Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 48(3): 471-481, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35168313

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) associated with primary spermatogenic failure is a common cause of male infertility usually considered untreatable; however, some reports have suggested that hormonal stimulation to boost the intra-testicular testosterone level and spermatogenesis might increase the chance of achieving pregnancy using homologous sperm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a series of eight NOA males who received long-term treatment with recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin twice a week for spermatogenesis stimulation. Six males received additional recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) supplementation 150-225 IU twice weekly. RESULTS: After recombinant gonadotropin therapy, viable spermatozoa were retrieved from the ejaculate in two patients and by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in another two subjects. Singleton spermatozoon retrieved from testes were frozen by vitrification on Cell-Sleeper devices. Two live births were obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated spermatozoa and one live birth and an ongoing pregnancy using thawed spermatozoa from TESA. CONCLUSION: Our proof-of-concept study indicates that hormonal therapy with recombinant gonadotropins could be considered in infertile men with NOA as an alternative to sperm donation. Large-scale studies are needed to substantiate hormone stimulation therapy with recombinant gonadotropins in routine clinical practice for this severe form of male infertility.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Azoospermia/drug therapy , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Proof of Concept Study , Retrospective Studies , Sperm Retrieval , Spermatogenesis , Spermatozoa , Testis
2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 48(1): 131-156, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34472769

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and seminal oxidative stress are emerging measurable factors in male factor infertility, which interventions could potentially reduce. We evaluated (i) the impact of lifestyle changes combined with oral antioxidant intake on sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and static oxidation-reduction potential (sORP), and (ii) the correlation between DFI and sORP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study involving 93 infertile males with a history of failed IVF/ICSI. Ten healthy male volunteers served as controls. Semen analysis was carried out according to 2010 WHO manual, whereas seminal sORP was measured using the MiOXSYS platform. SDF was assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay. Participants with DFI >15% underwent a three-month lifestyle intervention program, primarily based on diet and exercise, combined with oral antioxidant therapy using multivitamins, coenzyme Q10, omega-3, and oligo-elements. We assessed changes in semen parameters, DFI, and sORP, and compared DFI results to those of volunteers obtained two weeks apart. Spearman rank correlation tests were computed for sORP and DFI results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (40.8%) patients had DFI >15%, of whom 31 participated in the intervention program. A significant decrease in median DFI from 25.8% to 18.0% was seen after the intervention (P <0.0001). The mean DFI decrease was 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8-9.5%; P <0.0001), whereas it was 0.42% (95%CI; -4.8 to 5.6%) in volunteers (P <0.00001). No differences were observed in sperm parameters and sORP. Based on paired sORP and DFI data from 86 patients, no correlation was observed between sORP and DFI values (rho=0.03). CONCLUSION: A 3-month lifestyle intervention program combined with antioxidant therapy reduced DFI in infertile men with elevated SDF and a history of failed IVF/ICSI. A personalized lifestyle and antioxidant intervention could improve fertility of subfertile couples through a reduction in DFI, albeit controlled trials evaluating reproductive outcomes are needed before firm conclusions can be made. Trial registration number and date: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03898752, April 2, 2019.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Infertility, Male , Antioxidants/metabolism , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , DNA Fragmentation , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility, Male/drug therapy , Life Style , Male , Oxidative Stress , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Spermatozoa
3.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 42(6): 1108-1118, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33931371

