Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Mid-Level Constrained and Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,674 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Mid-level constraint polyethylene designs provide additional stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the survivorship and reason for revision between mid-level inserts and posterior-stabilized (PS) used in primary TKA and (2) evaluate the biomechanical constraint characteristics of mid-level inserts. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of primary TKA performed at our institution from 2016 to 2019 using either PS or mid-level constrained inserts from 1 of 6 manufacturers. Data elements included patient demographics, implants, reasons for revision, and whether a manipulation under anesthesia was performed. We performed finite element analyses to quantify the varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint of each mid-level constrained insert. A one-to-one propensity score matching was conducted between the patients with mid-level and PS inserts to match for variables, which yielded 2 cohorts of 3,479 patients. RESULTS: For 9,163 PS and 3,511 mid-level TKAs, survivorship free from all-cause revision was estimated up to 5 years and was lower for mid-level than PS inserts (92.7 versus 94.1%, respectively, P = .004). When comparing each company's mid-level insert to the same manufacturer's PS insert, we found no differences in all-cause revision rates (P ≥ .91) or revisions for mechanical problems (P ≥ .97). Using propensity score matching between mid-level and PS groups, no significant differences were found in rates of manipulation under anesthesia (P = .72), all-cause revision (P = .12), revision for aseptic loosening (P = .07), and revision for instability (P = .45). Finite element modeling demonstrated a range in varus/valgus constraint from ±1.1 to >5°, and a range in axial-rotation constraint from ±1.5 to ±11.5° among mid-level inserts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite wide biomechanical variations in varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint, we found minimal differences in early survivorship rates between PS and mid-level constrained knees.

Diagnostic Utility and Thresholds for Commonly Obtained Serum and Synovial Markers Prior to Reimplantation in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of persistent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) during 2-stage exchange remains a challenge. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance and thresholds of several commonly obtained serum and synovial markers to better guide reimplantation timing. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 249 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange with antibiotic spacers for PJI. Serum and synovial markers analyzed included white blood cell (WBC) count, polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Serum markers analyzed were erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), as well as percentage change in ESR and CRP from initial diagnosis to reimplantation. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy of detecting PJI. RESULTS: In TKAs, synovial ANC and WBC had the highest AUCs (0.76), with thresholds of 2,952 and 3,800 cells/µL, respectively. The next best marker was serum CRP (0.73) with a threshold of 5.2 mg/dL. In THAs, serum CRP had the highest AUC (0.84) with a threshold of 4.3 mg/dL, followed by synovial PMN% (0.80) with a threshold of 77%. Percentage change in serum ESR or CRP provided low diagnostic value overall. CONCLUSION: Regarding serum markers, CRP consistently performed well in detecting persistent PJI in patients with antibiotic spacers. Absolute values of serum CRP and ESR had better diagnostic value than trends for guiding reimplantation timing. Diagnostic performance differed with joint type; however, synovial markers outperformed serum counterparts. No marker alone can be utilized to diagnose residual PJI in these patients, and further work is needed in this domain.

Synovial Fluid Absolute Neutrophil Count and Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio are not Superior to Polymorphonuclear Percentage in Detecting Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Serum and synovial biomarkers are currently used to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown promise as an inexpensive test in diagnosing infection, but there are no reports of synovial NLR or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) for diagnosing chronic PJI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of both markers. METHODS: A retrospective review of 730 patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty and subsequent aspiration was conducted. Synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%), synovial NLR, synovial ANC, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum WBC, serum PMN%, serum NLR, and serum ANC had their utility in diagnosing PJI examined by area-under-the-curve analyses (AUC). Pairwise comparisons of AUCs were performed. RESULTS: The AUCs for synovial WBC, PMN%, NLR, and ANC were 0.84, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively. Synovial fluid ANC was a superior marker to synovial NLR (P = .027) and synovial WBC (P = .003) but not PMN% (P = .365). Synovial NLR was inferior to PMN% (P = .006) but not different from synovial WBC (P > .05). The AUCs for serum ESR, CRP, WBC, PMN%, NLR, and ANC were 0.70, 0.79, 0.63, 0.72, 0.74, and 0.67, respectively. Serum CRP outperformed all other serum markers (P < .05) except for PMN% and NLR (P > .05). Serum PMN% and NLR were similar to serum ESR (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Synovial ANC had similar performance to PMN% in diagnosing chronic PJI, whereas synovial NLR was a worse diagnostic marker. The lack of superiority to synovial PMN% limits the utility of these tests compared to established criteria.

