Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes in childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment exposures for childhood cancer reduce ovarian reserve. However, the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among female survivors is not well established. METHODS: Five-year survivors of childhood cancer in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, which captures national ART outcomes. The authors assessed the live birth rate, the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and associations with treatment exposure using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple ovarian stimulations per individual. Siblings from a random sample of survivors were recruited to serve as a comparison group. RESULTS: Among 9885 female survivors, 137 (1.4%; median age at diagnosis, 10 years [range, 0-20 years]; median years of follow-up after age 18 years, 11 years [range, 2-11 years]) underwent 224 ovarian stimulations using autologous or donor eggs and/or gestational carriers (157 autologous ovarian stimulation cycles, 67 donor ovarian stimulation cycles). In siblings, 33 (1.4%) underwent 51 autologous or donor ovarian stimulations. Of those who used embryos from autologous eggs without using gestational carriers, 97 survivors underwent 155 stimulations, resulting in 49 live births, for a 31.6% chance of live birth per ovarian stimulation (vs. 38.3% for siblings; p = .39) and a 43.9% chance of live birth per transfer (vs. 50.0%; p = .33). Prior treatment with cranial radiation therapy (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97) and pelvic radiation therapy (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.73) resulted in a reduced chance of live birth compared with siblings. The likelihood of live birth after ART treatment in survivors was not affected by alkylator exposure (cyclophosphamide-equivalent dose, ≥8000 mg/m2 vs. none; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.52-2.05). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood cancer survivors are as likely to undergo treatment using ART as sibling controls. The success of ART treatment was not reduced after alkylator exposure. The results from the current study provide needed guidance on the use of ART in this population.

Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do embryos that undergo a thaw, biopsy and re-vitrification (TBR) for pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have different ploidy and transfer outcomes compared with fresh biopsied embryos? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all embryos that underwent the following procedures: fresh biopsy for PGT-A (fresh biopsy); embryos that were warmed, biopsied for PGT-A and re-vitrified (single biopsy TBR); embryos with a no signal result after initial biopsy that were subsequently warmed, biopsied and re-vitrified (double biopsy TBR). The patients who underwent transfers of those embryos at a single academic institution between March 2013 and December 2021 were also studied. RESULTS: About 30% of embryos planned for TBR underwent attrition. Euploidy rates were similar after biopsy: fresh biopsy (42.7%); single biopsy TBR (47.5%) (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.88 to 1.12); and double biopsy TBR 50.3% (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.80 to 1.21). Ongoing pregnancy over 8 weeks was not statistically significant (double biopsy TBR: 6/19 [31.6%] versus fresh biopsy: 650/1062 [61.2%]) (adjusted RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.03). The miscarriage rate increased (double biopsy TBR: 4/19 [21.1%] versus fresh biopsy: 66/1062 [6.2%])(RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.38 to 8.31). Live birth rate was also lower per transfer for the double biopsy TBR group (double biopsy TBR [18.75%] versus fresh biopsy [53.75%]) (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.98), though not after adjustment (adjusted RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09). These differences were not seen when single biopsy TBR embryos were transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Embryos that undergo TBR have an equivalent euploidy rate to fresh biopsied embryos. Despite that, double biopsy TBR embryos may have impaired transfer outcomes.

The impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization treatment, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Citing the risks of administering anesthesia to patients with obesity, few fertility centers offer in vitro fertilization as a treatment modality for patients with body mass indexes ≥40 kg/m2. Although previous studies have assessed clinical pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates in patients who spontaneously conceive with body mass indexes ≥50 kg/m2, there is a paucity of in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcome data in patients with severe obesity who conceive after in vitro fertilization. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes in patients with obesity undergoing in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study within an academic fertility center including 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020; this cohort was used to determine in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes. A second embedded cohort of 867 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles that resulted in ongoing clinical pregnancies and deliveries within a single tertiary hospital system was used to determine pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. All patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 underwent consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist before starting treatment and a preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist before oocyte retrieval. Cycles were grouped by body mass index at cycle start (30-34.9, 35-39.9, 40-44.9, 45-49.9, and ≥50 kg/m2). Log-binomial regression and Poisson regression with an offset were fitted with body mass index of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, adjusting for potential confounders including oocyte age, patient age, embryo quality, transfer type, and coexisting comorbidities. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of preeclampsia with severe features, gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and birthweight. RESULTS: There were 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycle starts from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020. Of these, 1008 cycles were in the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 group, 547 in the 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 group, 277 in the 40 to 44.9 kg/m2 group, 161 in the 45 to 49.9 kg/m2 group, and 76 in the ≥50 kg/m2 body mass index group. Live birth rate was not significantly different between groups. The body mass index ≥50 kg/m2 group was significantly more likely to experience preeclampsia with severe features when compared with the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 body mass index group (absolute risk reduction, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-6.67). Fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and neonatal birthweights were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with body mass indexes from 30 to 60 kg/m2 who conceived via in vitro fertilization and received comprehensive prenatal care at a tertiary care hospital, in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes were largely comparable. These data support a collaborative care approach with maternal-fetal medicine specialists and skilled anesthesiologists, reinforcing the notion that in vitro fertilization should not be withheld as a treatment modality from patients with obesity.

Treatment of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in an in vitro fertilization population.

BACKGROUND: Asherman syndrome refers to the presence of intrauterine adhesions, which have clinical implications, including infertility. There are few studies assessing the effect of serial hysteroscopies for adhesiolysis on reproductive and pregnancy outcomes among women who subsequently undergo in vitro fertilization, and none have looked at maternal, neonatal, or placental pregnancy complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis among a cohort of patients who subsequently undergo in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for intrauterine adhesions at our center between 2005-2020 and subsequently attempted conception by in vitro fertilization. A control group of patients who underwent in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor infertility and had no history of intrauterine adhesions was chosen for comparison. RESULTS: There were 691 patients included in this study, of whom 168 were intrauterine adhesion cases. The implantation rate (41.3% in both groups) and live birth rate (adjusted relative risk, 0.93 [95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.14]) were not statistically different between cases and controls. When grouped by number of previous adhesiolysis surgeries, patients who underwent ≥2 adhesiolysis surgeries had a lower live birth rate than controls (adjusted relative risk, 0.53 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.99]). Endometrial thickness before the transfer was significantly reduced in cases vs controls (8.23 vs 10.25 mm; adjusted relative risk, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.90]). Adverse placental outcomes, including placenta accreta spectrum, placenta previa, or vasa previa, were significantly more likely to occur in cases than controls (adjusted relative risk, 2.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.46]). When grouped by the number of adhesiolysis surgeries, the risk appeared to increase as the number of prior surgeries increased. This is likely because of the increased severity of these adhesions. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients with a history of treated intrauterine adhesions have the same live birth rate as patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor indications. However, the subgroup of patients who require multiple surgeries for correction of intrauterine adhesions had a lower live birth rate after in vitro fertilization than controls. Patients with a history of treated intrauterine adhesions are at significantly greater risk of placenta accreta syndrome disorder than control patients who underwent in vitro fertilization for nonuterine factor indications.

Social media's impact on patient provider choice.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate if social media (SM) impacts a patient's provider choice in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI). METHODS: This was a survey-based study completed in July 2022. A survey link was distributed using Amazon Mechanical Turk, which directed participants to a Qualtrics-based survey. Participants were 18-50 years old. The primary outcome was to identify the preferred method for finding a REI provider based on time spent on SM (< 1 h, 1-3 h, 3 + h). RESULTS: A total of 336 responses were analyzed. Fifty-four percent of respondents used SM < 1 h, 33.33% used 1-3 h, and 12.80% used 3 + h. The majority (69.05%) of respondents stated that they would seek out a REI provider/clinic if they had difficulty conceiving. Most respondents identified asking their primary care physician (44.64%) as the primary means for finding an REI provider/clinic and did not prefer to use SM. Although Facebook (< 1 h: 30.94%, 1-3 h: 31.25%, 3 + h: 27.91%) was the most utilized SM platform among respondents, YouTube was the preferred SM platform if respondents were to follow a REI clinic with a preference for posts focusing on education (< 1 h: 55.68%, 1-3 h: 43.12%, 3 + h: 58.14%) or stress management (< 1 h: 17.61%, 1-3 h: 29.36%, 3 + h: 20.94%). CONCLUSION: Most respondents utilize traditional methods when choosing their REI provider or clinic and would not utilize SM. However, SM, primarily through YouTube, may be helpful for educating infertility patients and providing support and stress relief while they undergo treatment.