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the reproductive outcome similar after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger followed by luteal human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) boluses compared with HCG trigger and a standard luteal phase support (LPS)? DESIGN: Two open-label pilot randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 250 patients from 2014 to 2019, with a primary outcome of ongoing pregnancy per embryo transfer. Patients with ≤13 follicles on the trigger day were randomized (RCT 1) to: Group A (n = 65): GnRHa trigger followed by a bolus of 1500 IU HCG s.c. on the oocyte retrieval day (ORD) and 1000 IU HCG s.c. 4 days later, and no vaginal LPS; or Group B (n = 65): 6500 IU HCG trigger, followed by a standard vaginal progesterone LPS. Patients with 14-25 follicles on the trigger day were randomized (RCT 2) to Group C (n = 60): GnRHa trigger followed by 1000 IU HCG s.c. on ORD and 500 IU HCG s.c. 4 days later, and no vaginal LPS; or Group D (n = 60): 6500 IU HCG trigger and a standard vaginal LPS. RESULTS: In RCT 1, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 44% (22/50) in the GnRHa group versus 46% (25/54) in the HCG trigger group (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.62-1.45). No ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was seen in Groups A or B. In RCT 2, the ongoing pregnancy rate was 51% (25/49) in the GnRHa group versus 60% (31/52) in the HCG trigger group (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.60-1.22). The OHSS rates were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although a larger-scale study is needed before standard clinical implementation, the present study supports that the exogenous progesterone-free LPS is efficacious, simple and patient-friendly.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin/administration & dosage , Embryo Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Luteal Phase , Adult , Female , Humans , Ovulation Induction , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Progesterone/administration & dosage
4.
J Infect Dis ; 219(11): 1809-1817, 2019 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Female reproductive tract microbiota may affect human reproduction. The current study considered whether a more detailed characterization of the vaginal microbiota could improve prediction of risk of poor reproductive outcome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Vaginal samples from 120 patients undergoing IVF were sequenced using the V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene with clustering of Gardnerella vaginalis genomic clades. Abnormal vaginal microbiota was defined by microscopy and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for G. vaginalis and/or Atopobium vaginae above a threshold. RESULTS: Three major community state types with abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, and a diverse community type were identified, including 2 subtypes, characterized by a high abundance of L. crispatus and L. iners, respectively, but in combination with common diversity type operational taxonomic units. No significant association between community state type and the reproductive outcome could be demonstrated; however, abnormal vaginal microbiota by qPCR and a grouping based on high Shannon diversity index predicted the reproductive outcome equally well. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive value of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing was not superior to the simpler and less expensive qPCR diagnostic approach in predicting the risk of a poor reproductive outcome in patients undergoing IVF. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02042352.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Lactobacillus/isolation & purification , Microbiota , Reproduction , Vaginosis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Actinobacteria/genetics , Adult , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Lactobacillus/genetics , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Vagina/microbiology , Vaginosis, Bacterial/microbiology , Young Adult
5.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 35(2): 232-238, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28532660

ABSTRACT

In nature, HCG is secreted by the implanting embryo from peri-implantation and onwards. In contrast, LH is mandatory for steroidogenesis and follicular development during the follicular phase, working in synergy with FSH. Moreover, LH is mandatory for the function of the corpus luteum. Although LH and HCG bind to the same receptor, significant molecular, structural and functional differences exist, inducing differences in bioactivity. This randomized controlled study compared the effect of recombinant FSH stimulation combined with daily either micro-dose recombinant HCG or recombinant LH supplementation in a 1:1 bioactivity ratio from day 1 of stimulation in a long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist down regulation protocol. A total of 100 patients from a public clinic completed the study. The primary end-point was the oestradiol level on the day of ovulation trigger and the median oestradiol level in the HCG supplemented group was 8662 pmol/l versus 9203 pmol/l in the recombinant LH supplemented group; therefore, no significant difference was found. Moreover, no differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved or in the live birth rate. We conclude that recombinant HCG and recombinant LH are equally effective in boosting oestradiol synthesis during ovarian stimulation when used in a 1:1 bioactivity ratio.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin/administration & dosage , Luteinizing Hormone/administration & dosage , Ovulation Induction/methods , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood , Estradiol/blood , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/administration & dosage , Follicular Phase , Humans , Progesterone/blood , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Testosterone/blood , Therapeutic Equivalency
7.
Hum Reprod ; 30(10): 2387-95, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26209535

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Can the luteal phase support be improved in terms of efficacy, hormonal profiles and convenience as compared with today's standard care? SUMMARY ANSWER: Daily low-dose rhCG supplementation in GnRHa triggered IVF cycles can replace the traditional used luteal phase support with exogenous progesterone. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A bolus of hCG for final maturation of follicles in connection with COS may induce the risk of OHSS and the luteal phase progesterone levels rise very abruptly in the early luteal phase. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a proof-of-concept study conducted as a three arm RCT with a total of 93 patients. First patient enrolled in January 2012 and the study finished in January 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Normal responder women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment in a university hospital. One arm served as control, where women followed a standard antagonist protocol. Two study arms were included both having 125 IU hCG daily for luteal phase support without exogenous progesterone after using a GnRHa trigger for ovulation induction. In both study arms exogenous FSH was stopped on stimulation day 6 and replaced by exogenous hCG that was initiated on either stimulation day 2 or day 6. Blood samples were obtained on the day of ovulation induction, on the day of oocyte pickup (OPU) and day OPU + 7. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The mean serum levels of hCG did not exceeded the normal physiological range of LH activity in any samples. Mid-luteal progesterone levels were significantly higher in the two study groups receiving daily low-dose hCG for luteal phase support as compared with the control group (control group: 177 ± 27 nmol/l; study group 1: 334 ± 42 nmol/l; study group 2: 277 ± 27 nmol/l; (mean ± SEM). No differences in reproductive outcome were seen between groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The number of patients included is limited and conclusions need to be verified in a larger RCT. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Endogenous production of progesterone may become more attractive as the luteal phase support with levels of LH-like activity only in the physiological range and may, from the patients' point of view, replace inconvenient exogenous progesterone preparation. Further hCG may reduce the cost of stimulation and may collectively be used for stimulation of the follicular phase, ovulation induction and for luteal phase support. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: An unrestricted grant from ARTS Biologics made this study possible. None of the authors has any competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov number: NCT01504139. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 28 December 2011.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin/administration & dosage , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Luteal Phase/drug effects , Progesterone/chemistry , Adult , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/chemistry , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/metabolism , Follicular Phase/drug effects , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Humans , Infertility/blood , Infertility/therapy , Oocytes/cytology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Ovulation Induction , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Progesterone/blood , Progesterone/metabolism , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 48(1): 131-156, Jan.-Feb. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1356297

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and seminal oxidative stress are emerging measurable factors in male factor infertility, which interventions could potentially reduce. We evaluated (i) the impact of lifestyle changes combined with oral antioxidant intake on sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and static oxidation-reduction potential (sORP), and (ii) the correlation between DFI and sORP. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving 93 infertile males with a history of failed IVF/ICSI. Ten healthy male volunteers served as controls. Semen analysis was carried out according to 2010 WHO manual, whereas seminal sORP was measured using the MiOXSYS platform. SDF was assessed by sperm chromatin structure assay. Participants with DFI >15% underwent a three-month lifestyle intervention program, primarily based on diet and exercise, combined with oral antioxidant therapy using multivitamins, coenzyme Q10, omega-3, and oligo-elements. We assessed changes in semen parameters, DFI, and sORP, and compared DFI results to those of volunteers obtained two weeks apart. Spearman rank correlation tests were computed for sORP and DFI results. Results: Thirty-eight (40.8%) patients had DFI >15%, of whom 31 participated in the intervention program. A significant decrease in median DFI from 25.8% to 18.0% was seen after the intervention (P <0.0001). The mean DFI decrease was 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8-9.5%; P <0.0001), whereas it was 0.42% (95%CI; -4.8 to 5.6%) in volunteers (P <0.00001). No differences were observed in sperm parameters and sORP. Based on paired sORP and DFI data from 86 patients, no correlation was observed between sORP and DFI values (rho=0.03). Conclusion: A 3-month lifestyle intervention program combined with antioxidant therapy reduced DFI in infertile men with elevated SDF and a history of failed IVF/ICSI. A personalized lifestyle and antioxidant intervention could improve fertility of subfertile couples through a reduction in DFI, albeit controlled trials evaluating reproductive outcomes are needed before firm conclusions can be made. Trial registration number and date: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03898752, April 2, 2019.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Infertility, Male/drug therapy , Antioxidants/metabolism , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Spermatozoa , Fertilization in Vitro , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Oxidative Stress , DNA Fragmentation , Life Style
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL