ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Redo surgical aortic valve replacement (redo SAVR) and valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) are the two treatment strategies available for patients with severe symptomatic bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction. Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both early and mid-term outcomes of ViV TAVR versus redo SAVR in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve disease. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane reviews, and Google scholar electronic databases were searched and studies comparing ViV TAVR versus redo SAVR were included. The primary outcome of interest was mid-term (1-5 years) and 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included were 30-day all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, pacemaker implantation, stroke, acute kidney injury, major or life-threatening bleeding, and postprocedural aortic valve gradients. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all outcomes using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine observational studies with a total of 2,891 individuals and mean follow-up of 26 months met the inclusion criteria. There is no significant difference in mid-term and 1-year mortality between ViV-TAVR and redo SAVR groups with RR of 1.15 (95% CI 0.99-1.32; p = .06) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.69-1.61; p = .8). 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in ViV-TAVR group with RR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.45-0.93; p = .02). ViV-TAVR group had lower 30-day bleeding, length of stay, and higher postoperative gradients. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a lower 30-day mortality and similar 1-year and mid-term mortality for ViV TAVR compared to redo SAVR despite a higher baseline risk. Given these findings and the ongoing advances in the transcatheter therapeutics, VIV TAVR should be preferred over redo SAVR particularly in those at intermediate-high surgical risk.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Bioprosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Surgical Instruments , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is less understood in the risk stratification of patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), especially in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: This retrospective study from 2008 to 2012 evaluated all adult patients with AECOPD having BNP levels and available echocardiographic data demonstrating LVEF ≥40%. The patients were divided into groups 1, 2, and 3 with BNP ≤ 100, 101 to 500, and ≥501 pg/mL, respectively. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients without renal dysfunction. Outcomes included need for and duration of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanical ventilation (MV), NIV failure, reintubation at 48 hours, intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. Two-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the total 1145 patients, 550 (48.0%) met our inclusion criteria (age 65.1 ± 12.2 years; 271 [49.3%] males). Groups 1, 2, and 3 had 214, 216, and 120 patients each, respectively, with higher comorbidities and worse biventricular function in higher categories. Higher BNP values were associated with higher MV use, NIV failure, MV duration, and ICU and total LOS. On multivariate analysis, BNP was an independent predictor of higher NIV and MV use, NIV failure, NIV and MV duration, and total LOS in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1. B-type natriuretic peptide continued to demonstrate positive correlation with NIV and MV duration and ICU and total LOS independent of renal function in a subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Elevated admission BNP in patients with AECOPD and normal LVEF is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes and can be used to risk-stratify these patients.
Subject(s)
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Patient Outcome Assessment , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/blood , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Critical Care , Disease Progression , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review was performed with the goal of summarizing the role of operator experience in the treatment of severe left main stenosis by percutaneous intervention techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: The Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting had similar clinical outcomes for severe left main disease. However, PCI of the left main coronary stenosis is considered to be a high-risk intervention because of the large area of myocardium at jeopardy that can quickly cause hemodynamic compromise. Operator experience and familiarity with the use of hemodynamic support devices, plaque modification techniques, and intravascular imaging tools is associated with better clinical outcomes. In patients with severe left main stenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by high-volume operators, the clinical outcomes are superior.