Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Very Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The possible advantage of hybrid closed-loop therapy (i.e., artificial pancreas) over sensor-augmented pump therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes is unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, crossover trial, we recruited children 1 to 7 years of age with type 1 diabetes who were receiving insulin-pump therapy at seven centers across Austria, Germany, Luxembourg, and the United Kingdom. Participants received treatment in two 16-week periods, in random order, in which the closed-loop system was compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy (control). The primary end point was the between-treatment difference in the percentage of time that the sensor glucose measurement was in the target range (70 to 180 mg per deciliter) during each 16-week period. The analysis was conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Key secondary end points included the percentage of time spent in a hyperglycemic state (glucose level, >180 mg per deciliter), the glycated hemoglobin level, the mean sensor glucose level, and the percentage of time spent in a hypoglycemic state (glucose level, <70 mg per deciliter). Safety was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 74 participants underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 5.6±1.6 years, and the baseline glycated hemoglobin level was 7.3±0.7%. The percentage of time with the glucose level in the target range was 8.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4 to 9.9) higher during the closed-loop period than during the control period (P<0.001). The mean adjusted difference (closed-loop minus control) in the percentage of time spent in a hyperglycemic state was -8.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.9 to -7.1), the difference in the glycated hemoglobin level was -0.4 percentage points (95% CI, -0.5 to -0.3), and the difference in the mean sensor glucose level was -12.3 mg per deciliter (95% CI, -14.8 to -9.8) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The time spent in a hypoglycemic state was similar with the two treatments (P = 0.74). The median time spent in the closed-loop mode was 95% (interquartile range, 92 to 97) over the 16-week closed-loop period. One serious adverse event of severe hypoglycemia occurred during the closed-loop period. One serious adverse event that was deemed to be unrelated to treatment occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid closed-loop system significantly improved glycemic control in very young children with type 1 diabetes, without increasing the time spent in hypoglycemia. (Funded by the European Commission and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03784027.).

Parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology to manage type 1 diabetes in very young children during a clinical trial: Qualitative study.

AIMS: To explore parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology when caring for a very young child with type 1 diabetes during a clinical trial. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with parents of 30 children (aged 1-7 years) participating in a trial (the KidsAP02 study) comparing hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery with sensor-augmented pump therapy. In both arms, parents had access to remote monitoring technology. Data analysis focused on identification of descriptive themes. RESULTS: Remote monitoring technology gave parents improved access to data which helped them pre-empt and manage glucose excursions. Parents observed how, when children were in their own care, they could be more absent while present, as their attention could shift to non-diabetes-related activities. Conversely, when children were others' care, remote monitoring enabled parents to be present while absent, by facilitating oversight and collaboration with caregivers. Parents described how remote monitoring made them feel more confident allowing others to care for their children. Parents' confidence increased when using a hybrid closed-loop system, as less work was required to keep glucose in range. Benefits to children were also highlighted, including being able to play and sleep uninterrupted and attend parties and sleepovers without their parents. While most parents welcomed the increased sense of control remote monitoring offered, some noted downsides, such as lack of respite from caregiving responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Remote monitoring can offer manifold benefits to both parents and very young children with type 1 diabetes. Some parents, however, may profit from opportunities to take 'time out'.

The automated pancreas: A review of technologies and clinical practice.

Insulin pumps and glucose sensors are effective in improving diabetes therapy and reducing acute complications. The combination of both devices using an algorithm-driven interoperable controller makes automated insulin delivery (AID) systems possible. Many AID systems have been tested in clinical trials and have proven safety and effectiveness. However, currently, none of these systems are available for routine use in children younger than 6 years in Europe. For continued use, both users and prescribers must have sound knowledge of the features of the individual AID systems. Presently, all systems require various user interactions (e.g. meal announcements) because fully automated systems are not yet developed. Open-source systems are non-regulated variants to circumvent existing regulatory conditions. There are risks here for both users and prescribers. To evaluate AID therapy, the metric data of the glucose sensors, 'time in target range' and 'glucose management index', are novel recognized and suitable parameters allowing a consultation based on real glucose and insulin pump download data from the daily life of people with diabetes. Read out via cloud-based software or automatic download of such individual treatment data provides the ideal technical basis for shared decision-making through telemedicine, which must be further evaluated for general use.

