 59% using consensus body weight loss criteria, and 77% of cancer patients had a Weight Loss Grading Scale score greater than 0. Patients with and without cachexia had similar motor and cognitive gains, although patients with severe cachexia had more limited functional gains ( P < 0.05) and increased odds of acute care return ( P < 0.01). Patients with a Weight Loss Grading Scale score of 4 had decreased survival at 6 mos ( P < 0.05) compared with noncachectic patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there is a relationship between cachexia and recovery for cancer patients that should be further studied in rehabilitation settings.