α-Synuclein Deposition in Sympathetic Nerve Fibers in Genetic Forms of Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Cytoplasmic inclusions of α-synuclein (α-syn) in brainstem neurons are characteristic of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). PD also entails α-syn buildup in sympathetic nerves. Among genetic forms of PD, the relative extents of sympathetic intraneuronal accumulation of α-syn have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional observational study compared magnitudes of intraneuronal deposition of α-syn in common and rare genetic forms of PD. METHODS: α-Syn deposition was quantified by the α-syn-tyrosine hydroxylase colocalization index in C2 cervical skin biopsies from 65 subjects. These included 30 subjects with pathogenic mutations in SNCA (n = 3), PRKN [biallelic (n = 7) and monoallelic (n = 3)], LRRK2 (n = 7), GBA (n = 7), or PARK7/DJ1 [biallelic (n = 1) and monoallelic (n = 2)]. Twenty-five of the mutation carriers had PD and five did not. Data were also analyzed from 19 patients with idiopathic PD and 16 control participants. RESULTS: α-Syn deposition varied as a function of genotype (F = 16.7, P < 0.0001). It was above the control range in 100% of subjects with SNCA mutations, 100% with LRRK2 mutations, 95% with idiopathic PD, 83% with GBA mutations, and 0% with biallelic PRKN mutations. α-Syn deposition in the biallelic PRKN group was significantly higher than in the control group. In addition, patients with biallelic PRKN mutations had higher α-syn deposition than their unaffected siblings. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with SNCA, DJ-1, LRRK2, or GBA mutations have substantial intraneuronal α-syn deposition in sympathetic noradrenergic nerves in skin biopsies, whereas those with biallelic PRKN mutations do not. Biallelic PRKN patients may have mildly increased α-syn deposition compared with control subjects. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Patient-identified impact of symptoms in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of spinal bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) on quality of life (QoL) are not well understood. This study describes symptoms from the patient's perspective and the impact these symptoms have on QoL. METHODS: We conducted open-ended interviews with 21 adult men with genetically confirmed SBMA. Using a qualitative framework technique, we coded and analyzed interviews to identify symptoms and resulting themes. RESULTS: From these interviews, 729 quotations were extracted. We identified 200 SBMA-specific symptoms and 20 symptomatic themes. Weakness was mentioned by all interviewees. Symptoms within the domain of mental health and the specific themes of emotional issues and psychological impact were also frequently mentioned. DISCUSSION: Numerous symptoms affect QoL for patients with SBMA. We identified previously unrecognized symptoms that are important to address in enhancing clinical care for patients with SBMA and in developing tools to evaluate efficacy in future clinical trials. Muscle Nerve 57: 40-44, 2018.

Clinical features of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.

Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy is an X-linked motor neuron disease caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the androgen receptor gene. To characterize the natural history and define outcome measures for clinical trials, we assessed the clinical history, laboratory findings and muscle strength and function in 57 patients with genetically confirmed disease. We also administered self-assessment questionnaires for activities of daily living, quality of life and erectile function. We found an average delay of over 5 years from onset of weakness to diagnosis. Muscle strength and function correlated directly with serum testosterone levels and inversely with CAG repeat length, age and duration of weakness. Motor unit number estimation was decreased by about half compared to healthy controls. Sensory nerve action potentials were reduced in nearly all subjects. Quantitative muscle assessment and timed 2 min walk may be useful as meaningful indicators of disease status. The direct correlation of testosterone levels with muscle strength indicates that androgens may have a positive effect on muscle function in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy patients, in addition to the toxic effects described in animal models.

Exercise Intervention Leads to Functional Improvement in a Patient with Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy is a progressive neuromuscular disease that leads to muscle weakness and reduced physical function. Benefits of physical therapy for people with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy have not been reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old male patient with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy reported falling, difficulty walking and completing upright tasks, and showed clinical signs of low baseline function on examination. Transportation challenges made it difficult for this patient to attend frequent one-on-one physical therapy sessions. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: A minimally supervised home-based exercise intervention was chosen with the goal of safely improving his functional capacity. The 5-visit clinical intervention, spread over 10 months, provided 3 exercise modules: seated-to-standing postural alignment and core muscle activation; upright functional and endurance training; and balance training and rhythmic walking. Post-intervention the patient had increased lower extremity muscle strength, improved balance, and reduced self-reported fatigue. CONCLUSION: Home-based exercises were well tolerated with no increase in creatine kinase. Multiple clinical measures of strength and function improved, possibly related to the patients' excellent motivation and compliance with the programme. Promising utilization of a minimally supervised home-based programme is described here.

Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is caused by polyglutamine expansion in the androgen receptor, which results in ligand-dependent toxicity. Animal models have a neuromuscular deficit that is mitigated by androgen-reducing treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in patients with SBMA, and to identify outcome measures for use in future studies of the disease. METHODS: We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-site clinical trial in ambulatory, symptomatic men with genetically confirmed SBMA. Participants were assigned by random number table to receive dutasteride (0·5 mg per day) or placebo orally for 24 months. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was quantitative muscle assessment (QMA). The final efficacy analysis included all patients who were compliant with study treatment at 24 months. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00303446. FINDINGS: 50 men were randomly assigned to treatment groups (25 dutasteride, 25 placebo), and 44 were included in the efficacy analysis (21 dutasteride, 23 placebo). At 24 months, the placebo group showed a decrease of 4·5% (-0·30 kg/kg) from baseline in weight-scaled muscle strength as indicated by QMA, and the dutasteride group had an increase in strength of 1·3% (0·14 kg/kg); the difference between groups (5·8%, 95% CI -5·9 to 17·6; p=0·28) was not significant. Prespecified secondary outcome measures of creatine kinase, muscle strength and function, motor nerve conduction, activities of daily living, and erectile function did not show a significant difference between the study groups in change from baseline. Quality of life, as measured by the physical component summary of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form version 2, favoured dutasteride (change in score from baseline: placebo, -3·6%, vs dutasteride, 2·1%; p=0·01), whereas the mental component summary favoured placebo (3·3%vs -3·2%; p=0·03). The dutasteride group had fewer patients reporting falls than did the placebo group (9 vs 16; p=0·048); there were no other significant differences in reported adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Our study did not show a significant effect of dutasteride on the progression of muscle weakness in SBMA, although there were secondary indications of both positive and negative effects compared with placebo. A longer trial duration or larger number of patients might be needed to show an effect on disease progression. Performance testing, QMA, and quality of life measures were identified as potentially useful endpoints for future therapeutic trials.