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Clinical Protocols , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Professional Practice , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients treated with warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) become warfarin ineligible (WI) due to major bleeding events (MBE) or systemic thromboembolism (STE). We report a large multicenter real-world experience of the use of direct oral antagonists (DOACs) in these WI patients. METHODS: We report the outcomes of 263 WI patients treated with DOACs. The primary objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes of STE and MBE with DOACs. Secondary objective was to assess clinical predictors of repeat MBE and STE on DOACs. RESULTS: Note that 63% (166 of 263) patients had a repeat MBE on DOACs. Repeat MBE was significantly higher in patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding (74.5% vs. 30%, P < 0.0001). Five percent (12 of 263) developed repeat STE. Higher mean CHA2DS2VASC (6.5 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.6 = 0.001) score was associated with repeat STE. About 34% (57 of 166) of patients had an intervention to manage repeat MBE. LAAO devices were successfully used in 67% (12 of 18) high-risk patients who underwent major interventions to manage MBE. CONCLUSION: In WI patients rechallenged with DOACs, a significant proportion developed repeat MBE. LAAO devices seem reasonable in those patients who undergo major interventions to manage MBE with cautious and temporary continuation of DOAC.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Drug Substitution , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Stroke/epidemiology , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Drug Substitution/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke/chemically induced , Stroke/diagnosis , Treatment Failure , Warfarin/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Introduction Moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) of ischemic etiology has been associated with worse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Studies comparing concomitant mitral valve replacement/repair (MVR/Re) with CABG and standalone CABG have reported conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature. Patients and Methods We searched using PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google scholar databases from January 1960 to June 2016 for clinical trials comparing CABG to CABG + MVR/Re for moderate MR. Pooled risk ratio or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for individual outcomes were calculated using random effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q-statistic. Results A total of 11 studies were included. Mean follow-up was 35.3 months. All-cause mortality (Mantel-Haenszel [MH] risk ratio [RR]: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.75-1.24, p = 0.775), early mortality (MH RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.39-1.07, p = 0.092), and stroke rates (MH RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.21-2.03, p = 0.464) were similar between CABG and CABG + MVR/Re groups. Adverse event at follow-up was lower with CABG (MH RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.61-1.32, p = 0.584). MD of change from baseline in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (MD: - 2.50, 95% CI: - 5.21 to - 0.21, p = 0.071) and LV ejection fraction (MD: 0.48, 95% CI: - 2.48 to 3.44, p = 0.750) were not significantly different between the groups. Incidence of moderate MR (MH RR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.79-5.89, p < 0.001) was higher in the CABG only group. Conclusion Addition of MVR/Re to CABG in patients with moderate ischemic MR did not result in improvement in early or overall mortality, stroke risk, or intermediate markers of LV function when compared with CABG alone.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology , Odds Ratio , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recovery of Function , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with worse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, its role in an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) has not been reported. This was a retrospective cohort study during 2008-2012 at an academic medical center. AECOPD patients >18 years with available echocardiographic data were included. LVH was defined as LV mass index (LVMI) >95 g/m2 (women) and >115g/m2 (men). Relative wall thickness was used to classify LVH as concentric (>0.42) or eccentric (<0.42). Outcomes included need for and duration of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanical ventilation (MV), NIV failure, intensive care unit (ICU) and total length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of 802 patients with AECOPD, 615 patients with 264 (42.9%) having LVH were included. The LVH cohort had higher LVMI (141.1 ± 39.4 g/m2 vs. 79.7 ± 19.1 g/m2; p < 0.001) and lower LV ejection fraction (44.5±21.9% vs. 50.0±21.6%; p ≤ 0.001). The LVH cohort had statistically non-significant longer ICU LOS, and higher NIV and MV use and duration. Of the 264 LVH patients, concentric LVH (198; 75.0%) was predictive of greater NIV use [82 (41.4%) vs. 16 (24.2%), p = 0.01] and duration (1.0 ± 1.9 vs. 0.6 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.01) compared to eccentric LVH. Concentric LVH remained independently associated with NIV use and duration. In-hospital outcomes in patients with AECOPD were comparable in patients with and without LVH. Patients with concentric LVH had higher NIV need and duration in comparison to eccentric LVH.
Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Hospital Mortality , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/complications , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Intensive Care Units , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Retrospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pocket hematoma is one of the most common complications following cardiac device implantation. This study examined the impact of this complication on in-hospital outcomes following Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) implantation. METHODS: Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2010 was queried to identify all primary implantations of ICDs and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-D) during the year 2010 using ICD-9 codes. We then identified the patients who experienced a procedure related hematoma during the hospital stay. We compared the outcomes of the patients with and without a hematoma complication. All analyses were performed using SPSS 20 complex samples using appropriate weights to adjust for the complex sampling design of the national database. RESULTS: Out of a total of 85,276 primary ICD implantations in the year 2010, 2233 (2.6% of the implantations) were complicated by a hematoma. Increased age (p < 0.001), and comorbidities such as congestive heart failure (odds ratio (OR) - 1.86, p < 0.001), coagulopathy (OR - 2.3, p < 0.001) and renal failure (OR - 1.52, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of pocket hematoma formation. Patients who developed a hematoma had a longer hospitalization (9.1 days versus 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital costs ($56,545 versus $47,015, p < 0.001) compared to patients who did not have a hematoma. Overall mortality associated with ICD implantation was low (0.6%), and hematoma formation did not adversely affect mortality (0.6% versus 0.4%, p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: Hematoma occurs infrequently after ICD implantation, however, it adversely impacts the cost of procedure and length of stay.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Lariat procedure is increasingly used for the exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. There are anecdotal reports of pleural effusions after the Lariat procedure. However, the incidence, demographics, and pathophysiology of these effusions are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: Characterization of pleural effusions in patients who underwent LAA exclusion using the Lariat procedure. METHODS: We report the incidence, demographics, and clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients from a multicenter prospective registry who underwent the Lariat procedure and subsequently developed pleural effusions. RESULTS: A total of 10 out of 310 (3.2%) patients developed significant pleural effusions after the Lariat procedure. The mean age of these patients was 67 ± 9, ranging from 52 to 78 years and included 5 (50%) males. Nine patients had persistent AF with median CHADS2 score of 2.7 ± 1.2. The LAA was successfully ligated in all these patients. Post-Lariat procedure, 6 patients developed bilateral and 4 patients developed left-sided pleural effusions. Pleural tap revealed transudative in 2 and exudative in 6 patients. The remaining 2 patients responded to active diuresis and behaved clinically like transudative effusions. There is a statistically significant difference between the onset of pleural effusion after the Lariat procedure between tPLE versus ePLE groups (14 ± 1.2 vs. 6 ± 6, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Incidence of clinically significant pleural effusion is uncommon after the Lariat procedure and can be either exudative or transudative in nature depending on the underlying mechanisms. More prospective studies are needed to study the pathophysiologic basis of development of pleural effusions after the Lariat procedure.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pleural Effusion/epidemiology , Aged , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Exudates and Transudates , Female , Humans , Incidence , Ligation , Male , Middle Aged , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion/physiopathology , Pleural Effusion/therapy , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of the remnant pulmonary vein (PV) stumps in pneumonectomy patients has not been well characterized. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational study of patients with a remnant PV stump after pneumonectomy. Consecutive patients with a history of pneumonectomy and who had undergone RF ablation for drug refractory AF were identified from the AF database at the participating institutions. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in whom pneumonectomy was performed, for resection of tumors in 10, infection in 4, and bullae in 1 patient and who underwent RF ablation for AF. The mean age was 63 ± 7 years. The stumps were from the right lower PV in 5, left upper PV in 5, left lower PV in 3, and right upper PV in 2 patients. All the PV stumps were electrically active with PV potentials and 9 (60%) of them had triggered activity. PVI was performed in 14 and focal isolation in 1 patient. At 1-year follow-up, 80% were free of AF, off of antiarrhythmic medications. CONCLUSION: PV stumps in AF patients with previous pneumonectomy are electrically active and are frequently the sites of active firing. Isolation of these PV stumps can be accomplished safely and effectively using catheter ablation with no practical concern for PV stenosis or compromising PV stump integrity.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phlebography/methods , Pulmonary Veins/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Veins/physiopathology , Radiography, Interventional , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
