Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(5): 103603, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35985081

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Intraorbital and intracranial complications of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis require timely medical and surgical treatment to prevent the development of long-term neurologic sequelae. The era of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) has complicated the management of complicated acute rhinosinusitis, especially when patients have concurrent acute sinusitis and COVID-19 infection. This case series aims to highlight the clinical course of pediatric patients at a single tertiary pediatric hospital with concurrent complicated bacterial rhinosinusitis and COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of pediatric patients treated for COVID-19 and complications from acute sinusitis was performed using billing records for the year 2020-2021 at a single pediatric tertiary hospital. Data regarding presentation, management, microbiology, and hospital course was collected for review. RESULTS: A total of 6 patients with complicated bacterial sinusitis in the setting of COVID-19 infection were included. All patients were initially managed with medical therapy, consisting of systemic antibiotics, but 3 of these patients ultimately required surgical intervention. Cultures from the cohort grew Staphylococcus aureus, streptococcus intermedius, streptococcus constellatus or Prevotella species. All patients experienced clinical improvements and were eventually discharged home with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 continues to be an unusual disease especially for the pediatric population. Concurrent complicated acute rhinosinusitis and COVID-19 appear to have higher rates of surgical requirement in the pediatric population. COVID-19 safety precautions have influenced management practices for patients with severe bacterial rhinologic infections. While there may be an association between complicated bacterial rhinosinusitis and COVID-19 infection, further research is necessary to determine a true correlation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Staphylococcal Infections , Acute Disease , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Child , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/microbiology , Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy
2.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(6): 103066, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934006

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (ESPAL) and endovascular arterial embolization (EAE) are increasingly common treatment options for patients with refractory epistaxis. The objective of this study was to compare the utilization pattern and clinical outcomes between these interventions within our single multi-hospital network. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing ESPAL and/or EAE within any of the hospitals in a single healthcare network between 2008 and 2017 was conducted. We compared differences in procedure utilization with various hospital characteristics. Secondarily, we evaluated clinical outcomes and costs associated with each procedure. RESULTS: Forty-three ESPAL and 33 EAE procedures were performed across 7 hospitals, with the majority of procedures being performed at teaching institutions (65% and 91%, p = .013). The majority of both interventions were performed in larger hospitals and EAE patients were more likely to undergo inter-hospital transfer compared to ESPAL patients (48.5% and 16.3%, p = .02). Success rates for ESPAL and EAE were comparable (95% and 93%); however, the median direct cost of treatment for EAE was significantly higher than the cost for ESPAL ($12984.89 and $5002.02, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of both ESPAL and EAE interventions were performed at teaching and larger hospitals. Transfers occurring prior to EAE may have been due to the limited availability of interventional radiology services, and likely contributed to the increased cost of treatment. ESPAL is a known cost-effective management strategy and should be considered early in treatment algorithms of refractory epistaxis.


Subject(s)
Arteries/surgery , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Epistaxis/therapy , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Ligation/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sphenoid Sinus/blood supply , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Embolization, Therapeutic/economics , Endoscopy/economics , Endovascular Procedures/economics , Female , Humans , Ligation/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 28(3): e274-e277, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28468220

ABSTRACT

Forehead recontouring is a common part of facial feminization surgery. The procedure, which alters the shape and structure of the frontal bone, is regarded as safe and well tolerated by patients. The occurrence of delayed complications, however, is much less understood. The authors describe a patient involving the development of a sinocutaneous fistula as a delayed complication of forehead recontouring surgery. The clinical presentation and management of this patient are discussed. As facial feminization surgery expands as a cosmetic option for patients who desire more feminine facial features, practitioners should recognize the potential risk of sinonasal complications associated with forehead recontouring surgery.


Subject(s)
Cutaneous Fistula/etiology , Feminization , Forehead/surgery , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Rhytidoplasty/adverse effects , Transgender Persons , Aged , Cutaneous Fistula/diagnosis , Endoscopy , Female , Fistula/diagnosis , Fistula/etiology , Frontal Sinus , Humans , Male , Paranasal Sinus Diseases/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 15(7): 41, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26143392

ABSTRACT

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a broad clinical syndrome that is characterized by prolonged mucosal inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses, and is typically divided into two subtypes based on the presence or absence of nasal polyps. The etiology and pathogenesis of both forms remain areas of active research. Over the last 15 years, a number of hypotheses have been proposed to explain all or part of the clinical CRS spectrum. These hypotheses reflect the concept that CRS results from a dysfunctional interplay between individual host characteristics and factors exogenous to the host. Six broad theories on CRS etiology and pathogenesis are discussed as follows: (1) the "fungal hypothesis," (2) the "superantigen hypothesis," (3) the "biofilm hypothesis," and (4) the "microbiome hypothesis," all of which emphasize key environmental factors, and (5) the "eicosanoid hypothesis" and (6) the "immune barrier hypothesis," which describe specific host factors. These theories are reviewed, and the evidence supporting them is critically appraised.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis/immunology , Sinusitis/immunology , Animals , Biofilms , Chronic Disease , Eicosanoids/immunology , Humans , Microbiota
5.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; : 19458924241280757, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39279285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporary eosinophilia is a potential adverse reaction of monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of a variety of type 2 inflammatory conditions, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical significance of eosinophilia and eosinophilic adverse reactions following the initiation of biologic therapy are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe the postmarketing, eosinophilic adverse reactions with clinical significance in patients treated with the 3 biologic therapies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for CRSwNP: dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab. METHODS: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard was searched for eosinophilic adverse reactions related to dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab treatments from November 2004 to December 2022. Data regarding each of the eosinophilic adverse reactions were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 218, 270, and 134 reports of eosinophilic adverse reactions were reported among patients who were treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, respectively. The most common eosinophilic adverse reaction was eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (338 patients), followed by eosinophilic respiratory tract reactions (158 patients). The most common indication for biological treatment among the reaction groups was asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic adverse reactions are rare but consequential complications of biological treatment. They are more common among patients treated for asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Measuring and monitoring blood eosinophil levels may be appropriate in specific clinical instances when patients are started on different biologic therapies for type 2 inflammatory conditions.

6.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 38(4): 258-263, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623643

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inhalant allergens provide a source of environmental factors that contribute to the development of clinical symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between inhalant allergens and AD. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using three databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalKey, and Web of Science. Search terms, including "atopic dermatitis," "atopic eczema," and "eczema," were used in combination with "inhalant allergen," "inhaled allergen," and "aeroallergen" to identify relevant published manuscripts that highlight the relationship between AD and exposures to inhalant allergens. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were suitable for review. The studies included in the review investigated the effect of inhalant allergens on the clinical manifestations of AD through bronchial provocation, direct skin contact, and allergen sensitization. CONCLUSION: There is a significant relationship between exposures to inhalant allergens and AD. Inhalant allergens may aggravate AD symptoms by either bronchial provocation or direct skin contact. Sensitization of inhalant allergens, mainly house dust mites, follows a specific age-related pattern.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Dermatitis, Atopic , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/etiology , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects
7.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 9(4): e1299, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39015551

ABSTRACT

A novel bioresorbable agent on the market is PuraGel® (3-D Matrix, Tokyo, Japan), a RADA-16 product that acts as a synthetic hemostatic and space-filling gel that promotes wound healing and prevents adhesion formation. Given the reported benefits of accelerated wound healing and scar tissue prevention, there are multiple otolaryngologic applications where RADA-16 might improve outcomes. Our study highlights current utilization and associated post-operative complications with this product.

8.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 14(11): 1776-1801, 2024 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39404739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in children with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in children with PAD. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through December 2023. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on the incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, the incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence varied across the reviewed domains. CONCLUSION: Based on the currently available evidence, the incidence of PAD in children with recalcitrant CRS can be significantly elevated. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher level studies that compare different treatments in children with PAD and rhinosinusitis.


Subject(s)
Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Sinusitis/therapy , Sinusitis/immunology , Rhinitis/therapy , Rhinitis/immunology , Child , Chronic Disease , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/therapy , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/immunology , Rhinosinusitis
9.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 19(8): 831-836, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36996022

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Topical corticosteroid therapies are the most popular prescribed medications for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). While topical corticosteroids effectively reduce the inflammatory burden associated with CRS, their distribution inside the nasal cavity is limited and primarily dependent on their delivery device. Corticosteroid-eluting implants serve as relatively novel technology, allowing targeted, sustained release of a high concentration of corticosteroids directly onto the sinus mucosa. Three types of corticosteroid-eluting implants can be characterized: 1. intraoperatively inserted corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, 2. postoperatively inserted, office-based corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, and 3. office-based corticosteroid-eluting implants for naïve paranasal sinuses. AREAS COVERED: The review summarizes the different steroid-eluting sinus implants, their indications for use in CRS patients, and the existing evidence regarding their clinical efficacy. We also highlight potential areas for improvement and development. EXPERT OPINION: Corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants highlight an evolving field that is constantly investigating and adding new treatment options to the market. Presently, corticosteroid-eluting implants for CRS are most commonly applied intraoperatively and postoperatively with endoscopic sinus surgery, providing significant improvements in mucosal healing and reducing the amount of surgical failures. Future development around corticosteroid-eluting implants should focus on strategies to reduce the amount of crusting around the implants.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Rhinitis/surgery , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Paranasal Sinuses/pathology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Endoscopy , Chronic Disease
10.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(4): 460-469, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549446

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the literature on nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and its current clinical and research applicability in the diagnosis and treatment of different sinonasal inflammatory diseases, including acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A search of the PubMed database was conducted to include articles on nNO and sinonasal diseases from January 2003 to January 2020. All article titles and abstracts were reviewed to assess their relevance to nNO and ABRS, AR, or CRS. After selection of the manuscripts, full-text reviews were performed to synthesize current understandings of nNO and its applications to the various sinonasal inflammatory diseases. RESULTS: A total of 79 relevant studies from an initial 559 articles were identified using our focused search and review criteria. nNO has been consistently shown to be decreased in ABRS and CRS, especially in cases with nasal polyps. While AR is associated with elevations in nNO, nNO levels have also been found to be lower in AR cases with higher symptom severity. The obstruction of the paranasal sinuses is speculated to be an important variable in the relationship between nNO and the sinonasal diseases. Treatment of these diseases appears to affect nNO through the reduction of inflammatory disease burden and also mitigation of sinus obstruction. CONCLUSION: nNO has been of increasing interest to researchers and clinicians over the last decade. The most compelling data for nNO as a clinical tool involve CRS. nNO can be used as a marker of ostiomeatal complex patency. Variations in measurement techniques and technology continue to impede standardized interpretation and implementation of nNO as a biomarker for sinonasal inflammatory diseases.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis, Allergic , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Nitric Oxide , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Biomarkers , Chronic Disease
11.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 13(12): 2205-2230, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that the prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in patients with recurrent and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in patients with PAD. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through August 2022. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains. CONCLUSION: Based on the currently available evidence, PAD can occur in up to 50% of patients with recalcitrant CRS. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher-level studies that compare different treatments in patients with PAD and rhinosinusitis.


Subject(s)
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Adult , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Rhinitis/therapy , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/therapy , Chronic Disease , Prevalence
12.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 13(5): 865-876, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36575965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The escalating negative impact of climate change on our environment has the potential to result in significant morbidity of rhinologic diseases. METHODS: Evidence based review of examples of rhinologic diseases including allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis was performed. RESULTS: The lower socioeconomic population, including historically oppressed groups, will be disproportionately affected. CONCLUSIONS: We need a systematic approach to improve healthcare database infrastructure and funding to promote diverse scientific collaboration to address these healthcare needs.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Climate Change , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Chronic Disease
13.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 2885-2890, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36866689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Commonly used endoscopic grading scales, such as the nasal polyp scale, inadequately describe the degree of polyposis found postoperatively in the paranasal sinus cavities. The purpose of this study was to create a novel grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities, the Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS). METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized to establish the POPS using consensus opinion among 13 general otolaryngologists, rhinologists, and allergists. Postoperative endoscopy videos from 50 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained rhinologists and scored according to the POPS. Videos were rated again 1 month later by the same reviewers, and scores were assessed for test-retest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Overall inter-rater reliability for the first and second reviews of the 52 videos was Kf = 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) and Kf = 0.50 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) for the POPS. Intra-rater reliability showed near-perfect test-retest reliability for the POPS with Kf = 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). CONCLUSION: The POPS is an easy-to-use, reliable, and novel objective endoscopic grading scale that more accurately describes polyp recurrence in the postoperative state which will be useful in the future for measuring the efficacy of various medical and surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:2885-2890, 2023.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/surgery , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Nasal Polyps/diagnosis , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Chronic Disease
14.
Immunotherapy ; 14(8): 655-662, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510314

ABSTRACT

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a heterogenous disease with complex underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Biologics have been proven to be an effective add-on therapeutic option in severe and/or refractory cases. Currently, dupilumab, omalizumab and mepolizumab have phase III data to support their use in these patients and have received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration specifically for the treatment of nasal polyposis. Each of these biologics has shown its ability to reduce nasal polyp size and improve nasal congestion/obstruction and sense of smell, but additional research is needed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the different biologic agents for different nasal polyposis endotypes.


Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a complex disease that has many different causes. Biological therapies have been proven to be effective when added on to standard treatment in severe and/or cases that are not responsive to initial treatment. Currently, dupilumab, omalizumab and mepolizumab have data supporting their use in such patients and have received approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CRSwNP. Each of these biologics has shown its ability to reduce nasal polyp size and improve nasal congestion/obstruction and sense of smell, but additional research is needed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the different biologic agents for different CRSwNP subtypes.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy , Chronic Disease , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36474667

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) is an increasingly utilized approach for resection of pituitary tumors. Prior studies have evaluated preoperative tumor size, location, and extent as prognostic factors for surgical resection. There is little data on the relationship between preoperative pituitary tumor radiographic morphology and surgical outcomes. Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Setting: Single tertiary care institution. Subjects and Methods: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans from patients undergoing ETSS for pituitary tumor resections from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. A neuroradiologist classified these pituitary tumors into six morphologic groups, each defined by volume, dimensions, extension, and shape. Surgical difficulty, rates of incomplete resection, and postoperative complications were then stratified in relation to the morphologic groups. Results: Pituitary tumors from 131 patients were classified from preoperative imaging into six characteristic morphologies: (1) microtumor, (2) round, (3) transverse oblong, (4) superior-inferior oblong, (5) bilobed, and (6) large lobulated. Tumors that were characterized with the large lobulated, bilobed, and transverse oblong morphologies correlated with higher rates of postoperative evidence of residual tumor (70%, 36%, and 47%, respectively, all P < 0.002). Likewise, large lobulated, bilobed, and transverse oblong morphologies were also associated with intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (70%, 31%, and 35%, respectively, all P < 0.05). Conclusions: We describe a novel descriptive system for the morphology of pituitary tumors that can be determined from preoperative imaging. Different tumor morphologic groups are associated with varying degrees of gross tumor resection, complications, and surgical difficulty. Utilizing pituitary tumor morphology may aid surgeons in planning the extent of resection, need for complex closure, and patient counseling.

16.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(5S): S175-S193, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550800

ABSTRACT

This article presents guidelines for initial imaging utilization in patients presenting with sinonasal disease, including acute rhinosinusitis without and with suspected orbital and intracranial complications, chronic rhinosinusitis, suspected invasive fungal sinusitis, suspected sinonasal mass, and suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak. CT and MRI are the primary imaging modalities used to evaluate patients with sinonasal disease. Given its detailed depiction of bony anatomy, CT can accurately demonstrate the presence of sinonasal disease, bony erosions, and anatomic variants, and is essential for surgical planning. Given its superior soft tissue contrast, MRI can accurately identify clinically suspected intracranial and intraorbital complications, delineate soft tissue extension of tumor and distinguish mass from obstructed secretions.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Sinusitis , Societies, Medical , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , United States
17.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 21(9): 1143-1149, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34334061

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with diminished quality of life for patients and high costs and resource utilization for disease management. The understanding of CRSwNP pathophysiology has progressed with identification of various inflammatory biomarkers and subsequent development of monoclonal antibodies that target the underlying mechanisms of inflammation.Areas covered: Omalizumab is a biologic agent for CRSwNP treatment that targets immunoglobulin (Ig)-E. The US FDA has approved the use of omalizumab as an add-on biologic therapy for nasal polyposis in December 2020. Two Phase III clinical trials, POLYP 1 and POLYP 2, have shown that omalizumab improves both subjective patient-reported outcomes and objective physician-evaluated metrics for CRSwNP. Ongoing studies are still exploring the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of biologics for CRSwNP.Expert opinion: Biologics will continue develop as a viable management option for CRSwNP. Omalizumab is regarded as a promising addition to current treatment strategies for refractory disease.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Chronic Disease , Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy
18.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(5): 320-328, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33170026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of recent techniques and technologies for the application of topical corticosteroid therapy immediately following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A comprehensive search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify publications between January 2000 and December 2019 detailing clinical trials that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative applications of topical corticosteroids for CRS. RESULTS: A total of 21 articles, all of which highlight a variety of corticosteroid-infused products, including Propel corticosteroid-eluting stents, NasoPore, Merocel, SinuBand, calcium alginate, and bioresorbable gel-type products, are included for review. Propel stents are the only devices that have achieved level 1A evidence in terms of efficacy and have data to support their safety. The remaining products have shown mixed results in terms of efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: A wide range of techniques and technologies have been introduced to enhance the topical delivery of corticosteroids into the neosinuses after ESS for CRS. Regarding efficacy, there is level 1A evidence to support the use of Propel stents. Most of the remaining strategies show some degree of efficacy. Direct comparisons across the different strategies are limited owing to the varied uses of delivery vectors, corticosteroid choices, and doses of corticosteroids. Propel stents and SinuBand have sufficient data to support systemic and ocular safety, whereas the remaining products have limited data to support their safety.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Endoscopy/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Chronic Disease , Humans , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
19.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 11(11): 1577-1587, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076362

ABSTRACT

In the last two decades, the development of culture-independent genomic techniques has facilitated an increased appreciation of the microbiota-immunity interactions and their role in a multitude of chronic inflammatory diseases such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), asthma, inflammatory bowel disease and dermatitis. While the pathologic role of bacteria in chronic inflammatory diseases is generally accepted, the understanding of the role of fungi remains controversial. Chronic rhinosinusitis, specifically the phenotype linked to nasal polyps, represents a spectrum of chronic inflammatory diseases typically characterized by a type 2 immune response. Studies on the microbiota within sinus cavities from healthy and diseased patients have focused on the bacterial community, mainly highlighting the loss of diversity associated with sinus inflammation. Within the various CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) phenotypes, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis presents an opportunity to investigate the role of fungi in chronic type 2 immune responses as well as the antifungal immune pathways designed to prevent invasive fungal diseases. In this review, we examine the spectrum of fungi-associated sinus diseases highlighting the interaction between fungal species and host immune status on disease presentation. With a focus on fungi and type 2 immune response, we highlight the current knowledge and its limitations of the sinus mycobiota along with cellular interactions and activated molecular pathways linked to fungi.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Chronic Disease , Fungi , Humans
20.
Laryngoscope ; 131(9): 1952-1957, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33616224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the long-term (12-24 months) safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve as treatment for chronic rhinitis. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective, single-arm clinical study. METHODS: The study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2020. Study endpoints included change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), physician assessment of improvement using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Ninety-one participants completed the study through the initial 12-month study period. Sixty-two participants consented to the long-term follow-up with 57 completing the 24-month follow-up. Significant improvements in the total rTNSS were reflected in a median change from baseline of -3.0 or -4.0 at all timepoints (P < .001). Greater than 80.0% of participants achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of improvement by ≥1 point on the rTNSS at all follow-ups. Total RQLQ scores indicated significant improvement (P < .0001) in quality of life. Over 77% of participants achieved the MCID (≥0.5 points) for the total RQLQ score. According to the CGI-I, ≥83.0% experienced improvement at all but the 12-month visit (61.9%). One participant experienced two treatment-related serious adverse events (epistaxis and retained pledget). A total of 29 nonserious treatment-related AEs were reported in 23 participants; most events were transient and resolved with little to no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Cryotherapy significantly and clinically improves rhinitis symptoms and quality of life with outcomes that are durable through 24 months after treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1952-1957, 2021.


Subject(s)
Cryosurgery/adverse effects , Nasal Mucosa/innervation , Rhinitis/psychology , Rhinitis/surgery , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cryosurgery/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Mucosa/pathology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Safety , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL