A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders.

BACKGROUND: Investigations of unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) have focused primarily on major depressive episode remission/recovery and relapse/recurrence. This is the first prospective, naturalistic, long-term study of the weekly symptomatic course of MDD. METHODS: The weekly depressive symptoms of 431 patients with MDD seeking treatment at 5 academic centers were divided into 4 levels of severity: (1) depressive symptoms at the threshold for MDD; (2) depressive symptoms at the threshold for minor depressive or dysthymic disorder (MinD); (3) subsyndromal or subthreshold depressive symptoms (SSDs), below the thresholds for MinD and MDD; and (4) no depressive symptoms. The percentage of weeks at each level, number of changes in symptom level, and medication status were analyzed overall and for 3 subgroups defined by mood disorder history. RESULTS: Patients were symptomatically ill in 59% of weeks. Symptom levels changed frequently (1.8/y), and 9 of 10 patients spent weeks at 3 or 4 different levels during follow-up. The MinD (27%) and SSD (17%) symptom levels were more common than the MDD (15%) symptom level. Patients with double depression and recurrent depression had more chronic symptoms than patients with their first lifetime major depressive episode (72% and 65%, respectively, vs 46% of follow-up weeks). CONCLUSION: The long-term weekly course of unipolar MDD is dominated by prolonged symptomatic chronicity. Combined MinD and SSD level symptoms were about 3 times more common (43%) than MDD level symptoms (15%). The symptomatic course is dynamic and changeable, and MDD, MinD, and SSD symptom levels commonly alternate over time in the same patients as a symptomatic continuum of illness activity of a single clinical disease.

Psychosocial disability during the long-term course of unipolar major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to investigate psychosocial disability in relation to depressive symptom severity during the long-term course of unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Monthly ratings of impairment in major life functions and social relationships were obtained during an average of 10 years' systematic follow-up of 371 patients with unipolar MDD in the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study. Random regression models were used to examine variations in psychosocial functioning associated with 3 levels of depressive symptom severity and the asymptomatic status. RESULTS: A progressive gradient of psychosocial impairment was associated with a parallel gradient in the level of depressive symptom severity, which ranges from asymptomatic to subthreshold depressive symptoms to symptoms at the minor depression/dysthymia level to symptoms at the MDD level. Significant increases in disability occurred with each stepwise increment in depressive symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS: During the long-term course, disability is pervasive and chronic but disappears when patients become asymptomatic. Depressive symptoms at levels of subthreshold depressive symptoms, minor depression/ dysthymia, and MDD represent a continuum of depressive symptom severity in unipolar MDD, each level of which is associated with a significant stepwise increment in psychosocial disability.

Future directions in anxiolytic pharmacotherapy.

It seems that psychopharmacology may be well on its way toward the goal of developing new anxiolytic drug(s) that are fast acting and free from the unwanted effects associated with the traditional benzodiazepines. Several specific candidates exist, based upon rational targeting of neurotransmitter receptors shown to be linked to the neurobiology of anxiety. Thus, partial agonists at the benzodiazepine receptor, such as alpidem, abecarnil, and bretazenil, have highly promising preclinical profiles, and some useful preliminary results in clinical testing of anxiety disorder subjects. Neurosteroids are another interesting set of pharmacologic agents that target the benzodiazepine receptor, have a preclinical anxiolytic profile, and now need to be tested in clinical populations. Targeting of various serotonin (5HT) receptor subtypes is a very active area of current research for novel anxiolytic agents. 5HT3 antagonists may have an anxiolytic profile, but clinical results are still preliminary and need more validation. Of considerable interest is the idea of developing new drugs that act at 5HT1A, 5HT2A, or 5HT2C receptors. It has even been proposed that simultaneous targeting of both 5HT2A and 5HT1A receptors could result in robust anxiolytic agents that will have more immediate onset of action than currently available 5HT1A receptor acting drugs. Neuropeptide receptor agonists and antagonists with anxiolytic properties may represent one of the most striking new classes of potential anxiolytic drugs, but this is an emerging field that still requires considerably more systematic clinical testing. Nevertheless, preclinical studies as well as early clinical studies suggest that at least three neuropeptide receptors are provocative targets for novel anxiolytic agents: namely antagonists for CCK-B receptors, antagonists for CRF receptors, and agonists for neuropeptide Y receptors. Rational development of new pharmacologic agents based upon targeting receptors for those neurotransmitters that regulate the neurobiology of anxiety promises to bring forth a number of exciting therapeutic agents for the treatment of anxiety disorders in the future.

Major depressive disorder: a prospective study of residual subthreshold depressive symptoms as predictor of rapid relapse.

BACKGROUND: The study tested whether level of recovery from major depressive episodes (MDEs) predicts duration of recovery in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. METHODS: MDD patients seeking treatment at five academic centers were followed naturalistically for 10 years or longer. Patients were divided on the basis of intake MDE recovery into residual depressive symptoms (SSD; N=82) and asymptomatic (N=155) recovery groups. They were compared on time to first episode relapse/recurrence, antidepressant medication, and comorbid mental disorders. Recovery level was also compared to prior history of recurrent MDEs ( > 4 lifetime episodes) as a predictor of relapse/recurrence. RESULTS: Residual SSD compared to asymptomatic recovery patients relapsed to their next MDE > 3 times faster (median=68 vs. 23 weeks) and to any depressive episode > 5 times faster (median=33 vs. 184 weeks). Residual SSD recovery status was significantly associated with early episode relapse (OR=3.65) and was stronger than history of recurrent MDEs (OR=1.64). Rapid relapse in the SSD group could not be attributed to higher comorbidity or lower antidepressant treatment. LIMITATIONS: Although inter-rater agreement on weekly depressive symptom ratings was very high (ICC > 0.88), some error may exist in assigning recovery levels. Antidepressant treatments were recorded, but were not controlled. CONCLUSIONS: MDE recovery is a powerful predictor of time to episode relapse/recurrence. Residual SSD recovery is associated with very rapid episode relapse which supports the idea that SSD is an active state of illness. Asymptomatic recovery is associated with prolonged delay in episode recurrence. These findings of this present study have important implications for the goals of treatment of MDD and for defining true MDE recovery.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Familial-developmental history, symptomatology, comorbidity and course with special reference to gender-related differences.

BACKGROUND: Demographic data, family history, psychopathological features, comorbidity and course of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are investigated and data generated to support the possible existence of two subgroups with gender-related differences of a broader nature. METHOD: Two hundred and sixty-three OCD patients, consecutive admissions to the Institute of Psychiatry, University of Pisa over a period of 5 years, not excluding those with comorbid Axis I and Axis II conditions, were studied. Patients were evaluated with a specifically designed semi-structured OCD interview. RESULTS: We found a significantly greater history of perinatal trauma in men who also had an earlier onset, greater likelihood of never having been married and a higher frequency of such symptoms as sexual, exactness and symmetry obsessions and odd rituals; by contrast, women suffered a later onset of the disorder, were more likely to be married, had higher rates of associated panic attacks after the onset of OCD and a higher frequency of aggressive obsessions at the onset of their illness, and were less frequently associated with bipolar disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Pathophysiological mechanisms in OCD seem to differ by gender. Perinatal trauma might predispose to earlier onset in men, whereas in women there is a close association between OCD and panic disorder.

Comorbidity as a fundamental feature of generalized anxiety disorders: results from the National Comorbidity Study (NCS).

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a relatively common mental disorder in the general population, afflicting approximately 3% of community residents during their lifetime. It is not a benign condition, since significantly increased disability and dysfunction are found in GAD subjects compared to non-GAD subjects. For decades GAD has frequently been observed in the context of other mental and substance abuse disorders. Initially the weight of clinical opinion indicated that GAD was a residual disease which should only be diagnosed when other mental disorders are not present. More recently there has been a growing recognition that comorbidity is a fundamental characteristic of the course and nature of GAD. In a series of secondary analyses conducted in subjects in the National Comorbidity Study database, we found that 8 out of 10 subjects with lifetime GAD also had a comorbid mood disorder during their lifetime. We found unipolar disorders to be four times more common in GAD than bipolar disorders (67% vs. 17%), providing indirect support for the previously reported observation that GAD and major depression may share a common genetic diathesis. In addition, our analyses support the conclusion that when comorbid mood disorders are present in GAD, a significant increase in associated disability and dysfunction is also found. Thus this comorbid relationship has important implications for clinical course and outcome.