Clinical presentation and long-term outcome of patients with KCNJ11/ABCC8 variants: Neonatal diabetes or MODY in the DPV registry from Germany and Austria.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical presentation/longterm outcomes of patients with ABCC8/KCNJ11 variants in a large cohort of patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed patients in the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) registry with diabetes and pathogenic variants in the ABCC8/KCNJ11 genes. For patients with available data at three specific time-points-classification as K+ -channel variant, 2-year follow-up and most recent visit-the longitudinal course was evaluated in addition to the cross-sectional examination. RESULTS: We identified 93 cases with ABCC8 (n = 54)/KCNJ11 (n = 39) variants, 63 of them with neonatal diabetes. For 22 patients, follow-up data were available. Of these, 19 were treated with insulin at diagnosis, and the majority of patients was switched to sulfonylurea thereafter. However, insulin was still administered in six patients at the most recent visit. Patients were in good metabolic control with a median (IQR) A1c level of 6.0% (5.5-6.7), that is, 42.1 (36.6-49.7) mmol/mol after 2 years and 6.7% (6.0-8.0), that is, 49.7 (42.1-63.9) mmol/mol at the most recent visit. Five patients were temporarily without medication for a median (IQR) time of 4.0 (3.5-4.4) years, while two other patients continue to be off medication at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ABCC8/KCNJ11 variants should be suspected in children diagnosed with diabetes below the age of 6 months, as a high percentage can be switched from insulin to oral antidiabetic drugs. Thirty patients with diabetes due to pathogenic variants of ABCC8 or KCNJ11 were diagnosed beyond the neonatal period. Patients maintain good metabolic control even after a diabetes duration of up to 11 years.

Metabolic control during the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown in a large German cohort of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the DPV initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if metabolic control worsened during the SARS-CoV2 lockdown in spring 2020 in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Germany. METHODS: Data from 19,729 pediatric T1D patients from the diabetes prospective follow-up (DPV) registry were available. Data sets from four time-periods between January 1 and June 30, 2020, were compared with data from the whole year 2019 in the same patient; differences were adjusted for seasonality, increasing age, and longer diabetes duration. HbA1c values from laboratory measurements and estimates derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) were aggregated into a combined glucose indicator (CGI), expressed in analogy to HbA1c. RESULTS: Based on regression models adjusted for differences of sex, age, diabetes duration, and migratory background between the four time-periods, CGI values in 2020 were slightly higher than in 2019, for example, by 0.044% (0.042-0.046) (median [95% CI]) in the second lockdown month, time-period 3. Insulin dose and BMI-SDS were also marginally higher. In 2020, there were fewer hospitalizations (e.g., incidence risk ratio in time-period 3 compared with 2019: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.46-0.58]). In a subgroup of patients reporting CGM data in both years, metrics in 2020 improved: time in target increased, and mean sensor glucose fell, for example, by 2.8% (2.7-2.9), and by 4.4 mg/dl (4.3-4.6) in time-period 3. CONCLUSION: Before, during, and after the lockdown in spring 2020, metabolic control in youth with T1D in Germany did not differ significantly from the preceding year. Further effects of the ongoing pandemic on pediatric T1D patients need to be evaluated.

