The prognostic and predictive role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (FoxP3 + and CD8 +) and tumor-associated macrophages in early HER2 + breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In HER2-positive (HER2 +) breast cancer, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may influence the efficacy of the HER2-antibody trastuzumab and the patient's outcome. In this HER2 + patient cohort, our aim was to study the numbers of FoxP3 + regulatory TILs and CD8 + cytotoxic TILs, their correlations with CD68 + and CD163 + TAMs, and the prognostic and predictive value of the studied factors. METHODS: We evaluated 139 non-metastatic HER2 + breast cancer patients operated between 2001 and 2008. The FoxP3+TIL count (FoxP3+TILs) was assessed using the hotspot method, and the CD8 + TIL count (CD8+mTILs) utilizing a digital image analysis from invasive margin areas. The ratios between CD8+mTILs and FoxP3+TILs as well as CD8+mTILs and TAMs were calculated. RESULTS: FoxP3 + TILs and CD8 + mTILs correlated positively with each other (p<0.001). FoxP3+TILs had a positive correlation with CD68+and CD163+TAMs (p≤0.038), while CD8 + mTILs correlated only with CD68+TAMs (p<0.001). In the HER2 + and hormone receptor-positive Luminal B subgroup, high numbers of FoxP3+TILs were associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (54% vs. 79%, p = 0.040). The benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab was extremely significant among patients with a high CD8 + mTILs/CD68 + TAMs ratio, with overall survival (OS) 84% vs. 33% (p = 0.003) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) 88% vs. 48% (p = 0.009) among patients treated with or without trastuzumab, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the HER2 + Luminal B subgroup, high FoxP3 + TILs were associated with shorter DFS. A high CD8 + mTILs/CD68 + TAMs ratio seems to associate with impressive efficacy of trastuzumab.

A practical prognostic peripheral blood-based risk model for the evaluation of the likelihood of a response and survival of metastatic cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Less than half of unselected metastatic cancer patients benefit from the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Systemic cancer-related inflammation may influence the efficacy of ICIs and thus, systemic inflammatory markers could have prognostic and/or predictive potential in ICI therapy. Here, we aimed to identify a combination of inflammation-related laboratory parameters to establish a practical prognostic risk model for the pretreatment evaluation of a response and survival of ICI-treated patients with different types of metastatic cancers. METHODS: The study-cohort consisted of a real-world patient population receiving ICIs for metastatic cancers of different origins (n = 158). Laboratory parameters determined before the initiation of the ICI treatment were retrospectively collected. Six inflammation-related parameters i.e., elevated values of neutrophils, platelets, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and the presence of anemia, were each scored with one point, giving 0-6 risk points for each patient. The patients with information of all these six parameters (n = 109) were then stratified into low-risk (0-3 points) and high-risk (4-6 points) groups. The overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) according to the risk scores were determined. RESULTS: The risk model was strongly associated with the outcome of the patients. The ORR to ICI treatment in the high-risk group was 30.3% in comparison to 53.9% in the low-risk group (p = 0.023). The medians for OS were 10.0 months and 27.3 months, respectively (p < 0.001), and the corresponding medians for PFS were 3.9 months and 6.3 months (p = 0.002). The risk group remained as a significant prognostic factor for both OS (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.64-5.64, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.04-3.06, p = 0.035) in the Cox multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a readily feasible, practical risk model consisted of six inflammation-related laboratory parameters as a tool for outcome prediction in metastatic cancer patients treated with ICIs. The risk model was strongly associated with the outcome of the patients in terms of all the evaluated indicators i.e., ORR, OS and PFS. Yet, further studies are needed to validate the risk model.

Peritumoral ADC values in breast cancer: region of interest selection, associations with hyaluronan intensity, and prognostic significance.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the differences in peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values by four different ROI selection methods and to validate the optimal method. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate if the peritumor-tumor ADC ratios are correlated with axillary lymph node positivity and hyaluronan accumulation. METHODS: Altogether, 22 breast cancer patients underwent 3.0-T breast MRI, histopathological evaluation, and hyaluronan assay. Paired t and Friedman tests were used to compare minimum, mean, and maximum values of tumoral and peritumoral ADC by four methods: (M1) band ROI, (M2) whole tumor surrounding ROI, (M3) clockwise multiple ROI, and (M4) visual assessment of ROI selection. Subsequently, peritumor/tumor ADC ratios were compared with hyaluronan levels and axillary lymph node status by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found among the four ROI selection methods regarding minimum, mean, or maximum values of tumoral and peritumoral ADC. Visual assessment ROI measurements represented the less time-consuming evaluation method for the peritumoral area, and with sufficient accuracy. Peritumor/tumor ADC ratios obtained by all methods except the clockwise ROI (M3) showed a positive correlation with hyaluronan content (M1, p = 0.004; M2, p = 0.012; M3, p = 0.20; M4, p = 0.025) and lymph node metastasis (M1, p = 0.001; M2, p = 0.007; M3, p = 0.22; M4, p = 0.015), which are established factors for unfavorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the peritumor/tumor ADC ratio could be a readily applicable imaging index associated with axillary lymph node metastasis and extensive hyaluronan accumulation. It could be related to the biological aggressiveness of breast cancer and therefore might serve as an additional prognostic factor. KEY POINTS: • Out of four different ROI selection methods for peritumoral ADC evaluation, measurements based on visual assessment provided sufficient accuracy and were the less time-consuming method. • The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio can provide an easily applicable supplementary imaging index for breast cancer assessment. • A higher peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was associated with axillary lymph node metastasis and extensive hyaluronan accumulation and might serve as an additional prognostic factor.

Antibiotic Treatment is an Independent Poor Risk Factor in NSCLC But Not in Melanoma Patients Who had Received Anti-PD-1/L1 Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment may reduce the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by disrupting gut microbiome. We aimed to study the association of antibiotics and survival outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 222 melanoma and 199 NSCLC patients had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy in 5 Finnish hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from hospital and national medical records. RESULTS: There were 32% of melanoma and 31% of NSCLC patients who had received antibiotic treatment (ABT) 3 months before to 1 month after the first anti-PD-1/L1 antibody infusion. In survival analyses, early antibiotic treatment was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (ABT 19.2 [17.6-43.7] vs. no ABT 35.6 [29.3-NA] months, P = .033) but not with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (ABT 5.8 [3.0-12.6] vs. no ABT 10.2 [7.7-15.3] months, P = .3) in melanoma patients and with inferior OS (ABT 8.6 [6.4-12.3] vs. no ABT 18.5 [15.1-21.6] months, P < .001) and PFS (ABT 2.8 [2.1-4.5] vs. no ABT 5.6 [4.4-8.0] months, P = .0081) in NSCLC patients. In multivariable analyses, ABT was not an independent risk-factor for inferior OS and PFS in melanoma but was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12 [1.37-3.28]) and PFS (HR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]) in NSCLC after adjusted for other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early ABT was an independent poor risk factor in NSCLC patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy but not in melanoma patients. The weight of ABT as a poor risk factor might depend on other prognostic factors in different cancers.

Peritumor to tumor apparent diffusion coefficient ratio is associated with biologically more aggressive breast cancer features and correlates with the prognostication tools.

PURPOSE: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is increasingly used to characterize breast cancer. The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio is suggested to be a reliable and generally applicable index. However, its overall prognostication value remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the associations between the peritumor/tumor ADC ratio and histopathological biomarkers and published prognostic tools in patients with invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 88 lesions (five bilateral) in 83 patients with primary invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. The lowest intratumoral mean ADC value on the slice with the largest tumor cross-sectional area was designated the tumor ADC, and the highest mean ADC value on the peritumoral breast parenchymal tissue adjacent to the tumor border was designated the peritumor ADC. The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was then calculated. The tumor and peritumor ADC values and peritumor/tumor ADC ratios were compared with histopathological parameters using an unpaired t test, and their correlations with published prognostic tools were evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was significantly associated with tumor size (p<0.001), histological grade (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (p = 0.006), axillary-lymph-node metastasis (p = 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006), but was not associated with estrogen receptor status (p = 0.931), progesterone receptor status (p = 0.160), or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (p = 0.259). The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio showed moderate positive correlations with the Nottingham Prognostic Index (r = 0.498, p<0.001) and mortality predicted using PREDICT (r = 0.436, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The peritumor/tumor ADC ratio was correlated with histopathological biomarkers in patients with invasive breast cancer, showed significant correlations with published prognostic indexes, and may provide an easily applicable imaging index for the preoperative prognostic evaluation of breast cancer.

UDP-sugar accumulation drives hyaluronan synthesis in breast cancer.

Increased uptake of glucose, a general hallmark of malignant tumors, leads to an accumulation of intermediate metabolites of glycolysis. We investigated whether the high supply of these intermediates promotes their flow into UDP-sugars, and consequently into hyaluronan, a tumor-promoting matrix molecule. We quantified UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) and UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcUA) in human breast cancer biopsies, the levels of enzymes contributing to their synthesis, and their association with the hyaluronan accumulation in the tumor. The content of UDP-GlcUA was 4 times, and that of UDP-GlcNAc 12 times higher in the tumors as compared to normal glandular tissue obtained from breast reductions. The surge of UDP-GlcNAc correlated with an elevated mRNA expression of glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase 2 (GFAT2), one of the key enzymes in the biosynthesis of UDP-GlcNAc, and the expression of GFAT1 was also elevated. The contents of both UDP-sugars strongly correlated with tumor hyaluronan levels. Interestingly, hyaluronan content did not correlate with the mRNA levels of the hyaluronan synthases (HAS1-3), thus emphasizing the role of the UDP-sugar substrates of these enzymes. The UDP-sugars showed a trend to higher levels in ductal vs. lobular cancer subtypes. The results reveal for the first time a dramatic increase of UDP-sugars in breast cancer, and suggest that their high supply drives the accumulation of hyaluronan, a known promoter of breast cancer and other malignancies. In general, the study shows how the disturbed glucose metabolism typical for malignant tumors can influence cancer microenvironment through UDP-sugars and hyaluronan.