Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 27(10): 1916-22, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Chlorhexidine containing catheter securement dressings may prevent CRBSI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized, controlled trial was conducted at 10 German hematology departments. We compared chlorhexidine-containing dressings with non-chlorhexidine control dressings in neutropenic patients. The primary end point was the incidence of definite CRBSI within the first 14 days (dCRBSI14) of CVC placement. Secondary end points included combined incidence of definite or probable CRBSI within 14 days (dpCRBSI14), overall (dpCRBSI), incidence of unscheduled dressing changes and adverse events. RESULTS: From February 2012 to September 2014, 613 assessable patients were included in the study. The incidence of dCRBSI14 was 2.6% (8/307) in the chlorhexidine and 3.9% (12/306) in the control group (P = 0.375). Both dpCRBSI14 and dpCRBSI were significantly less frequent in the study group with dpCRBSI14 in 6.5% (20/307) of the chlorhexidine group when compared with 11% (34/306) in the control group (P = 0.047), and dpCRBSI in 10.4% (32/307) versus 17% (52/306), respectively (P = 0.019). The frequency of dressing intolerance with cutaneous and soft tissue abnormalities at the contact area was similar in both groups (12.4% and 11.8%; P = 0.901). CONCLUSIONS: Although the trial failed its primary end point, the application of chlorhexidine containing catheter securement dressings reduces the incidence of definite or probable CRBSI in neutropenic patients. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT01544686 (Clinicaltrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Neutropenia/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bandages , Catheter-Related Infections/complications , Catheter-Related Infections/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/pathology
2.
Oncoimmunology ; 11(1): 2068109, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35496500

ABSTRACT

Immunostimulatory regimens are a game changer in the fight against cancer, but still only a minority of patients achieve clinical benefit. Combination with immunomodulatory drugs and agents converting otherwise non-immunogenic forms of cell death into bona fide "immunogenic cell death" (ICD) could improve the efficacy of these novel therapies. The aim of our study was to investigate conventional Amphotericin B (AmB) as an enhancer of antitumor immune responses. In tumor cell line models, AmB induced ICD with its typical hallmarks of calreticulin (CALR) expression and release of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) as well as Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP). Interestingly, in contrast to non-ICD inducing treatments, ICD induction led to up-regulation of PD-L1-expression by ICD experiencing cells, resulting in decreased maturation of dendritic cells (DCs). Blocking this PD-L1 expression on tumor cells could unleash full ICD effects on antigen presenting cells. Even at sub-toxic concentrations, AmB was able to enhance CALR on leukemic blasts, particularly on phagocytic monoblastic THP-1 cells, which also showed features of "M1-like" differentiation after AmB exposure. The ability of AmB to increase the immunogenicity of tumor cells was confirmed in vivo in a mouse vaccination experiment. In conclusion, we demonstrate that AmB can promote antitumor immune responses in a dose-dependent manner by ICD induction, surface translocation of CALR on leukemic blasts even at sub-toxic concentrations, and "M1-like" polarization of phagocytic cells, making it noteworthy as potential booster for cancer immunotherapy. We additionally report for the first time that PD-L1 expression may be a feature of ICD, possibly as a negative feedback mechanism regulating the maturation status of DCs and thus indirectly affecting T-cell priming.


Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen , Immunogenic Cell Death , Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Animals , Biomarkers , Humans , Immunotherapy , Mice , Phagocytes
3.
Eur J Med Res ; 16(4): 159-66, 2011 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21486730

ABSTRACT

Echinocandins represent the newest class of antifungal agents. Currently, three echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin are licensed for clinical use in various indications. They act as inhibitors of ß-(1,3)-glucan synthesis in the fungal cell wall and have a favorable pharmacological profile. They have a broad spectrum of activity against all Candida species. Higher MIC's have been observed against C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii. Data from clinical trials for invasive Candida infections / candidaemia suggest that the clinical outcome of patients treated with either drug may be very similar. A comparison has been done between caspofungin and micafungin but for anidulafungin a comparative trial with another echinocandin is still lacking. All three drugs are highly effective if not superior to treatment with either fluconazole or Amphotericin B, particularly in well-defined clinical settings such as invasive Candida infections, Candida oesophagitis and candidaemia. Differences between the three echinocandins with regard to the route of metabolism, requirement for a loading dose, dose adjustment in patients with moderate to severe hepatic disease and different dosing schedules for different types of Candida infections have to be considered. Relevant drug-drug interactions of Caspofungin and Micafungin are minimal. Anidulafungin has no significant drug interactions at all. However, echinocandins are available only for intravenous use. All three agents have an excellent safety profile.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents , Candidiasis, Invasive/drug therapy , Echinocandins , Lipopeptides , Anidulafungin , Antifungal Agents/chemistry , Antifungal Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Biofilms , Candidiasis, Invasive/pathology , Caspofungin , Drug Interactions , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Echinocandins/chemistry , Echinocandins/pharmacokinetics , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Humans , Lipopeptides/chemistry , Lipopeptides/pharmacokinetics , Lipopeptides/therapeutic use , Micafungin , Molecular Structure
4.
Anticancer Res ; 28(6B): 3961-4, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19192656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). However, its clinical efficacy is limited by its renal and hematotoxicity profile. In a randomized, multicenter phase III trial, we replaced conventional cisplatin by a liposomal formulation of cisplatin (lipoplatin) and compared the safety and efficacy profiles of patients in the two treatment arms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Main inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed SCCHN, age between 18-75 years with sufficient renal function. Main endpoints for this interims analysis were hemato- and nephrotoxicity. First response data were collected. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were evaluable for outcome and toxicity. Grade III and IV hematotoxicity were more frequent in the cisplatin arm (31.7% vs. 12%), with grade IV leucopenia occurring in 22.2%. However, 16% of the patients in that treatment arm experienced grade III anemia compared to only 9.5% treated with the cisplatin regimen. A total 4% of the patients in the lipoplatin arm developed grade IV neuropathy, whereas in the cisplatin arm, 19% developed grade III neuropathy and none developed grade IV. The renal toxicity profile of both drugs also showed marked differences. In the cisplatin arm, 23.8% of patients suffered grade III toxicity. In contrast, no grade III or IV renal toxicity occurred in patients treated with lipoplatin. The efficacy results showed 38.8% objective partial remission in the cisplatin arm vs. 19% in the lipoplatin arm. However 64% of the patients achieved stable disease while being treated with lipoplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), vs. 50% in the cisplatin/5-FU arm. CONCLUSION: Liposomal cisplatin seems to reduce both the renal and hematological toxicity to a clinically relevant extent as compared to conventional cisplatin. The clinical benefit rate is similar for both regimens.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 14 Suppl 4: 46-54, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18430129

ABSTRACT

Bloodstream infections caused by Candida spp. are increasingly recognised in critically ill adult and paediatric individuals, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Candida albicans is the single most common fungal species to cause nosocomial infections. However, non-C. albicans spp., including Candida glabrata and Candida krusei, which are less susceptible to fluconazole, have become more common. Until the 1980s, the therapeutic possibilities for invasive candidosis were limited to amphotericin B, but with the advent of new antifungal agents, such as azoles and echinocandins, less toxic therapeutic options have become available and there are now possibilities for prevention and optimised therapy for documented Candida infections. In this review, the currently available options for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidosis are discussed with regard to the role of liposomal amphotericin B in comparison with the echinocandins and azoles.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Candida/growth & development , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Fungemia/drug therapy , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Azoles/administration & dosage , Candidiasis/immunology , Candidiasis/microbiology , Caspofungin , Critical Illness , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Echinocandins/administration & dosage , Fungemia/microbiology , Humans , Lipopeptides
7.
Ann Surg ; 234(6): 732-40, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11729379

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of organs from brain-dead donors by assessing the influence of alternative strategies on the early behavior of kidneys after transplantation into unmodified hosts. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Kidneys transplanted from living donors perform consistently better than those from cadaver sources. The authors have recently shown that donor brain death produces inflammatory changes in peripheral organs within hours, amplifies coincident ischemia-reperfusion injury, and accelerates acute and chronic rejection. Normalization of the graft by donor hormone treatment has hitherto been unsuccessful. METHODS: A standardized rat model of brain death was used. Experimental groups included recipients of allogeneic grafts from living and brain-dead donors (F344-->LEW). Donors were treated immediately after induction of brain death either with intravenous steroids, which block inflammatory cytokine release, or a soluble P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (sPSGL), which blocks initial selectin-mediated cellular adhesion. Kidney grafts were examined serially up to 10 days by morphology, immmunohistology, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Overall survival of ummodified recipients of kidneys from brain-dead donors was significantly reduced versus living donors. Animals with organs from brain-dead donors that had received steroids or sPSGL survived significantly longer than those from untreated brain-dead donors. The intensity of ischemia-reperfusion injury and of acute rejection was reduced. Cellular infiltration and transcription of mRNA of representative proinflammatory mediators were diminished. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of organ donors at the time of brain death markedly improves organ quality after kidney transplantation, upgrading it to that from a living donor.


Subject(s)
Brain Death , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Kidney Transplantation , Kidney/drug effects , Membrane Glycoproteins/pharmacology , Tissue Donors , Animals , Antigens, CD/analysis , Cytokines/analysis , Cytokines/genetics , Graft Survival , HLA-D Antigens/analysis , Immunohistochemistry , Kidney/chemistry , Kidney/pathology , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Rats, Inbred Lew
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL