Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent Thrombosis Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides intra-procedural guidance in optimizing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in stent implantation. However, current data on the benefit of IVUS during PCI in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is mixed. We performed meta-analysis pooling available data assessing IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in STEMI patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed and Embase for studies comparing IVUS versus angiography-guided PCI in STEMI. Mantel-Haenszel random effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies including 336,649 individuals presenting with STEMI were included for the meta-analysis. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 60 months. We found significant association between IVUS-guided PCI with lower risk for MACE (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.90) compared with angiography-guided PCI. We also found significant association between IVUS-guided PCI with lower risk for death, MI, TVR, and in-hospital mortality but not ST. CONCLUSION: In our meta-analysis, IVUS-guided compared with angiography-guided PCI was associated with improved long-term and short-term clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.

Age-Stratified Sex Disparities in Care and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Women are undertreated and have worse clinical outcomes than men after acute myocardial infarction. It remains uncertain whether the sex disparities in treatments and outcomes persist in the contemporary era and whether they affect all age groups equally. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) registry, we evaluated 1,260,200 hospitalizations for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) between 2010 and 2016, of which 32% were for women. The age-stratified sex differences in care measures and mortality were examined. Stepwise multivariable adjustment models, including baseline comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and reperfusion and revascularization therapies, were used to compare measures and outcomes between women and men across different age subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, women with STEMI were older than men and had more comorbidities. Women were less likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass surgery across all age subgroups. Women with STEMI overall experienced higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.039, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003-1.077), which persisted after multivariable adjustments. However, when stratified by age, the difference in mortality became non-significant in most age groups after stepwise multivariable adjustment, except among the youngest patients 19-49 years of age with STEMI (women vs men: 3.9% vs 2.6%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.259, 95% confidence interval: 1.083-1.464). CONCLUSIONS: Women with STEMI were less likely to receive reperfusion and revascularization therapies and had higher in-hospital mortality and complications compared with men. Younger women with STEMI (19-49 years of age) experienced higher in-hospital mortality that persisted after multivariable adjustment.

Relation Between Cardiology Follow-Up Visits, Evidence-Based Statin Prescribing, and Statin Adherence (from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System).

Statin use remains suboptimal in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We assessed whether outpatient care with a cardiology provider is associated with evidence-based statin prescription and statin adherence. We identified patients with ASCVD aged ≥18 years receiving primary care in 130 facilities and associated community-based outpatient clinics in the entire Veterans Affairs Health Care System between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014. Patients were divided into: (1) patients with at least 1 outpatient cardiology visit and (2) patients with no outpatient cardiology visits in the year before the index primary care visit. We assessed any- and high-intensity statin prescription adjusting for several patient- and facility-level covariates, and statin adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC). We included 1,249,061 patients with ASCVD (mean age: 71.9 years; 98.0% male). After adjusting for covariates, patients who visited a cardiology provider had greater odds of being on a statin (87.4% vs 78.4%; Odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 1.26), high-intensity statin (34.5% vs 21.2%; OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.22), and higher statin adherence (mean PDC 0.76 ± 0.29 vs 0.70 ± 0.34, PDC ≥0.8: 62.0% vs 57.3%; OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.11). A dose response relation was seen with a higher number of cardiology visits associated with a higher statin use and statin adherence. In conclusion, compared with outpatient care delivered by primary care providers alone, care delivered by a cardiology provider for patients with ASCVD is associated with a higher likelihood of guideline-based statin use and statin adherence.