The effects of male anxiety and depression on IVF outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the effects of male anxiety and depression on IVF outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Men with anxiety had lower final total motile sperm counts (fTMSC) during IVF compared to men without anxiety; however, there were no differences in live birth rates (LBRs). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Studies have shown that male anxiety causes low sperm motility, worse sperm morphology, and increased DNA fragmentation, which are known to be influential factors on fertilization rates and embryo quality during IVF. However, data are lacking on whether there is a direct association between male anxiety and/or depression and IVF outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a survey-based, retrospective cohort study completed at a single, large hospital-affiliated fertility center with 222 respondents who underwent IVF with or without ICSI. The study was conducted between 6 September 2018 and 27 December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Male partners of couples who underwent IVF or IVF/ICSI completed a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. They were separated into two groups for both anxiety (HADS-A ≥ 8 or HADS-A < 8) and depression (HADS-D ≥ 8 or HADS-D < 8). Men with an elevated HADS-A or HADS-D score ≥8 were considered to have anxiety or depression, respectively. The primary outcome was LBR. Secondary outcomes included semen parameters at the time of IVF, cycle outcomes, pregnancy outcomes, and prevalence of erectile dysfunction and low libido. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were a total of 222 respondents, of whom 22.5% had a HADS-A ≥ 8 and 6.5% had a HADS-D ≥ 8. The average age of respondents was 37.38 ± 4.90 years old. Antidepressant use was higher in the respondents with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≥ 8 (P < 0.05). Smoking use was similar between groups for both HADS-A and HADS-D (P > 0.05). When adjusted for male BMI, antidepressant use and smoking, men with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≥ 8 had similar rates of erectile dysfunction (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.12 (95% CI 0.60, 2.06)) and low libido (aRR = 1.70 (95% CI 0.91, 3.15)) compared to those with a HADS-A or HADS-D ≤ 8. Men with a HADS-A ≥ 8 were more likely to have a lower fTMSC on the day of oocyte retrieval (11.8 ≥ 8 vs 20.1 < 8, adjusted ß = -0.66 (95% CI -1.22, -0.10)). However, the LBR per embryo transfer (ET) was similar between the HADS-A groups (43.2% ≥8 vs 45.1% <8, adjusted relative risk = 0.90 (95% CI 0.65, 1.06)). Although depression was uncommon in the entire cohort, the HADS-D groups were clinically similar for fTMSC (18.7 ≥ 8 vs 16.0 < 8) and LBR per ET (46.7% ≥8 vs 45.4% <8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Limitations of our study are the survey-based design, the lack of sperm morphology assessment at the time of IVF, our inability to fully assess the HADS-D ≥ 8 cohort due to the small sample size and the large Caucasian demographic. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Couples undergoing IVF have an increased likelihood of suffering from anxiety and/or depression. There is currently a debate on whether or not men should be treated with antidepressants while attempting to conceive due to potential detrimental effects on sperm quality. Our study shows that, regardless of antidepressant use, couples with men who did or did not report anxiety and/or depression have similar LBRs when undergoing IVF. Therefore, it is important to assess both partners for mental health and to not withhold treatment due to a concern about a potential impact of antidepressants or anxiety/depression on sperm quality. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding to report for this study. Z.W. is a contributing author for UptoDate. S.S.S. is on the advisory board for Ferring Pharmaceuticals. E.G. was a medical consultant for Hall-Matson Esq, Teladoc, and CRICO and is a contributing author for UptoDate. The remaining authors have nothing to report. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The effect of the Ontario Fertility Program on IVF utilization and outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the demographics and clinical outcomes similar for patients aged ≥40 but <43 years seeking IVF in Ontario, Canada, before and after implementation of the Ontario Fertility Program (OFP), which supports public funding of IVF up to age 43? DESIGN: Retrospective database review using the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry Plus (CARTR Plus) and Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario databases. Cycles from women who underwent autologous IVF and who were aged ≥40 and <43 years were analysed during a 2-year period prior to (2014-2015) and after (2016-2017) introduction of publicly funded IVF through the OFP. RESULTS: There was an almost doubling of treatment cycles in women aged 40-42 in Ontario after the OFP launch. Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle start (17.0% versus 13.3%, P < 0.001) and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per stimulation cycle (20.5% versus 16.8%, P < 0.001) were statistically higher in women before OFP implementation. While cumulative live birth rate per cycle start was statistically lower after funding was introduced (12.5% versus 10.5%, P = 0.027), the clinical importance of this difference appears small. Outcomes were above the 10% live birth per cycle threshold recommended by the Advisory Process for Infertility Services panel, commissioned by the Ministry of Health, to determine access to publicly funded IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IVF in women over age 40 doubled with access to OFP funding; however, eligibility criteria based on age still meet the target of achieving a cumulative live birth rate of at least 10%.

