Factors Related to Ventilation Tube Extrusion Time in Children and Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting extrusion time in both children and adults with ventilation tube (VT) insertion, providing useful information for clinicians for better decision-making, follow strategy, and potentially improve clinical outcomes for these patients. METHODS: Data from patients receiving myringotomy with VT insertion from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2012, were retrospectively collected and analyzed by the end of 2018. Various factors, including age, gender, history of VT insertion, tympanogram, size of VT used, local finding of tympanic membrane, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and postoperative ear infection, were included and analyzed to examine the effects of these factors on extrusion time. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were included in this study (Child group-Adult group = 237:210). The overall average extrusion time was 225.85 days. In the subgroup analysis, the average time was 221.3 days and 231.0 days for children and adults, respectively. The results showed that the VT extrusion time was significantly longer in participants without a history of VT insertion and in those where larger sized VTs were inserted in both age-groups. Male gender had an influence on extrusion time in children. In addition, a history of VT insertion and VT size were determined to be factors related to extrusion before 12 months in children. CONCLUSION: History of VT insertion and VT size were significantly related to VT extrusion time in both children and adults and defined as factors associated with extrusion before 12 months in children. The findings suggest avoiding VT with a diameter < 1 mm and considering an appropriately larger size in patients with a history of VT insertion to optimize VT retention.

Factors Associated with the Underestimation of Manual CPAP Titration Pressure.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the use of in-laboratory positive airway pressure (PAP) titration studies was not routinely suggested. PAP pressure prediction calculations are emerging as alternative methods for the treatment of these patients. The underestimation of PAP titration pressure usually leads to unsatisfactory results for PAP therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with the underestimation of PAP titration pressure when using PAP pressure prediction equations. Estimated PAP pressure formulas based on body mass index (BMI) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were chosen to validate the accuracy of equations in the successful prediction of titration pressure. Among 341 adult patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by overnight polysomnography (PSG) and who received overnight PAP titration in order to select a successful pressure, the mean age of the total subjects was 55.4 years old and 78.9% of patients were male. The average BMI and AHI scores were 27.1 ± 4.8 and 37 ± 21.7, respectively. After multivariate stepwise regression analysis, the odds ratio of participants with a pretitration AHI was 1.017 (95% CI: 1.005-1.030). Only the severity of OSA was significantly different between the underestimated group and the adequately assessed group. In conclusion, a high AHI, but not BMI, is associated with an underestimated CPAP titration pressure in adult patients with OSA.

Effects of implants with steroids after endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis affects approximately 5%-2% of the general population worldwide. Steroid implants after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have drawn considerable interest for their cost savings, but relevant guidelines indicate that evidence on this topic is of low quality with high heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of steroid implants after ESS by synthesizing relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of potential references from five biomedical databases. They further extracted relevant data from the included studies, including (a) mean, standard deviation, or standard error for Lund-Kennedy endoscopic (LKE) score and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score and (b) events and sample sizes of each group for further intervention. Data were pooled in a random-effects model, and results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and I2 . RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (n = 853) were included and showed that the steroid implant group had lower LKE scores (WMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.75 to -0.62; I2  = 0%) and POSE scores (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.47 to -0.76; I2  = 48%) than the placebo implant group at postoperative week 2. Moreover, the reoperation rate in the steroid implant group was also lower than in the placebo implant group (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; I2  = 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in the postoperative oral steroid requirement between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, steroid implant decreases LKE and POSE among patients receiving ESS in the short term, but long-term effects remain unclear. Patient-based outcomes are worth further discussion in the future.

Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Packing of the nasal cavity has traditionally been used for postoperative bleeding control and decreasing synechia formation in patients undergoing nasal surgeries. Although absorbable nasal packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorbable nasal packing is still often used in nasal surgeries in various parts of the world. It is known to be associated with pain and discomfort especially upon and during removal, and previous reviews have only evaluated the effects of local anesthetic infiltration of nasal packing in septal surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases from their earliest record to April 27, 2019, randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials for review, and included only randomized controlled trials for data analysis. We included studies using topical anesthetics-infiltrated nasal packing following sinonasal surgeries and evaluated the effectiveness compared to placebo packing in pain reduction during postoperative follow up, as well as the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. RESULTS: Among 15 studies included for review, 9 studies involving 765 participants contributed to the meta-analysis. In terms of pain reduction, our analysis showed significant standard mean differences regarding effectiveness at postoperative 1, 12, 24 h interval for all surgical groups combined, in the sinus surgery group, as well as during nasal packing removal. There was no consistent evidence to support the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports anesthetics infiltration of nasal packing as an effective method in managing pain in patients with nasal packing after sinonasal surgeries. However, the level of evidence is low. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish its effectiveness in reducing anxiety. We believe this review is of great clinical significance due to the vast patient population undergoing sinonasal surgeries. Postoperative local hemorrhage remains the greatest concern for ear nose and throat surgeons due to the rich vasculature of the nose and sinuses. Sinonasal packing provides structural support and serves as an important measure for hemostasis and synechia formation. Although absorbable packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorable packing materials are still used in many countries due to lower cost. Infiltration of nasal packing with local anesthetic provides a solution to the discomfort, nasal pressure and nasal pain experienced commonly by the patients as evidenced by our analysis.

Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis / Efeito do tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos locais na dor e ansiedade pós-operatórias após cirurgias nasosinusais: revisão sistêmica e metanálise

Abstract Introduction: Packing of the nasal cavity has traditionally been used for postoperative bleeding control and decreasing synechia formation in patients undergoing nasal surgeries. Although absorbable nasal packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorbable nasal packing is still often used in nasal surgeries in various parts of the world. It is known to be associated with pain and discomfort especially upon and during removal, and previous reviews have only evaluated the effects of local anesthetic infiltration of nasal packing in septal surgeries. Objective: To evaluate the effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries Materials and methods: We searched the PubMed and Embase databases from their earliest record to April 27, 2019, randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials for review, and included only randomized controlled trials for data analysis. We included studies using topical anesthetics-infiltrated nasal packing following sinonasal surgeries and evaluated the effectiveness compared to placebo packing in pain reduction during postoperative follow up, as well as the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. Results: Among 15 studies included for review, 9 studies involving 765 participants contributed to the meta-analysis. In terms of pain reduction, our analysis showed significant standard mean differences regarding effectiveness at postoperative 1, 12, 24 h interval for all surgical groups combined, in the sinus surgery group, as well as during nasal packing removal. There was no consistent evidence to support the effectiveness in anxiety reduction. Conclusions: Our study supports anesthetics infiltration of nasal packing as an effective method in managing pain in patients with nasal packing after sinonasal surgeries. However, the level of evidence is low. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish its effectiveness in reducing anxiety. We believe this review is of great clinical significance due to the vast patient population undergoing sinonasal surgeries. Postoperative local hemorrhage remains the greatest concern for ear nose and throat surgeons due to the rich vasculature of the nose and sinuses. Sinonasal packing provides structural support and serves as an important measure for hemostasis and synechia formation. Although absorbable packing has been gaining popularity in the recent years, nonabsorable packing materials are still used in many countries due to lower cost. Infiltration of nasal packing with local anesthetic provides a solution to the discomfort, nasal pressure and nasal pain experienced commonly by the patients as evidenced by our analysis.

