Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 102(3): 282-293, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695168

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We identified risk factors and outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy in a universally tested population according to disease severity and validated information on SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy in national health registers in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cohort study using data from national registers and medical records including all pregnancies between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. We compared women with a validated positive SARS-CoV-2 test during pregnancy with non-infected pregnant women. Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes were assessed by Poisson and Cox regression models and stratified according to disease severity defined by hospital admission status and admission reason (COVID-19 symptoms or other). Using medical record data on actual period of pregnancy, we calculated predictive values of the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in pregnancy in the registers. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 1819 (1.6%) of 111 185 pregnancies. Asthma was associated with infection (relative risk [RR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.07). Risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospital admission were high body mass index (median ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09), asthma (RR 7.47, 95% CI 3.51-15.90) and gestational age at the time of infection (gestational age 28-36 vs < 22: RR 3.53, 95% CI 1.75-7.10). SARS-CoV-2-infected women more frequently had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.64), early pregnancy loss (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.88), preterm delivery before gestational age 28 (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.26), iatrogenically preterm delivery before gestational age 37 (aHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19) and small-for-gestational age children (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.54). The associations were stronger among women admitted to hospital for any reason. The validity of the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in relation to pregnancy in the registers compared with medical records showed a negative predictive value of 99.9 (95% CI 99.9-100.0) and a positive predictive value of 82.1 (95% CI 80.4-83.7). CONCLUSIONS: Women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy were at increased risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, early pregnancy loss, preterm delivery and having children small for gestational age. The validity of Danish national registers was acceptable for identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Asthma , COVID-19 , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth , Infant, Newborn , Child , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Premature Birth/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Patient Acuity
2.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(11): 2097-2110, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34467518

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Assessing the risk factors for and consequences of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy is essential to guide clinical care. Previous studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy have been among hospitalized patients, which may have exaggerated risk estimates of severe outcomes because all cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pregnant population were not included. The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors for and outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy independent of severity of infection in a universally tested population, and to identify risk factors for and outcomes after severe infection requiring hospital admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective population-based cohort study in Denmark using data from the Danish National Patient Register and Danish Microbiology Database and prospectively registered data from medical records. We included all pregnancies between March 1 and October 31, 2020 and compared women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test during pregnancy to non-infected pregnant women. Cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy were both identified prospectively and through register linkage to ensure that all cases were identified and that cases were pregnant during infection. Main outcome measures were pregnancy, delivery, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Severe infection was defined as hospital admission due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms. RESULTS: Among 82 682 pregnancies, 418 women had SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, corresponding to an incidence of 5.1 per 1000 pregnancies, 23 (5.5%) of which required hospital admission due to COVID-19. Risk factors for infection were asthma (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% CI 1.41-3.41) and being foreign born (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.70-2.64). Risk factors for hospital admission due to COVID-19 included obesity (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.00-7.51), smoking (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.58-13.90), infection after gestational age (GA) 22 weeks (GA 22-27 weeks: OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.16-12.29; GA 28-36 weeks: OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.60-14.12), and having asthma (OR 4.53, 95% CI 1.39-14.79). We found no difference in any obstetrical or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 in 20 women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy required admission to hospital due to COVID-19. Risk factors for admission comprised obesity, smoking, asthma, and infection after GA 22 weeks. Severe adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy were rare.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , Young Adult
3.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 25(1): 37-42, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821047

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The primary purpose of the study was to investigate a possible association between uterine fibroids and time to pregnancy (TTP), and, secondly, to explore the effect of myomectomy on TTP.Methods: This historical cohort study used data from the Danish National Birth Cohort and the Danish National Patient Registry. The study population consisted of 86,323 women with 92,696 pregnancies. The main outcome was TTP; groups were compared using a binary outcome: TTP >12 months or TTP ≤12 months.Results: Women who had a fibroid diagnosis code before attempting to conceive (n = 92) had an increased risk of TTP >12 months compared with women without a fibroid diagnosis code (n = 87,358) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 6.68). Women who had a fibroid diagnosis code after pregnancy (n = 963) also had an increased risk of TTP >12 months compared with women without a fibroid diagnosis code (adjusted OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.04, 1.47).Conclusion: We found an association between having a uterine fibroid diagnosis code and TTP >12 months. We were not able to make a valid assessment of the effect of myomectomy on TTP.


Subject(s)
Leiomyoma/physiopathology , Time-to-Pregnancy/physiology , Uterine Myomectomy/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Neoplasms/physiopathology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Female , Humans , Leiomyoma/surgery , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery
4.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 29(9): 839-42, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23855353

ABSTRACT

This is a retrospective study to investigate whether motivational interviewing increases weight loss among obese or overweight women prior to fertility treatment. Women with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) approaching the Fertility Clinic, Regional Hospital Skive, were given advice about diet and physical activity with the purpose of weight loss. In addition, they were asked if they wanted to receive motivational interviewing. Among other data, age, height and weight were obtained. Main outcomes were weight loss measured in kg and decrease in BMI. We studied 187 women: 110 received sessions of motivational interviewing (intervention group, n = 110), 64 received motivational support by phone or e-mail only and 13 women did not wish any motivational support (control group, n = 77). The mean weight loss and decrease in BMI was greater in the intervention group compared with the control group (9.3 kg versus 7.3 kg, difference p = 0.01, 3.3 kg/m(2) versus 2.6 kg/m(2), difference p = 0.02). The mean period of intervention was comparable in the two groups, 7.9 month and 7.3 month, respectively, (difference non significant: NS). The study indicates that motivational interviewing may be a valuable tool in weight loss programs for obese and overweight women prior to fertility treatment.