Cytogenetic outcomes following a failed cell-free DNA screen: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 35,146 singleton pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA screening is routinely offered to pregnant individuals to screen for aneuploidies. Although cell-free DNA screening is consistently more accurate than multiple-marker screening, it sometimes fails to yield a result. These test failures and their clinical implications are poorly described in the literature. Some studies suggest that a failed cell-free DNA screening result is associated with increased likelihood of cytogenetic abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The objectives were to determine: (1) the proportion of test failures on first and subsequent attempts, and (2) whether a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt is associated with increased likelihood of common aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies). STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry, Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario. The study included all singleton pregnancies in Ontario with an estimated date of delivery from September 1, 2016 to March 31, 2019 that had a cell-free DNA screening record in the registry. Specific outcomes (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies) of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt were compared with those of pregnancies with low-risk cell-free DNA-screening results using modified Poisson regression adjusted for funding status (publicly funded vs self-paid), gestational age at screening, method of conception, and maternal age for autosomal aneuploidies. RESULTS: Our cohort included 35,146 pregnancies that had cell-free DNA screening during the study period. The overall cell-free DNA screening failure rate was 4.8% on first attempt and 2.2% after multiple attempts. An abnormal cytogenetic result for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, or sex chromosome aneuploidies was identified in 19.4% of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screening for which cytogenetic testing was performed. Pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt had a relative risk of 130.3 (95% confidence interval, 64.7-262.6) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13, and a risk difference of 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.3), compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result. The risk of sex chromosome aneuploidies was not significantly greater in pregnancies with a failed result compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.9; relative difference, 1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 3.2). CONCLUSION: Cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeated testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Perinatal and pediatric outcomes associated with the use of fertility treatment: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Around 2% of births in Ontario, Canada involve the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and it is rising due to the implementation of a publicly funded ART program in 2016. To better understand the impact of fertility treatments, we assessed perinatal and pediatric health outcomes associated with ART, hormonal treatments, and artificial insemination compared with spontaneously conceived births. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using provincial birth registry data linked with fertility registry and health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Live births and stillbirths from January 2013 to July 2016 were included and followed to age one. The risks of adverse pregnancy, birth and infant health outcomes were assessed by conception method (spontaneous conception, ART - in vitro fertilization and non-ART - ovulation induction, intra-uterine or vaginal insemination) using risk ratios and incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Propensity score weighting using a generalized boosted model was applied to adjust for confounding. RESULT(S): Of 177,901 births with a median gestation age of 39 weeks (IQR 38.0-40.0), 3,457 (1.9%) were conceived via ART, and 3,511 (2.0%) via non-ART treatments. There were increased risks (adjusted risk ratio [95% CI]) of cesarean delivery (ART: 1.44 [1.42-1.47]; non-ART: 1.09 [1.07-1.11]), preterm birth (ART: 2.06 [1.98-2.14]; non-ART: 1.85 [1.79-1.91]), very preterm birth (ART: 2.99 [2.75-3.25]; non-ART: 1.89 [1.67-2.13]), 5-min Apgar < 7 (ART: 1.28 [1.16-1.42]; non-ART: 1.62 [1.45-1.81]), and composite neonatal adverse outcome indicator (ART: 1.61 [1.55-1.68]; non-ART: 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Infants born after fertility treatments had increased risk of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (ART: 1.98 [1.84-2.13]; non-ART: 1.59 [1.51-1.67]) and prolonged birth admission (≥ 3 days) (ART: 1.60 [1.54-1.65]; non-ART: 1.42 [1.39-1.45]). The rate of emergency and in-hospital health services use within the first year was significantly increased for both exposure groups and remained elevated when limiting analyses to term singletons. CONCLUSION(S): Fertility treatments were associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes; however, the overall magnitude of risks was lower for infants conceived via non-ART treatments.

Premature progesterone elevation during the early and mid-follicular phases in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is associated with lower live birth, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates.

PURPOSE: Evaluate follicular phase progesterone elevation (≥ 1.5 ng/mL) prior to trigger during IVF stimulation and its effects on live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and implantation rate (IR) in fresh IVF cycles. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study within an academic clinic. A total of 6961 fresh IVF and IVF/ICSI cycles from October 1, 2015 to June 30, 2021 were included and grouped by progesterone (PR) prior to trigger: PR < 1.5 ng/mL (low PR group) and PR ≥ 1.5 ng/mL (high PR group). Main outcome measures included LBR, CPR, and IR. RESULTS: Among all cycle starts, 1568 (22.5%) were in the high PR group and 5393 (77.5%) were in the low PR group. Of the cycles which proceeded to an embryo transfer, 416 (11.1%) were in the high PR group and 3341 (88.9%) were in the low PR group. The high PR group had significantly lower IR (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.88), CPR (aRR 0.74; 95% CI 0.64-0.87), and LBR (aRR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.85) compared to the low PR group. When stratified by progesterone on the day of trigger (TPR), there was a clinically notable decrease in IR (16.8% vs 23.3%), CPR (28.1% vs 36.0%), and LBR (22.8% vs 28.9%) in the high PR group compared to the low PR group even when TPR < 1.5 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In fresh IVF cycles in which TPR < 1.5 ng/mL, progesterone elevation ≥ 1.5 ng/mL at any point in time prior to trigger negatively impacts IR, CPR, and LBR. This data supports testing of serum progesterone in the follicular phase prior to trigger, as these patients may benefit from a freeze-all approach.

Ultra-low-dose and very-low-dose Lupron downregulation protocols for poor responders based on POSEIDON group 3 and 4 classifications.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess if very-low-dose Lupron (VLDL) and ultra-low-dose Lupron (ULDL) protocols can have comparable cycle outcomes when compared to other "poor responder" stimulation protocols based on POSEIDON classification groups 3 (PG3) and 4 (PG4). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a single, large academic center was performed. Women in PG3 (age < 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) or PG4 (age ≥ 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) undergoing in vitro fertilization using an ULDL (Lupron 0.1 to 0.05 mg daily), VLDL (Lupron 0.2 to 0.1 mg daily), microflare (Lupron 0.05 mg twice a day), estradiol priming/antagonist, antagonist, or minimal stimulation protocols from 2012 to 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocytes (MII) obtained. The secondary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). RESULTS: The cohort included 3601 cycles. The mean age was 38.1 ± 3.8 years. In the PG3 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols produced a comparable number of MIIs (5.8 ± 4.3 and 5.9 ± 5.4, respectively) and live births (33.3% and 33.3%, respectively) when compared to other protocols. In the PG4 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols resulted in a higher percentage of MIIs when compared to microflare or minimal stimulation (Microflare/ULDL: adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.78 (95% CI 0.65, 0.95); min stim/ULDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.58); microflare/VLDL: aRR 0.77 (95% CI 0.63, 0.95); min stim/VLDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.95)). There were no significant differences in LBR. CONCLUSION: Dilute Lupron downregulation protocols have comparable outcomes to other poor responder protocols and are reasonable to use.

Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) has become popularized with increasing numbers of reproductive-aged patients desiring to maintain fertility for future family building. OC was initially used for fertility preservation in postmenarchal patients prior to gonadotoxic therapies; however, it is now available to patients to circumvent age-related infertility and other diagnoses associated with early loss of ovarian reserve. The primary aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of the most recent and robust data on the utilization and outcomes of OC in both patient populations. OC results in similar oocyte yield in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies and patients undergoing planned OC. Available data are insufficient to predict the live birth rates or the number of oocytes needed to result in live birth. However, oocyte yield and live birth rates are best among patients < 37.5 years old or with anti-mullerian hormone levels > 1.995 ng/dL, at the time of oocyte retrieval. There is a high 'no use' rate (58.9%) in patients using planned OC with 62.5% returning to use frozen oocytes with a spouse. The utilization rate in medical OC patients is < 10%. There is currently no data on the effects of BMI, smoking, or ethnicity on planned OC outcomes. CONCLUSION: It is too early to draw any final conclusions on outcomes of OC in medical OC and planned OC; however, preliminary data supports that utilization of OC in both groups result in preservation of fertility and subsequent live births in patients who return to use their cryopreserved eggs. Higher oocyte yield, with fewer ovarian stimulation cycles, and higher live birth rates are seen in patients who seek OC at younger ages, reinforcing the importance of age on fertility preservation. More studies are needed in medical OC and planned OC to help guide counseling and decision-making in patients seeking these services.

The impact of insurance mandates on donor oocyte utilization: an analysis of 39,338 donor oocyte cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.

BACKGROUND: A total of 19 states passed legislation mandating insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology, and out-of-pocket costs associated with in vitro fertilization vary significantly depending on the region. Consequently, it has been observed that assisted reproductive technology utilization differs regionally and is associated with the presence of an insurance mandate. However, it is unknown whether regional differences exist among patients using donor oocytes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the patient and cycle-specific parameters associated with the use of donor oocytes according to the insurance mandate status of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinic in which the assisted reproductive technology cycle was performed. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study using national data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry for 39,338 donor oocyte cycles and 242,555 autologous oocyte cycles performed in the United States from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. Cycles were stratified by insurance mandate of the state in which the assisted reproductive technology cycle was performed: comprehensive (coverage for at least 4 cycles of assisted reproductive technology), limited (coverage limited to 1-3 assisted reproductive technology cycles), offer (insurance mandates exist but exclude assisted reproductive technology treatment), and no mandate. The primary outcome was the number of previous autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles of the recipient. The secondary outcomes included age, serum follicle stimulating hormone level, frozen donor oocyte utilization, day of embryo transfer, number of embryos transferred, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Analyses were adjusted for day of transfer, number of embryos transferred, and age of the recipient. RESULTS: Patients in no mandate states underwent fewer autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles (mean, 1.1; standard deviation, 1.6) before using donor oocytes than patients in offer (mean, 1.7; standard deviation, 2.5; P<.01), limited (mean, 1.5; standard deviation, 2.5; P<.01), and comprehensive (mean, 1.7; standard deviation, 2.0; P<.01) states. Patients in no mandate states were more likely to use frozen oocytes than patients in offer (relative risk, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.57), limited (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.54), and comprehensive (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.99) states. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar among recipients of donor oocytes, regardless of insurance mandate. CONCLUSION: Despite similar ages and ovarian reserve parameters, patients without state-mandated insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology were more likely to use frozen donor oocytes and undergo fewer autologous in vitro fertilization cycles than their counterparts in partial or comprehensive insurance coverage states. These differences in donor oocyte utilization highlight the financial barriers associated with pursuing assisted reproductive technology in uninsured states.

Use of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and subsequent prenatal care and diagnostic testing.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene defects (PGT-M) is to identify inherited pathogenic variants in the embryo prior to embryo transfer, increasing the likelihood of an unaffected child. Prenatal diagnostic testing is recommended to confirm the results of PGT-M. The purpose of this study was to characterize the population undergoing PGT-M over time. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who had a positive pregnancy test after PGT-M from 2012 to 2019. A query of the internal assisted reproductive technology database and chart review were used. RESULTS: One hundred and 42 patients completed IVF cycles for PGT-M during this time period and progressed past 10 weeks gestation. There were more PGT-M cycles over time with 46 cycles between 2012 and 2015 and 96 cycles between 2016 and 2019. Patients varied on the decision to pursue prenatal diagnostic testing after PGT-M. For those with known follow-up (130/142), 16 patients underwent diagnostic testing (12%) and 114 did not. CONCLUSION: As PGT-M is increasingly utilized prior to pregnancy, it is important for genetic counselors and OB/GYNs to understand the characteristics and outcomes of the population of patients undergoing PGT-M, including how to counsel about the residual risk of an affected pregnancy after PGT-M.

Day of trophectoderm biopsy and embryo quality are associated with outcomes following euploid embryo transfer.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes following transfer of euploid blastocysts of varying quality biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study to evaluate embryo transfer outcomes for women undergoing autologous cryopreserved next generation sequencing euploid single embryo transfer from 10/2015 to 2/2022 at an academic IVF program. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), implantation rate (IR), and miscarriage rate (SAB rate). RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-five transfers from 418 patients were analyzed. Euploid embryos biopsied on day 5 resulted in higher LBR compared to those biopsied on day 6 (62.3% vs. 49.6%; aRR 0.81 95% CI 0.65-0.996). When stratified by biopsy day and blastocyst quality, there was no difference in IR, OPR, and SAB rate for good, fair, and poor quality blastocysts biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. However, day 5 good quality embryos were associated with a higher LBR compared to day 6 good quality embryos (74.3% vs. 51.3%; aRR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.999). There were no significant differences in LBR for fair and poor quality embryos biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. CONCLUSION: Overall LBR are higher for euploid embryos biopsied on day 5 versus day 6. When stratified by embryo quality and day of biopsy, LBR are significantly higher for good quality day 5 versus day 6 embryos. When choosing between multiple euploid embryos, day 5 biopsied good quality embryos should be preferentially selected for transfer over day 6 embryos of the same quality.

Association between serum estradiol level on day of progesterone start and outcomes from frozen blastocyst transfer cycles utilizing oral estradiol.

PURPOSE: Supraphysiologic serum estradiol levels may negatively impact the likelihood of conception and live birth following IVF. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between serum estradiol level on the day of progesterone start and clinical outcomes following programmed frozen blastocyst transfer cycles utilizing oral estradiol. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study at an academic fertility center analyzing 363 patients who underwent their first autologous single (SET) or double frozen embryo transfer (DET) utilizing oral estradiol and resulting in blastocyst transfer from June 1, 2012, to June 30, 2018. Main outcome measures included implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates. Cycles were stratified by quartile of serum estradiol on the day of progesterone start and separately analyzed for SET cycles only. Poisson and Log binomial regression were used to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage with adjustments made for age and BMI. RESULTS: Cycles with the highest quartile of estradiol (mean 528 pg/mL) were associated with lower risks of implantation (RR 0.66, CI 0.50-0.86), ongoing pregnancy (RR 0.66, CI 0.49-0.88), and live birth (RR 0.70, CI 0.52-0.94) compared with those with the lowest estradiol quartile (mean 212 pg/mL). Similar findings were seen for analyses limited to SETs. There was no significant difference in miscarriage rate or endometrial thickness between groups. CONCLUSION: High levels of serum estradiol on the day of progesterone start may be detrimental to implantation, pregnancy, and live birth following frozen blastocyst transfer.

Optimizing pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles by stratifying pre-wash total motile count and patient-specific factors: a patient counseling tool.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to clarify which pre-wash total motile count are associated with improved clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) based on maternal age, AMH level, stimulation regimen, and infertility diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of first completed IUI cycles at two academic fertility centers from 5/2015 to 9/2019. Cycles were stratified by pre-wash TMC, maternal age, AMH level, stimulation regimen, and infertility diagnosis. The primary outcome was CPR and secondary outcomes were live birth and miscarriage. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred fifty-four cycles were analyzed. Of the 162 cycles that resulted in a CPR (14.0%), most had an insemination TMC > 20 million. Compared to TMC > 20 million, there was no difference in CPR or LBR for lower TMC categories, excluding the TMC < 2 million group, in which there were no pregnancies. When TMC was stratified by deciles, there was also no difference in CPR and LBR, including within the lowest decile (TMC 0.09-8.6 million). Younger age and higher ovarian reserve parameters were associated with higher pregnancy and LBR when stratified by TMC. There was no difference in pregnancy and LBR when considering different stimulation protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that pregnancy and LBR are equivalent above a TMC of 2 million. Data stratified by TMC and patient parameters can be used to counsel patients pursuing ART.

The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival.

BACKGROUND: Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation-positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation-negative [FP-]). RESULTS: The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP-, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP-, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow-up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP-, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP-, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24-0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP-, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38-0.90). Adjusted 3- and 5-year invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3-year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP-, 79.4%; P = .411; 5-year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP-, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3-year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP-, 93.5%; P = .854; 5-year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP-, 81.4%; P = .700). CONCLUSIONS: FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.

Quality of embryos on day 7 after medium refreshment on day 6: a prospective trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Are embryos that fail to meet biopsy or freezing criteria on day 6 (D6) more likely to meet these criteria on day 7 (D7) if cultured in fresh medium from D6 to D7? SUMMARY ANSWER: Refreshment of medium on D6 did not increase the proportion of usable embryos on D7, with an adverse effect for women ≥40 years old. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo development in continuous single-step medium, from fertilization to the blastocyst stage, is equivalent to that using a sequential media protocol. However, there remains a theoretical benefit of refreshing the culture environment by transitioning slowly developing D6 embryos to a fresh medium droplet of the same composition, with a renewed source of nutrients and a milieu free of metabolic toxins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective trial of culture media exposure in which embryos were randomized on D6 to remain in the same culture medium from D3 to D7 (continuous, n = 620) or be moved to fresh medium (fresh, n = 603) on D6, with re-evaluation on D7. Data were collected from IVF cycles, with or without ICSI, between 29 March 2019 and 17 February 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Embryos from 298 women, aged 18-44 years, from cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) that did not meet criteria for biopsy and/or freeze on D6 were included in the study. Embryos were only included if there was a minimum of two embryos meeting the inclusion criteria in any cohort. Only the first cycle undertaken by each woman in the study period from which embryos were randomized was included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1254 embryos were randomized from 312 cycles (209 non-PGT and 103 PGT) including 200 women undergoing IVF without PGT and 98 women who underwent PGT. The proportion of usable blastocysts on D7 did not differ between groups: 10.1% (61/603) in fresh versus 9.7% (60/620) in continuous medium (relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.47)). Embryos from women ≥40 years old had a significantly decreased likelihood of achieving a usable blastocyst on D7 after culture in fresh versus continuous medium: 3.5% versus 12.2%; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-0.98. In total, 9.9% of embryos otherwise discarded on D6 met the criteria for biopsy and/or freeze on D7. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Future work investigating implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates with D7 embryos is still needed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Refreshment of medium on D6 did not increase the proportion of usable embryos on D7 overall. Younger women were more likely to develop D7 embryos after refreshment of medium on D6, while an adverse effect was seen in women ≥40 years old. However, by extending the culture of embryos to D7, additional blastocysts become available for clinical use. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was provided through the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brigham and Women's Hospital. I.G.I. works with Teladoc Health. A.L. has no disclosures. E.S.G. works as a consultant for Teladoc Health, and a writer and editor for UpToDate and BioMed Central. C.R. is a board member of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and works with UpToDate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles.

BACKGROUND: A controversial and unresolved question in reproductive medicine is the utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization. Infertility is prevalent, but its treatment is notoriously expensive and typically not covered by insurance. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is critical to consider in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for the treatment of infertility in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: As reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, a national data registry, in vitro fertilization cycles occurring between 2014 and 2016 in the United States were analyzed. A probabilistic decision tree was developed using empirical outputs to simulate the events and outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The treatment strategies were (1) in vitro fertilization with intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and (2) in vitro fertilization with transfers of untested embryos. Patients progressed through the treatment model until they achieved a live birth or 12 months after ovarian stimulation. Clinical costs related to both treatment strategies were extracted from the literature and considered from both the patient and payer perspectives. Outcome metrics included incremental cost (measured in 2018 US dollars), live birth outcomes, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and incremental cost per live birth between treatment strategies. RESULTS: The study population included 114,157 first fresh in vitro fertilization stimulations and 44,508 linked frozen embryo transfer cycles. Of the fresh stimulations, 16.2% intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and 83.8% did not. In patients younger than 35 years old, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs. At age 35 years and older, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy led to more cumulative births but was associated with higher costs from both perspectives. From a patient perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored the no preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy strategy from the <35 years age group to the 38 years age group and beginning at age 39 years favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. From a payer perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy regardless of patient age. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is dependent on patient age and perspective. From an economic perspective, routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should not be universally adopted; however, it may be cost-effective in certain scenarios.