Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify patient preferences and outcomes of chest masculinization surgery in patients identifying as nonbinary versus transgender (trans-) males. METHODS: Patients who underwent chest masculinization (2003-2022) were included. Demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical approaches, complications, secondary procedures, and BODY-Q chest module survey responses were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Three hundred two patients were included. Thirteen percent identified as nonbinary and 87% as trans-male. The most common surgical approach in both groups was double incision with free nipple-areola graft (63% vs 71%, P = 0.33). Nonbinary patients more frequently opted for double incision without free nipple areola graft compared to trans-male patients (18% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001). Other unique surgical requests of nonbinary patients included nipple areola preservation and small breast mound preservation (5.2%) and balance between losing bulk and achieving a more androgynous appearance (5.3%). The survey response rate was 31% (93/302). Both groups reported improved quality of life postoperatively (P = 0.16). Three nonbinary patients elected not to keep their nipple-areola complexes (P = 0.005). Trans-male patients were more likely to report having a male chest as very important for their gender identity (82% vs 95%, P = 0.043). Nonbinary patients were less likely to prefer small nipples (82% vs 95%, P = 0.033) and 18% stated that they preferred no nipples (vs 2.7% trans-male patients, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonbinary patients have distinct surgical preferences regarding nipple-areola complexes. Chest masculinization planning can differ for this group of patients compared to their trans-male counterparts.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL