Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 16: 80, 2015 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26055269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports high prevalence of periodontitis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Several renal factors have been proposed as possible modifiers of periodontitis pathogenesis in this population. In this cross sectional study, we investigated whether distinct microbial profiles in renal patients could explain high periodontitis prevalence. METHODS: We characterized the subgingival microbiome in 14 End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and 13 control individuals with chronic periodontitis with similar demographic and clinical parameters. Medical, demographic and periodontal parameters were recorded. Subgingival biofilm samples were collected from the deepest pocket in two different quadrants and characterized via 454-pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. RESULTS: We found 874 species-level operational taxonomic units (OTU) across samples. Renal and control groups did not differ in the individual proportions of periodontitis-associated taxa. However, in principal coordinate plots of distance among samples based on OTU prevalence, some renal patients clustered apart from controls, with the microbial communities of these outlier subjects showing less diversity. Univariate correlation analysis showed a significant negative correlation between dialysis vintage and community diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Within the study limitations, dialysis vintage was associated with a less diverse periodontal microbial community in ESRD suggesting the need for further research.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/microbiology , Microbiota/genetics , Periodontium/microbiology , RNA, Bacterial/analysis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/analysis , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Periodontitis/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dysbiosis/complications , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Renal Dialysis , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Time Factors
2.
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad ; 35(2): 307-312, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422827

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vascularized (VBG) and non-vascularized (NVBG) bone grafting are two crucial biological reconstructive techniques in the management of bone tumours. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of reconstruction with vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts after resection of bone tumours. METHODS: A systematic evaluation of the literature from 2012-2021 was undertaken using the online databases PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library considering only comparative articles with specific outcomes for the restoration of the defect with vascularized and non-vascularized bone graft following the resection of bone tumours. The quality of the research methodology was evaluated using Oxford Quality Scoring System and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized trials and non-randomized comparison research respectively. The SPSS version 23 was used to examine the data that was collected. Musculoskeletal tumour society score (MSTS), bone union time, and complications were the outcomes of this review. RESULTS: Four clinical publications were considered, totalling 178 participants (92 men and 86 women) with 90 patients with VBG and 88 with NVBG. MSTS score and bone union time were the key outcomes that were measured. The overall MSTS (p>0.05) and rate of complications (p>0.05) results were comparable between the two groups, however, VBG had a better rate of bone union (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of the quicker bone union, our systematic evaluation demonstrated that VBG causes earlier recovery. Complication rates and functional results were the same in both groups. The link between the bone union time and functional score following VBG and NVBG must also be demonstrated.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Male , Humans , Female , Treatment Outcome , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL