ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Program websites are essential resources in the process of residency and fellowship application. We evaluated the information furnished on these resources by Epilepsy fellowship programs. The extent of information provided was compared across geographic zones, academic affiliation, and national ranking. METHODS: A list of Epilepsy fellowship programs was derived from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA). Links to program websites were obtained directly from FREIDA or using Google's search engine. Online data was categorized to reflect program information, education, recruitment, compensation, epilepsy center-specific information, and social media presence. Data points under each category were collected to develop a standardized scoring system. The frequency of criterion present was compared across geographic zones, academic affiliation, and national ranking using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. Significance was determined at a p-value ≤ 0.05 for all cases. The study utilized IBM SPSS version 28 and Python 3.11.3. RESULTS: We analyzed 80 Epilepsy fellowship programs. The most reported feature was the program director's name and email (100.0%). The least reported features included board pass rates (1.3%), preparatory boot camp (8.8%), and post-fellowship placements (11.3%). Programs were found to be well-represented on X (88.8%), Facebook (81.3%), and Instagram (71.3%). Most (85.0%) of the programs were searchable through Google. The scores for program information, education, recruitment, compensation, epilepsy center-specific information, and social media visibility did not significantly vary based on location, academic affiliation, or rank status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that despite an online presence, there is much room for improvement in the content available to the applicant. To improve the Match process and attract a roster of well-informed fellows, Epilepsy fellowship programs should furnish program websites with up-to-date information relevant to program information, education, recruitment, compensation, and epilepsy center-specific information.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Fellowships and Scholarships , Internet , Humans , Internship and Residency , Social Media , Education, Medical, GraduateABSTRACT
Background and purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing CT angiography (CTA) and CT perfusion (CTP) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Concerns over contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) often lead medical centres to mandate pre-imaging serum creatinine level assessments, causing unnecessary delays. We aim to confirm further the practice of conducting CTA/CTP without first testing creatinine. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central and Scopus from inception until March 2023 for studies reporting on AKI in patients with AIS receiving CTA/CTP. Outcomes of interest were (1) the odds of AKI in patients receiving CTA/CTP versus non-contrast CT and (2) the overall incidence of AKI and haemodialysis in patients with AIS undergoing CTA/CTP. Results: Results were pooled using a random effects model. 13 studies were included (5 cohort and 8 single-arm studies) with 5104 patients in total, out of which 4347 patients received CTA/CTP and 757 patients received no contrast. In case-control studies, 4.8% (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.22, Z=1.32, p=0.19) of patients who received CTA/CTP developed AKI, compared with 7.7% of patients in the control group. Temporary haemodialysis was required for two patients in the analysed studies. Conclusions: Non-randomised evidence suggests that CTA/CTP is not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of AKI in patients with stroke. Further well-designed prospective studies are required to explore potential risk factors of CIN in specific patient populations such as diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. There is no universally accepted effective treatment for NAFLD. Although various studies propose statins effective in lowering liver enzymes and in improving liver histology, their potency in the treatment and development of NAFLD remains unknown. PURPOSE: We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of statins in the treatment and the development of NAFLD. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from their inception until May 2021 for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of statins for the treatment of NAFLD and its development. Studies were included irrespective of the dosage or duration, and their risk of bias was assessed. The outcomes of interest for our study were the effect of statins on liver histology (steatosis, fibrosis and necroinflammation, NAFLD activity score [NAS]) and liver enzymes (Alanine transaminase [ALT], Aspartate transaminase [AST], and Gamma-glutamyl transferase [GGT] levels). To pool continuous outcomes, a random-effects model was used to derive weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Generic inverse variance was then used for different measurement units reported by the studies. For studies investigating the effects of statins on the development of NAFLD, generic inverse variance along with random effects model was used to derive odds ratio (ORs) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies including 1,247,503 participants were short-listed for our analysis. All the studies included in our analysis had a low to moderate risk of bias. The results of our analysis suggest that statins may significantly reduce the risk of developing NAFLD (OR:0.69, 95% CI [0.57,0.84]; p = 0.0002; I² =36%). Statin use significantly reduced ALT levels (WMD: -27.28, 95% CI [-43.06, -11.51]; p = 0.0007; I² =90%), AST levels (WMD: -10.99, 95% CI [-18.17, -3.81]; p = 0.003; I² =79%) and GGT levels (WMD: -23.40, 95% CI [-31.82, -14.98]; p < 0.00001; I² = 21%) in patients presenting with NAFLD at baseline. In liver histology outcomes, steatosis grade (SMD: -2.59, 95% CI [-4.61, -0.56]; p = 0.01; I² = 95%), NAS (WMD: -1.03, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.74]; p < 0.00001; I² = 33%), necro-inflammatory stage (WMD: -0.19, 95% CI [-0.26, -0.13]; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%) and significant fibrosis (OR:0.20, 95% CI [0.04, 0.95]; p = 0.04; I² = 97%) underwent notable reduction. However, fibrosis stage outcome (WMD: 0.07, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.20]; p = 0.27; I² = 0%) was non-significant. CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in transaminase and transferase levels. Marked improvement in liver histology of NAFLD patients was observed. Statin use also remarkably reduced the risk of developing NAFLD. Future large-scale trials can further aid in identifying the positive impact of statins in treatment for NAFLD and those at risk of developing it.