Parents' views about healthcare professionals having real-time remote access to their young child's diabetes data: Qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: We explored parents' views about healthcare professionals having remote access to their young child's insulin and glucose data during a clinical trial to inform use of data sharing in routine pediatric diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Interviews with 33 parents of 30 children (aged 1-7 years) with type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized trial (KidsAP02) comparing hybrid closed-loop system use with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. RESULTS: Parents reported multiple benefits to healthcare professionals being able to remotely access their child's glucose and insulin data during the trial, despite some initial concerns regarding the insights offered into everyday family life. Key benefits included: less work uploading/sharing data; improved consultations; and, better clinical input and support from healthcare professionals between consultations. Parents noted how healthcare professionals' real-time data access facilitated remote delivery of consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how these were more suitable for young children than face-to-face appointments. Parents endorsed use of real-time data sharing in routine clinical care, subject to caveats regarding data access, security, and privacy. They also proposed that, if data sharing were used, consultations for closed-loop system users in routine clinical care could be replaced with needs-driven, ad-hoc contact. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time data sharing can offer clinical, logistical, and quality-of-life benefits and enhance opportunities for remote consultations, which may be more appropriate for young children. Wider rollout would require consideration of ethical and cybersecurity issues and, given the heightened intrusion on families' privacy, a non-judgmental, collaborative approach by healthcare professionals.

Use of insulin pump therapy is associated with reduced hospital-days in the long-term: a real-world study of 48,756 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

In pediatric diabetes, insulin pump therapy is associated with less acute complications but inpatient pump education may lead to more hospital days. We investigated the number of hospital days associated with pump vs. injection therapy between 2009 and 2018 in 48,756 patients with type 1 diabetes < 20 years of age from the German Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV). Analyses were performed separately for hospitalizations at diagnosis (hierarchical linear models adjusted for sex, age, and migration), and for hospitalizations in the subsequent course of the disease (hierarchical Poisson models stratified by sex, age, migration, and therapy switch). At diagnosis, the length of hospital stay was longer with pump therapy than with injection therapy (mean estimate with 95% CI: 13.6 [13.3-13.9] days vs. 12.8 [12.5-13.1] days, P < 0.0001), whereas during the whole follow-up beyond diagnosis, the number of hospital days per person-year (/PY) was higher with injection therapy than with pump therapy (4.4 [4.1-4.8] vs. 3.9 [3.6-4.2] days/PY), especially for children under 5 years of age (4.9 [4.4-5.6] vs. 3.5 [3.1-3.9] days/PY).Conclusions: Even in countries with hospitalizations at diabetes diagnosis of longer duration, the use of pump therapy is associated with a reduced number of hospital days in the long-term. What is known: • In pediatric diabetes, insulin pump therapy is associated with better glycemic control and less acute complications compared with injection therapy. • However, pump therapy implies more costs and resources for education and management. What is new: • Even in countries where pump education is predominantly given in an inpatient setting, the use of pump therapy is associated with a reduced number of hospital days in the long-term. • Lower rates of hospitalization due to acute complications during the course of the disease counterbalance longer hospitalizations due to initial pump education.

Three-Variate Longitudinal Patterns of Metabolic Control, Body Mass Index, and Insulin Dose during Puberty in a Type 1 Diabetes Cohort: A Group-Based Multitrajectory Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the interrelationship of metabolic control, age- and sex-adjusted body mass index, and daily insulin dose and to identify heterogeneous multivariate developmental curves from childhood to young adulthood in a large cohort of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) STUDY DESIGN: Data were extracted from the diabetes follow-up registry DPV. Longitudinal data from 9239 participants with T1D age 8-18 years with diabetes duration ≥2 years and ≥5 years of follow-up were analyzed. We applied group-based multitrajectory modeling to identify latent groups of subjects following similar developmental curves across outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], age/sex-standardized body mass index [BMI-SDS], daily insulin dose per kg). Group number was based on Bayes information criterion and group size (≥5%). RESULTS: The group-based multitrajectory approach revealed 5 heterogeneous 3-variate trajectories during puberty. Individuals with stable good metabolic control, high-normal increasing BMI-SDS, and rising insulin dose patterns were classified as group 1 (33%). Group 2 (20%) comprised youths with intermediate-increasing HbA1c, low BMI-SDS, and steeply increasing insulin dose trajectories. Group 3 (11%) followed intermediate-rising HbA1c and high-normal increasing BMI-SDS developmental curves, while insulin dose increased steeply. In group 4 (14%), both high-increasing HbA1c and insulin dose trajectories were observed, while BMI-SDS was stable-normal. Group 5 (22%) included subjects with intermediate-rising HbA1c patterns, high-increasing BMI-SDS, and increasing insulin dose patterns. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 5 distinct 3-variate curves of HbA1c, BMI-SDS, and insulin dose during puberty among youths with T1D. This approach demonstrates a considerable heterogeneity highlighting the importance of personalized medical care.

