ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LAE) is an essential element of staging and treatment of different gynecologic malignancies. However, LAE can induce asymptomatic and symptomatic pelvic lymphoceles (LCs) in a considerable percentage of patients. Therapy of symptomatic LCs may cause additional morbidity. The best strategy to reduce the rate of LCs has not established yet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and May 2012, transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic ± para-aortic LAE was performed at the Department of Gynecology at Charité University Hospital Berlin in 238 patients with cervical, endometrial, ovarian, or groin-positive vulvar cancer. The application of FloSeal (Baxter, Deerfield, IL) and CoSeal (Baxter) was used in 25 patients (group A) as an alternative to routine pelvic drainage after LAE. A case-control comparison was performed on 25 patients (group B) with bilateral drainage after complete LAE. The primary objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the method. As a secondary objective, we evaluated the incidence of LCs and symptomatic LCs in both groups. The detection of LCs was performed during oncologic follow-up by sonography, computed tomographic imaging, or magnetic resonance imaging. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pelvic (n = 50) or pelvic + para-aortic (n = 42) LAE was performed in 44 patients with cervical, 2 with endometrial, 1 with ovarian, and 2 with groin-positive vulvar cancer, respectively. In group B (n = 25), systematic bilateral pelvic drainage was placed after finishing LAE, whereas in group A (n = 25) LAE areas were sealed with 5 mL FloSeal on each side and sprayed with CoSeal afterward without placing drains. In 14 of 50 patients (28%), LCs were detected. In a subgroup of patients with cervical cancer (88% of the cohort), symptomatic LCs occurred in 11% in group A and 18% in group B. Operative revision of symptomatic LCs was necessary in 5% and 18% in groups A and B, respectively (p = .66). Mean Hospital stay was significant shorter in group A (6 days) versus B (8 days) (p = .027). CONCLUSION: The results of this case-controlled pilot study indicate that the application of FloSeal and CoSeal after transperitoneal LAE is feasible and safe, may reduce hospital stay, and may potentially decrease the rate of symptomatic LCs in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Subject(s)
Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable/therapeutic use , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Lymph Node Excision , Lymphocele , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Aged , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Germany , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymphocele/diagnosis , Lymphocele/etiology , Lymphocele/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pelvis/pathology , Pelvis/surgery , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: : Our aim was to present our initial clinical experience using a novel exoscopically based colposcopy system (VITOM) for the evaluation of cervical, vulvar, and vaginal diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : Women referred to the Charite Cervix Center, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, were included. Patients with abnormal Pap smear results, vulvar lesions, or a biopsy report of neoplasia of the lower genital tract were included into the study. The VITOM was used for colposcopic evaluation and directed biopsies. Colposcopic findings were reported according to the criteria of the Committee on Nomenclature of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Histologic diagnosis was described as normal, low-grade lesion, high-grade lesion (including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3, vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 2,3), or cancer. RESULTS: : We recruited 76 patients (54 with cervical, 4 with vaginal, and 18 with vulvar disease) to the prospective study. Four patients were pregnant. Of patients with cervical disease, 29% had a history of previous conization and 3.7% had a history of trachelectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the VITOM for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, 3 were 90%, 77%, 90% and 77%, respectively. Concordance of exocolposcopic impressions and histologic results was higher in high-grade lesions (K = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.32-0.87, p < .001) than in low-grade lesions (K = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.1-0.41, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: : Exocolposcopy with the VITOM is accurate and shows good correlation to histologic findings in high-grade disease of the lower genital tract. The potential advantages include patient and trainee involvement in examination, decision making, and documentation.
Subject(s)
Colposcopy/methods , Uterine Cervical Diseases/diagnosis , Vaginal Diseases/diagnosis , Vulvar Diseases/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Berlin , Biopsy , Female , Histocytochemistry , Humans , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Diseases/pathology , Vaginal Diseases/pathology , Vulvar Diseases/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify possible biomarkers for preterm delivery by analyzing midtrimester amniotic fluid. METHODS: Thirty-two amniotic fluid samples were studied; 16 patients had a spontaneous preterm delivery and 16 patients delivered at term. The proteomic technique consisted of surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF) using different types of solid chromatographic chips (Q10, CM10 and IMAC30). RESULTS: Mass spectrometry tracings were obtained from the amniotic fluids of both patients who delivered preterm and patients who delivered at term. Seven potential markers were identified to be differentially expressed in patients who delivered preterm. CONCLUSIONS: Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid obtained in the midtrimester reveals the presence of a set of proteins in patients at risk for preterm delivery.