A Free-Floating Aortic Thrombus: An Uncommon Approach to Handle a Rare Clinical Entity.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic material in the non-aneurysmatic and non-atherosclerotic aorta is a rare entity without any recommended standard treatment so far. We present a successful treatment strategy for patients who do not fit into any of the common approaches. CASE REPORT: A free-floating thrombus in the descending aorta was found as source of embolism in an 82-year-old female patient with lower limb ischemia. After initial heparinization of the patient without relevant reduction of the thrombotic mass, the thrombus was removed using an interdisciplinary approach. Under echocardiographic guidance to locate the thrombus, the AngioVac device, usually licensed to remove floating thrombi from the venous system, was used off-label to remove the thrombus by a transfemoral approach. To avoid rebuilding of a new thrombus, the attachment point with an exulcerated plaque in the descending aorta was covered by a stent graft via the same femoral access. The patient did not experience any further embolic events, and the postoperative course was uncomplicated. CONCLUSION: Patients with uncommon aortic diseases, such as the reported free-floating thrombus, should be treated by an individualized, interdisciplinary approach. Besides the recommended treatment options, there are other uncommon approaches that might offer an alternative in complex cases. CLINICAL IMPACT: Evidence is rare for the treatment of a free-floating thrombus in the descending aorta and the treatment strategy remains discussed controversially. We present a rather uncommon approach of successful off-label treatment for patients who do not fit into any of the common approaches (operative, endovascular, or conservative treatment based on patient's comorbidities). The AngioVac System has already been successfully used off-label in the arterial system but not in the above presented way of treating a free-floating thrombus in a patient with high embolization risk and treatment-limiting comorbidities.

Caseload and In-Hospital Outcome of Carotid Surgery Performed during the COVID-19 Pandemic vs. Previous Years: A Single-Centre Analysis.

With the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, restrictions and challenges for elective and emergency vascular surgery as well as worse outcomes were reported. This study aims to compare our single-centre experience with carotid artery surgery during the pandemic and previous years.Our retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients undergoing carotid surgery for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis between January 2017 and December 2021. Caseload, operation specific parameters, and demographic data as well as in-hospital outcome were compared during the COVID-19 pandemic versus previous years.A total of 623 consecutive patients were included. The caseload comparison showed an average of 112 carotid artery surgeries per adjusted year (March 16th to December 31st) from 2017 to 2019, prior to the pandemic. The caseload reduction in the first year of the pandemic (2020) was 36.6% (n = 71) and 17.9% (n = 92) in the second year (2021). No rebound effect was observed. There was no significant difference (p = 0.42) in the allocation of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (asymptomatic patients: 37.1% prior vs. 40.8% during the pandemic; symptomatic patients: 62.9 vs. 59.2%). Major adverse event rates in years prior to the pandemic were postoperative bleeding requiring revision: n = 31 (7.1%); stroke in symptomatic patients: n = 9 (3.3%) and stroke in asymptomatic patients: n = 4 (2.5%); symptomatic myocardial infarction (MCI): n = 1 (0.2%); death: n = 2 (0.5%). During the pandemic, major adverse event rates were postoperative bleeding requiring revision: n = 12 (6.5%); stroke in symptomatic patients: n = 1 (0.9%), stroke in asymptomatic patients: n = 1 (1.3%); symptomatic MCI: n = 1 (0.5%); death: n = 1 (0.5%).Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, there has been a significant reduction in carotid artery surgery performed both in symptomatic as well as in asymptomatic patients. There was no worsening of the outcome of carotid surgery performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this remained safe and feasible.