The Influence of Dorr Type and Femoral Fixation on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines report moderate evidence for cementing femoral stems for hip fractures, mainly derived from hemiarthroplasty literature. This is the first large, nonregistry study examining the influence of femoral fixation, implant type, patient characteristics, and radiographic factors on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for acute femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed of 709 THA cases (199 cemented, 510 cementless) for femoral neck fractures from 2006 to 2020 at three large academic institutions. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and radiographs were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated for multiple outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with P ≤ .05 denoting significance. RESULTS: Cementless stems had a higher all-cause aseptic femoral revision rate (5.1 versus 0.5%, P = .002) and periprosthetic femoral fracture rate (4.3 versus 0%, P = .001). Each successive Dorr type had a higher fracture rate with cementless implants: 2.3%, 3.7%, and 15.9% in Dorr A, B, and C, respectively (P < .001). Logistic regression analyses confirmed that cementless stems (P = .02) and Dorr C bone (P = .001) are associated with periprosthetic fractures; collared implants and prophylactic cables did not protect against fractures. There was no difference in rates of dislocation, septic revision, or mortality between groups. CONCLUSION: Cementless stems during THA for femoral neck fractures have a higher aseptic femoral revision rate, specifically for periprosthetic fractures. Dorr C bone was particularly prone with an alarmingly high fracture rate. All fractures occurred in cementless cases, suggesting that cemented stems may minimize this complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Reduced Infection Rate After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Extended Oral Antibiotic Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The optimal postoperative antibiotic duration has not been determined for aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) where the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is 3%-7.5%. This study compared PJI rates in aseptic R-TKA performed with extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) to published rates. METHODS: Aseptic R-TKAs consecutively performed between 2013 and 2017 at a tertiary care referral center in the American Midwest were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were administered intravenous antibiotics while hospitalized and discharged on 7-day oral antibiotic prophylaxis. Infection rates and antibiotic-related complications were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of the 176 analysis patients were female, with an average age of 64 years and body mass index of 35 kg/m2. Instability and aseptic loosening comprised 86% of revision diagnoses. Overall, 87.5% of intraoperative cultures were negative, and the remainder were single positive cultures considered contaminants. PJI rates were 0% at 90 days, 1.8% (95% confidence interval 0.4%-5.3%) at 1 year, and 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.6%-5.7%) at mean follow-up of approximately 3 years (range, 7-65 months). CONCLUSION: EOAP after aseptic R-TKA resulted in a PJI rate equivalent to primary TKA, representing a 2- to-4-fold decrease compared with published aseptic R-TKA infection rates. Further study on the benefits and costs of EOAP after aseptic R-TKA is encouraged.

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Extended Oral Antibiotics Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in High-Risk Cases: 3855 Patients With 1-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Surgical and host factors predispose patients to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While surgical factors are modifiable, host factors can be challenging, and there are limited data demonstrating that preoperative patient optimization decreases risk of PJI. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the one-year infection rate in high-risk patients. METHODS: A total of 3855 consecutive primary THAs and TKAs performed between 2011 and 2019 at a suburban academic hospital with modern perioperative and infection-prevention protocols were retrospectively reviewed. Beginning in January 2015, a 7-day oral antibiotic prophylaxis protocol was implemented after discharge for patients at high risk for PJI. The percentage of high-risk patients diagnosed with PJI within 1 year was compared between groups that did and did not receive extended antibiotic prophylaxis. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed, with P ≤ .05 denoting statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall 1-year infection rates were 2.26% and 0.85% after THA and TKA, respectively. High-risk patients with extended antibiotic prophylaxis had a significantly lower rate of PJI than high-risk patients without extended antibiotic prophylaxis (0.89% vs 2.64%, respectively; P < .001). There was no difference in the infection rate between high-risk patients who received antibiotics and low-risk patients (0.89% vs 1.29%, respectively; P = .348) with numbers available. CONCLUSION: Extended postoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis for 7 days led to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in 1-year infection rates of patients at high risk for infection. In fact, the PJI rate in high-risk patients who received antibiotics was less than the rate seen in low-risk patients. Thus, extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis may be a simple measure to effectively counteract poor host factors. Moreover, the findings of this study may mitigate the incentive to select healthier patients in outcome-based reimbursement models. Further study with a multicenter randomized control trial is needed to further validate this protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

External Validation Demonstrates Limited Clinical Utility of a Preoperative Prognostic Calculator for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative calculation of treatment failure risk in patients undergoing surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is imperative to allow for medical optimization and targeted prevention. A preoperative prognostic model for PJI treatment failure was previously developed, and this study sought to externally validate the model. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 380 PJIs treated at two institutions. The model was used to calculate the risk of treatment failure, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for each institution. RESULTS: When applying this model to institution 1, an AUC of 0.795 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.693-0.897) was found, whereas institution 2 had an AUC of 0.592 (95% CI: 0.502-0.683). Comparing all institutions in which the model had been applied to, we found institution 2 represented a significantly sicker population and different infection profile. CONCLUSION: In this cohort study, we externally validated the prior published model for institution 1. However, institution 2 had a decreased AUC using the prior model and represented a sicker and less homogenous cohort compared with institution 1. When matching for chronicity of the infection, the AUC of the model was not affected. This study highlights the impact of comorbidities and their distributions on PJI prognosis and brings to question the clinical utility of the algorithm which requires further external validation.

Do Antibiotic-Impregnated Intramedullary Dowels Assist in Eradicating Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Antibiotic-impregnated intramedullary dowels historically have been advocated and are frequently used to facilitate periprosthetic knee infection eradication. They are used for focused delivery of antibiotics into the femoral and tibial intramedullary canals during 2-stage resection utilizing an antibiotic cement spacer. However, the literature is limited on the use and efficacy of antibiotic-eluding intramedullary dowels in periprosthetic joint infection. We reviewed the available literature and have found that the data at this point are equivocal with respect to whether antibiotic-impregnated cement intramedullary dowels augment the intra-articular antibiotic cement spacer in eradicating infection in total knee arthroplasty. Thus, we believe that the decision to use dowels can be left up to the surgeon preference. However, further research is warranted to review operative room efficiency and healthcare costs, and to validate the clinical efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated dowels in periprosthetic joint infection.

Failure After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Antibiotics in the Cement Spacer.

BACKGROUND: Failure after a 2-stage exchange surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is high. Previous studies demonstrated that positive cultures at reimplantation are associated with failure afterward. The aim of this multicenter study was to define the role of antibiotics in the cement spacer in relation to reimplantation cultures and subsequent failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2-stage exchange procedures between 2000 and 2015. Culture-negative PJIs, cases in which no cultures were obtained during reimplantation, and cases without data on cement spacers were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four cases were included. The rate of positive cultures during reimplantation was 9.5% for cement spacers containing a glycopeptide (27/284) (with or without an aminoglycoside) vs 21.7% for those containing monotherapy with an aminoglycoside (13/60) (P = .008), and was mostly attributed by a reduction in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (17% vs 2%, P < .001). The failure rate was >2-fold higher at 40.0% (16/40) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 15.8% (48/304) for those with negative cultures (P < .001). Overall, a glycopeptide in the cement spacer was not associated with a lower failure rate (18% vs 23%, P = .3), but was associated with lower failure due to CoNS (2.5% vs 13.3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a 2-stage exchange procedure for PJI, adding a glycopeptide to the cement spacer reduces the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation and is associated with a lower failure rate due to CoNS afterward.

Surgical Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Fate of Spacer Exchanges.