AIMS: Pocket haematoma is a common complication following pacemaker implantation. Impact of this complication on post-procedural outcomes has previously not been systematically studied. We sought to identify the incidence of pocket haematoma after a de novo pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation and evaluate its impact on the hospital outcomes using a large all-payer national inpatient database. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2010 was queried to identify all primary implantations of single chamber, dual chamber pacemakers, and biventricular devices during the year 2010 using the appropriate ICD-9 codes. Patients who experienced a procedure-related haematoma during the hospital stay were identified. Of a total of 78,751 primary pacemaker implantations in the year 2010, 1677 (2.1%) of the implantations were complicated by a pocket haematoma. Higher age groups, more complex pacemaker types (BiV > dual chamber > single chamber), and comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and coagulopathy were associated with an increased risk of pocket haematoma formation post-pacemaker implantation. Patients who developed a pocket haematoma had a longer length of stay (8.7 vs. 4.8 days, P < 0.001), higher hospitalization costs ($48,815 vs. $34,324, P < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (2.0 vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) compared with patients who did not develop a haematoma. CONCLUSIONS: Haematoma is a relatively common complication associated with pacemaker implantation; however, it adversely impacts in-hospital outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/economics , Hematoma/epidemiology , Hospital Costs , Hospital Mortality , Length of Stay/economics , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Infant , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Regression Analysis , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cocaine use is a known but rare cause of cardiac arrhythmias. Ventricular arrhythmias related to cocaine may not respond to antiarrhythmic drugs and may need treatment with radiofrequency ablation. OBJECTIVES: We describe the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of cocaine-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) from a multicenter registry. METHODS: Subjects presenting with VT related to cocaine use and being considered for radiofrequency ablation have been included in the study. Patients who were refractory to maximal medical therapy underwent radiofrequency ablation of the VT. Clinical, procedural variables, efficacy, and safety outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 14 subjects met study criteria (age 44 ± 13, range 18- to 68-year-old with 79% male, 71% Caucasian). MRI showed evidence of scar only in 43% of patients (6/14). The mechanism of VT was focal in 50% (n = 7) and scar related reentry in 50% (n = 7) based on 3D mapping. The mean VT cycle length was 429 ± 96 milliseconds. The site of origin was epicardial in 16% (3/18) of VTs. Most clinical VTs were hemodynamically stable (75%). Mean ejection fraction at the time of admission was 44 ± 14%. Duration of procedure was 289 ± 50 minutes. One subject developed pericardial tamponade requiring drainage. At 18 ± 11 months follow-up, freedom from arrhythmia was seen in 86% (1 case lost to follow-up and 2 died). CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is not only feasible but also safe and effective in patients who have drug refractory VT related to chronic cocaine use.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Tachycardia, Ventricular/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Drug Resistance , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common tachyarrhythmia and is becoming increasingly prevalent, while dementia is a neurological condition manifested as loss of memory and cognitive ability. Both these conditions share several common risk factors. It is becoming increasingly evident that AF increases the risk of dementia. There are several pathophysiological mechanisms by which AF can cause dementia. AF increases the stroke risk and strokes are strongly associated with dementia. Besides stroke, altered cerebral blood flow in AF and cerebral microbleeds from anticoagulation may enhance the risk of dementia. Maintaining sinus rhythm may therefore decrease this risk. Catheter ablation is emerging as an effective alternative to maintain patients in sinus rhythm. This procedure has also shown promise in decreasing the risk of all types of dementia. Besides maintaining sinus rhythm and oral anticoagulation, aggressive risk factor modification may reduce the likelihood or delay the onset of dementia.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/psychology , Dementia/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Dementia/prevention & control , Humans , Risk Assessment/methods , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) are associated with increased risk of bleeding events, including hemorrhagic stroke, and periprocedural and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) among this patient population has been uncertain with studies showing contradictory results. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for studies comparing outcomes among patients with and without significant CKD, and with and without ESRD who underwent LAAO device implantation. Data on outcomes from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. RESULTS: Data from eleven studies with 61,724 patients with and without kidney disease were included in the final analyses. There was an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.76, 95 % CI [1.15-6.64]; p = 0.02) and peri-procedural bleeding (1.51 [1.33-1.71]; p < 0.01) associated with kidney disease. There was no significant difference in risk of stroke (1.19 [0.70-2.03]; p = 0.53), pericardial effusion (1.22 [0.77-1.92]; p = 0.40), vascular complications (1.18 [0.92-1.52]; p = 0.20), or device related thrombus (1.13 [0.53-2.40]; p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an increased risk of complications among patients with kidney disease, who undergo LAAO device implantation. These findings suggest the need for studies with randomized control design specifically designed to compare outcomes with LAAO versus anticoagulation in the CKD and ESRD populations.