Functional Assessment and Evaluation of Outcome After Endovascular Therapy With Coverage of the Left Subclavian Artery in Case of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) can be treated by use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In this setting, the coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is frequently necessary. Nevertheless, the functionality of the upper left extremity after TEVAR had been rarely analyzed. Thus, this study intends to underline the safety of TEVAR as well as to determine the functionality of the left arm after coverage of the LSA. METHODS: All patients suffering from BTAI treated by endovascular means in 3 centers (Aachen [Germany], Maastricht [Netherlands], and Innsbruck [Austria]) between 1996 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The safety of the procedure had been assessed by the morbidity and mortality rate. The mid-term functional status of the upper left extremity was evaluated by using the DASH score (disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand). RESULTS: Forty-six patients (40 male, 6 female), mean age 39.4 ± 16.9 years suffered from BTAI caused by traffic accident (n = 31 [67.39%]), by skiing injury (n = 8 [17.39%]), and by fall (n = 7 [15.21%]). All patients underwent TEVAR, the technical success rate was 100%; 1 carotid-carotid subclavian bypass implantation was necessary. LSA coverage was performed in 76% (35/46) of the cases. Total complication rate was 17.3% (8/46); the endoleak rate was 8.6% (4/46) (2 × Ib, 1 × IIa, 1 × IV). Further complications were bypass and endograft occlusion. The postoperative mortality rate was 6% (3/46), the DASH score was completed in 65% (30/46). The study population reached a mean value of 17 ± 20, which is comparable to a nonharmed reference group (10.10 ± 14.68). A significant correlation between the DASH score and patients age could be demonstrated (2-sided P value: 0.0213). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy of BTAI revealed a good primary success rate. An adequate mid-term functional status of the upper left extremity could be assessed in comparison to a nonharmed reference group.

Open surgical retrieval of an embolized PFO occluder system.

Device migration after intervention for persistent foramen ovale occlusion is a rare complication. In case of failure of endovascular device retrieval, open surgical removal is indicated, safe, and reliable.

Ischemia and functional status of the left arm and quality of life after left subclavian artery coverage during stent grafting of thoracic aortic diseases.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to report on the incidence of left arm ischemia, left arm function, and quality of life after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by stent grafting with and without coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA). METHODS: All patients who underwent TEVAR since 1996 in our institution were included. Basic demographic parameters, underlying disease, details of TEVAR, long-term left arm function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] questionnaire), and quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey) were analyzed. End points were left arm ischemia, need for LSA revascularization (before or after TEVAR), long-term functional impairment, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients underwent TEVAR for degenerative aneurysm (n = 64), traumatic aortic injury (TAI; n = 38), or Stanford type B dissection (n = 36). Seventy-three patients (52.9%) had LSA coverage, which led to partial or complete LSA occlusion in 49 (35.5%). Selectively, nine patients (6.5%) had primary LSA revascularization. After TEVAR, left arm ischemia was observed in only one patient, who consecutively needed a left carotid to subclavian bypass. During a mean follow-up period of 4.1 ± 3.7 years, no additional patient needed secondary LSA revascularization. In comparing patients with occluded vs patent LSA, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) health scores (12-Item Short Form Health Survey) as well as DASH scores were similar. However, subgroup analysis showed better PCS scores for TAI patients with patent LSA, whereas MCS and DASH scores were similar in TAI patients, and scores were indifferent within thoracic aortic aneurysm and Stanford type B dissection subgroups. In comparing different subgroups, TAI patients had significantly better PCS, MCS, and DASH scores. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR is associated with a low risk of peri-interventional left arm ischemia. During long-term follow-up, secondary LSA revascularization is uncommon. Coverage of the LSA has no impact on left arm function and quality of life, probably with the exception of physical health scores in patients with TAI.

Outcome after interposition of vein grafts for arterial repair of extremity injuries in civilians.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report on immediate and long-term outcomes after vein graft interposition in patients with upper- and lower-limb arterial injuries. METHODS: In the retrospective data analysis, all patients who underwent vein graft repair of limb arterial injuries in our civilian institution since 1990 were included, analyzed, and followed. Study end points were crude early and long-term patency, vascular reintervention, limb salvage, and perioperative death. RESULTS: A total 152 consecutive patients (127 men; median age, 31.7 years; range, 5.3-77.2) who presented with 158 lesions of limb arteries (lower limb: n = 90; upper limb: n = 68) underwent repair with the use of vein graft interposition. The vast majority of lesions were caused by blunt trauma (n = 144; 91%). In early results, the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3%. In-hospital limb loss rate was significantly lower in the upper limb (n = 2; 2.9%) than in the lower limb (n = 12; 13.3%; P < .05). Primary early patency was 93% (upper limb) and 89% (lower limb): early graft occlusions occurred both in the upper limb (n = 5; 7%) and the lower limb (n = 10; 11%; P = .59). Occlusions were followed by amputation in six cases (upper limb: one of five; lower limb: five of 10) despite successful revision of the occluded grafts. Long-term results after a median follow-up period of 6.0 years (range, 0.3-23.4) showed upper limb (62% of patients were followed): no late limb loss, no vascular reintervention; patency: 97.6%; lower limb (66% of patients were followed): one late limb loss, one redo bypass for vein graft dilation, patency: 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency repair of civilian artery injuries with the use of vein grafts is associated with considerable risk of early occlusion and limb loss. When compared with the upper limb, limb loss rate is significantly higher in the lower extremity. Early graft occlusion is frequently followed by limb loss, especially in the lower limb. During long-term follow-up, occlusions of interposed vein grafts, vascular reinterventions, and late amputations are uncommon.

Treatment options of crural pseudoaneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoaneurysms (PAs) of crural arteries represent rare complications of vascular interventions or surgery. Management of crural PAs includes different treatment options, conservative treatment as well as open surgery or endovascular procedures. We reviewed our experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients who were diagnosed with crural PAs since 2003. We evaluated etiology, treatment and outcome. Endpoints were target vessel patency, vascular re-intervention and limb loss. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were diagnosed with crural PAs. PA was caused by vascular intervention in 27 patients (90 %): open balloon thrombectomy (n = 25), subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (n = 1) and transcutaneous catheter-assisted thrombus aspiration (n = 1). In 3 patients (10 %) it was caused by orthopaedic surgical procedures. Location of crural PAs were peroneal artery (n = 11; 36.7 %), posterior tibial artery (n = 10; 33.3 %), anterior tibial artery (n = 5; 16.7 %), and tibioperoneal trunk (n = 4; 13.3 %). Treatment of crural PAs included open surgery (n = 3; 10 %), endovascular procedures (n = 13; 43.3 %) such as endograft implantation (n = 9) or coil embolisation (n = 4), and conservative management (n = 14; 46.7 %). After a median follow-up period of 7 months (range: 0 - 46 months) 8 of 9 endografts were occluded, in none of these patients a minor or a major amputation was necessary. None of the surgically, endovascularly and conservatively treated patients needed a re-intervention for crural PA. A major amputation was necessary in 4 patients due to progression of peripheral arterial disease; none was a directly consequence of the crural PA. CONCLUSIONS: Crural PAs are mainly caused by vascular intervention, most frequently by catheter thrombectomy. As a consequence, we recommend fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy over a guide wire as routine technique. In many cases of crural PAs, conservative management is sufficient. The choice of treatment of crural PAs depends on size, location and associated symptoms. Endovascular treatment using endografts is limited by poor long-term patency.

Transcatheter embolization for the management of acute active inferior epigastric artery hemorrhages.

PURPOSE: To report a retrospective review of all patients who were admitted to the interventional radiology unit at our hospital for transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of an acute active hemorrhage of the inferior epigastric artery. METHODS: From 1996 to 2012, 52 consecutive patients (26 men; mean age 63±15 years) with hemodynamically relevant active abdominal wall hematoma were admitted for TAE of the inferior epigastric artery. Of these, 19 patients had spontaneous hemorrhage due to use of anticoagulants, 18 due to abdominal trauma, and 15 due to an iatrogenic complication. All superselective embolizations were performed using a coaxial catheter technique with a 0.018-inch microcatheter introduced through the diagnostic macrocatheter. Various embolization methods, alone or in combination, were applied, including primarily microcoils and polyvinyl alcohol particles. RESULTS: Primary technical success was achieved in 47/52 (90%) patients; the remainder needed a second embolization session (secondary success 100%). The mean puncture-to-hemostasis time was 65.4±35 minutes. No patient developed a large hematoma or pseudoaneurysm at the puncture site. The 30-day mortality was 19% (n=10) and the total cumulative mortality rate was 23% (n=12). Over a mean 67-month follow-up of 39/40 survivors (1 lost to follow-up), no complications from the embolization procedure, such as abdominal wall ischemia, were observed. There were no differences in outcomes based on etiology of the hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with acute active hemorrhage of the IEA in the anterior abdominal wall, TAE is a fast, safe, minimally invasive, and reliable method with a high technical success rate and no long-term complications.

Incidence and predisposing factors of cold intolerance after arterial repair in upper extremity injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report was to present abnormal posttraumatic cold intolerance in patients that previously underwent repair of arterial injuries after civilian upper limb trauma in our institution. METHODS: All patients who underwent repair of arterial lesions after upper limb trauma since 1990 were reviewed, and clinical follow-up studies were performed. Patients were asked to complete the cold intolerance symptom severity (CISS) questionnaire to evaluate presence and severity of self-reported cold sensitivity, and the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire to analyze functional disability. Abnormal cold intolerance was defined as a CISS score over 30. Further analysis included evaluation of epidemiologic, clinical, and perioperative data for factors predisposing to abnormal cold intolerance. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients with previous repair of upper limb arterial injuries were eligible to answer the CISS and DASH questionnaires, and 56 patients (64%; 43 men; median age: 31.9 years) completed both. In our cohort, blunt trauma was the predominant cause of injury (n = 50; 89%). Accompanying lesions of nerves (n = 22; 39%) and/or orthopedic injuries (n = 36; 64%) were present in 48 patients (86%). After a median follow-up period of 5.5 years (range, 0.5-19.7), 23 patients (41% of 56) reported on abnormal cold intolerance. Patients with cold intolerance had worse functional results (as measured by the DASH questionnaire; mean ± SD, 42.7 ± 29.7 vs 11.5 ± 23.9; P < .001) when compared with patients without. Cold intolerance was more frequently seen in patients with previous nerve lesion (P = .027) and in proximal injuries (subclavian or axillary vs brachial or forearm arteries: P = .006), but was not correlated to gender, age, involvement of the dominant or nondominant arm, and the presence of ischemia, bone injury, or an isolated vascular injury. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal cold intolerance is frequently seen in patients with a history of arterial repair in upper limb trauma. It is associated with significant functional impairment. Concomitant nerve injury and involvement of the subclavian or axillary artery are the major predisposing factors for development of cold intolerance after upper limb trauma.

Incidence and treatment of local stenosis or occlusion at the vascular access site leading to limb ischemia and new-onset intermittent claudication after percutaneous interventions: implications of vascular closure devices.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular access site complications (ASCs) are an ongoing hazard of percutaneous interventions (PI). We analyzed incidence, indication, and results of operative repair of access site complications leading to acute limb ischemia (ALI) or new-onset severe claudication (CI) in our institution during an 8-year period. METHODS: Retrospective analysis: demographic parameters, details of coronary or vascular intervention, use of a vascular closure device (VCD), clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapy. ENDPOINTS: perioperative outcome (death, limb loss, and need for re-operation/intervention) and length of hospital stay. For comparison of annual operation rates, patients were grouped by the years 2001 to 2004 (no use of VCD) and 2005 to 2008 (selective use of a VCD; in all cases: Angio-Seal), and Chi-Square-test was applied. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (19 female; median age: 64.5 years) underwent repair of arterial ASCs causing ALI (n = 32) or new-onset severe CI (n = 19) after 58,453 catheter interventions (overall rate: 0.087%; ALI: 0.055%; CI: 0.032%). Corresponding with more widespread VCD use, the annual number of ALI and new onset CI increased significantly (P < 0.001). PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOME: 30 day mortality was 4%. No limb loss occurred. Re-operations were indicated in 10 patients (20%) for: hematoma (n = 5), local infection (n = 3), revision of fasciotomy (n = 1), and repeated thrombectomy (n = 1). Median length of postoperative hospital stay: 7 days (range: 1-28). CONCLUSION: ALI and new-onset severe CI due to access site complications after PI are rare, however, they are potentially threatening life and limb. The use of VCDs results in an overall increase of ischemic complications.

Endovascular popliteal thrombectomy using the self-expanding, retrievable Solitaire recanalization device.

PURPOSE: To present an initial peripheral application of the self-expanding, detachable, fully-retrievable Solitaire FR Recanalization Device for endovascular thrombectomy in the lower leg of a patient with acute peripheral limb ischemia. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old woman with a long history of peripheral arterial occlusive disease and a femoropopliteal bypass graft presented with sudden grade IIb ischemia of the left lower leg. Conventional antegrade angiography identified total thrombotic occlusion of the tibioperoneal trunk below the distal femoropopliteal bypass anastomosis; the bypass itself was not occluded. When suction thrombectomy was unsuccessful, a 4×20-mm self-expanding, retrievable Solitaire stent was deployed. The thrombus was retrieved, with immediate recanalization of the tibioperoneal trunk and no sequela. Clinical signs of ischemia resolved, and after 6 months of follow-up, no reocclusion had occurred. CONCLUSION: Developed as a tool to retrieve clots causing acute ischemic stroke, the Solitaire FR Recanalization Device may also have a place in treating patients with acute below-the-knee thrombotic arterial occlusion in whom suction thrombectomy had failed. The Solitaire stent may be an additional endovascular option that can result in successful treatment of acute limb ischemia and avoid more expensive surgical procedures in selected cases.

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) does not predict amputation in popliteal artery injury.

PURPOSE: Vascular injuries in lower extremity trauma, especially with involvement of the popliteal artery, are associated with considerably high rates of limb loss, especially with blunt trauma mechanisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of amputation in patients with traumatic popliteal artery lesions with special focus on the validity of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients treated for isolated lesions of the popliteal artery following trauma between January 1990 and December 2020 at a high-volume level I trauma center were included. Primary outcome was limb salvage dependent on MESS and the influence of defined parameters on limb salvage was defined as secondary outcome. The extent of trauma was assessed by the MESS. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (age 39.2 ± 18.6 years, 76% male) with most blunt injuries (n = 47, 94%) were included. None of the patients died within 30 days and revascularization was attempted in all patients with no primary amputation and the overall limb salvage rate was 88% (44 patients). A MESS ≥ 7 was observed in 28 patients (56%) with significantly higher rates of performed fasciotomies (92.9% vs. 59.1%; p < 0.01) in those patients. MESS did not predict delayed amputation within our patient cohort (MESS 8.4 ± 4.1 in the amputation group vs. 8.1 ± 3.8 in the limb salvage group; p = 0.765). CONCLUSION: Revascularization of limbs with isolated popliteal artery injuries should always be attempted. MESS did not predict delayed amputation in our cohort with fasciotomy being an important measure to increase limb salvage rates.

Risk factors for major amputation after arterial vascular trauma of the lower extremity.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Arterial vascular trauma bears a great risk of poor functional outcome or limb loss. The aim of this study was to analyze amputation rates of patients after vascular trauma and to perform a predictor analysis for the risk of major amputation. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis of 119 extremities treated for arterial vascular injury between 1990 and 2018 amputation rates and factors associated with limb loss were assessed. All patients were treated for traumatic vascular injuries; iatrogenic injuries were not included in the study. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 119 legs in 118 patients were treated after arterial vascular trauma. The in-hospital major amputation rate was 16.8% and the mortality rate was 2.5%. In the predictors analysis, vascular re-operation (amputation rate 53.8% vs 12%, odds ratio = 8.56), a Rutherford category ⩾IIb (25.4% vs 4.2%, odds ratio = 6.43), work-related or traffic accidents (28.2% vs 0%, odds ratio = 4.86), concomitant soft tissue or bone injuries (26.7% vs 7.3%, odds ratio = 4.64), polytrauma (33.3% vs 12%, odds ratio = 3.68), and blunt trauma (18.9% vs 0% for penetrating trauma, odds ratio = 1.64) were found to be associated with amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity arterial vascular trauma was associated with a significant major amputation rate. Several predictors for limb loss were identified, which could aid in identifying patients at risk and adapting their treatment.

Prevalence of VOYAGER PAD trial exclusion criteria in unselected patients undergoing lower limb revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The VOYAGER PAD trial investigated data on dual pathway inhibition after lower limb revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Multiple exclusion criteria were applied. However, neither data on the prevalence of exclusion criteria nor on the total number of patients screened for inclusion was discussed. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective observational study in unselected PAD patients undergoing lower limb revascularization. Demographic and disease-specific data was collected. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included with only 29 patients (19.3%) as potential candidates for the VOYAGER PAD study medication. Poorly controlled diabetes or severe uncontrolled hypertension (33.3%), major tissue loss (18.7%), acute limb ischaemia within prior 2 weeks (17.3%) and a history of intracranial hemorrhage, stroke or TIA (16%) were amongst the exclusion criteria most frequently met. Compared to VOYAGER PAD study patients, significant differences regarding sex (36.7% female vs. 25.8%), renal insufficiency (29.0% vs. 20.1%), previous myocardial infarction (16.7% vs. 11.1%) and known carotid artery disease (18.7% vs. 8.6%) revealed. Patients presented significantly more frequently with critical limb ischemia (56.7% vs. 30.4%) and a history of previous peripheral revascularization (72.0% vs. 35.9%). Fewer endovascular interventions (52% vs. 65.5%) and more surgeries (58% vs. 34.5%) were performed. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral arterial disease, the majority presents with characteristics that, at present, preclude prescription of rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin. This patient cohort represents a population with higher rates of comorbidities and more complex vascular interventions, but might also benefit from dual pathway inhibition strategy.

Predictors for the need for fasciotomy after arterial vascular trauma of the lower extremity.