BACKGROUND: Patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergoing 2-stage exchange arthroplasty may undergo an interim spacer exchange for a variety of reasons including mechanical failure of spacer or persistence of infection. The objective of this study is to understand the risk factors and outcomes of patients who undergo spacer exchange during the course of a planned 2-stage exchange arthroplasty. METHODS: Our institutional database was used to identify 533 patients who underwent a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI, including 90 patients with a spacer exchange, from 2000 to 2017. A retrospective review was performed to extract relevant clinical information. Treatment outcomes included (1) progression to reimplantation and (2) treatment success as defined by a Delphi-based criterion. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were performed to investigate whether spacer exchange was associated with failure. Additionally, a propensity score analysis was performed based on a 1:2 match. RESULTS: A spacer exchange was required in 16.9%. Patients who underwent spacer exchanges had a higher body mass index (P < .001), rheumatoid arthritis (P = .018), and were more likely to have PJI caused by resistant (0.048) and polymicrobial organisms (P = .007). Patients undergoing a spacer exchange demonstrated lower survivorship and an increased risk of failure in the multivariate and propensity score matched analysis compared to patients who did not require a spacer exchange. DISCUSSION: Despite an additional load of local antibiotics and repeat debridement, patients who underwent a spacer exchange demonstrated poor outcomes, including failure to undergo reimplantation and twice the failure rate. The findings of this study may need to be borne in mind when managing patients who require spacer exchange.

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Disease Modifying Agents, and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: What Does a Joint Surgeon Need to Know?

The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is 1.6× greater than in patients undergoing the same procedure for osteoarthritis. This higher risk "may" be due to the immunosuppressive therapies for RA patients including corticosteroids, such as prednisone, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate. There is a debate about the role of DMARDs in increasing the incidence of subsequent PJI. Studies show conflicting results, with some demonstrating no significant increase in the rates of PJI and some finding otherwise. The International Consensus Meeting on PJI recommended that DMARDs should be halted prior to an elective total joint arthroplasty based on their half-life. Moreover, the International Consensus Meeting stated that cessation of immunosuppressant medications should be performed in consultation with and under the direction of the treating physician. In this review, we aimed to provide an introduction to the available treatment options and cover the recommendations on the treatment protocols for RA patients who undergo elective total joint arthroplasty.

Infection Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Is the Main Cause of Litigation: Data From One Metropolitan Area.

BACKGROUND: A prior survey of members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons revealed that 78% of responding surgeons were named as a defendant in at least 1 lawsuit, and 69% of these lawsuits were dismissed or settled out of court. The most common sources of litigation were nerve injury, limb-length discrepancy, and infection. This study examined common reasons for lawsuits after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in a single metropolitan area. METHODS: A retrospective review of lawsuits filed between 2009 and 2015 in a 5-county metropolitan area was performed, including 30 hospitals and 113 TJA surgeons. Complaints underwent a manual review to determine the number of lawsuits and the specific allegations filed against each surgeon. RESULTS: Thirty-one (27.4%) surgeons were named as a defendant in at least 1 lawsuit. Eighty-three total lawsuits were filed during the period, 50 of which were dismissed or settled outside of court. Top reasons for lawsuits were, in descending order, infection, nerve injury, chronic pain, vascular injury, periprosthetic fracture, retention of foreign body, dislocation, limb-length discrepancy, venous thromboembolism, loosening, compartment syndrome, and other medical complaints. CONCLUSION: Infection appears to be the basis of most lawsuits after TJA. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for a lawsuit for complications and should strive to better communicate with patients regarding preoperative informed consent and disclosure after adverse events. Surgeons should minimize performing surgery in patients at high risk of complications, such as patients with a higher likelihood of developing postoperative infection or patients on chronic pain medications.

Tourniquetless Total Knee Arthroplasty With Modern Perioperative Protocols Decreases Pain and Opioid Consumption in Women.

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether a modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) protocol without a tourniquet results in less patient-reported pain and in-hospital opioid consumption compared to TKA with a tourniquet. METHODS: A retrospective study of 203 primary unilateral cemented TKAs consecutively performed with or without tourniquet was performed. Identical perioperative pain and blood loss protocols were used in all cases. In tourniquetless TKAs, the tourniquet was not inflated at any time, and sterile CO2 gas compression maximized cement interdigitation. RESULTS: After exclusions for scientific confounds, 184 TKAs (93 with tourniquet; 91 tourniquetless) were analyzed. Controlling for multiple covariates, females with a tourniquet reported significantly more pain (P = .002) and opioid consumption (P < .001) the first 24 hours after surgery compared to females without a tourniquet. There were no differences in pain (P = .192) or amount of opioids consumed (P = .203) among males with and without a tourniquet. Tourniquet use resulted in a significant reduction in blood loss for both females (P ≤ .040) and males (P ≤ .020), although the total blood savings of approximately 200 mL is of unknown clinical significance. CONCLUSION: Avoiding tourniquet use during TKA for females may be a relatively risk-free adjunct to minimize opioid consumption during hospitalization. Further study is warranted to elucidate the factors accounting for different outcomes in females and males.

Increased Complications for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although it has been shown that anxiety and depression are associated with increased complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the outcomes of TJA in patients with a history of psychosis are unknown. This study evaluated the influence of bipolar and schizophrenic disorders on complications after TJA, particularly aseptic and septic revisions. METHODS: A retrospective review of 156 TJAs (125 primaries and 31 revisions) was performed at a single institution from 2000 to 2015. Bipolar and schizophrenic patients were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes or by those actively taking anti-psychotic medications, followed by manual chart review to confirm diagnoses. The psychosis patient cohort was matched 3:1 for a variety of factors. Revisions and readmissions were evaluated. Survivorship curves were generated. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder had an increased odds of developing peri-prosthetic joint infection at 90 days (odds ratio [OR] 3.34, P = .049), 2 years (OR 3.94, P = .004), and at any time point (OR 4.32, P = .002). Psychosis patients had increased odds of aseptic and mechanical revisions at all endpoints, particularly from dislocation. Psychosis patients had a higher number of post-operative emergency department visits (P < .001), and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bipolar affective disorder or schizophrenia may have multiple barriers to self-care after TJA, and are at an increased risk for undergoing revision TJA for prosthetic joint infection and mechanical causes. Increased pre-operative education and screening of this patient population may be necessary prior to performing TJA.

Development and Evaluation of a Prognostic Calculator for the Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative identification of patients at risk of failing surgical treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is imperative to allow medical optimization and targeted prevention. The purpose of this study was to create a preoperative prognostic calculator for PJI treatment by assessing a patient's individual risk for treatment failure based on many preoperative variables. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 1438 PJIs, treated at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2014. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. A total of 63 risk factors, including patient characteristics, microbiology data, and surgical variables were evaluated using logistic regression, in which coefficients were scaled to produce weighted scores. RESULTS: The 10 significant risk factors for PJI treatment failure were in descending order of relative weight: irrigation and debridement (30 points), history of myocardial infarction (15 points), revision surgery (11 points), presence of sinus tract (10 points), resistant organisms (9 points), ever smoker (6 points), prior surgery (2.86 points per prior operation), synovial white blood cell count (8.3 × natural log of cell count), body mass index (0.66 per increment), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (depends on both smoking and 2 stage, as these are higher order interaction factors). The area under the curve for this risk model was 0.6904 (95% confidence interval: 0.6476-0.7331). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort study, we were able to identify risk factors and their relative weight for predicting PJI treatment failure. Some of the identified factors are indeed modifiable and should be addressed before treating a patient for PJI.

Culturing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Number of Samples, Growth Duration, and Organisms.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the difficulty isolating microorganisms in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), current guidelines recommend that 3-5 intraoperative samples be cultured and maintained for 3-14 days. We investigated (1) the optimal number of culture samples and growth duration to diagnose PJI and (2) the microbiology profile at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of 711 patients (329 hips, 382 knees) with PJI that met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria from 2000 to 2014 was performed. Two thousand two hundred ninety aerobic and anaerobic cultures were analyzed. A manual chart review collected demographic, surgical, and microbiological data. Microbiology profiles were trended. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Obtaining 5 samples provided the greatest yield positive cultures for diagnosing PJI. The percentage of positive cultures overall was 62.6% and stratified by organism type: antibiotic resistant (80.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (76.0%), gram negative (58.9%), Pseudomonas (52.0%), variant PJI organisms (28.2%), Propionibacterium acnes (20.0%), and Escherichia coli (8.0%). Although most organisms were cultured in 5 days or less, 10.8 days were needed for Propionibacterium acnes, 6.6 for variant PJI organisms, and 5.2 for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. At 3 days, only 42.2% of cultures turned positive compared with 95.0% at 8 days. There was a significant decrease in time in gram-positive PJIs and an increase in culture-negative PJIs. CONCLUSION: The optimal number of cultures and growth duration depended on the type of organism. This study provides evidence that 5 samples should be obtained and held for at least 8 days given that the type of organisms is likely to be unknown at the time of surgery.

Cefazolin Prophylaxis for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Obese Patients Are Frequently Underdosed and at Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: One of the most effective prophylactic strategies against periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is administration of perioperative antibiotics. Many orthopedic surgeons are unaware of the weight-based dosing protocol for cefazolin. This study aimed at elucidating what proportion of patients receiving cefazolin prophylaxis are underdosed and whether this increases the risk of PJI. METHODS: A retrospective study of 17,393 primary total joint arthroplasties receiving cefazolin as perioperative prophylaxis from 2005 to 2017 was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (underdosed and adequately dosed) based on patient weight and antibiotic dosage. Patients who developed PJI within 1 year following index procedure were identified. A bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders and identify risk factors for PJI. RESULTS: The majority of patients weighing greater than 120 kg (95.9%, 944/984) were underdosed. Underdosed patients had a higher rate of PJI at 1 year compared with adequately dosed patients (1.51% vs 0.86%, P = .002). Patients weighing greater than 120 kg had higher 1-year PJI rate than patients weighing less than 120 kg (3.25% vs 0.83%, P < .001). Patients who were underdosed (odds ratio, 1.665; P = .006) with greater comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.259; P < .001) were more likely to develop PJI at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin underdosing is common, especially for patients weighing more than 120 kg. Our study reports that underdosed patients were more likely to develop PJI. Orthopedic surgeons should pay attention to the weight-based dosing of antibiotics in the perioperative period to avoid increasing risk of PJI.

The Alpha-Defensin Test for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in the Setting of an Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Secondary to a Failed Metal-on-Metal Bearing or Corrosion at the Head-Neck Junction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) secondary to a failed metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing or corrosion at the head-neck junction in a metal-on-polyethylene bearing, ruling in or out periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging. Alpha-defensin has emerged as an accurate test for PJI. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of the alpha-defensin synovial fluid test in detecting PJI in patients with ALTR. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 26 patients from 3 centers with ALTR that had an alpha-defensin test performed. Patients were assessed for PJI using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Thirteen of these subjects had MoM total hip arthroplasty, 9 had ALTR secondary to head-neck corrosion, and 4 had MoM hip resurfacing. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 26 patients met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. However, 9 hips were alpha-defensin positive, including 1 true positive and 8 that were falsely positive (31%). All 8 of the false positives were also Synovasure positive, although 5 of 8 had an accompanying warning stating the results may be falsely positive due to a low synovial C-reactive protein value. CONCLUSION: Similar to synovial fluid white blood cell count, alpha-defensin testing is prone to false-positive results in the setting of ALTR. Therefore, we recommend an aggressive approach to ruling out PJI including routine aspiration of all hips with ALTR before revision surgery to integrate the synovial fluid blood cell count, differential, cultures and adjunctive tests like alpha-defensin to allow for accurate diagnosis preoperatively.

Determining the Role and Duration of the "Antibiotic Holiday" Period in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty involves resection and reimplantation of new implants at a later stage. An antibiotic-free period is often advocated by surgeons before reimplantation. However, there is no conclusive evidence supporting the utility or duration of this practice. This study evaluated the utility and optimal duration of the antibiotic-free period before reimplantation. METHODS: Electronic infection databases of 2 institutions were retrospectively reviewed from 2000 to 2014 to identify 785 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty, of which 409 were reimplanted without any surgeries between the first and second stage. Total joint arthroplasties that met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The antibiotic holiday period was defined as the time period off antibiotics before reimplantation. Treatment success was defined according to the Delphi consensus criteria. A multivariate analysis and Fisher exact test were performed. RESULTS: The duration of the antibiotic-free period was not significantly associated with reinfection following reimplantation after controlling for potential confounders, including joint involvement, gender, institution, and comorbidities. However, the duration of spacer implantation was significantly associated with reinfection. Of the patients who failed treatment, 41.5% failed on antibiotics while 58.5% failed during the antibiotic-free period at a mean of 26.1 days. CONCLUSION: The duration of an antibiotic-free period does not appear to significantly affect PJI rate after reimplantation. However, many patients fail during the antibiotic-free period. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of reimplantation for 2-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI treatment.