Obstetric outcomes in women with rheumatic disease and COVID-19 in the context of vaccination status.

OBJECTIVE: To describe obstetric outcomes based on COVID-19 vaccination status, in women with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) who developed COVID-19 during pregnancy. METHODS: Data regarding pregnant women entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry from 24 March 2020-25 February 2022 were analysed. Obstetric outcomes were stratified by number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received prior to COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. Descriptive differences between groups were tested using the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 73 pregnancies in 73 women with RMD and COVID-19. Overall, 24.7% (18) of pregnancies were ongoing, while of the 55 completed pregnancies, 90.9% (50) of pregnancies resulted in livebirths. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 60.3% (n = 44) of women were unvaccinated, 4.1% (n = 3) had received one vaccine dose while 35.6% (n = 26) had two or more doses. Although 83.6% (n = 61) of women required no treatment for COVID-19, 20.5% (n = 15) required hospital admission. COVID-19 resulted in delivery in 6.8% (n = 3) of unvaccinated women and 3.8% (n = 1) of fully vaccinated women. There was a greater number of preterm births (PTB) in unvaccinated women compared with fully vaccinated 29.5% (n = 13) vs 18.2% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive study, unvaccinated pregnant women with RMD and COVID-19 had a greater number of PTB compared with those fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, the need for COVID-19 pharmacological treatment was uncommon in pregnant women with RMD regardless of vaccination status. These results support active promotion of COVID-19 vaccination in women with RMD who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy.

The BILAG2004-Pregnancy index is reliable for assessment of disease activity in pregnant SLE patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the inter-rater reliability of the BILAG2004-Pregnancy index for assessment of SLE disease activity in pregnancy. METHODS: Pregnant SLE patients were recruited from four centres and assessed separately by two raters/physicians in routine clinical practice. Disease activity was determined using the BILAG2004-Pregnancy index. Reliability was assessed using level of agreement, κ-statistics and analysis of disagreement. Major disagreement was defined as a score difference of A and C/D/E or B and D/E between the two raters, and minor disagreement was a score difference of A and B or B and C between raters. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients (63.3% Caucasian, 13.3% Afro-Caribbean, 16.7% South Asian) were recruited. The majority of patients had low-level disease activity according to the local rater's assessment, and there was no grade A activity, with grade B activity present in the following systems: mucocutaneous (nine patients), musculoskeletal (two patients), cardiorespiratory (one patient) and renal (one patient). The distribution of disease activity was similar to the external rater's assessment. Good levels of agreement (>70%) were achieved in all systems. κ-statistics were not appropriate for use in the gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, constitutional and neuropsychiatric systems, as there was minimal variation between patients but good levels of agreement otherwise. There were three major disagreements (0.1 per patient, all differences between B and D/E) and five minor disagreements (0.17 per patient). CONCLUSION: The BILAG2004-Pregnancy index is reliable for assessment of disease activity in pregnant SLE patients.

The BILAG2004-Pregnancy Index is a valid disease activity outcome measure for pregnant SLE patients.

Objectives: This study was to determine whether the BILAG2004-Pregnancy Index (BILAG2004-P) has construct/criterion validity and is sensitive to change. Methods: This was an observational multicentre study that recruited pregnant SLE patients. Data were collected on disease activity [using the BILAG2004-P and Physician Global Assessment (PGA)], investigations and therapy at each assessment. The overall BILAG2004-P score as determined by the highest score achieved by any system was used in the analysis. Cross-sectional analysis was used for construct and criterion validity. The comparison was with C3, C4 and anti-dsDNA for construct validity, while it was with change in therapy and PGA in criterion validity. Sensitivity to change was assessed by determining the relationship between the change in BILAG2004-P and the change in therapy between two consecutive visits. Results: A total of 97 patients with 112 pregnancies were recruited. There were 610 assessments available for construct/criterion validity analysis (98.2% of pregnancies had more than one assessment) and 497 observations for sensitivity to change analysis. Increasing BILAG2004-P scores were associated with low C3. The active BILAG2004-P score (grade A or B) was associated with an increase in therapy and the PGA of active disease. There was an increasing likelihood of higher overall scores with an increase in therapy and the PGA of active disease. In the sensitivity to change analysis, an increase in the BILAG2004-P score was associated with an increase in therapy and inversely associated with a decrease in therapy. A decrease in the BILAG2004-P score was associated with a decrease in therapy and inversely associated with an increase in therapy. Conclusion: The BILAG2004-P has criterion validity and is sensitive to change.

Mapping of a novel susceptibility gene for rheumatoid arthritis in the telomeric MHC region.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex heterogeneous disease with an estimated genetic contribution to of 30-50%. Approximately one third arises from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) at 6p21.3. The contribution of specific DRB1 alleles encoding the shared epitope has been well described, however, several recent studies have suggested that additional telomeric genetic influences may exist. This region is difficult to study as a result of the presence of strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) within the MHC and high gene density particularly in the central class III region. In this article we review the current data supporting the existence of a non-DRB1 susceptibility gene for rheumatoid arthritis, in particular within the class III region.

Additional genetic susceptibility for rheumatoid arthritis telomeric of the DRB1 locus.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an estimated genetic contribution of 30-50%, approximately one-third of which arises from the major histocompatibility complex on 6p21.3. Many studies have implicated alleles of DRB1 that encode a shared epitope. However, several recent studies have suggested that additional telomeric genetic influences may exist. In this study, we sought to investigate whether a separate non-DRB1 effect could be detected and to determine its likely location. METHODS: We typed 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, located mainly in the telomeric class III region of the major histocompatibility complex, in 164 British Caucasian families with RA that had at least 1 affected offspring and used unconditioned and DRB1-conditioned transmission disequilibrium tests (TDTs). RESULTS: Unconditioned TDTs revealed overtransmission of shared epitope alleles (P = 2.12 x 10(-5)) and an allele of the HLA-B-associated transcript 1 (BAT1) gene in the telomeric class III region (P = 0.009). Using a DRB1-conditioned TDT to assess whether an independent effect existed, we detected unequal transmission of alleles of lymphocyte-specific transcript 1 (P = 0.004), BAT1 (P = 0.003), and PG8 (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: At least 1 additional non-DRB1 susceptibility locus for RA exists in an interval that encompasses the junction of the class III and I regions. This is a genomic segment of high linkage disequilibrium containing a large number of poorly characterized immunomodulatory genes.