INTRODUCTION: Compartment syndrome of the lower extremity following arterial vascular trauma can cause irreversible damage to muscle as well as nerve tissue leading to long-term functional impairment of the extremity or worse limb loss. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of compartment syndrome is mandatory to preserve muscle tissue and prevent limb loss. The aim of the study was to analyze the fasciotomy rate of our patient cohort and to perform a predictors analysis for the need of fasciotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective study all patients treated for arterial vascular trauma since 1990 were identified. Demographics, clinical data and outcome were analysed. After separation in a fasciotomy and non-fasciotomy group, a Bayes Network was used to arrive at a predictor ranking for the need of fasciotomy via a gain ratio feature evaluation. RESULTS: In the period of 28 years, 88 (73.9%) of a total of 119 patients, predominantly male (80.7%) and aged under 40 years (37.5 ± 17.5), required fasciotomy after arterial vascular trauma. Patients of the fasciotomy group presented at higher Rutherford categories (grade III 34.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.005), varied in terms of the type of arterial vascular injury (dissection 25% vs. 61.3%, p <0.001, occlusion 15.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.011) and showed prolonged hospitalization (35.17 ± 29.3 vs. 21.48±25.4, p = 0.002). Ischaemia duration exceeding 2.5 h followed by the Rutherford grade IIa and greater, the site (popliteal artery segment 3), type (transection and occlusion), and mechanism of vascular trauma (work related accident over traffic and sports accidents), as well as the male gender presented as strong predictors for fasciotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial vascular trauma requiring fasciotomy for compartment syndrome accounted for 73.9% of all cases. Immediate diagnosis and treatment is mandatory to prevent long-term functional impairment or limb loss. The above mentioned predictors should help identifying patients at risk for developing a compartment syndrome to provide best possible treatment.

Endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate a 12-year experience with endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysm (IAA). METHODS: From August 1997 through July 2009, 91 patients (81 men; mean age 71 years, range 31-90) underwent endovascular treatment for isolated IAA at our department. Of these, 77 patients received stent-grafts either alone or in combination with coils or an Amplatzer vascular plug (n = 2); 1 patient received a Smart stent combined with coils, and 13 patients were treated with coil embolization only. The aneurysms were classified according to location: type I = common iliac artery (CIA), type II = internal iliac artery (IIA), type III = CIA and IIA, and type IV = external iliac artery with/without CIA and/or IIA involvement. RESULTS: Primary technical success was 90.1% for all aneurysm types and 93.6%, 80%, 88.8%, and 93.3% for types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Secondary technical success was 96.7% for all types and 97.8%, 95%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, for each type. Clinical success was 93.4% for all types and 97.8%, 85%, 100%, and 86.7%, respectively, by type. Complications in 18 (19.8%) patients included 7 type I endoleaks, 3 type II endoleaks, 2 enlarged aneurysm sacs (incomplete embolization), 5 cases of buttock claudication, and 2 stent-graft thromboses. Two patients were converted to open surgery; 10 underwent secondary interventions. Mortality rates were 1.1% (n = 1) at 30 death days and 23.1% (n = 21) over a mean follow-up of 45.9 months (no aneurysm-related death). Cumulative overall survival was 97.7% at 1 year and 47.6% at 10 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related complications was 88.6% at 1 year and 83.5% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of isolated IAA is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgery. However, it may be associated with several complications and must, therefore, be carefully planned.

Endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during subclavian vein cannulation.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review a 9-year experience with endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during subclavian vein cannulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2000 through July 2009 (109 months), 13 patients underwent endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization. All catheters were still in situ, including one 7-F catheter, six 8-F catheters, and six large-bore 10-11-F catheters. Treatment was performed with an Angio-Seal device (n = 6) or balloon catheters (n = 7) and by additional stent-graft placement (n = 4). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 27.3 months (range, 0.4-78 months). The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the late mortality rate was 46.1%. Primary technical success was achieved in nine patients (69.2%), in four with the use of a compliant balloon catheter and in the other five with an Angio-Seal device. Complications required additional stent-graft placement in four patients (30.8%), one because of stenosis after Angio-Seal device deployment and three as a result of insufficient closure of the puncture site by balloon tamponade. Stent-graft repair was successful in all four patients, for a primary assisted technical success rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular techniques offer a less invasive alternative to surgery. The present limited experience shows that the use of the Angio-Seal device is not without risks, whereas balloon tamponade is not always reliable in closing the puncture site. Stent-graft placement may be required in patients in whom balloon tamponade fails or in whom the use of the Angio-Seal device is contraindicated.