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation stenting constitutes 20% of all PCI performed. Given the extensive prevalence of bifurcation lesions, various techniques have sought to optimally stent the bifurcation to improve revascularization while also decreasing rates of stent thrombosis and lesion recurrence. Advanced techniques, such as planned two-stent approaches, have been shown to have improved outcomes but also require fluoroscopy and procedure time, posing an economic argument as well as a patient-outcome one. OBJECTIVE: Because of the many strategies posited in the literature, it becomes essential to objectively evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to help determine the optimal stenting strategy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical evidence on the efficacy of coronary bifurcation stenting. RESULTS: In this paper, we review the most recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of various stenting techniques and advances in stenting technologies published to gauge the current state of understanding and chart where the field is heading. CONCLUSION: Bifurcation stenting is a maturing problem in the field of interventional cardiology that is adapting to the needs of the patients and advances in technology.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Stents , Coronary AngiographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aspiration is utilized for removal of thrombi and vegetations in inoperable patients and high-risk surgical candidates where medical therapy alone is unlikely to achieve desired outcome. A number of case reports and series have been published since the introduction of AngioVac system (AngioDynamics Inc., Latham, NY) in 2012 where this technology was used in the treatment of endocarditis. However, there is a lack of consolidated data reporting on patient selection, safety and outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were queried for publications reporting cases where transcatheter aspiration was used for endocarditis vegetation debulking or removal. Data on patient characteristics, outcomes and complications from select reports were extracted and systematically reviewed. RESULTS: Data from 11 publications with 232 patients were included in the final analyses. Of these, 124 had lead vegetation aspiration, 105 had valvular vegetation aspiration, and 3 had both lead as well as valvular vegetation aspiration. Among the 105 valvular endocarditis cases, 102 (97 %) patients had right sided vegetation removal. Patients with valvular endocarditis were younger (mean age 35 years) vs. patients with lead vegetations (mean age 66 years). Among the valvular endocarditis cases, there was a 50-85 % reduction in vegetation size, 14 % had worsening valvular regurgitation, 8 % had persistent bacteremia and 37 % required blood transfusion. Surgical valve repair or replacement was subsequently performed in 3 % and in-hospital mortality was 11 %. Among patients with lead infection, procedural success rate was reported at 86 %, 2 % had vascular complications and in-hospital mortality was 6 %. Persistent bacteremia, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and clinically significant pulmonary embolism occurred in about 1 % each. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aspiration of vegetations in infective endocarditis has acceptable success rates in vegetation debulking as well as rates of morbidity or mortality. Large prospective multi-center studies are warranted to determine predictors of complications, thus helping identify suitable patients.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Female , Humans , Adult , Aged , Prospective Studies , Vacuum Curettage , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Endocarditis, Bacterial/surgery , Endocarditis/diagnostic imaging , Endocarditis/surgery , Bacteremia/complications , Bacteremia/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adenosine is a coronary hyperemic agent used to measure invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) of intermediate severity coronary stenosis. AIM: To compare FFR assessment using adenosine with an alternate hyperemic agent, regadenoson. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of FFR. Data on FFR, correlation coefficient and adverse events from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed by means of random effects model. Two tailed P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 test. RESULTS: Five studies with 248 patients were included in the final analysis. All included patients and coronary lesions underwent FFR assessment using both adenosine and regadenoson. There was no significant mean difference between FFR measurement by the two agents [odds ratio (OR) = -0.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-0.02)-0.01, P = 0.88]. The cumulative correlation coefficient was 0.98 (0.96-0.99, P < 0.01). Three of five studies reported time to FFR with cumulative results favoring regadenoson (mean difference 34.31 s; 25.14-43.48 s, P < 0.01). Risk of adverse events was higher with adenosine compared to regadenoson (OR = 2.39; 95%CI: 1.22-4.67, P = 0.01), which most commonly included bradycardia and hypotension. Vast majority of the adverse events associated with both agents were transient. CONCLUSION: The performance of regadenoson in inducing maximal hyperemia was comparable to that of adenosine. There was excellent correlation between the FFR measurements by both the agents. The use of adenosine, was however associated with higher risk of adverse events and longer time to FFR compared to regadenoson.