International benchmarking in type 1 diabetes: Large difference in childhood HbA1c between eight high-income countries but similar rise during adolescence-A quality registry study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences and similarities in HbA1c levels and patterns regarding age and gender in eight high-income countries. SUBJECTS: 66 071 children and adolescents below18 years of age with type 1 diabetes for at least 3 months and at least one HbA1c measurement during the study period. METHODS: Pediatric Diabetes Quality Registry data from Austria, Denmark, England, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the United States, and Wales were collected between 2013 and 2014. HbA1c, gender, age, and duration were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Distribution of gender and age groups was similar in the eight participating countries. The mean HbA1c varied from 60 to 73 mmol/mol (7.6%-8.8%) between the countries. The increase in HbA1c between the youngest (0-9 years) to the oldest (15-17 years) age group was close to 8 mmol/mol (0.7%) in all countries (P < .001). Females had a 1 mmol/mol (0.1%) higher mean HbA1c than boys (P < .001) in seven out of eight countries. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of large differences in the mean HbA1c between countries, a remarkable similarity in the increase of HbA1c from childhood to adolescence was found.

Pharmacotherapy of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with autoimmune type 1 diabetes has changed tremendously in the last 20 years with the knowledge of DCCT trial regarding near-normal glucose levels on the micro- and macrovascular outcome. Intensified insulin therapy is now standard of care. Carb counting however was introduced systematically only recently in several countries. In industrialized countries most patients in this age group are treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin injections. Nowadays this is combined with continuous subcutaneous glucose measurement commencing sensor-augmented pump therapy. Predictive low glucose suspend reduces the frequency of hypoglycemic events. Still not available for children is a commercially available closed loop system. However, treatment goals are still frequently not reached especially in the group of adolescents. Therefore several additive drugs are tested to improve treatment results. There are new insulins with faster and longer action profile in the pipeline to better mimic physiologic insulin profiles. Smart insulins may be able to mimic reaction on blood sugar levels. The broad facet of treatment modalities helps pediatric diabetes teams to individualize therapy and so improve patients' health-related quality of life.

Pharmacotherapy of Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Increasing obesity and overweight has led to increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in adolescents and young adults all over the world. Overweight naturally reduces insulin sensitivity. The following permanent insulin resistance can be found even in younger obese children. Beta-cell insufficiency following high insulin production over years leads to impaired glucose tolerance and later type 2 diabetes mellitus. In children and adolescents, the diagnosis of T2D is often made by screening very obese patients with oral glucose tolerance test. Usually in these patients, few or no diabetes symptoms are found. As frequently found in pediatric pharmacotherapy, only a few of the modern substances used in adults are available for pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The essential change in lifestyle for weight reduction is difficult in this age group with often rather disappointing results.

Review of Leipzig protocol for intravenous insulin infusion in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes during intercurrent illness and surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous intravenous (IV) insulin infusion therapy minimizes blood glucose (BG) fluctuations and prevents metabolic deterioration in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) during intercurrent illness and surgery. However, data on the adequate fluid and insulin substitution in this situation is rare. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of IV insulin therapy according to our local protocol. METHODS: Retrospective study of 124 cases of hospitalization with IV insulin therapy because of intercurrent illness (n = 78) or minor surgery (n = 46) in 62 patients with T1D (mean age: 9.6 ± 5.4 years). The patients received a glucose-electrolyte infusion and short-acting insulin (normal insulin). Infusion rate was adapted according to the BG measured hourly. Glycemic control was analyzed in subgroups subdivided by age, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and reason for hospitalization. RESULTS: Mean infusion time was 22 hours (range 1.5-147 hours). In 65% of the infusion time, patients' BG was within the target range (4-8 mmol/L). Critical events (BG <3 or > 15 mmol/L) were found in 6% of the infusion time. Comparison of glycemic control in subgroups for HbA1c and the reason for hospitalization revealed no significant differences. However, patients aged <12 years exhibited significant more critical events, primarily hypoglycemia compared to adolescents (hypoglycemia/case 2.4 ± 2.7 vs 0.9 ± 2.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol for IV insulin therapy proved to be appropriate for adequate glycemic control in pediatric patients with T1D during intercurrent illness and surgery. However, the regime seems to be more suitable in adolescents. We adapted our protocol in younger patients with reduction of the insulin dose.

Comparing clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with pancreatic diabetes to patients with type 1 diabetes: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Only few studies have been conducted on pancreatic diabetes and data from large epidemiological studies are missing. Our main objective was to study the most important differences and similarities between pediatric individuals with pancreatic diabetes and type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Patients <20 years of age were identified from the diabetes patient follow-up registry (DPV). Data of the most recent treatment year between January 2000 and March 2018 were aggregated. Propensity score was used to match individuals with pancreatic diabetes to individuals with T1D. Matching was conducted one-to-one by sex, age, diabetes duration, body mass index SD score (BMI-SDS), and migration background. RESULTS: We studied 731 individuals with pancreatic diabetes and 74 460 with T1D. In the matched cohort of 631 pairs, HbA1c was significantly lower in pancreatic diabetes (7.4% [95% confidence interval: 7.2; 7.5%]) compared to T1D patients (8.7% [8.5; 8.8%]). Daily insulin dose (0.80 IU/kg [0.77; 0.84] vs 0.86 IU/kg [0.82; 0.90]) and insulin pump use (13.3% [10.7; 16.4] vs 22.1% [19.0; 25.6%]) were lower in patients with pancreatic diabetes. However, event rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar between pancreatic and T1D patients (8.8 [5.4; 14.2] vs 9.6 [5.9; 15.6] events per 100 patient years). CONCLUSIONS: With the use of robust epidemiological data, our study improves the knowledge on clinical characteristics in pediatric individuals with pancreatic diabetes. Moreover, our results serve as a basis to reconsider treatment options and for discussing clinical practice guidelines for patients with this rare medical condition.

Reduced burden of diabetes and improved quality of life: Experiences from unrestricted day-and-night hybrid closed-loop use in very young children with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experiences of families with very young children aged 1 to 7 years (inclusive) with type 1 diabetes using day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of 20 children aged 1 to 7 years with type 1 diabetes completed a closed-loop experience survey following two 3-week periods of unrestricted day-and-night hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy using Cambridge FlorenceM system at home. Benefits, limitations, and improvements of closed-loop technology were explored. RESULTS: Responders reported reduced burden of diabetes management, less time spent managing diabetes, and improved quality of sleep with closed-loop. Ninety percent of the responders felt less worried about their child's glucose control using closed-loop. Size of study devices, battery performance and connectivity issues were identified as areas for improvement. Parents/caregivers wished for more options to input information to the system such as temporary glucose targets. CONCLUSIONS: Parents/caregivers of very young children reported important quality of life benefits associated with using closed-loop, supporting adoption of this technology in this population.

Glycated hemoglobin A1c as a risk factor for severe hypoglycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of severe hypoglycemia related to glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in a population-based cohort of pediatric type 1 diabetes patients during two time periods since 1995. METHODS: The association between HbA1c levels and severe hypoglycemia (defined as requiring assistance from another person) or hypoglycemic coma (loss of consciousness or seizures) was analyzed by multivariable regression analysis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the DPV Diabetes Prospective Follow-up in Germany and Austria in 1995-2003 (n = 15 221 patients) and 2004-2012 (n = 22 318 patients). RESULTS: Mean adjusted rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma decreased from 19.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.95-20.48] and 4.36 (3.93-4.83) per 100 patient-years in 1995-2003 to 15.01 (14.18-15.88) and 2.15 (1.94-2.39) in 2004-2012, respectively (p < 0.001). From the first to the second period, the relative risk (RR) for severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma per 1% lower HbA1c decreased from 1.22 (1.15-1.30) to 1.06 (1.01-1.12) and from 1.27 (1.15-1.40) to 1.04 (0.94-1.16), respectively. Risk of severe hypoglycemia and coma declined most in patients with HbA1c levels of 6-6.9% (RR 0.70 and 0.43, respectively) and with HbA1c of 7-7.9% (RR 0.63 and 0.38, respectively). Mean HbA1c levels fell from 8.4% in 1995-2003 to 8.2% in 2004-2012, while the use of insulin pumps, short- and long-acting insulin analogs, and glucose monitoring increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to 1995-2003, low HbA1c has become a minor risk factor for severe hypoglycemia and coma in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes in the 2004-2012 period.

Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Importance: Insulin pump therapy may improve metabolic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes, but the association with short-term diabetes complications is unclear. Objective: To determine whether rates of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis are lower with insulin pump therapy compared with insulin injection therapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based cohort study conducted between January 2011 and December 2015 in 446 diabetes centers participating in the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Initiative in Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg. Patients with type 1 diabetes younger than 20 years and diabetes duration of more than 1 year were identified. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses with age, sex, diabetes duration, migration background (defined as place of birth outside of Germany or Austria), body mass index, and glycated hemoglobin as covariates were used to account for relevant confounders. Exposures: Type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy or with multiple (≥4) daily insulin injections. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rates of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis during the most recent treatment year. Secondary outcomes included glycated hemoglobin levels, insulin dose, and body mass index. Results: Of 30 579 patients (mean age, 14.1 years [SD, 4.0]; 53% male), 14 119 used pump therapy (median duration, 3.7 years) and 16 460 used insulin injections (median duration, 3.6 years). Patients using pump therapy (n = 9814) were matched with 9814 patients using injection therapy. Pump therapy, compared with injection therapy, was associated with lower rates of severe hypoglycemia (9.55 vs 13.97 per 100 patient-years; difference, -4.42 [95% CI, -6.15 to -2.69]; P < .001) and diabetic ketoacidosis (3.64 vs 4.26 per 100 patient-years; difference, -0.63 [95% CI, -1.24 to -0.02]; P = .04). Glycated hemoglobin levels were lower with pump therapy than with injection therapy (8.04% vs 8.22%; difference, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.22 to -0.13], P < .001). Total daily insulin doses were lower for pump therapy compared with injection therapy (0.84 U/kg vs 0.98 U/kg; difference, -0.14 [-0.15 to -0.13], P < .001). There was no significant difference in body mass index between both treatment regimens. Similar results were obtained after propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses in the entire cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: Among young patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin pump therapy, compared with insulin injection therapy, was associated with lower risks of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis and with better glycemic control during the most recent year of therapy. These findings provide evidence for improved clinical outcomes associated with insulin pump therapy compared with injection therapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Use of insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and its impact on metabolic control: comparison of results from three large, transatlantic paediatric registries.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: While the use of insulin pumps in paediatrics has expanded dramatically, there is still considerable variability among countries in the use of pump technology. The present study sought to describe differences in metabolic control and pump use in young people with type 1 diabetes using data collected in three multicentre registries. METHODS: Data for the years 2011 and 2012 from 54,410 children and adolescents were collected from the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up Registry (DPV; n = 26,198), T1D Exchange (T1DX; n = 13,755) and the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA; n = 14,457). The modality of insulin delivery, based on age, sex and ethnic minority status, and the impact of pump use on HbA1c levels were compared. RESULTS: The overall mean HbA1c level was higher in the NPDA (8.9 ± 1.6% [74 ± 17.5 mmol/mol]) than in the DPV (8.0 ± 1.6% [64 ± 17.0 mmol/mol], p < 0.001) and T1DX (8.3 ± 1.4% [68 ± 15.4 mmol/mol], p < 0.001). Conversely, pump use was much lower in the NPDA (14%) than in the DPV (41%, p < 0.001) and T1DX (47%, p < 0.001). In a pooled analysis, pump use was associated with a lower mean HbA1c (pump: 8.0 ± 1.2% [64 ± 13.3 mmol/mol] vs injection: 8.5 ± 1.7% [69 ± 18.7 mmol/mol], p < 0.001). In all three registries, those with an ethnic minority status were less likely to be treated with a pump (p < 0.001) and boys were treated with a pump less often compared with girls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Despite similar clinical characteristics and proportion of minority participants, substantial differences in metabolic control exist across the three large transatlantic registries of paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes, which appears to be due in part to the frequency of insulin pump therapy.

GAD65 antigen therapy in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The 65-kD isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) is a major autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. We hypothesized that alum-formulated GAD65 (GAD-alum) can preserve beta-cell function in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We studied 334 patients, 10 to 20 years of age, with type 1 diabetes, fasting C-peptide levels of more than 0.3 ng per milliliter (0.1 nmol per liter), and detectable serum GAD65 autoantibodies. Within 3 months after diagnosis, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three study treatments: four doses of GAD-alum, two doses of GAD-alum followed by two doses of placebo, or four doses of placebo. The primary outcome was the change in the stimulated serum C-peptide level (after a mixed-meal tolerance test) between the baseline visit and the 15-month visit. Secondary outcomes included the glycated hemoglobin level, mean daily insulin dose, rate of hypoglycemia, and fasting and maximum stimulated C-peptide levels. RESULTS: The stimulated C-peptide level declined to a similar degree in all study groups, and the primary outcome at 15 months did not differ significantly between the combined active-drug groups and the placebo group (P=0.10). The use of GAD-alum as compared with placebo did not affect the insulin dose, glycated hemoglobin level, or hypoglycemia rate. Adverse events were infrequent and mild in the three groups, with no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GAD-alum did not significantly reduce the loss of stimulated C peptide or improve clinical outcomes over a 15-month period. (Funded by Diamyd Medical and the Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00723411.).

Association between IgE-mediated allergies and diabetes mellitus type 1 in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by an immunological reaction that is dominated by type-1 T helper (Th1) cells, whereas immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergies are associated with Th2 cell. According to the Th1/Th2-hypothesis, the immune system is said to either develop into the direction of Th1 or Th2 cells. This would mean that a child developing T1DM is unlikely to develop an IgE-mediated allergy and vice versa. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the prevalence of T1DM and IgE-mediated allergies. METHODS: We designed a prospective case control study with 94 children and adolescents with T1DM and 188 age- and sex-matched control children. The basis of our investigations was a questionnaire concerning the family and children's history as to the presence of IgE-mediated allergies. Moreover, the following blood investigations were done: total serum IgE, specific IgE antibodies to major inhalant allergens, and a multiplex cytokine analysis measuring levels of specific cytokines representing either Th1- or Th2- cytokines. RESULTS: Children with T1DM reported the presence of IgE-mediated allergies significantly more often than children of the control group. Children with T1DM had significantly higher tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) levels than healthy controls. Levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6 were higher in the groups of children with the presence of a personal history of allergies, regardless of the presence of T1DM. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that T1DM is associated with a higher risk of a self-reported presence of IgE-mediated allergies and that the Th1/Th2-hypothesis may be an oversimplification.