Resumo Introdução: O tamponamento da cavidade nasal tem sido usado tradicionalmente para controle do sangramento pós-operatório e diminuição da formação de sinéquia em pacientes submetidos a cirurgias nasais. Embora o tamponamento nasal absorvível tenha ganhado popularidade nos últimos anos, o tampão nasal não absorvível ainda é frequentemente usado em várias partes do mundo. Sabe-se que o tamponamento está associado a dor e desconforto, especialmente na sua remoção, e revisões anteriores avaliaram apenas os efeitos do tampão com anestésico local em cirurgias do septo nasal. Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito do tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos locais na dor e ansiedade pós-operatórias após cirurgias nasosinusais. Material e métodos: Para a revisão, pesquisamos nos bancos de dados PubMed e Embase desde o registro mais antigo até 27 de abril de 2019, incluímos ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados, a ensaios clínicos prospectivos controlados e apenas ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados para análise de dados. Incluímos estudos que usaram tamponamento nasal infiltrado com anestésicos tópicos após cirurgias nasosinusais e avaliamos a eficácia em comparação com o tamponamento com placebo na redução da dor durante o acompanhamento pós-operatório, bem como os efeitos na redução da ansiedade. Resultados: Entre os 15 estudos incluídos, 9, que envolveram 765 participantes, contribuíram para a metanálise. Em termos de redução da dor, nossa análise mostrou diferenças médias padrão significantes em relação à eficácia no pós-operatório nos intervalos de 1, 12, 24 horas para todos os grupos cirúrgicos combinados, no grupo da cirurgia sinusal e durante a remoção do tamponamento nasal. Não houve evidências consistentes para apoiar a eficácia na redução da ansiedade. Conclusões: Nosso estudo apoia o uso de tamponamentos nasais infiltrados com anestésicos locais como um método eficaz no tratamento da dor em pacientes após cirurgias nasosinusais. No entanto, o nível de evidência é baixo. São necessários mais ensaios clínicos randomizados de alta qualidade para estabelecer sua eficácia na redução da ansiedade. Acreditamos que esta revisão seja de grande significado clínico devido à vasta população submetida a cirurgias nasosinusais. A hemorragia local pós-operatória continua a ser a maior preocupação para os cirurgiões otorrinolaringológicos devido à rica vasculatura do nariz e seios nasais. O tamponamento nasosinusal fornece suporte estrutural e serve como uma medida importante para a hemostasia e formação de sinéquias. Embora o tamponamento absorvível tenha ganhado popularidade nos últimos anos, os materiais de tamponamento não absorvíveis ainda são usados em muitos países devido ao menor custo. A infiltração do tamponamento nasal com anestésicos locais fornece uma solução para desconforto, pressão e dor nasal comumente referida pelos pacientes, como evidenciado por nossa análise.

Effects of a P-glycoprotein modulator on the pharmacokinetics and distribution of free levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in rats.

Pharmacokinetics of free-form levobupivacaine (LB) and free-form racemic bupivacaine (BU) using microdialysis sampling technique were conducted in this study. Three microdialysis probes were implanted in the jugular vein toward the right atrium, brain striatum and bile duct of male Sprague-Dawley rats for concurrently sampling free drug. Effects of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on the brain distribution and hepatobiliary excretion of LB and BU were examined for the first time after cyclosporine (CsA) administration. LB and BU in samples were determined by HPLC. The blood pharmacokinetics of free LB and free BU were not significantly different. For brain pharmacokinetics, the CsA pretreatment raised significantly the area under curve (AUC) of BU (24.0+/-5.9 vs. 14.6+/-4.4min microg/mL, p=0.015). Brain regions concentrations of LB and BU were significantly higher than plasma concentrations of LB (p<0.001) and BU (p<0.001), respectively. The BU concentration of cerebral cortex was significant higher than that of striatum (6.06+/-1.03 vs. 4.04+/-0.90microg/mL, p=0.005) and hippocampus (6.06+/-1.03 vs. 4.45+/-1.07microg/mL, p=0.04), suggesting that BU might display an uneven brain distribution. For bile pharmacokinetics, LB and BU went through hepatobiliary excretion, and the AUC of BU was significantly higher than that of the LB group (6.6+/-1.0 vs. 4.6+/-0.6min microg/mL, p=0.005). In addition, the pretreatment of CsA significantly reduced the hepatobiliary excretion of BU in terms of AUC (4.4+/-0.8 vs. 6.6+/-1.0minmicrog/mL, p=0.003). Furthermore, the maximum concentration (C(max)) of BU diminished significantly as a result of the CsA pretreatment (0.10+/-0.03 vs. 0.20+/-0.05microg/mL, p=0.002). To sum up, enantioselective brain distribution and hepatobiliary excretion of free LB and free BU were observed, and P-gp may relate to the drug transport.