Subject(s)
Infertility/therapy , Motivational Interviewing/methods , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Prenatal Care/methods , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Infertility/complications , Obesity/complications , Overweight/complications , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Weight Reduction Programs
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 183(19)2021 05 10.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998455

ABSTRACT

Some pregnant women use capsaicin patches placed on the lower back as pain relief during labour. The effect of prescription capsaicin patches for treatment of neuropathic pain is pharmacologically documented. There are no studies on the effect of capsaicin patches on labour pain. In this case report, capsaicin patches placed on the lower back prevented epidural analgesia during labour and spinal anaesthesia for suturing of perineal rupture due to oedema and erythema of the skin. Due to lack of evidence, neuraxial anaesthesia after the use of capsaicin patches on the lower back are contraindicated.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesia, Obstetrical , Labor Pain , Labor, Obstetric , Capsaicin , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
6.
BMJ Open ; 10(2): e032104, 2020 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32071172

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the association between clinically significant uterine fibroids and preterm birth, caesarean section (CS), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), placental abruption, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and uterine rupture. METHODS, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A historical cohort study based on data from the Danish National Birth Cohort, the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Birth Registry (DNBR). The final study population consisted of 92 696 pregnancies and was divided into four groups for comparison. Group 1: pregnancies of women without a fibroid diagnosis code or fibroid operation code; group 2: pregnancies of women with a fibroid diagnosis code before pregnancy, during pregnancy or up to 1 year after delivery, and no fibroid operation code before pregnancy; group 3: pregnancies of women with a fibroid diagnosis code given more than 1 year after delivery; and group 4: pregnancies of women with a fibroid operation code given before pregnancy. RESULTS: A diagnosis of fibroids before pregnancy yielded an increased risk of preterm birth (gestational age (GA) ≤37 weeks) (OR 2.27 (1.30─3.96)) and extreme preterm birth (GA 22+0─27+6 weeks, OR 20.09 (8.04─50.22)). The risk of CS was increased (OR 1.83 (1.23─2.72)) for women with a fibroid diagnosis code given before pregnancy; significantly increased risk of elective CS (OR 1.92 (1.11─3.32)), but not acute CS (OR 1.54 (0.94─2.52)). The risks of PPH, placental abruption or IUGR were not increased in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: We found a strong association between clinically significant uterine fibroids and preterm birth, and an association between clinically significant uterine fibroids and CS. In contrast, no association between clinically significant uterine fibroids and PPH, placental abruption or IUGR was seen.


Subject(s)
Leiomyoma/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology , Abruptio Placentae/epidemiology , Adult , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Humans , Leiomyoma/diagnosis , Leiomyoma/surgery , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Uterine Myomectomy/methods , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Rupture/epidemiology
7.
Health Econ Rev ; 8(1): 21, 2018 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30194567

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this review was to evaluate the methodological design in studies reporting resource use and costs related to robotic surgery in gynecology. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database for relevant studies before May 2016. The quality of the methodological design was assessed with items regarding methodology from the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). The systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two relevant studies were included. None of the reviewed studied fully complied with the CHEERS methodological checklist. Background and objectives, Target population and subgroups and Setting and location were covered in sufficient details in all studies whereas the Study perspective, Justification of the time horizon, Discount rate, and Estimating resources and costs were covered in less than 50%. Most of the studies (29/32) used the health care sector perspective whereas the societal perspective was applied in three studies. The time horizon was stated in 18/32 of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of studies evaluating costs of robotic surgery was low. The longest follow-up was 4 months and in general, the use of detailed cost data were lacking in most of the investigations. Key determinants, such as purchasing, maintenance costs of the robotic platform, and the use of surgical equipment, were rarely reported. If health care cost analyses lack transparency regarding cost drivers included it may not provide a true foundation for decision-making.

8.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 180(38)2018 Sep 17.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30259843

ABSTRACT

Septic abortion is a rare, but potentially life-threatening condition. Quick diagnosis and treatment is essential for the outcome. This case report describes a healthy 34-year-old woman who was admitted with abdominal pain, fever and an ongoing spontaneous abortion at gestational age week 13 + 6 days. During evacuation severe bleeding and coagulopathy was seen. She was treated with multiple coagulation products but due to a life-threatening situation an acute hysterectomy was performed. She was discharged after nine days.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Septic , Abortion, Septic/drug therapy , Abortion, Septic/surgery , Abortion, Septic/therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/complications , Blood Coagulation Disorders/therapy , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL