Parallel regulation of a modulator-activated current via distinct dynamics underlies comodulation of motor circuit output.

The cellular mechanisms underlying comodulation of neuronal networks are not elucidated in most systems. We are addressing this issue by determining the mechanism by which a peptide hormone, crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP), modulates the biphasic (protraction/retraction) gastric mill (chewing) rhythm driven by the projection neuron MCN1 in the crab stomatogastric ganglion. MCN1 activates this rhythm by slow peptidergic (CabTRP Ia) and fast GABAergic excitation of the reciprocally inhibitory central pattern generator neurons LG (protraction) and Int1 (retraction), respectively. MCN1 synaptic transmission is limited to the retraction phase, because LG inhibits MCN1 during protraction. Bath-applied CCAP also excites both LG and Int1, but selectively prolongs protraction. Here, we use computational modeling and dynamic-clamp manipulations to establish that CCAP prolongs the gastric mill protractor (LG) phase and maintains the retractor (Int1) phase duration by activating the same modulator-activated inward current (I(MI)) in LG as MCN1-released CabTRP Ia. However, the CCAP-activated current (I(MI-CCAP)) and MCN1-activated current (I(MI-MCN1)) exhibit distinct time courses in LG during protraction. This distinction results from I(MI-CCAP) being regulated only by postsynaptic voltage, whereas I(MI-MCN1) is also regulated by LG presynaptic inhibition of MCN1. Hence, without CCAP, retraction and protraction duration are determined by the time course of I(MI-MCN1) buildup and feedback inhibition-mediated decay, respectively, in LG. With I(MI-CCAP) continually present, the impact of the feedback inhibition is reduced, prolonging protraction and maintaining retraction duration. Thus, comodulation of rhythmic motor activity can result from convergent activation, via distinct dynamics, of a single voltage-dependent current.

Mechanosensory gating of proprioceptor input to modulatory projection neurons.

Sensorimotor gating commonly occurs at sensory neuron synapses onto motor circuit neurons and motor neurons. Here, using the crab stomatogastric nervous system, we show that sensorimotor gating also occurs at the level of the projection neurons that activate motor circuits. We compared the influence of the gastro-pyloric receptor (GPR) muscle stretch-sensitive neuron on two projection neurons, modulatory commissural neuron 1 (MCN1) and commissural projection neuron 2 (CPN2), with and without a preceding activation of the mechanosensory ventral cardiac neurons (VCNs). MCN1 and CPN2 project from the paired commissural ganglia (CoGs) to the stomatogastric ganglion (STG), where they activate the gastric mill (chewing) motor circuit. When stimulated separately, the GPR and VCN neurons each elicit the gastric mill rhythm by coactivating MCN1 and CPN2. When GPR is instead stimulated during the VCN-gastric mill rhythm, it slows this rhythm. This effect results from a second GPR synapse onto MCN1 that presynaptically inhibits its STG terminals. Here, we show that, during the VCN-triggered rhythm, the GPR excitation of MCN1 and CPN2 in the CoGs is gated out, leaving only its influence in the STG. This gating effect appears to occur within the CoG and does not result from a ceiling effect on projection neuron firing frequency. Additionally, this gating action enables GPR to either activate rhythmic motor activity or act as a phasic sensorimotor feedback system. These results also indicate that the site of sensorimotor gating can occur at the level of the projection neurons that activate a motor circuit.

Peptide hormone modulation of a neuronally modulated motor circuit.

Rhythmically active motor circuits are influenced by neuronally released and circulating hormone modulators, but there are few systems in which the influence of a peptide hormone modulator on a neuronally modulated motor circuit has been determined. We performed such an analysis in the isolated crab stomatogastric nervous system by assessing the influence of the hormone crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) on the gastric mill (chewing) rhythm elicited by identified modulatory projection neurons. The gastric mill circuit is located in the stomatogastric ganglion. In situ, this ganglion is located within the ophthalmic artery and thus is in the path of circulating hormones such as CCAP. Focally-applied CCAP directly excited some gastric mill neurons, including the gastric mill central pattern generator neurons LG and Int1, but it did not elicit a sustained gastric mill rhythm. At concentrations as low as 10(-10) M, however, CCAP did influence gastric mill rhythms elicited by coactivating the projection neurons MCN1 and CPN2 and by selectively stimulating MCN1. In both cases, CCAP slowed this rhythm by selectively prolonging the protraction phase, although its influence on the MCN1-elicited rhythm was limited to those with relatively brief cycle periods. Interestingly, CCAP also reduced the threshold MCN1 firing frequency for activating the gastric mill rhythm. Last, the gastric mill neurons that exhibited altered activity during these CCAP-influenced rhythms did not correspond completely to the set of CCAP-responsive neurons. These results highlight the ability of hormonal modulation to enhance the flexibility provided by the neuronal modulation of rhythmically active motor circuits.

Central nervous system projections to and from the commissural ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis.

Higher-order inputs provide important regulatory control to motor circuits, but few cellular-level studies of such inputs have been performed. To begin studying higher-order neurons in an accessible model system, we have localized, in the supraesophageal ganglion (brain), neurons that are candidates for influencing the well-characterized motor circuits in the stomatogastric nervous system (STNS) of the crab Cancer borealis. The STNS is an extension of the central nervous system and includes four ganglia, within which are a set of motor circuits that regulate the ingestion and processing of food. These motor circuits are locally regulated by a set of modulatory neurons, most of which are located in the paired commissural ganglia (CoGs). These modulatory neurons are well-positioned to receive input from brain neurons because the circumesophageal commissures (CoCs) connect the brain with the CoGs. We have performed a series of CoC backfills to localize the brain neurons that are likely to innervate the CoGs and are, therefore, candidates for influencing the STNS motor patterns. CoC backfill-labeled neuronal somata within the brain are clustered around a subset of anatomically defined neuropil regions. We have concomitantly localized many CoG neurons that project into the brain. This latter pathway presumably includes neurons that provide feedback regarding ongoing STNS activity. Interestingly, nearly all of these brain and CoG neurons project through the medial aspect of the CoC. This work provides an initial framework for future studies to determine the way that higher-order input regulates rhythmic motor patterns.