ABSTRACT
Myocardial injury occurs in 20% to 30% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, and cardiovascular complications contribute to approximately 40% of all COVID-19-related deaths. Most cases of myocarditis related to COVID-19 infection occur in the acute phase of infection and are self-limited. We describe a case of delayed-onset fulminant myocarditis that developed 5 weeks after mild COVID-19 infection leading to cardiogenic shock and the need for mechanical circulatory support. Our case illustrates how myocarditis can occur as a late complication of COVID-19 infection, even in those with a mild initial course.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rotational and orbital coronary atherectomy (CA) are commonly utilized to treat complex calcified coronary lesions. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate sex differences in procedural complications and clinical outcomes after CA. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched for all studies comparing sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following CA. The outcomes of interest were procedural complications (coronary dissection, stroke, major bleeding, coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and slow or no flow in target vessel) and the clinical outcomes (including early mortality, mid-term all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. RESULTS: Six observational studies with 3517 patients (2420 men and 1035 women) were included in this meta-analysis. While there was no significant difference in the early mortality (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.37-3.53; P = 0.83) between men and women, at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in women (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49; P = 0.0009). Women had an increased risk of procedure-related stroke (RR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.06-14.90; P = 0.04), coronary dissection (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.58; P = 0.006), and bleeding (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.30-3.93; P = 0.004), whereas the rates of coronary perforation, cardiac tamponade, and the risk of slow or no flow in the revascularized artery were similar in both. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, women undergoing CA are at increased risk of mid-term mortality and procedure-related complications including stroke, coronary dissection, and major bleeding.
Subject(s)
Atherectomy, Coronary , Cardiac Tamponade , Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Injuries , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Stroke , Female , Humans , Male , Atherectomy, Coronary/adverse effects , Cardiac Tamponade/epidemiology , Cardiac Tamponade/etiology , Sex Characteristics , Heart Injuries/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Stroke/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
AIMS: Studies comparing outcomes of multivessel (MV) vs. culprit-vessel (CV) only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during index cardiac catheterization in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) have reported conflicting results. In this systematic review we aim to investigate outcomes with MV vs. CV-only revascularization strategies in patients with acute MI and CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing MV vs. CV PCI in patients with acute MI and CS. Data were extracted and pooled by means of random effects model. Primary outcome was early all-cause mortality (up to 30 days), while the secondary outcomes included late all-cause mortality (mean, 11.4 months), stroke, new renal replacement therapy, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and bleeding. Pooled odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated. A total of 16 studies enrolling 75 431 patients were included. The MV PCI was associated with higher risk of early mortality [OR 1.17, 95% CI (1.00-1.35); P = 0.04; NNH = 62], stroke [1.15 (1.03-1.29); P = 0.01; NNH = 351], and new renal replacement therapy [1.33 (1.06-1.67); P = 0.01; NNH = 61]; and with lower risk of repeat revascularization [0.61 (0.41-0.89); P = 0.01] when compared with CV PCI. No significant difference was observed in late-term mortality [1.02 (0.84-1.25); P = 0.84], risk of reinfarction [1.13 (0.94-1.35); P = 0.18], or bleeding [1.21 (0.94-1.55); P = 0.13] between groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with acute MI and CS, MV PCI during index cardiac catheterization was associated with higher risk of early mortality, stroke, and renal replacement therapy.